Home Grape Ancient Russian principalities. Russian principalities and lands in the XII-XIII centuries. Vladimir-Suzdal Principality, Grand Duchy of Vladimir

Ancient Russian principalities. Russian principalities and lands in the XII-XIII centuries. Vladimir-Suzdal Principality, Grand Duchy of Vladimir

Can't solve the test online?

Let us help you pass the test. We are familiar with the peculiarities of taking tests online in Distance Learning Systems (LMS) of more than 50 universities.

Order a consultation for 470 rubles and the online test will be passed successfully.

1. Year of foundation of Moscow
1132
1140
1147
1152

2. The results of the German-Swedish aggression of the XIII century
The raids of the invaders turned into a complete collapse
Russia retained independence in all respects
Lost independence of the northwestern Russian lands
Baltic tribes fought off the crusaders
The final determination of the foreign policy of Russia, proximity to the East

3. Cities that escaped the Mongol-Tatar conquest
Vladimir
Kozelsk
Smolensk
Ryazan
Kyiv
Novgorod

4. The Battle of the Neva took place in ... year.
1240

5. April 5, 1242 Alexander Nevsky defeated the crusaders on the ice of Lake Peipsi. This battle is known as...
Neva battle
Battle on the Ice
Battle of Kulikovo
standing on the river Ugra

6. Principalities that became the largest centers of Russian lands in the 12th century.
Kyiv
Galicia-Vladimirskoe
Rostov
Vladimir-Suzdal
Moscow
Novgorod Republic

7. Correlate the authorities of the Novgorod Republic and their functions
Veche - supreme body of the republic
Posadnik - the head of the government, in his hands were the administration and the court
Archbishop - head of the church, managed the treasury and foreign policy
Prince - led the army during military campaigns
Tysyatsky - was in charge of the city militia, the commercial court, and the collection of taxes

8. Causes of feudal fragmentation
the growth of independence of the boyars-patrimonials
ending the strife of the princes
constant raids of nomads
revitalization of economic life on the ground due to the redistribution of vassal payments to Kyiv in the economy
strengthening the power of the city centers of the local princely-boyar power
tribute becomes the main means of subsistence

9. In the battle on the Kalka River, together with the Russians, they fought against the Mongol-Tatars ...
Pechenegs
Khazars
Karakalpaks
Cumans

10. Economic forms of vassal dependence of Russian lands on the Horde:
supply of warriors
work off duties
payment of the annual tribute "Exit"
receipt by Russian princes from the Horde khans of labels for reigning
maintenance of Mongolian garrisons in Russian lands
the death of princes and combatants

11. Feature of the political life of the Vladimir-Suzdal principality
The nobility plays a leading role
Boyar Democratic Republic
The monocracy of the grand princely power was formed
Existence in the power of two rival princely families

12. The sequence of the reign of the Vladimir-Suzdal princes:
1 Yuri Dolgoruky
2 Andrey Bogolyubsky
3 Vsevolod the Big Nest
4 Yuri Vsevolodovich

13. The largest cities of the Novgorod Republic
Staraya Russa
Torzhok
Permian
Lviv
Hill
Pskov
Nizhny Novgorod

14. Organizer of the all-Mongol campaign against Russia in 1237
Genghis Khan
Jochi
Batu
subedey

15. Military monastic order that participated in the crusade against Russia
Hospitallers
Teutonic
Livonian
Templars

100 years after the collapse of the Old Russian state, by the middle of the XII century. 10 independent political formations existed on the Old Russian territory. The process of state fragmentation continued to develop in an ascending line
In 1054, with the death of Yaroslav the Wise, the Old Russian state collapsed. Yaroslav divided the Old Russian state into several possessions between his sons. The elder Izyaslav received Kyiv and Novgorod, Svyatoslav - the Chernigov principality, which included Tmutarakan, Murom and Ryazan, Vsevolod - Pereyaslavl (Southern) and Rostov land in the Volga-Oka interfluve, Igor - Vladimir-Volynsky, Vyacheslav - Smolensk. The princes of Polotsk continued to own their principality. Subsequently, these principalities have never been reunited all together, so the year 1054 is considered the last year of the existence of the Old Russian state.

It was replaced by the so-called “period of feudal fragmentation”, expressed first in the ownership, and then in the military-political division of the ancient Russian territory, the existence of quite numerous independent principalities.

Under Prince Vladimir Monomakh, who ascended the throne of Kyiv in 1113, attempts were renewed to create a major ancient Russian state. According to Monomakh's plan, it was to be managed by himself, his eldest son Mstislav and the latter's offspring. Prince in Kyiv, Monomakh kept Novgorod, Pereyaslavl (Southern), Smolensk, Rostov and Vladimir Volynsky, where his sons ruled. It was a large territory, but it was inferior in size to the territory of the Old Russian state.

Grand Duke Vladimir II Vsevolodovich Monomakh. Portrait from the Royal Titular, 1672

In the first quarter of the XII century. retained their independence from Kyiv, the Polotsk and Chernigov principalities, and in the west of the Old Russian lands - formed in the 80s. 11th century principalities of Przemysl and Terebovl. The death of Vladimir Monomakh in 1125 and his eldest son Mstislav the Great in 1132 led to a long struggle between the Monomakhoviches and the Chernigov princes for possession of the Kyiv principality, as well as within the sons and grandsons of Vladimir Monomakh themselves for the redistribution of possessions.

As a result, this struggle led to the loss of Kyiv by the Monomakhoviches and to the complete independence of such principalities as Pereyaslav, Smolensk, Suzdal (the ancient Rostov land), Vladimir-Volyn; to the formation in 1136 of an independent Novgorod Republic; the renewal in 1139 of the independence of the Principality of Polotsk, annexed to the possessions of Mstislav the Great in 1132; the formation in 1141 of the Przemysl and Terebovl principalities of a single Galician principality. At the same time, Murom and Ryazan separated from the Chernigov Principality in 1127.

Thus, 100 years after the collapse of the Old Russian state, by the middle of the XII century. 10 independent political formations already existed on ancient Russian territory. The process of state fragmentation continued to develop in an ascending line.

There were objective reasons for this. The centers seeking independence ceased to pay tribute to the Kyiv princes and to send their squads at their disposal when these princes organized major military campaigns. Material and human resources remained at the complete disposal of the princes who were gaining independence, and they directed them to the expansion and development of their own territories, the construction of cities, and the strengthening of borders. Both written sources and archaeological data testify to the beginning of the mid-12th century. a sharp increase in urban construction. New cities appear not in the vicinity of the old centers, but in places where there were no cities at all before. This testifies to the general expansion of the boundaries of the ancient Russian principalities and the development of new territories by these principalities.

So, the Kiev principality expanded its territory to the south, reaching the river. Ros. It developed land in the west between the Goryn and Teterev rivers. The territory of the Pereyaslav Principality grew in the eastern and southern directions, covering the basin of the river. Sula and reaching the river. Vorskla. The Chernigov princes expanded their territory, mainly in the northeast direction, including lands along the river. Lopasnya, left tributary of the Oka. In the south, their possessions crossed the tributary of the Desna Seim and reached the river. Oster.

The territory of the Galician principality grew at the expense of the lands located on the right bank of the upper reaches of the Dniester. The princes of Polotsk increased their possessions to the northwest, capturing the lands of the Latgalians along the lower reaches of the Western Dvina. The princes of Smolensk moved northeast, seeking to control the upper reaches of the Volga. Here they competed with the oncoming movement of the Suzdal, later Vladimir, princes, who sought to secure the path along the Volga from Zubtsov to Yaroslavl.

Another direction of expansion of the territory of North-Eastern Russia was the east, where in the second half of the 60s - early 70s. 12th century on the left bank of the Volga, Gorodets Radilov (modern Gorodets) was founded, and in 1221, at the confluence of the Oka into the Volga, Novgorod, later called Nizhny. In the Podvinye (the basin of the Northern Dvina), the Suzdalians clashed with the Novgorodians, who were mastering this territory from the west, from the Ladoga and Onega lakes, as well as from the north. Novgorodians play the main role in the conquest and economic development of the vast territory east of Ladoga and Onega up to the river. Pechory.

A sharp increase in the number of cities in the middle of the XII century. occurred primarily at the expense of the so-called “small towns”, the area of ​​​​which, identified archaeologically, ranged from 0.2 to about 2 hectares. The growth in the number of such wooden-walled cities is explained by the fact that the principalities, having achieved political independence, began to strengthen their borders. This is how the cities so famous now as Moscow, Tver, Kostroma, Nizhny Novgorod appeared, which initially did not play any noticeable economic or political role, but performed the functions of frontier fortresses. Nevertheless, relying on such fortresses, the population of various principalities got the opportunity to conduct internal colonization and economic development of territories in a safer environment.

The positive results of political fragmentation for a long time outweighed the negative consequences of such dismemberment. Therefore, fragmentation continued to grow.

By 1237, the beginning of the Batu invasion, the Novgorod Republic and many principalities existed on the territory of ancient Russia. In the east, it was the Principality of Ryazan, which included in its composition the Principality of Pronskoe; Murom, which bordered the Grand Duchy of Vladimir. From the composition of the latter in 1212-1218. the principalities of Pereyaslavl (Pereyaslavl-Zalessky), Yuriev, Rostov, Yaroslavl and Uglich stood out. To the west of them was the principality of Smolensk, and then the principalities of Vitebsk, Polotsk and Pinsk.

To the south of the Smolensk principality lay the principality of Chernigov, which included several specific principalities: Kozelsk, Kursk, Rylsk, possibly Novgorod-Seversk and Putivl. To the south of Chernigov lay the Principality of Pereyaslavl (Southern Pereyaslavl). The largest ancient Russian principality remained Kiev, where there were also several appanages: the principalities of Vyshgorod, Kanev and Torg. The western Vladimir-Volyn principality included such destinies as the principalities of Belz, Cherven and Lutsk. Adjoining from the south to the Vladimir-Volyn principality, the Principality of Galicia included the only specific center - Przemysl.

Thus, by the time of the Tatar-Mongol invasion, ancient Russia was divided into 18 large state formations, which included more than a dozen specific principalities.
This political fragmentation, associated with the absence of a unified armed forces, significantly influenced the outcome of the struggle of the Russian people against foreign invasion.
After the Tatar-Mongol campaigns against the Russian principalities in late 1237 and early 1241. and recognition by the majority of Russian princes in 1242 of the supreme power of the great Mongol Khan and Khan of the Golden Horde Batu, who was subordinate to him, great changes took place in the settlement of the Old Russian people, the number and structure of the Old Russian principalities.

The lands from the Sula to the Desna, the left tributaries of the Dnieper, where the Pereyaslavl (Pereyaslavl South) principality, the steppe parts of the Kyiv principality, the southern parts of the Chernigov principality, and the lands along the right tributaries of the middle course of the Oka, passed under the direct control of the Tatar-Mongol. In the west, the Galician-Volyn princes lost their former control over the lands along the Siret, the Prut and the lower reaches of the Dniester.

In the Volgook interfluve, due to the devastation by Batu and the subsequent Horde khans of the old centers of the ancient Rostov land of Rostov, Suzdal, Vladimir, the population, fleeing from military threats, began to leave for the outskirts of this land, which contributed to the formation in the post-Mongolian time of such principalities as Tver, Belozersky, Moscow, Kostroma and Gorodetskoye with the center in Gorodets Radilov on the Volga. By the 70s. 13th century in North-Eastern Russia, instead of 6 principalities of pre-Mongolian times, there were as many as fourteen: in addition to the indicated 5 principalities, there were also Starodub, Suzdal, Galich-Dmitrov, Pereyaslav (Pereslavl-Zales), Yuryev, Rostov, Yaroslavl and Uglich. The Grand Duchy of Vladimir remained the main one.

Western Russian principalities, such as Polotsk, Vitebsk and Pinsk, were captured by the Lithuanians. And in the 60s. 14th century Lithuanian Grand Duke Olgerd annexed Kyiv with its lands to the Lithuanian state. Even earlier, in the first half of the XIII century. Russian possessions in the Baltic were lost, where formed at the end of the XII-beginning of the XIII centuries. German bishoprics, as well as founded at the beginning of the XIII century. The Order of the Swordsmen, first took away the possessions of the Polotsk princes in the land of the Latgalians, and then the possessions of Novgorod the Great in the land of the Estonians.

