Cool post, that each TV channel presents the news in its own way. ;)
NTV turns everything into a bloody mess, REN TV is looking everywhere for signs of paranormal phenomena, and Channel One convinces the viewer that everything is just fine in the country.
First channel
Yesterday in the village of Smolino, Kemerovo region, a small incident occurred between local residents. About 30 young people met in hand-to-hand combat, after which they were detained by the arriving police squad. After an explanatory conversation, the fighters who had already made friends in the bullpen with pleasure were released. According to local residents, such fights are more of an old traditional character - it was in the village of Smolino that many centuries ago Russian men went out, as they say, "wall to wall." For other news ...
More than 22 victims are now in the regional hospital, not far from the village of Smolino, Kemerovo region.
We will remind, on the eve there was a brutal mass fight with the use of military weapons. As a result of the accident, at least 3 bodies were mutilated beyond recognition, two of them are now in intensive care. The number of victims has not yet been reported. The lists of corpses will soon be announced by representatives of the Ministry of Emergency Situations. According to our sources, the conflict occurred as a result of the division of influence between the two active organized crime groups. We will follow the development of events.
LIFENEWS
A citizen of Tajikistan, Abba Fukhnazarov, was injured yesterday as a result of the ethnic conflict in the village of Smolino, Kemerovo Region. On a video surveillance camera installed in a potato field, you can see. As a group of 28 Russian local residents, they opened fire from a traumatic weapon at a visiting guest for absolutely no reason. Again, as we see in the video, they shot mainly in the face and at least 120 shots were fired. It happened exactly two hours ago, but now Abba Fukhnazarov, with an exclusive interview, told how everything really happened ...
REN TV
An unusual fight took place yesterday in the village of Smolino, Kemerovo Region. It seemed - at first glance - nothing surprising, ordinary fighting villagers in the number of thirty people. But pay attention to the background ... take a closer look ... there are yellow dots. As the professor of the Russian Academy of Sciences Ivan Abramovich explained to us, this is nothing more than "Night Lights". Clearly visible, well-defined lights of unknown nature, usually red, orange, or white. This group includes the lion's share of UFO sightings at large distances. " We will definitely tell you more about these lights in the next episodes of the "Secrets of the Universe" program.
Russia 1
And at the end of the release, one more piece of news - in the village of Smolino, Kemerovo region, there was a fight between thirty local residents. Mikhail Zelensky will tell the details right after the news in his program. He will invite all thirty members of the squabble into his studio and make them fight again. Do not miss.
Pepper
Vlad Nekrasov reports:
An indescribable in its cynicism and inhumanity incident took place in the godforsaken village of Smolino, in the Kemerovo region. It would seem that it is the most ordinary village, here legends have been written and deeds have been done for centuries. But that's not the point. The bottom line is that this evening someone really wanted to fight. As a result, we see that we see - 30 broken skulls and a scarlet river of blood, on which, perhaps, you can swim to the neighboring village. Although from these broken skulls, you can still assemble a raft, bandaging it with the remnants of tendons. That's the whole story. Don't go to the village at night, comrade!
Star
Briefly to other news. Yesterday in the village of Smolino, Kemerovo region, a scuffle of a group of young people took place. Our sources report that the fight took place in the area where a rare tank was stationed from the Second World War. Now, apparently, the fighters will have to answer for their act, since the desecration of the monument is a serious matter and has already caused a public outcry in social networks. We are following the development of events.
Union
Still don't believe in God? Then what we are going to show you now cannot be called anything other than a miracle. The most common battle of adolescents in the Orthodox Russian village of Smolino in the Kemerovo principality. Look, they all fight, hate each other. But what is it? Do you see the hand? This holy hand that came out of nowhere and wants to stop them all ... It was the Lord himself who came down to reason with sinners ...
You've probably already heard about yesterday's fight in the village of Smolino, Kemerovo Region? Pay attention to the style and clothing of the fighters. Without getting up from the couch and calling us at the number, you can order a gopnic outfit under different lots. So, lot number 1 ...
INTRODUCTION ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .3
Fact and event: differentiation of concepts. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 5
The concept of an event in journalism. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Interpretation of fact and event: differentiation of concepts. ... ...