In the 40s. 14th century The Polish king took possession of the Principality of Galicia. In the 50s. Lithuanian Prince Olgerd subjugated the Principality of Bryansk. Relative political independence, depending on the Golden Horde, remained only for a few small “Verkhovian” principalities (former Chernigov appanages in the upper reaches of the Oka), the Ryazan and Pron principalities, the Smolensk principality, the principalities of North-Eastern Russia and the Novgorod feudal republic. The largest of these state formations remained the Grand Duchy of Vladimir with its center in Vladimir on the Klyazma.

However, from the beginning of the XIV century. Horde khans established their control over its territory. The fierce struggle for the Khan's throne between various groups of Genghisides and the Horde nobility, which began in 1359 in the Horde, led to a split in the Horde into the Eastern Horde (Saray) and the Western Horde (Mamaev), which immediately affected the situation of the Russian lands, which for a number of years stopped paying tribute to the Tatars. The growth of the independence of the Russian princes was facilitated by the strengthening economic position of them and the population subject to them.

Preview:

Test 6 Old Russian principalities and lands in the XII-XIII centuries.

1. Prince in Novgorod from the 12th century. played a role:

1) the first person;

2) secondary, he was only a military leader;

3) the governor of Kyiv;

4) nominally the supreme judge;

5) not quite clear, because Novgorod was ruled by a veche and it was a republic, not a principality.

2. Ancient Novgorod can be called a port of the seas:

1) Black; 2) Black and Baltic;3) Black, Baltic and Caspian;

4) Caspian, Aral and Black;5) Black and White.

3. Under what prince in 1136 did Novgorod finally separate from Kyiv:

1) Alexandra Nevsky;2) Vsevolod Mstislavich;

3) Vsevolod Volodarevich;4) Dmitry Miroshkinich;

5) Novgorod was originally in a special contractual relationship with Kyiv.

4. Novgorodians presented to Prince VsevolodMstislavich is accused of being:

1) did not care about smerds;

2) left Novgorod for the sake of reigning in another place;

3) the first to flee from the battlefield;

4) 1, 2, 3 are correct;

5) violated "lessons and graveyards" (norms, time and place of tribute collection).

5. The uprising in Novgorod against the posadnik Dmitry Miroshkinich broke out in ... year:

1) 1136; 2) 1207; 3) 1229; 4) not against, but under his leadership in 1221; 5) 1230.

6. In the political life of Novgorod, the leading role belonged to:

1) veche and prince; 2) the prince and the thousand;3) the prince, the thousandth and the posadnik;

4) thousand, posadnik and archbishop;5) to the archbishop, prince and thousand.

7. In the era of fragmentation in Kyiv, the actual power was:

1) at the prince and boyars; 2) at the squad; 3) in the hands of the people's council;

4) fragile and passed from hand to hand;5) at the Chernigov princes.

8. During the period of fragmentation in Kyiv, strife did not stop until:

1) Yuri Dolgoruky did not seize power;2) the boyars did not come to power;

3) Kyiv has not been taken from battle since 1169 by the son of Yuri Dolgoruky Gleb;

4) did not introduce co-government of two princes;

5) the Galician-Volyn princes did not include Kyiv in their lands.

9. The Galician principality in 1202 became equal in area to the Holy Roman Empire as a result of:

1) the conquests of Yaroslav Osmomysl;

2) the conquests of Osmomysl and the unification at the end of the 12th century. with the Volyn principality;

3) unification with the Volyn principality and invitation in 1202 of the Galician prince Roman Mstislavich to the throne of Kyiv;

4) invitations of Roman Mstislavich to the throne of Kyiv and the conquest of the Danubian principalities;

5) the conquest of the Danube region and part of Poland.

10. Relying on the younger combatants, he created a "veche of youths" (military servants not from the boyars) of the Galician prince:

1) Yaroslav Osmomysl;

2) Roman Metislavich;

3) Daniil Galitsky;

4) Rurik Rostislavich;

5) Izyaslav Mstislavich.

11. In the Vladimir-Suzdal land, cities associated with the names of the builder princes arose:

1) Yaroslavl; 2) Vladimir; 3) Yuriev; 4) Dmitrov; 5) all specified.

12. In the XII century. opolem was called:

1) a place between the boyar estates;

2) the edge of the grain field;

3) the edge of the forest;

4) uplands on the Russian Plain with fertile land;

5) plots of unsuitable land, wedged into the grain field.

13. Kuchkovy field in the old days was called:

1) Vladimir-Suzdal principality;

2) the personal estate of Yuri Dolgoruky;

3) the city of Moscow;

4) Lubyanka Square in Moscow;

5) the estate of the boyar Stepan Kuchka on the banks of the Moscow River.

14. The date of foundation of Moscow is considered to be ... year:

1) 1147; 2) 1137; 3) 1127; 4) 1117; 5) 1157.

15. The first wooden fortress in Moscow was built in ... year:

1) 1147; 2) 1126; 3) 1156; 4) 1166; 5) 1176 .

16. How is the name of the Chernigov prince Svyatoslav Olgovich connected with Moscow:

1) Moscow was allocated to him as an inheritance;

2) here he celebrated one of his victories with his ally Yuri Dolgoruky;

3) the first annalistic mention of Moscow is connected with it; 4) 1 and 3 are correct; 5) 2 and 3 are correct.

17. The Church of the Intercession on the Nerl was built by order of the prince:

1) Vladimir Monomakh;

2) Andrei Bogolyubsky;

3) Daniil Galitsky;

4) Yuri Dolgoruky;

5) Vsevolod the Big Nest.

18. Prince Andrei of Vladimir was nicknamed Bogolyubsky:

1) for a meek disposition and strict observance of church rituals;

2) for a trip to holy places in Jerusalem;3) at the place of his residence - Bogolyubovo;

4) as a connoisseur of church architecture;

5) for the patronage of the church and the support of the clergy.

19. Andrei Bogolyubsky in 1169 took Kyiv with his troops and appointed his brother Gleb to reign in it, who:

1) ruled Kyiv until 1198;

2) was killed in battle with the Polovtsians in 1170;

3) caught a cold while hunting and died in 1172;

4) was soon poisoned by the boyars;

5) in 1169 he was deposed and tonsured a monk.

20. Andrei Bogolyubsky was warlike and sent troops to:

1) Kyiv; 2) Kyiv and Novgorod;3) Kyiv, Novgorod and Volga Bulgaria;

4) Volga Bulgaria and the Galician principality;5) Volga Bulgaria, Galician principality and Kyiv.

21. Andrey Bogolyubsky was killed by boyar conspirators led by the Kuchkovichi in ... year:

1) 1170; 2) 1171; 3) 1172; 4) 1173; 5) 1174.

22. Vsevolod the Big Nest began to reign in Vladimir from ... the year:

1) 1172; 2) 1173; 3) 1174; 4) 1176; 5) 1177 .

23. After the death of Prince Vsevolod the Big Nest, his sons started strife. In 1216, troops converged on the Lipitsky field:

1) Constantine in alliance with the Novgorod prince Mstislav Udaly; 2) Yuri;

3) Yaroslav; 4) all of the above is true;5) only 1 and 3 are correct.

24. The bloody battle on the Lipitsky field between the sons of Vsevolod the Big Nest won (won):

1) Mstislav; 2) Mstislav and Konstantin;3) Mstislav, Konstantin and Yuri;

4) Yuri and Yaroslav;5) Yaroslav and Mstislav.

25. The early feudal era in Russia corresponds to:

1) landownership;2) St. George's day rule;3) patrimonial economy;

4) quitrent; 5) month.

26. The early feudal era in Russia does not correspond to:

1) the all-Russian market;

2) constant struggle with nomads;

3) patrimonial economy;

4) princely power;

5) Hungarian-Russian alliance.

27. The early feudal era in Russia corresponds:

1) the defeat of the Huns;

2) defeat in the X century. Khazaria;

3) the establishment of a Russian-Hungarian alliance;

4) the conquest of the Volga Bulgaria;

5) lively trade with China, supported by dynastic marriages.

28. Does not correspond to the early feudal era in Russia:

1) polyudie; 2) the custom of blood feud;3) lively trade with Byzantium;

4) repeated clashes with the Hungarians;5) constant enmity with Khazaria.

29. The early feudal period in Russia corresponds to:

1) annexation of Cherven Rus;

2) repeated clashes with Turkey;

3) the introduction of the patriarchate;

4) the beginning of the construction of St. Basil's Cathedral;

5) the first attempt to annex Siberia.

30. Culture of Russia in the X-XIII centuries. is high because:

1) received the direct cultural heritage of the ancient world;

2) the culture of Russia was influenced by its neighbors - the Scythians and Greeks of the Black Sea region, and then Byzantium;

3) merchants who visited Western Europe, Eastern countries and Byzantium adopted a lot from the culture of other countries;

4) 1, 2 and 3 are correct; 5) only 2 and 3 are correct.

31. The development of the culture of Russia was positively affected by the annual crowded trips of Russian merchants and nobility:

1) to Byzantium; 2) to the East; 3) to Western Europe;4) all of the above is true; 5) 1 and 2 are correct.

32. Eastern Slavs in the field of culture, unlike many peoples of Europe:

1) did not receive the direct cultural heritage of the ancient world;

2) only inherited a rich vocabulary and mythology;

3) received a highly developed culture, not much inferior to the Byzantine one;

4) only 1.2 is true; 5) only 2, 3 are correct.

33. A great influence on the development of the culture of Russia in antiquity had:

1) Scythian neighbors; 2) religious ties with the Greek clergy and Christianization;

3) frequent trips of merchants and nobles to Byzantium, to the East, to Western Europe;

4) all of the above is true;5) only 2 and 3 are correct.

34. Among the centers of culture of European importance are the most ancient Russian cities:

1) Kyiv and Novgorod; 2) Chernihiv; 3) Minsk; 4) all of the above; 5) only 1.2 is correct.

35. Old Russian cities are also considered centers of European importance.:

1) Moscow, Minsk, Polotsk;2) Kyiv, Novgorod, Galich;3) Suzdal, Rostov, Vladimir-on-Klyazma;

4) Smolensk, Chernigov, Vladimir-Volynsky; 5) all named.

36. Schools for boys in Kyiv existed:

1) already in the 8th century; 2) in the 9th century; 3) from the 10th century; 4) from the 11th century; 5) from the XII century.

37. The first school for girls in Kyiv opened at the end ... of the century:

1) IX; 2) X; 3) XI; 4) XII; 5) XIII.

38. The literacy of citizens and the widespread use of writing in Russia are evidenced by:

1) birch-bark letters of Novgorodians;2) inscriptions on the products of artisans;

3) inscriptions on the walls of churches made by parishioners;4) all of the above is true; 5) only 1.2 is correct.

39. The blacksmith of Kievan Rus forged his name Ludota Koval on the:

1) an ax; 2) sword; 3) a knife; 4) boiler; 5) shield.

40. Among the inscriptions left on the walls of Russian churches in the era of Kievan Rus, there is the name of Stavr Gordyatinich, famous for:

1) an epic was composed about him;2) a chronicler mentions him;

3) he made a successful trip to Constantinople;

4) he inflicted a mortal wound on the Polovtsian Khan Tugorkan in battle;

5) he was the son-in-law of Vladimir Monomakh.

41. In Kyiv, on the wall of one of the surviving churches there is an inscription dated 1054 about the death of Yaroslav the Wise. It is valuable because:

1) helps to find out the dates of his life;

2) gives an idea of ​​the degree of his influence;

3) testifies to his title of Caesar (king);

4) clarifies the meaning of his nickname Wise;

5) sheds light on the family ties of the prince with the European courts.

42. Stone structures in Kyiv appeared in the middle ... century:

1) IX; 2) X; 3) XI; 4) XII; 5) XIII.

43. Traditions had a huge impact on the architecture of Kievan Rus:

1) Byzantine masters;2) Slavic wooden architecture;

3) Western Europe;4) all of the above is true;5) only 1 and 2 are correct.

44. The architectural treasury of world culture includes:

1) St. Sophia Cathedrals in Kyiv (1037) and Novgorod (1052);2) Church of the Intercession on the Nerl (1165);

3) Demetrius Cathedral of Vladimir (1194-1197);4) all of the above is true;5) only 1 and 2 are correct.

45. The appearance in the cities of two-, three-storey buildings forced architects to build high tower-like churches. The first such churches arose:

1) already in the 11th century; 2) at the turn of the X-XI centuries;3) at the turn of the XI-XII centuries;

4) at the turn of the XII-XIII centuries;5) churches of this type appeared with the adoption of Christianity.

46. ​​A number of tower-shaped temples of Kievan Rus have survived to this day. Among them:

1) Pyatnitsky in Chernigov;2) Mikhailovsky in Smolensk;3) Pyatnitsky in Novgorod;

4) only 1 and 3 are correct;5) all of the above is correct.

47. The white-stone architecture of Vladimir-Suzdal Russia, which has survived to this day, is considered the pearl of medieval European architecture for:

1) proportional harmonious forms;

2) generous gold lace trim;

3) widespread use of sculptural images on facades;

4) all of the above is true;

5) only 1 and 2 are correct.

48. Architects of Kievan Rus created buildings with precisely calculated proportions because:

1) were able to achieve this, even building by eye;

2) used measures of length - cubit and sazhen;

3) they knew the number of vehicles;

4) all of the above is true;

5) only 2 and 3 are correct.

49. Indicate the material on which icons were painted in Kievan Rus:

1) raw plaster;

2) parchment;

3) wooden board;

4) canvas;

5) all of the above.

50. Frescoes in temples were created:

1) painting raw plaster with paints;

2) on wooden boards impregnated with resin;

3) on canvas;

4) on colored glass;

5) on finely dressed leather.


The period of feudal fragmentation, traditionally called the “specific period”, lasted from the 12th to the end of the 15th centuries. Feudal fragmentation weakened the defensive capabilities of the Russian lands. This became noticeable in the second half of the 11th century, when a new strong enemy appeared in the south - the Polovtsy (Turkic nomadic tribes). According to the annals, it is estimated that from 1061 to the beginning of the 13th century. there were more than 46 major invasions of the Polovtsians. A feature of feudal fragmentation in Russia compared to European countries was a simplified feudal hierarchy: it consisted of only 3 main steps - grand dukes, specific princes and their boyars (approximate), and all princely families were offshoots of only two genera - the ruling dynasty of Rurikovich and Gediminovich. As a result of the fragmentation of the ancient Russian state by the middle of the XII century. separated into independent ten states-principalities. Subsequently, by the middle of the 13th century, their number reached eighteen. They were named after the capital cities: Kiev, Chernigov, Pereyaslav, Muromo-Ryazan. Suzdal (Vladimir). Smolensk, Galician, Vladimir-Volynsk, Polotsk, Novgorod Boyar Republic. In each of the principalities, one of the branches of the Rurikovich ruled, and the sons of princes and governors-boyars ruled over separate destinies and volosts. However, in all the lands, the same written language, a single religion and church organization, the legal norms of the Russkaya Pravda, and most importantly, the awareness of common roots, a common historical destiny, were preserved. At the same time, each of the established independent states had its own peculiarities of development. The largest of them, which played a significant role in the subsequent history of Russia, were: Suzdal (later - Vladimir) principality - North-Eastern Russia; Galician (later - Galicia-Volyn) Principality - South-Western Russia; Novgorod Boyar Republic - Novgorod Land (North-Western Russia). The main centers of Russia during the period of specific fragmentation were the great principalities of Vladimir-Suzdal (since 1169, after the victory of his prince Andrei Bogolyusbsky over Kyiv, the city of Vladimir became the nominal capital of all Russia), Kiev (according to tradition, Kyiv for a long time remained the cultural and ecclesiastical center of Russia, only in 1299 the head of the Russian church, the metropolitan, moved to Vladimir), Galicia-Volyn in the west and the Novgorod feudal republic.

Vladimir-Suzdal principality in the period of feudal fragmentation.

Features of development: the main branch of the economy is agriculture due to the abundance of fertile lands, the constant influx of people in search of protection from nomad raids, the rapid growth of cities, the location at the crossroads of trade routes, the unlimited nature of the power of the prince.


Political structure: Prince, Druzhina, Veche, Boyars

Novgorod boyar republic in the period of feudal fragmentation.

Features of development: the leading branches of the economy are trade and handicrafts, the weak development of agriculture due to harsh climatic conditions, the widespread development of crafts - salt production, hunting, etc., special public administration, constant orientation towards European countries.

Political structure: Veche, Boyar Council, Tysyatsky, Posadnik, Prince.

Consequences of fragmentation:

Positive: 1) the development of crafts and trade. 2) an increase in the number of cities. 3) political stabilization on the ground. 4) flourishing culture

Negative: 1) lack of a unified defense system. 2) external danger for each principality. 3) ruinous civil strife. 4) weakness of the central government

7.Mongol-Tatar invasion and its consequences. Russia and the Golden Horde. At the beginning of the 13th c. in the steppes of Central Asia, the Mongol-Tatars formed a military-feudal power. It was an association not of a single people, but of dozens of nomadic tribes. In 1222, the hordes of Genghis Khan invaded Transcaucasia, passed through Iran and the Caucasus with fire and sword. Having devastated the country of the Alans (Ossetia), the Mongols defeated the Polovtsy and in the spring of 1223 reached the banks of the Don. The threat of the Mongol conquest hung over the Polovtsy, who turned to the Russian princes for help, warning them of the imminent danger. In conditions of feudal fragmentation, far from all the princes supported the Polovtsians. The united Russian-Polovtsian army took the battle with the main forces of the Mongols on May 31, 1223 on the Kalka River. The battle ended with the complete victory of the Mongol-Tatars. The reason for the defeat of the Russians was the complete absence of a common command. After 13 years, the army of the Mongol-Tatars, which was led by the grandson of Genghis Khan Batu, defeated the Volga Bulgaria, began the conquest of Russia. In 1236, Batu invaded the territory of North-Eastern Russia. The first victim of his invasion was the Ryazan principality. In conditions of fragmentation, each principality defended itself. Following the Ryazan army, Batu conquered the Vladimir-Suzdal and Smolensk principalities. In 1239-1240. Batu made a second trip to Russia. The southwestern principalities were under attack. Having met no organized resistance, he conquered the Chernigov, Pereyaslav and Gapitsin-Volyn principalities. In 1242, Batu created a powerful state - the Golden Horde, with the capital Sarai on the Lower Volga. In Russia, the Mongol-Tatar yoke was established. The Mongols retained the former system of government and social relations in the occupied lands, but established control over them. The khans of the horde began to issue permits (labels) for a great reign in Russia. To collect tribute, the Mongol-Tatars introduced the institution of Baskaks (tribute collectors). At first, tribute was collected in kind, then in money. The Mongol conquest led to a long economic, political and cultural decline of the Russian lands. Many territories were devastated and devastated, cities were destroyed, the most skilled artisans were taken to the Horde, a demographic decline began. Despite the severity of the consequences of the Mongol-Tatar yoke, Russia managed to maintain its statehood, religion and culture.

Reasons for the defeat of the Russian principalities in the fight against the Mongol-Tatars:

The absence of a unified Russian army, the significant numerical superiority of the Mongols, the high military skill of the Mongols, the fragmentation and lack of unity in the Russian lands, the most severe discipline that reigned in the Mongol army, the lack of cavalry soldiers in the Russian troops.

Consequences of the Mongol-Tatar invasion:

Migration of the population to the northern regions, the weakening of the military potential of the Russian principalities, the decline of crafts and trade, the conversion of a significant number of the population into slavery, numerous casualties among the civilian population, the preservation of feudal fragmentation, the inhibition of the development of commodity-money relations, the political dependence of the Russian princes, the desolation of agricultural land, stealing to the Horde of artisans.

OLD RUSSIAN PRINCIPALITIES - state formations that existed in Russia during the period of feudal fragmentation ( 12 – 15 centuries).

Arising in the second half

10th c. and became at 11 in. In the second 12 in. to its actual collapse. Conditional holders sought, on the one hand, to turn their conditional holdings into unconditional ones and achieve economic and political independence from the center, and on the other hand, by subordinating the local nobility, to establish full control over their possessions. In all regions (with the exception of the Novgorod land, where, in fact, the republican regime was established and the princely power acquired a military-service character), the princes from the house of Rurikovich managed to become sovereign sovereigns with the highest legislative, executive and judicial functions. They relied on the administrative apparatus, whose members constituted a special service class: for their service they received either part of the income from the exploitation of the subject territory (feeding), or land for holding. The main vassals of the prince (boyars), together with the tops of the local clergy, formed under him an advisory and advisory body - the boyar duma. The prince was considered the supreme owner of all lands in the principality: some of them belonged to him on the basis of personal ownership (domain), and he disposed of the rest as the ruler of the territory; they were divided into dominal possessions of the church and conditional holdings of the boyars and their vassals (boyar servants).

The socio-political structure of Russia in the era of fragmentation was based on a complex system of suzerainty and vassalage (the feudal ladder). The feudal hierarchy was headed by the Grand Duke (until the middle

12 in. the owner of the Kyiv table, later this status was acquired by the Vladimir-Suzdal and Galician-Volyn princes). Below were the rulers of large principalities (Chernigov, Pereyaslav, Turov-Pinsk, Polotsk, Rostov-Suzdal, Vladimir-Volyn, Galicia, Muromo-Ryazan, Smolensk), even lower - the owners of the destinies within each of these principalities. At the lowest level there was an untitled serving nobility (boyars and their vassals).

From the middle

11 in. the process of disintegration of large principalities began, which first of all affected the most developed agricultural regions (Kyiv and Chernihiv regions). AT 12 - first half 13 in. this trend has become universal. Particularly intense fragmentation was in the Kiev, Chernigov, Polotsk, Turov-Pinsk and Muromo-Ryazan principalities. To a lesser extent, it affected the Smolensk land, and in the Galicia-Volyn and Rostov-Suzdal (Vladimir) principalities, periods of disintegration alternated with periods of temporary unification of appanages under the rule of the "senior" ruler. Only Novgorod land throughout its history continued to maintain political integrity.

In the conditions of feudal fragmentation, all-Russian and regional princely congresses acquired great importance, at which domestic and foreign policy issues were resolved (inter-princely feuds, the fight against external enemies). However, they did not become a permanent, regular political institution and could not slow down the process of dissipation.

By the time of the Tatar-Mongol invasion, Russia was divided into many small principalities and was unable to combine forces to repel external aggression. Devastated by the hordes of Batu, it lost a significant part of its western and southwestern lands, which became in the second half of the 13th-14th centuries. easy prey for Lithuania (Turovo-Pinsk, Polotsk, Vladimir-Volyn, Kiev, Chernigov, Pereyaslav, Smolensk principalities) and Poland (Galician). Only North-Eastern Russia (Vladimir, Muromo-Ryazan and Novgorod lands) managed to maintain its independence. In the 14th - early 16th century. it was "gathered" by the princes of Moscow, who restored the unified Russian state.

Kievan principality. It was located in the interfluve of the Dnieper, Sluch, Ros and Pripyat (modern Kyiv and Zhytomyr regions of Ukraine and the south of the Gomel region of Belarus). It bordered in the north with Turov-Pinsk, in the east - with Chernigov and Pereyaslav, in the west with the Vladimir-Volyn principality, and in the south it ran into the Polovtsian steppes. The population was made up of Slavic tribes of Polyans and Drevlyans.

Fertile soils and mild climate favored intensive farming; The inhabitants were also engaged in cattle breeding, hunting, fishing and beekeeping. Here the specialization of crafts took place early; “woodworking”, pottery and leatherworking acquired special importance. The presence of iron deposits in the Drevlyansk land (included in the Kyiv region at the turn of the 9th–10th centuries) favored the development of blacksmithing; many types of metals (copper, lead, tin, silver, gold) were brought from neighboring countries. The famous trade route "from the Varangians to the Greeks" passed through the Kiev region.