80s of the XX century. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
90s of the XX century. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
2000s. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Interpretation of events in the present and in the future. ...
INTERPRETATION OF EVENTS IN JOURNALISM. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 5
INTERPRETATION OF EVENTS IN DIFFERENT PERIODS. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
CONCLUSION. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
BIBLIOGRAPHY. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
APPENDICES. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Annex 1 "". ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Appendix 2 "". ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Appendix 3 "". ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Appendix 4 "". ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
Appendix 5 "". ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
INTRODUCTION
The image of events over time is not always the same; the event itself in journalism is a rather flexible category. It has been repeatedly noted that the same event in different media is often presented with a large number of differences and inconsistencies: the circumstances of the incident, any nuances, details, and sometimes the version of what happened in general, do not coincide. The same event, presented in the same media, but in different periods can be presented differently in terms of the choice of genre and other parameters of the journalistic text.
In particular, this is noticeable when comparing several materials published at different times, but devoted to the same news feed.
Over time, as mentioned earlier, the parameters of a journalistic text can change: genre, language, and this is due to the fact that at different periods of time the same event can be perceived by the author, and therefore portrayed in different ways. That is, its interpretation is changing. Different interpretations in time are formed due to the conditions that exist at the time of the creation of the text, such as: the author, current political and socio-cultural conditions. It is worth noting that the interpretation of an event can also be associated with the interpretation of the fact that gave rise to the event, and this is a significant difference, since the interpretation of a fact can change not only the material about the event, but also the attitude towards the event. This can only be traced most clearly in time. The most vividly it will be possible to trace this in the domestic media, since the history of Russia, even over the past 30-35 years, has provided a wide variety of political conditions and socio-cultural attitudes, to a greater extent - their nuances.
In connection with the above relevance given work is to observe the change in the interpretation of an event in the same publication over time, since the specifics of coverage of events in different periods of the history of the same media will always be of great interest - both readers and research.
The subject of research are the factors that affect the display of the event. That is, it is simpler - the properties of the journalistic text, or its features.
Object (objects) research is the publication of the socio-political weekly "Young Far East", dedicated to the celebration of Victory Day in different periods of time.
The purpose the work is to trace how the authors of the publication interpret the event and facts in different periods and try to predict how it will look in the future.
Theoretical basis works were the works of such domestic and foreign scientists and publicists as: L. A. Polueva, M. N. Kim, A. A. Tertychny,.
1. Interpretation of events in journalism
1.1 Fact and event: differentiation of concepts
Before proceeding to the study of the problem of interpreting events in the all-Russian and regional print media, let us define what the concepts of “fact”, “event” and “interpretation of a fact / event” include.
First, it is necessary to understand the complex nature of the fact, which, as L.A. Poelueva, is expressed in the problem of correlation between "fact and objective reality and the resulting contradiction - the identification of fact and event." 1 Therefore, these two concepts must be distinguished.
The explanatory dictionary of S.A. Kuznetsov interprets the concept of a fact as follows:
"FACT -a; m. [from lat. factum - done]
True event, actual incident or real phenomenon; example, case.
In func. tale. Reality, reality ”. 2
The fact is at the heart of any journalistic work. According to M.N. Kim, "Facts are a kind of building blocks from which the entire structure of a journalistic work is built." “The purpose of facts in journalism is multifunctional: they can become the basis of an information message; can act as arguments and evidence-based evidence. " 3
Information materials include one fact, a feature of the analytical material is that it includes a set of facts. Facts in analytical materials serve as evidence and arguments. The skill of a journalist lies in not only skillfully operating with facts, but also correctly assessing them, interpreting, analyzing, and finally finding significant cause-and-effect relationships between them.
The fact can be true or false. Establish a fact, i.e. making it reliable means verifying it (checking for truth). Another question is that such verification is not always possible. Sometimes it is impossible objectively: it is impossible to prove that someone has committed a crime, since the relevant data are not available or cannot be clarified. And sometimes it is impossible subjectively: emotions and subjective assessments of the speaker interfere with this. Perhaps this is a fact, but in order to establish it, one must abstract from the author's assessment and comment.
A reliable fact is a judgment about an event that turned out to be true as a result of its verification. An unreliable fact is a judgment about an event, which proved impossible to verify. And if the judgment as a result of verification turned out to be false, then there can be no question of the fact as such.