» (from the Baltic Sea to Byzantium); through the Pripyat, it was connected with the basin of the Vistula and the Neman, through the Desna - with the upper reaches of the Oka, through the Seim - with the Don basin and the Sea of ​​\u200b\u200bAzov. An influential trade and craft industry was formed early in Kyiv and nearby cities.layer.

From the end of the 9th to the end of the 10th c. Kyiv land was the central region of the Old Russian state. At Vladimir the Holy, with the allocation of a number of semi-independent destinies, it became the core of the grand ducal domain; at the same time Kyiv turned into the church center of Russia (as the residence of the metropolitan); an episcopal see was also established in nearby Belgorod. After the death of Mstislav the Great in 1132, the actual disintegration of the Old Russian state took place, and the Kievan land was constituted as

special principality.

Despite the fact that the Kyiv prince ceased to be the supreme owner of all Russian lands, he remained the head of the feudal hierarchy and continued to be considered "senior" among other princes. This made the Kiev principality the object of a fierce struggle between the various branches of the Rurik dynasty. The powerful Kievan boyars and the trade and craft population also took an active part in this struggle, although the role of the people's assembly (veche) by the beginning of the 12th century. decreased significantly.

Until 1139, the Kyiv table was in the hands of the Monomashichs - Mstislav the Great was succeeded by his brothers Yaropolk (1132–1139) and Vyacheslav (1139). In 1139 it was taken from them by the Chernigov prince Vsevolod Olgovich. However, the rule of the Chernigov Olgoviches was short-lived: after the death of Vsevolod in 1146, the local boyars, dissatisfied with the transfer of power to his brother Igor, called Izyaslav Mstislavich, a representative of the older branch of the Monomashichs (Mstislavichs), to the Kyiv throne. On August 13, 1146, having defeated the troops of Igor and Svyatoslav Olgovich near the Olga grave, Izyaslav captured the ancient capital; Igor, taken prisoner by him, was killed in 1147. In 1149, the Suzdal branch of the Monomashichs, represented by Yuri Dolgoruky, entered the struggle for Kyiv. After the death of Izyaslav (November 1154) and his co-ruler Vyacheslav Vladimirovich (December 1154), Yuri established himself on the Kiev table and held it until his death in 1157. The strife within the Monomashich house helped the Olgoviches take revenge: in May 1157, Izyaslav Davydovich Chernigovskii seized princely power (1157 –1159). But his unsuccessful attempt to seize Galich cost him the grand-ducal table, which returned to the Mstislavichs - the Smolensk prince Rostislav (1159-1167), and then to his nephew Mstislav Izyaslavich (1167-1169).

From the middle of the 12th century the political significance of the Kyiv land is falling. Its disintegration into destinies begins: in the 1150s–1170s, the Belgorod, Vyshgorod, Trepol, Kanev, Torche, Kotelniche and Dorogobuzh principalities stand out. Kyiv ceases to play the role of the only center of the Russian lands; in the north-east

and in the southwest, two new centers of political attraction and influence are emerging, claiming the status of great principalities - Vladimir on the Klyazma and Galich. The princes of Vladimir and Galicia-Volyn no longer seek to occupy the Kyiv table; periodically subjugating Kyiv, they put their proteges there.

In 1169–1174, the Prince of Vladimir dictated his will to Kyiv Andrey Bogolyubsky: in 1169 he expelled Mstislav Izyaslavich from there and gave the reign to his brother Gleb (1169–1171). When, after the death of Gleb (January 1171) and Vladimir Mstislavich (May 1171), who replaced him, the Kyiv table without his consent was taken by his other brother Mikhalko, Andrei forced him to give way to Roman Rostislavich, a representative of the Smolensk branch of the Mstislavichs (Rostislavichs); in 1172 Andrey expelled Roman as well and planted another of his brother Vsevolod the Big Nest in Kyiv; in 1173 he forced Rurik Rostislavich, who had seized the Kievan table, to flee to Belgorod.

After the death of Andrei Bogolyubsky in 1174, Kyiv fell under the control of the Smolensk Rostislavichs in the person of Roman Rostislavich (1174–1176). But in 1176, having failed in the campaign against the Polovtsy, Roman was forced to give up power, which was used by the Olgovichi. At the call of the townspeople, the Kyiv table was occupied by Svyatoslav Vsevolodovich Chernigov (1176-1194 with a break of 11

8 one). However, he did not succeed in ousting the Rostislavichs from the Kievan land; in the early 1180s, he recognized their rights to Porosie and the Drevlyane land; Olgovichi strengthened in the Kyiv district. Having reached agreement with the Rostislavichs, Svyatoslav concentrated his efforts on the fight against the Polovtsy, having managed to seriously weaken their onslaught on Russian lands.

After his death in 1194, the Rostislavichi returned to the Kievan table in the person of Rurik Rostislavich, but already at the beginning of the 13th century. Kyiv fell into the sphere of influence of the powerful Galician-Volyn prince Roman Mstislavich, who in 1202 expelled Rurik and installed his cousin Ingvar Yaroslavich of Dorogobuzh in his place. In 1203, Rurik, in alliance with the Polovtsy and Chernigov Olgovichi, captured Kyiv and, with the diplomatic support of the Vladimir prince Vsevolod the Big Nest, the ruler of North-Eastern Russia, held the Kievan reign for several months. However, in 1204, during a joint campaign of the South Russian rulers against the Polovtsy, he was arrested by Roman and tonsured a monk, and his son Rostislav was thrown into prison; Ingvar returned to the Kyiv table. But soon, at the request of Vsevolod, Roman released Rostislav and made him a prince of Kyiv.

After the death of Roman in October 1205, Rurik left the monastery and at the beginning of 1206 occupied Kyiv. In the same year, Prince Vsevolod Svyatoslavich Chermny of Chernigov entered the fight against him. Their four-year rivalry ended in 1210 with a compromise agreement: Rurik recognized Kyiv for Vsevolod and received Chernigov as compensation.

After the death of Vsevolod, the Rostislavichs reasserted themselves on the Kievan table: Mstislav Romanovich the Old (1212/1214–1223 with a break in 1219) and his cousin Vladimir Rurikovich (1223–1235). In 1235, Vladimir, having suffered a defeat from the Polovtsy near Torchesky, was taken prisoner by them, and power in Kyiv was seized first by Prince Mikhail Vsevolodovich of Chernigov, and then Yaroslav, son of Vsevolod the Big Nest. However, in 1236, Vladimir, having redeemed himself from captivity, without much difficulty regained the grand prince's throne and remained on it until his death in 1239.

In 1239–1240, Mikhail Vsevolodovich Chernigov and Rostislav Mstislavich Smolensky were in Kyiv, and on the eve of the Tatar-Mongol invasion, he was under the control of the Galician-Volyn prince Daniil Romanovich, who appointed voivode Dmitr there. In the autumn of 1240, Batu moved to South Russia and in early December took and defeated Kyiv, despite the desperate nine-day resistance of the inhabitants and a small squad of Dmitry; he subjected the principality to terrible devastation, after which it could no longer recover. Returning to the capital in 1241, Mikhail Vsevolodich was summoned to the Horde in 1246 and killed there. From the 1240s, Kyiv became formally dependent on the great princes of Vladimir (Alexander Nevsky, Yaroslav Yaroslavich). In the second half of the 13th c. a significant part of the population emigrated to the northern Russian regions. In 1299, the metropolitan see was transferred from Kyiv to Vladimir. In the first half of the 14th century the weakened Kiev principality became the object of Lithuanian aggression and in 1362, under Olgerd, it became part of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania.

Principality of Polotsk. It was located in the middle reaches of the Dvina and Polota and in the upper reaches of the Svisloch and Berezina (the territory of the modern Vitebsk, Minsk and Mogilev regions of Belarus and southeastern Lithuania). In the south it bordered on Turov-Pinsky, in the east - on the Smolensk principality,in the north - with the Pskov-Novgorod land, in the west and north-west - with Finno-Ugric tribes (Livs, Latgales). It was inhabited by the Polochans (the name comes from the Polota River) - a branch of the East Slavic tribe of the Krivichi, partially mixed with the Baltic tribes.

As an independent territorial entity, the Polotsk land existed even before the emergence of the Old Russian state. In the 870s, the Novgorod prince Rurik imposed tribute on the Polotsk people, and then they submitted to the Kyiv prince Oleg. Under the Kiev prince Yaropolk Svyatoslavich (972–980), the Polotsk land was a principality dependent on him, ruled by the Norman Rogvolod. In 980, Vladimir Svyatoslavich captured her, killed Rogvolod and his two sons, and took his daughter Rogneda as his wife; since that time, the Polotsk land finally became part of the Old Russian state. Having become the prince of Kyiv, Vladimir transferred part of it to the joint holding of Rogneda and their eldest son Izyaslav. In 988/989 he made Izyaslav the prince of Polotsk; Izyaslav became the ancestor of the local princely dynasty (Polotsk Izyaslavichi). In 992 the diocese of Polotsk was established.

Although the principality was poor in fertile lands, it had rich hunting and fishing lands and was located at the crossroads of important trade routes along the Dvina, Neman and Berezina; impenetrable forests and water barriers protected it from outside attacks. This attracted numerous settlers here; cities grew rapidly, turning into trade and craft centers (Polotsk, Izyaslavl, Minsk, Drutsk, etc.). Economic prosperity contributed to the concentration of significant resources in the hands of the Izyaslavichs, on which they relied in their struggle to achieve independence from the authorities of Kyiv.

Izyaslav's heir Bryachislav (1001–1044), taking advantage of the princely civil strife in Russia, pursued an independent policy and tried to expand his possessions. In 1021, with his squad and a detachment of Scandinavian mercenaries, he captured and plundered Veliky Novgorod, but then was defeated by the ruler of the Novgorod land, the Grand Duke Yaroslav the Wise on the river Sudoma; nevertheless, in order to ensure the loyalty of Bryachislav, Yaroslav ceded to him Usvyatskaya and Vitebsk volosts.

The Principality of Polotsk achieved special power under the son of Bryachislav Vseslav (1044–1101), who launched expansion to the north and northwest. Livs and Latgalians became his tributaries. In the 1060s he made several campaigns against Pskov and Novgorod the Great. In 1067 Vseslav ravaged Novgorod, but was unable to keep the Novgorod land. In the same year, Grand Duke Izyaslav Yaroslavich struck back at his strengthened vassal: he invaded the Principality of Polotsk, captured Minsk, defeated Vseslav's squad on the river. Nemiga, by cunning, took him prisoner along with his two sons and sent him to prison in Kyiv; the principality became part of the vast possessions of Izyaslav. After the overthrow

Izyaslav rebellious Kievans September 14, 1068 Vseslav regained Polotsk and even for a short time took the Kyiv Grand Duke's table; in the course of a fierce struggle with Izyaslav and his sons Mstislav, Svyatopolk and Yaropolk in 1069–1072, he managed to retain the Polotsk principality. In 1078, he resumed aggression against neighboring regions: he captured the Smolensk principality and devastated the northern part of Chernigov land. However, already in the winter of 1078-1079, Grand Duke Vsevolod Yaroslavich carried out a punitive expedition to the Principality of Polotsk and burned Lukoml, Logozhsk, Drutsk and the suburbs of Polotsk; in 1084 prince of Chernigov Vladimir Monomakh took Minsk and subjected the Polotsk land to a cruel defeat. Vseslav's resources were exhausted, and he no longer tried to expand the limits of his possessions.

With the death of Vseslav in 1101, the decline of the Principality of Polotsk begins. It breaks up into divisions; Minsk, Izyaslav and Vitebsk principalities stand out from it. The sons of Vseslav waste their strength in civil strife. After the predatory campaign of Gleb Vseslavich in the Turov-Pinsk land in 1116 and his unsuccessful attempt to capture Novgorod and the Smolensk principality in 1119, the aggression of the Izyaslavichs against neighboring regions practically ceased. The weakening of the principality opens the way for the intervention of Kyiv: at 11

1 9 Vladimir Monomakh without much difficulty defeats Gleb Vseslavich, seizes his inheritance, and imprisons himself in prison; in 1127 Mstislav the Great devastated the southwestern regions of the Polotsk land; in 1129, taking advantage of the refusal of the Izyaslavichs to take part in the joint campaign of the Russian princes against the Polovtsy, he occupies the principality and at the Kiev Congress seeks the condemnation of five Polotsk rulers (Svyatoslav, Davyd and Rostislav Vseslavich, Rogvolod and Ivan Borisovich) and their expulsion to Byzantium. Mstislav transfers the land of Polotsk to his son Izyaslav, and appoints his governors in the cities.

Although in 1132 the Izyaslavichs, in the person of Vasilko Svyatoslavich (1132–1144), managed to return the ancestral principality, they were no longer able to revive its former power. In the middle of the 12th c. a fierce struggle for the Polotsk princely table breaks out between Rogvolod Borisovich (1144–1151, 1159–1162) and Rostislav Glebovich (1151–1159). At the turn of the 1150s-1160s, Rogvolod Borisovich made the last attempt to unite the principality, which, however, collapsed due to the opposition of other Izyaslavichs and the intervention of neighboring princes (Yuri Dolgorukov and others). In the second half

7 in. the crushing process deepens; the Drutsk, Gorodensky, Logozhsky and Strizhevsky principalities arise; the most important regions (Polotsk, Vitebsk, Izyaslavl) end up in the hands of the Vasilkoviches (descendants of Vasilko Svyatoslavich); the influence of the Minsk branch of the Izyaslavichs (Glebovichi), on the contrary, is falling. Polotsk land becomes the object of expansion of the Smolensk princes; in 1164 Davyd Rostislavich Smolensky for some time even takes possession of the Vitebsk volost; in the second half of the 1210s, his sons Mstislav and Boris established themselves in Vitebsk and Polotsk.

At the beginning of the 13th c. the aggression of the German knights begins in the lower reaches of the Western Dvina; by 1212 the Sword-bearers conquered the lands of the Livs and southwestern Latgale, tributaries of Polotsk. Since the 1230s, the Polotsk rulers also had to repel the onslaught of the newly formed Lithuanian state; mutual strife prevented them from joining forces, and by 1252 the Lithuanian princes

capture Polotsk, Vitebsk and Drutsk. In the second half of the 13th c. for the Polotsk lands, a fierce struggle unfolds between Lithuania, the Teutonic Order and the Smolensk princes, the winner of which is the Lithuanians. The Lithuanian prince Viten (1293–1316) takes Polotsk from the German knights in 1307, and his successor Gedemin (1316–1341) subdues the Minsk and Vitebsk principalities. Finally, the Polotsk land became part of the Lithuanian state in 1385.Chernihiv principality. It was located east of the Dnieper between the Desna valley and the middle reaches of the Oka (the territory of the modern Kursk, Orel, Tula, Kaluga, Bryansk, the western part of the Lipetsk and southern parts of the Moscow regions of Russia, the northern part of the Chernihiv and Sumy regions of Ukraine and the eastern part of the Gomel region of Belarus ). In the south it bordered on Pereyaslavsky, in the east - on Muromo-Ryazansky, in the north - on Smolensk, in the west - on Kyiv and Turov-Pinsk principalities. It was inhabited by East Slavic tribes of Polyans, Severyans, Radimichi and Vyatichi. It is believed that it received its name either from a certain Prince Cherny, or from the Black Guy (forest).

With a mild climate, fertile soils, numerous rivers rich in fish, and in the north with forests full of game, Chernihiv land was one of the most attractive areas for settlement in Ancient Russia. Through it (along the rivers Desna and Sozh) passed the main trade route from Kyiv to northeastern Russia. Towns with a significant artisan population arose early here. In the 11th-12th centuries. The Chernihiv principality was one of the richest and politically significant regions of Russia.

By the 9th c. the northerners, who formerly lived on the left bank of the Dnieper, having subjugated the Radimichi, Vyatichi and part of the glades, extended their power to the upper reaches of the Don. As a result, a semi-state entity emerged that paid tribute to the Khazar Khaganate. At the beginning of the 10th c. it recognized dependence on the Kyiv prince Oleg. In the second half of the 10th c. Chernihiv land became part of the grand ducal domain. Under St. Vladimir, the diocese of Chernihiv was established. In 1024, it fell under the rule of Mstislav the Brave, brother of Yaroslav the Wise, and became a principality virtually independent of Kyiv. After his death in 1036, it was again included in the grand ducal domain. According to the will of Yaroslav the Wise, the Chernigov principality, together with the Muromo-Ryazan land, passed to his son Svyatoslav (1054-1073), who became the ancestor of the local princely dynasty of Svyatoslavichs; they, however, managed to establish themselves in Chernigov only towards the end of the 11th century. In 1073, the Svyatoslavichs lost the principality, which ended up in the hands of Vsevolod Yaroslavich, and from 1078 - his son Vladimir Monomakh (until 1094). Attempts by the most active of the Svyatoslavichs, Oleg "Gorislavich", to regain control of the principality in 1078 (with the help of his cousin Boris Vyacheslavich) and in 1094–1096

(with the help of the Polovtsy) ended in failure. Nevertheless, by decision of the Lyubech princely congress of 1097, Chernigov and Muromo-Ryazan lands were recognized as the patrimony of the Svyatoslavichs; the son of Svyatoslav Davyd (1097-1123) became the prince of Chernigov. After Davyd's death, the throne was occupied by his brother Yaroslav of Ryazan, who in 1127 was expelled by his nephew Vsevolod, the son of Oleg "Gorislavich". Yaroslav retained the Muromo-Ryazan land, which from that time turned into an independent principality. The Chernihiv land was divided among themselves by the sons of Davyd and Oleg Svyatoslavich (Davydovichi and Olgovichi), who entered into a fierce struggle for allotments and the Chernigov table. In 1127-1139 it was occupied by the Olgovichi, in 1139 they were replaced by the Davydovichi - Vladimir (1139-1151) and his brotherIzyaslav (1151-1157), but in 1157 he finally passed to the Olgovichi: Svyatoslav Olgovich (1157-1164) and his nephews Svyatoslav (1164-1177) and Yaroslav (1177-1198) Vsevolodichi. At the same time, the Chernihiv princes tried to subjugate Kyiv: Vsevolod Olgovich (1139-1146), Igor Olgovich (1146) and Izyaslav Davydovich (1154 and 1157-1159) owned the Kyiv grand prince's table. They also fought with varying success for Veliky Novgorod, the Turov-Pinsk principality, and even for distant Galich. In internal strife andin wars with their neighbors, the Svyatoslavichs often resorted to the help of the Polovtsy.

In the second half of the 12th century, despite the extinction of the Davydovich family, the process of fragmentation of the Chernigov land intensified. It includes Novgorod-Seversk, Putivl, Kursk, Starodub and Vshchizh principalities; the principality of Chernigov proper was limited to the lower reaches of the Desna, from time to time also including the Vshchizh and Starobud volosts. The dependence of the vassal princes on the Chernigov ruler becomes nominal; some of them (for example, Svyatoslav Vladimirovich Vshchizhsky in the early 1160s) show a desire for complete independence. The fierce feuds of the Olgoviches do not prevent them from actively fighting for Kyiv with the Smolensk Rostislavichs: in 1176–1194 Svyatoslav Vsevolodich rules there, in 1206–1212/1214, intermittently, his son Vsevolod Chermny. They are trying to gain a foothold in Novgorod the Great (1180–1181, 1197); in 1205 they manage to take possession of the Galician land, where, however, in 1211 a catastrophe befell them - the three princes of the Olgovichi (Roman, Svyatoslav and Rostislav Igorevich) were captured and hanged by the verdict of the Galician boyars. In 1210, they even lose the Chernigov table, which for two years passes to the Smolensk Rostislavichs (Rurik Rostislavich).

In the first third of the 13th c. The Chernigov Principality breaks up into many small destinies, only formally subordinate to Chernigov; Kozelskoe, Lopasninskoe, Rylskoe, Snovskoe, then Trubchevskoe, Glukhovo-Novosilskoe, Karachevo and Tarusa principalities stand out. Despite this, Prince Mikhail Vsevolodich of Chernigov

(1223-1241) does not stop its active policy towards neighboring regions, trying to establish control over Novgorod the Great (1225, 1228-1230) and Kyiv (1235, 1238); in 1235 he took possession of the Galician principality, and later the Przemysl volost.

The waste of significant human and material resources in civil strife and in wars with neighbors, the fragmentation of forces and the lack of unity among the princes contributed to the success of the Mongol-Tatar invasion. In the autumn of 1239, Batu took Chernigov and subjected the principality to such a terrible defeat that it actually ceased to exist. In 1241, the son and heir of Mikhail Vsevolodich, Rostislav, left his fiefdom and went to fight in the Galician land, and then fled to Hungary. Obviously, the last Chernigov prince was his uncle Andrei (mid-1240s - early 1260s). After 1261, the Principality of Chernigov became part of the Principality of Bryansk, founded in 1246 by Roman, another son of Mikhail Vsevolodich; the Bishop of Chernigov also moved to Bryansk. In the middle of the 14th century The Principality of Bryansk and Chernihiv lands were conquered by the Lithuanian prince Olgerd.

Muromo-Ryazan principality. It occupied the southeastern outskirts of Russia - the basin of the Oka and its tributaries Proni, Osetra and Tsna, the upper reaches of the Don and Voronezh (modern Ryazan, Lipetsk, northeast of Tambov and south of Vladimir regions). It bordered on the west with Chernigov, on the north with the Rostov-Suzdal principality; in the east, its neighbors were the Mordovian tribes, and in the south, the Cumans. The population of the principality was mixed: both Slavs (Krivichi, Vyatichi) and Finno-Ugric peoples (Mordva, Muroma, Meshchera) lived here.

Fertile (chernozem and podzolized) soils prevailed in the south and in the central regions of the principality, which contributed to the development of agriculture. Its northern part was densely covered with forests rich in game and swamps; The locals were mainly engaged in hunting. In the 11th-12th centuries. a number of urban centers arose on the territory of the principality: Murom, Ryazan (from the word "cassock" - a marshy swampy place overgrown with shrubs), Pereyaslavl, Kolomna, Rostislavl, Pronsk, Zaraysk. However, in terms of economic development, it lagged behind most other regions of Russia.

Murom land was annexed to the Old Russian state in the third quarter of the 10th century. under the Kiev prince Svyatoslav Igorevich. In 988-989 St. Vladimir included it in the Rostov inheritance of his son Yaroslav the Wise. In 1010, Vladimir allocated it as an independent principality to his other son Gleb. After the tragic death of Gleb in 1015, it returned to the Grand Duke's domain, and in 1023-1036 it was part of the Chernigov inheritance of Mstislav the Brave.

According to the will of Yaroslav the Wise, the Murom land, as part of the Chernigov principality, passed in 1054 to his son Svyatoslav, and in 1073 he transferred it to his brother Vsevolod. In 1078, having become the great prince of Kyiv, Vsevolod gave Murom to Svyatoslav's sons Roman and Davyd. In 1095 Davyd ceded it to Izyaslav, the son of Vladimir Monomakh, receiving Smolensk in return. In 1096, David's brother Oleg "Gorislavich" expelled Izyaslav, but then he himself was expelled by Izyaslav's elder brother Mstislav the Great. However, by decision

At the Lyubech Congress, the Murom land, as a vassal possession of Chernigov, was recognized as the patrimony of the Svyatoslavichs: it was given to Oleg "Gorislavich", and for his brother Yaroslav, a special Ryazan volost was allocated from it.