Consequently, "a fact in journalism can be defined as a reliable reflection of a fragment of reality that has real representativeness." 4
Researchers also distinguish two types of facts used by journalists: scientific facts and everyday facts.
Scientific facts are always based on numerous empirical observations, experiments, experiments. They are always “the result of generalizations, verified by abstract knowledge. At the same time, the higher the requirements for accuracy and objectivity, the greater the number of empirical observations and measurements and the more necessary the use of statistical methods for their processing. " 5
The use of scientific facts in journalistic materials is of the most diverse nature: from a simple statement to detailed provisions. Accuracy and reliability are the main features of all scientific facts.
Ordinary facts, in contrast to scientific ones, "are the result of a person's perception of the surrounding reality, the perception of the immediate, concrete-sensual, imprinted in the unity of the emotional reaction and logical awareness of what has happened." 6 “... One can speak of an ordinary fact as an initial content element, possessing the reliability of direct observation, reflecting a“ discrete piece of reality ”in the human mind. 7
Such facts are used when it is necessary to tell about the direct experience of people, about their emotional reactions to certain events, etc. Common facts include opinions, assessments, told by smb. stories, etc.
It is important to note that one cannot sharply oppose a fact and its assessment by someone, arguing that a fact is something completely objective, and an assessment or judgment about it is, on the contrary, subjective. Do not forget that a fact becomes such and becomes available only in the form of a judgment (statement). Reality exists independently of a person, but fact does not. A person actually singles out some fragment, and in it - a certain aspect (event); then he “translates” his knowledge about reality (event) into “natural” language, builds knowledge in the form of a judgment about the subject, then checks whether this judgment is true or false (“verifies” it). And only if it turns out that the judgment is true, what is described in this judgment becomes a fact.
The judgment can be different in content. For example, it can describe being: "there is one and only one sun." Can refer a given person or object to one or another class: "Socrates is a person." Can ascribe to a person or an object the quality: "Masha is kind." However, there are also judgments that cannot be verified / verified at all. For example: "Petya is a fool." These are the so-called value judgments.
The fact can correspond to the most abstract judgments in nature. It is abstract in nature, it is always a "naked" fact, purged of private characteristics. Facts do not describe, they are presented. You can describe how events unfold, but not how facts happen. Facts don't "happen" at all. This is just our image of the situation. An image that, as a result of verification (verification), turned out to be true.
Along with this, it should be noted that according to Kuznetsov's dictionary, an event is "something that happened, happened, a significant phenomenon, a fact of public or private life." 8 This definition sounds somewhat different in jurisprudence: “An event is a category that may differ in complexity from a fact. This complexity is expressed by the scale of what is happening, the massiveness of the participants, the duration in time. As an independent category, an event can be represented by the sum of facts ”. 9 It is noticeable that in both of the above definitions, the emphasis is on such concepts as “significance”, “scale”, “mass character”, “public”. Based on this, the following logical conclusion can be drawn: the main difference between an event and a fact is that it somehow affects the established order of things, changes the situation that has developed in a particular sphere of social life.
An event has only one property or sign - it happened or did not happen. "The participants of the autoagittray drove through the most remote villages" (see. Annex 1"And to the village and to the outpost" The organ of the Khabarovsk regional committee of the Komsomol "Young Far East" No. 89 (10601) dated May 9, 1980) is an event. At the same time, there can be several judgments about this event. For example, this: "Everywhere they were given a warm welcome from the leadership, workers of state farms" (see. Annex 1"And to the village and to the outpost" Organ of the Khabarovsk regional committee of the Komsomol "Young Far East" No. 89 (10601) dated May 9, 1980). Or something like this: "Avtoagitreis did not meet with much enthusiasm from the population of remote areas, despite this, all the planned work on the sale of books by the leader of the revolution, publications about the Great Patriotic War, memoirs of war veterans was completed." One of them can be a fact (a statement of fact) if, as a result of verification, it turns out that it is true. But the second cannot be a fact at all, since in real time it is not possible to find out how it actually happened, that is, there are no means of verification. This is a typical value judgment. Thus, events are evaluated emotionally, facts - as a rule, rationally. The assessments of events and facts can be independent of each other.