In 1123, Yaroslav, who occupied the Chernigov throne, handed over Murom and Ryazan to his nephew Vsevolod Davydovich. But after being expelled from Chernigov in 1127, Yaroslav returned to the Murom table; from that time, the Muromo-Ryazan land became an independent principality, in which the descendants of Yaroslav (the younger Murom branch of the Svyatoslavichs) established themselves. They had to constantly repel the raids of the Polovtsy and other nomads, which diverted their forces from participating in the all-Russian princely strife, but by no means from internal strife associated with the process of crushing that had begun (already in the 1140s, the Yelets principality stood out on its southwestern outskirts). From the mid-1140s, the Muromo-Ryazan land became the object of expansion by the Rostov-Suzdal rulers - Yuri Dolgoruky and his son Andrey Bogolyubsky. In 1146, Andrei Bogolyubsky intervened in the conflict between Prince Rostislav Yaroslavich and his nephews Davyd and Igor Svyatoslavich and helped them capture Ryazan. Rostislav kept Moore behind him; only a few years later he was able to regain the Ryazan table. Early 1160

- x in Murom, his great-nephew Yuri Vladimirovich established himself, who became the founder of a special branch of the Murom princes, and from that time the Murom principality separated from Ryazan. Soon (by 1164) it fell into vassal dependence on the Vadimir-Suzdal prince Andrei Bogolyubsky; under the subsequent rulers - Vladimir Yuryevich (1176-1205), Davyd Yuryevich (1205-1228) and Yury Davydovich (1228-1237), the Principality of Murom gradually lost its significance.

The Ryazan princes (Rostislav and his son Gleb), however, actively resisted the Vladimir-Suzdal aggression. Moreover, after the death of Andrei Bogolyubsky in 1174, Gleb tried to establish control over the entire North-Eastern Russia. In alliance with the sons of Pereyaslav prince Rostislav Yuryevich Mstislav and Yaropolk, he began a struggle with the sons of Yuri Dolgoruky Mikhalko and Vsevolod the Big Nest for the Vladimir-Suzdal principality; in 1176 he captured and burned Moscow, but in 1177 he was defeated on the Koloksha River, was captured by Vsevolod and died in 1178 in prison

. Gleb's son and heir Roman (1178-1207) took the vassal oath to Vsevolod the Big Nest. In the 1180s, he made two attempts to dispossess his younger brothers and unite the principality, but the intervention of Vsevolod prevented the implementation of his plans. The progressive fragmentation of the Ryazan land (in 1185–1186 the Principalities of Pronsk and Kolomna separated) led to increased rivalry within the princely house. In 1207, Roman's nephews Gleb and Oleg Vladimirovich accused him of plotting against Vsevolod the Big Nest.; Roman was summoned to Vladimir and thrown into prison. Vsevolod tried to take advantage of these strife: in 1209 he captured Ryazan, put his son Yaroslav on the Ryazan table, and appointed Vladimir-Suzdal posadniks to the rest of the cities; however, in the sameIn the year Ryazanians expelled Yaroslav and his proteges.

In the 1210s, the struggle for allotments intensified even more. In 1217, Gleb and Konstantin Vladimirovich organized in the village of Isady (6 km from Ryazan) the murder of six of their brothers - one brother and five cousins. But Roman's nephew Ingvar Igorevich defeated Gleb and Konstantin, forced them to flee to the Polovtsian steppes and occupied the Ryazan table. During his twenty-year reign (1217-1237), the process of fragmentation became irreversible.

In 1237 the Ryazan and Murom principalities were defeated by the hordes of Batu. Prince Yuri Ingvarevich of Ryazan, Prince Yuri Davydovich of Murom and most of the local princes perished. In the second half of the 13th c. Murom land fell into complete desolation; Murom bishopric at the beginning of the 14th century. was moved to Ryazan; only in the middle of the 14th century. Murom ruler Yuri Yaroslavich revived his principality for a while. The forces of the Ryazan principality, which was subjected to constant Tatar-Mongol raids, were undermined by the internecine struggle between the Ryazan and Pronsk branches of the ruling house. From the beginning of the 14th century it began to experience pressure from the Moscow principality that had arisen on its northwestern borders. In 1301 Moscow Prince Daniil Alexandrovich captured Kolomna and captured Ryazan Prince Konstantin Romanovich. In the second half of the 14th century Oleg Ivanovich (1350–1402) was able to temporarily consolidate the forces of the principality, expand its borders and strengthen the central government; in 1353 he took Lopasnya from Ivan II of Moscow. However, in the 1370s–1380s, during the struggle of Dmitry Donskoy with the Tatars, he failed to play the role of a “third force” and create his own center for the unification of the northeastern Russian lands.

. In 1393, Prince Vasily I of Moscow, with the consent of the Tatar Khan, annexed the Principality of Murom. The Ryazan principality during the 14th century. gradually fell into greater dependence on Moscow. The last Ryazan princes - Ivan Vasilyevich (1483-1500) and Ivan Ivanovich (1500-1521) - retained only a shadow of independence. Finally, the Ryazan principality became part of the Muscovite state in 1521. Tmutarakan principality. It was located on the Black Sea coast, occupied the territory of the Taman Peninsula and the eastern tip of the Crimea. The population was made up of Slavic colonists and tribes of Yases and Kasogs. The principality had a favorable geographical position: it controlled the Kerch Strait and, accordingly, the Don (from Eastern Russia and the Volga region) and Kuban (from the North Caucasus) trade routes to the Black Sea. However, the Rurikovichs did not attach much importance to Tmutarakan; often it was a placewhere the princes, expelled from their estates, took refuge, and where they gathered forces for the invasion of the central regions of Russia.

From the 7th c. The Taman Peninsula belonged to the Khazar Khaganate. At the turn of the 9th-10th centuries. began its settlement by the Slavs. It ended up under the rule of the Kyiv princes as a result of the campaign of Svyatoslav Igorevich in 965, when the Khazar port city of Samkerts (ancient Hermonassa, Byzantium Tamatarkha, Russian Tmutarakan) located on its western tip was probably taken; he became the main Russian outpost on the Black Sea. Vladimir the Holy made this region a semi-independent principality and gave it to his son Mstislav the Brave. Perhaps Mstislav held Tmutarakan until his death in 1036. Then it became part of the Grand Duke's domain, and according to the will of Yaroslav the Wise in 1054 passed to his son the Chernigov prince Svyatoslav and from that time was considered a territory dependent on Chernigov.

Svyatoslav planted his son Gleb in Tmutarakan; in 1064, Gleb was expelled by his cousin Rostislav Vladimirovich, who, despite Svyatoslav's campaign in Tmutarakan in 1065, was able to keep the principality until his death in 1067. When he died, Svyatoslav, at the request of local residents, again sent Gleb to Tmutarakan, but he did not reign for long and already in 1068–1069 he left for Novgorod. In 1073, Svyatoslav gave Tmutarakan to his brother Vsevolod, but after Svyatoslav's death, his sons Roman and Oleg "Gorislavich" captured it (1077). In 1078, Vsevolod, having become the Grand Duke, recognized Tmutarakan as the possession of the Svyatoslavichs. In 1079, Roman was killed by his Polovtsy allies during a campaign against Pereyaslavl-Russian, and Oleg was captured by the Khazars and sent to Constantinople to the Byzantine emperor Nicephorus III Votaniatus, who exiled him to the island of Rhodes. Tmutarakan again fell under the rule of Vsevolod, who ruled it through his posadniks. In 1081, Volodar Rostislavich Przemysl and his cousin Davyd Igorevich Turovsky attacked Tmutarakan, deposed Vsevolodov's governor Ratibor and began to reign there. In 1083 they were expelled by Oleg "Gorislavich" who returned to Russia and owned Tmutarakan' for eleven years. In 1094, he left the principality and, together with his brothers, began to fight for the "fatherland" (Chernigov, Murom, Ryazan). By decision of the Lyubech Congress of 1097, Tmutarakan was assigned to the Svyatoslavichs.

At the end of the 11th c. Yaroslav Svyatoslavich sat on the Tmutarakan table. At the beginning of the 12th c. Oleg Gorislavich returned to Tmutarakan, holding it until his death in 1115. Under his heir and son Vsevolod, the principality was defeated by the Polovtsians. In 1127 Vsevolod handed over the reign of Tmutarakan to his uncle Yaroslav, who was expelled by him from Chernigov. However, this title was already purely nominal: Yaroslav until his death in 1129 was the owner of the Muromo-Ryazan land. By this time, the ties between Russia and Tmutarakan had finally been broken.

In 1185, the grandsons of Oleg "Gorislavich" Igor and Vsevolod Svyatoslavich organized a campaign against the Polovtsy in order to restore the Tmutarakan principality, which ended in complete failure (the campaign of Prince Igor). see also KHAZAR KAGANATE.

Turov-Pinsk principality. It was located in the basin of the Pripyat River (south of modern Minsk, east of Brest and west of Gomel regions of Belarus). It bordered in the north with Polotsk, in the south with Kyiv, and in the east with the Chernigov principality, reaching almost to the Dnieper; border with its western neighbor -The Vladimir-Volyn principality was not stable: the upper reaches of the Pripyat and the Goryn valley passed either to the Turov or Volyn princes. The Turov land was inhabited by the Slavic tribe of the Dregovichi.

Most of the territory was covered with impenetrable forests and swamps; Hunting and fishing were the main occupations of the inhabitants. Only certain areas were suitable for agriculture; there, first of all, urban centers arose - Turov, Pinsk, Mozyr, Sluchesk, Klechesk, which, however, in terms of economic importance and population could not compete with the leading cities of other regions of Russia. The limited resources of the principality did not allow its owners to participate on an equal footing in the all-Russian civil strife.

In the 970s, the land of the Dregovichi was a semi-independent principality, which was in vassal dependence on Kyiv; its ruler was a certain Tur, from which the name of the region came. In 988-989 St. Vladimir singled out the “drevlyansk land and Pinsk” as an inheritance for his nephew Svyatopolk the Accursed. At the beginning of the 11th century, after Svyatopolk's conspiracy against Vladimir was uncovered, the Principality of Turov was included in the Grand Duchy domain. In the middle of the 11th c. Yaroslav the Wise passed it on to his third son Izyaslav, the ancestor of the local princely dynasty (Turov's Izyaslavichi). When Yaroslav died in 1054 and Izyaslav occupied the grand prince's table, Turovshchina became part of his vast possessions (1054–1068, 1069–1073, 1077–1078). After his death in 1078, the new Kyiv prince Vsevolod Yaroslavich gave the Turov land to his nephew Davyd Igorevich, who held it until 1081. In 1088 it was in the hands of Svyatopolk, the son of Izyaslav, who in 1093 sat on the grand prince's table. By decision of the Lyubech Congress of 1097, Turovshchina was assigned to him and his descendants, but soon after his death in 1113, it passed to the new Kyiv prince Vladimir Monomakh

. Under the division that followed the death of Vladimir Monomakh in 1125, the Principality of Turov passed to his son Vyacheslav. From 1132 it became the object of rivalry between Vyacheslav and his nephew Izyaslav, son of Mstislav the Great. In 1142-1143 it was owned for a short time by the Chernihiv Olgovichi (Great Prince of Kyiv Vsevolod Olgovich and his son Svyatoslav). In 1146-1147 Izyaslav Mstislavich finally expelled Vyacheslav from Turov and gave him to his son Yaroslav.

In the middle of the 12th c. the Suzdal branch of the Vsevolodichis intervened in the struggle for the Turov Principality: in 1155, Yuri Dolgoruky, becoming the great Kyiv prince, put his son Andrei Bogolyubsky on the Turov table, in 1155 - his other son Boris; however, they failed to hold on to it. In the second half of the 1150s, the principality returned to the Turov Izyaslavichs: by 1158, Yuri Yaroslavich, the grandson of Svyatopolk Izyaslavich, managed to unite the entire Turov land under his rule. Under his sons Svyatopolk (until 1190) and Gleb (until 1195), it broke up into several destinies. By the beginning of the 13th century. the principalities of Turov, Pinsk, Slutsk and Dubrovitsky took shape. During the 13th century the crushing process progressed inexorably; Turov lost its role as the center of the principality; Pinsk began to acquire more and more importance. Weak petty rulers could not organize any serious resistance to external aggression. In the second quarter of the 14th c. The Turov-Pinsk land turned out to be an easy prey for the Lithuanian prince Gedemin (1316–1347).

Smolensk principality. It was located in the basin of the Upper Dnieper(modern Smolensk, south-east of the Tver regions of Russia and the east of the Mogilev region of Belarus).It bordered in the west with Polotsk, in the south with Chernigov, in the east with the Rostov-Suzdal principality, and in the north with the Pskov-Novgorod land. It was inhabited by the Slavic tribe of Krivichi.

The Smolensk principality had an extremely advantageous geographical position. The upper reaches of the Volga, Dnieper and Western Dvina converged on its territory, and it lay at the intersection of two major trade routes - from Kyiv to Polotsk and the Baltic states (along the Dnieper, then dragged to the Kasplya River, a tributary of the Western Dvina) and to Novgorod and the Upper Volga region ( through Rzhev and Lake Seliger). Here, cities arose early, which became important trade and craft centers (Vyazma, Orsha).

In 882, Prince Oleg of Kyiv subjugated the Smolensk Krivichi and planted his governors in their land, which became his possession. At the end of the 10th c. St. Vladimir singled her out as an inheritance to his son Stanislav, but after some time she returned to the grand ducal domain. In 1054, according to the will of Yaroslav the Wise, the Smolensk region passed to his son Vyacheslav. In 1057, the great Kyiv prince Izyaslav Yaroslavich handed it over to his brother Igor, and after his death in 1060 he shared it with his other two brothers Svyatoslav and Vsevolod. In 1078, by agreement between Izyaslav and Vsevolod, the Smolensk land was given to Vsevolod's son Vladimir Monomakh; soon Vladimir moved to reign in Chernigov, and the Smolensk region was in the hands of Vsevolod. After his death in 1093, Vladimir Monomakh planted his eldest son Mstislav in Smolensk, and in 1095 his other son Izyaslav. Although in 1095 Smolensk land was for a short time in the hands of the Olgoviches (Davyd Olgovich), the Lyubech congress of 1097 recognized it as the patrimony of the Monomashichs, and the sons of Vladimir Monomakh Yaropolk, Svyatoslav, Gleb and Vyacheslav ruled in it.

After the death of Vladimir in 1125, the new Kyiv prince Mstislav the Great allocated Smolensk land to his son Rostislav (1125–1159), the ancestor of the local princely dynasty of the Rostislavichs; henceforth it became an independent principality. In 1136 Rostislav achieved the creation of an episcopal see in Smolensk, in 1140 he repelled an attempt by the Chernigov Olgoviches (the great Kyiv prince Vsevolod) to seize the principality, and in the 1150s he entered the struggle for Kyiv. In 1154 he had to cede the Kyiv table to the Olgoviches (Izyaslav Davydovich of Chernigov), but in 1159 he established himself on it (he owned it until his death in 1167). He gave the Smolensk table to his son Roman (1159–1180 intermittently), who was succeeded by his brother Davyd (1180–1197), son Mstislav Stary (1197–1206, 1207–1212/12

1 4), nephews Vladimir Rurikovich (1215–1223 with a break in 1219) and Mstislav Davydovich (1223–1230).

In the second half of the 12th - early 13th century. Rostislavichi actively tried to bring under their control the most prestigious and richest regions of Russia. The sons of Rostislav (Roman, Davyd, Rurik and Mstislav the Brave) waged a fierce struggle for the Kyiv land with the older branch of the Monomashichs (Izyaslavichs), with the Olgoviches and with the Suzdal Yuryevichs (especially with Andrei Bogolyubsky in the late 1160s - early 1170s); they were able to gain a foothold in the most important regions of the Kiev region - in Posemye, Ovruch, Vyshgorod, Torcheskaya, Trepolsky and Belgorod volosts. In the period from 1171 to 1210, Roman and Rurik sat down at the Grand Duke's table eight times. In the north, Novgorod land became the object of expansion of the Rostislavichs: Davyd (1154–1155), Svyatoslav (1158–1167) and Mstislav Rostislavich (1179–1180), Mstislav Davydovich (1184–1187) and Mstislav Mstislavich Udatny (1210–1215 and 1216–1218); in the late 1170s and in the 1210s, the Rostislavichs held Pskov; sometimes they even managed to create appanages independent of Novgorod (in the late 1160s and early 1170s in Torzhok and Velikiye Luki). In 1164-1166 the Rostislavichs owned Vitebsk (Davyd Rostislavich), in 1206 - Pereyaslavl Russian (Rurik Rostislavich and his son Vladimir), and in 1210-1212 - even Chernigov (Rurik Rostislavich). Their success was facilitated by both the strategically advantageous position of the Smolensk region and the relatively slow (compared to neighboring principalities) process of its fragmentation, although some destinies (Toropetsky, Vasilevsky-Krasnensky) were periodically separated from it.

In the 1210s–1220s, the political and economic importance of the Smolensk Principality increased even more. The merchants of Smolensk became important partners of the Hansa, as their trade agreement of 1229 (Smolenskaya Torgovaya Pravda) shows. Continuing the struggle for Novgorod (in 1218–1221 the sons of Mstislav the Old Svyatoslav and Vsevolod reigned in Novgorod) and Kyiv lands (in 1213–1223, with a break in 1219, Mstislav the Old sat in Kyiv, and in 1119, 1123–1235 and 1236–1238 – Vladimir Rurikovich), Rostislavichi also intensified their onslaught to the west and southwest. In 1219 Mstislav the Old captured Galich, which then passed to his cousin Mstislav Udatny (until 1227). In the second half of the 1210s, the sons of Davyd Rostislavich, Boris and Davyd, subjugated Polotsk and Vitebsk; the sons of Boris Vasilko and Vyachko vigorously fought the Teutonic Order and the Lithuanians for the Dvina.

However, from the end of the 1220s, the weakening of the Smolensk principality began. The process of its fragmentation into destinies intensified, the rivalry of the Rostislavichs for the Smolensk table intensified; in 1232, the son of Mstislav the Old, Svyatoslav, took Smolensk by storm and subjected it to a terrible defeat. The influence of the local boyars increased, which began to interfere in princely strife; in 1239 the boyars put Vsevolod, the brother of Svyatoslav, who pleased them, on the Smolensk table. The decline of the principality predetermined failures in foreign policy. Already by the mid-1220s, the Rostislavichs had lost the Podvinye; in 1227 Mstislav Udatnoy ceded the Galician land to the Hungarian prince Andrew. Although in 1238 and 1242 the Rostislavichs managed to repulse the attack of the Tatar-Mongol detachments on Smolensk, they could not repulse the Lithuanians, who in the late 1240s captured Vitebsk, Polotsk and even Smolensk itself. Alexander Nevsky drove them out of the Smolensk region, but the Polotsk and Vitebsk lands were completely lost.

In the second half of the 13th c. the line of Davyd Rostislavich was established on the Smolensk table: it was successively occupied by the sons of his grandson Rostislav Gleb, Mikhail and Theodore. Under them, the collapse of the Smolensk land became irreversible; Vyazemskoye and a number of other destinies emerged from it. The princes of Smolensk had to recognize vassal dependence on the great prince of Vladimir and the Tatar khan (1274). In the 14th century under Alexander Glebovich (1297–1313), his son Ivan (1313–1358) and grandson Svyatoslav (1358–1386), the principality completely lost its former political and economic power; Smolensk rulers unsuccessfully tried to stop the Lithuanian expansion in the west. After the defeat and death of Svyatoslav Ivanovich in 1386 in a battle with the Lithuanians on the Vekhra River near Mstislavl, Smolensk land became dependent on the Lithuanian prince Vitovt, who began to appoint and dismiss Smolensk princes at his own discretion, and in 1395 established his direct rule. In 1401, the Smolensk people rebelled and, with the help of the Ryazan prince Oleg, expelled

Lithuanians; Smolensk table was occupied by the son of Svyatoslav Yuri. However, in 1404 Vitovt took the city, liquidated the principality of Smolensk and included its lands into the Grand Duchy of Lithuania.Pereyaslav principality. It was located in the forest-steppe part of the Dnieper left bank and occupied the interfluve of the Desna, Seim, Vorskla and the Northern Donets (modern Poltava, east of Kyiv, south of Chernihiv and Sumy, west of Kharkov regions of Ukraine). It bordered on the west with Kyiv, in the north with the Chernigov principality; in the east and south, its neighbors were nomadic tribes (Pechenegs, Torks, Polovtsy). The southeastern border was not stable - it either moved forward into the steppe, or retreated back; the constant threat of attacks made it necessary to create a line of border fortifications and settle along the bordersthose nomads who switched to a settled life and recognized the power of the Pereyaslav rulers. The population of the principality was mixed: both the Slavs (Polyans, northerners) and the descendants of the Alans and Sarmatians lived here.

The mild temperate continental climate and podzolized chernozem soils created favorable conditions for intensive agriculture and cattle breeding. However, the neighborhood with warlike nomadic tribes, which periodically devastated the principality, had a negative impact on its economic development.

By the end of the 9th c. on this territory a semi-state formation arose with a center in the city of Pereyaslavl. At the beginning of the 10th c. it fell into vassal dependence on the Kyiv prince Oleg. According to a number of scientists, the old city of Pereyaslavl was burned by nomads, and in 992 Vladimir the Holy, during a campaign against the Pechenegs, founded a new Pereyaslavl (Pereyaslavl Russian) at the place where the Russian daring Jan Usmoshvets defeated the Pecheneg hero in a duel. Under him and in the first years of the reign of Yaroslav the Wise, Pereyaslavshchina was part of

grand ducal domain, and in 1024-1036 became part of the vast possessions of brother Yaroslav Mstislav the Brave on the left bank of the Dnieper. After the death of Mstislav in 1036, the Kyiv prince again took possession of it. In 1054, according to the will of Yaroslav the Wise, Pereyaslav land passed to his son Vsevolod; from that time on, it separated from the Kyiv principality and became an independent principality. In 1073, Vsevolod handed it over to his brother, the great Kievan prince Svyatoslav, who, possibly, planted his son Gleb in Pereyaslavl. In 1077, after the death of Svyatoslav, Pereyaslavshchina again fell into the hands of Vsevolod; an attempt by Roman, the son of Svyatoslav, to capture it in 1079 with the help of the Polovtsians ended in failure: Vsevolod entered into a secret agreement with the Polovtsian Khan, and he ordered Roman to be killed. After some time, Vsevolod transferred the principality to his son Rostislav, after whose death in 1093 his brother Vladimir Monomakh began to reign there (with the consent of the new Grand Duke Svyatopolk Izyaslavich). By decision of the Lyubech congress of 1097, the Pereyaslav land was assigned to the Monomashichi. Since that time, she remained their fiefdom; as a rule, the great princes of Kyiv from the Monomashich family allocated it to their sons or younger brothers; for some of them, the Pereyaslav reign became a stepping stone to the Kyiv table (Vladimir Monomakh himself in 1113, Yaropolk Vladimirovich in 1132, Izyaslav Mstislavich in 1146, Gleb Yurievich in 1169). True, the Chernigov Olgovichi tried several times to put it under their control; but they managed to capture only the Bryansk Estate in the northern part of the principality.

Vladimir Monomakh, having made a number of successful campaigns against the Polovtsy, secured the southeastern border of Pereyaslavshchina for a while. In 1113 he transferred the principality to his son Svyatoslav, after his death in 1114 - to another son Yaropolk, and in 1118 - to another son Gleb. According to the will of Vladimir Monomakh in 1125, Pereyaslav land again went to Yaropolk. When Yaropolk left to reign in Kyiv in 1132, the Pereyaslav table became a bone of contention within the Monomashich family - between the Rostov prince Yuri Vladimirovich Dolgoruky and his nephews Vsevolod and Izyaslav Mstislavich. Yuri Dolgoruky captured Pereyaslavl, but reigned there for only eight days: he was expelled by the Grand Duke Yaropolk, who gave the Pereyaslav table to Izyaslav Mstislavich, and in the next, 1133, to his brother Vyacheslav Vladimirovich. In 1135, after Vyacheslav left to reign in Turov, Pereyaslavl was again captured by Yuri Dolgoruky, who installed his brother Andrei the Good there. In the same year, the Olgovichi, in alliance with the Polovtsy, invaded the principality, but the Monomashichs joined forces and helped Andrei repel the attack. After the death of Andrei in 1142, Vyacheslav Vladimirovich returned to Pereyaslavl, who, however, soon had to transfer the reign to Izyaslav Mstislavich. When in 1146 Izyaslav

took the Kyiv table, he planted his son Mstislav in Pereyaslavl.

In 1149, Yuri Dolgoruky resumed the struggle with Izyaslav and his sons for dominion in the southern Russian lands. For five years, the Principality of Pereyaslav turned out to be either in the hands of Mstislav Izyaslavich (1150–1151, 1151–1154), or in the hands of the sons of Yuri Rostislav (1149–1150, 1151) and Gleb (1151). In 1154, the Yuryevichs established themselves in the principality for a long time: Gleb Yuryevich (1155-1169), his son Vladimir (1169-1174), brother of Gleb Mikhalko (1174-1175), again Vladimir (11

7 5-1187), grandson of Yuri Dolgorukov Yaroslav the Red (until 1199) and sons of Vsevolod the Big Nest Konstantin (1199-1201) and Yaroslav (1201-1206). In 1206, the Grand Duke of Kyiv Vsevolod Chermny from the Chernigov Olgovichi planted his son Mikhail in Pereyaslavl, who, however, was expelled in the same year by the new Grand Duke Rurik Rostislavich. From that time on, the principality was held either by the Smolensk Rostislavichs or the Yuryevichs. In the spring of 1239, the Tatar-Mongol hordes invaded Pereyaslav land; they burned Pereyaslavl and subjected the principality to a terrible defeat, after which it could no longer be revived; the Tatars included him in the "Wild Field". In the third quarter of the 14th c. Pereyaslavshchina became part of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania.Vladimir-Volyn principality. It was located in the west of Russia and occupied a vast territory from the upper reaches of the Southern Bug in the south to the upper reaches of the Nareva (a tributary of the Vistula) in the north, from the valley of the Western Bug in the west to the Sluch River (a tributary of the Pripyat) in the east (modern Volynskaya, Khmelnitskaya, Vinnitskaya, north of Ternopil, north-east of Lvov, most of the Rivne region of Ukraine, west of Brest and south-west of Grodno region of Belarus, east of Lublin and south-east of Bialystok voivodeship of Poland). It bordered in the east with Polotsk, Turov-Pinsky and Kyiv,in the west with the Principality of Galicia, in the northwest with Poland, in the southeast with the Polovtsian steppes. It was inhabited by the Slavic tribe Dulebs, who were later called Buzhans or Volynians.

Southern Volyn was a mountainous area formed by the eastern spurs of the Carpathians, the northern one was lowland and wooded woodland. A variety of natural and climatic conditions contributed to economic diversity; The inhabitants were engaged in agriculture, and cattle breeding, and hunting, and fishing. The economic development of the principality was favored by its unusually favorable geographical position: the main trade routes from the Baltic to the Black Sea and from Russia to Central Europe passed through it; at their intersection, the main urban centers arose - Vladimir-Volynsky, Dorogichin, Lutsk, Berestye, Shumsk.

At the beginning of the 10th c. Volyn, together with the territory adjacent to it from the south-west (the future Galician land), became dependent on the Kyiv prince Oleg. In 981, St. Vladimir annexed to it the Peremyshl and Cherven volosts, which he had taken from the Poles, pushing the Russian border from the Western Bug to the San River; in Vladimir-Volynsky, he established an episcopal see, and made the Volyn land itself a semi-independent principality, transferring it to his sons - Pozvizd, Vsevolod, Boris. During the internecine war in Russia in 1015-1019, the Polish king Boleslav I the Brave returned Przemysl and Cherven, but in the early 1030s they were recaptured by Yaroslav the Wise, who also annexed Belz to Volhynia.

In the early 1050s, Yaroslav placed his son Svyatoslav on the Vladimir-Volyn table. According to Yaroslav's will in 1054, he passed to his other son Igor, who held him until 1057. According to some sources, in 1060 Vladimir-Volynsky was transferred to Igor's nephew Rostislav Vladimirovich; that one, however

, owned it for a short time. In 1073, Volhynia returned to Svyatoslav Yaroslavich, who had taken the Grand Duke's throne, and gave it to his son Oleg "Gorislavich" as an inheritance, but after the death of Svyatoslav at the end of 1076, the new Kyiv prince Izyaslav Yaroslavich took this region from him.

When Izyaslav died in 1078 and the great reign passed to his brother Vsevolod, he planted Yaropolk, the son of Izyaslav, in Vladimir-Volynsky. However, after some time, Vsevolod separated the Przemysl and Terebovl volosts from Volyn, transferring them to the sons of Rostislav Vladimirovich (the future Galician principality). The attempt of the Rostislavichs in 1084-1086 to take away the Vladimir-Volyn table from Yaropolk was unsuccessful; after the murder of Yaropolk in 1086, Grand Duke Vsevolod made his nephew Davyd Igorevich Volhynia ruler. The Lyubech congress of 1097 secured Volyn for him, but as a result of the war with the Rostislavichs, and then with the Kyiv prince Svyatopolk Izyaslavich (1097–1098), Davyd lost it. By decision of the Uvetichi Congress of 1100, Vladimir-Volynsky went to Svyatopolk's son Yaroslav; Davyd got Buzhsk, Ostrog, Czartorysk and Duben (later Dorogobuzh).

In 1117, Yaroslav rebelled against the new Kyiv prince Vladimir Monomakh, for which he was expelled from Volhynia. Vladimir passed it on to his son Roman (1117–1119), and after his death to his other son Andrei the Good (1119–1135); in 1123, Yaroslav tried to regain his inheritance with the help of the Poles and Hungarians, but died during the siege of Vladimir-Volynsky. In 1135, Prince Yaropolk of Kyiv installed his nephew Izyaslav, son of Mstislav the Great, in place of Andrei.

When in 1139 the Olgoviches of Chernigov took possession of the Kyiv table, they decided to oust the Monomashichs from Volhynia. In 1142, Grand Duke Vsevolod Olgovich managed to plant his son Svyatoslav in Vladimir-Volynsky instead of Izyaslav. However, in 1146, after the death of Vsevolod, Izyaslav seized the great reign in Kyiv and removed Svyatoslav from Vladimir, allocating Buzhsk and six more Volyn cities as his lot. Since that time, Volyn finally passed into the hands of the Mstislavichs, the eldest branch of the Monomashichs, who ruled it until 1337. Izyaslav Mstislav (1156–1170). Under them, the process of fragmentation of the Volyn land began: in the 1140s–1160s, the Buzh, Lutsk and Peresopnytsia principalities stood out.

In 1170, the Vladimir-Volyn table was taken by the son of Mstislav Izyaslavich Roman (1170-1205 with a break in 1188). His reign was marked by the economic and political strengthening of the principality. Unlike the Galician princes, the Volyn rulers had an extensive princely domain and were able to concentrate significant material resources in their hands. Having strengthened his power within the principality, Roman in the second half of the 1180s began to conduct an active external

politics. In 1188 he intervened in civil strife in the neighboring principality of Galicia and tried to seize the Galician table, but failed. In 1195 he came into conflict with the Smolensk Rostislavichs and ruined their possessions. In 1199 he managed to subjugate the Galician land and create a single Galicia-Volyn principality. At the beginning of the XIII century. Roman extended his influence to Kyiv: in 1202 he expelled Rurik Rostislavich from the Kyiv table and placed his cousin Ingvar Yaroslavich on him; in 1204 he arrested and tonsured a monk, Rurik, who was newly established in Kyiv, and restored Ingvar there. Several times he invaded Lithuania and Poland. By the end of his reign, Roman had become the de facto hegemon of Western and Southern Russia and styled himself "King of Russia"; nevertheless, he failed to put an end to feudal fragmentation - under him, old and even new appanages continued to exist in Volhynia (Drogichinsky, Belzsky, Chervensko-Kholmsky).

After the death of Roman in 1205 in a campaign against the Poles, there was a temporary weakening of princely power. His successor Daniel already in 1206 lost the Galician land, and then was forced to flee from Volhynia. The Vladimir-Volyn table turned out to be the object of rivalry between his cousin Ingvar Yaroslavich and cousin Yaroslav Vsevolodich, who constantly turned to the Poles and the Hungarians for support. Only in 1212 Daniil Romanovich was able to establish himself in the Vladimir-Volyn principality; he managed to achieve the liquidation of a number of destinies. After a long struggle with the Hungarians, Poles and Chernigov Olgoviches, in 1238 he subjugated the Galician land and restored the united Galicia-Volyn principality. In the same year, while remaining its supreme ruler, Daniel handed over Volhynia to his younger brother Vasilko (1238–1269). In 1240 Volhynia was ravaged by the Tatar-Mongol hordes; Vladimir-Volynsky taken and plundered. In 1259 the Tatar commander Burundai invaded Volyn and forced Vasilko to demolish the fortifications of Vladimir-Volynsky, Danilov, Kremenets and Lutsk; however, after an unsuccessful siege of the Hill, he had to withdraw. In the same year, Vasilko repulsed the attack of the Lithuanians.

Vasilko was succeeded by his son Vladimir (1269–1288). During his reign, Volyn was subjected to periodic Tatar raids (especially devastating in 1285). Vladimir restored many devastated cities (Berestye and others), built a number of new ones (Kamenets on Losnya), erected temples, patronized trade, and attracted foreign artisans. At the same time, he waged constant wars with the Lithuanians and Yotvingians and intervened in the feuds of the Polish princes. This active foreign policy was continued by Mstislav (1289–1301), the youngest son of Daniil Romanovich, who succeeded him.

After death ca. 1301 childless Mstislav Galician Prince Yuri Lvovich again united the Volyn and Galician lands. In 1315 he failed in the war with the Lithuanian prince Gedemin, who took Berestye, Drogichin and laid siege to Vladimir-Volynsky. In 1316, Yuri died (perhaps he died under the walls of besieged Vladimir), and the principality was divided again: most of Volyn was received by his eldest son, the Galician prince Andrei (1316–1324

) , and Lutsk inheritance - the youngest son Leo. The last independent Galician-Volyn ruler was Andrey's son Yuri (1324-1337), after whose death the struggle for the Volyn lands between Lithuania and Poland began. By the end of the 14th century Volyn became part of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania.Galician principality. It was located on the southwestern outskirts of Russia east of the Carpathians in the upper reaches of the Dniester and Prut (modern Ivano-Frankivsk, Ternopil and Lvov regions of Ukraine and the Rzeszow province of Poland). It bordered in the east with the Volyn principality, in the north with Poland, in the west with Hungary, and in the south it ran into the Polovtsian steppes. The population was mixed - Slavic tribes occupied the Dniester valley (Tivertsy and streets) and the upper reaches of the Bug (Dulebs, or Buzhans); Croats (herbs, carps, hrovats) lived in the Przemysl region.

Fertile soils, mild climate, numerous rivers and vast forests created favorable conditions for intensive agriculture and cattle breeding. The most important trade routes passed through the territory of the principality - the river from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea (through the Vistula, the Western Bug and the Dniester) and the land route from Russia to Central and South-Eastern Europe; periodically extending its power to the Dniester-Danube lowland, the principality also controlled the Danube communications between Europe and the East. Here, large shopping centers arose early: Galich, Przemysl, Terebovl, Zvenigorod.

In the 10th-11th centuries. this region was part of the Vladimir-Volyn land. In the late 1070s - early 1080s, the great Kyiv prince Vsevolod, the son of Yaroslav the Wise, separated the Przemysl and Terebovl volosts from it and gave it to his great-nephews: the first Rurik and Volodar Rostislavich, and the second - to their brother Vasilko. In 1084–1086, the Rostislavichs unsuccessfully tried to establish control over Volhynia. After the death of Rurik in 1092, Volodar became the sole owner of Przemysl. The Lubech congress of 1097 assigned him the Przemysl, and Vasilko the Terebovl volost. In the same year, the Rostislavichi, with the support of Vladimir Monomakh and the Chernigov Svyatoslavichs, repelled an attempt by the Grand Duke of Kyiv Svyatopolk Izyaslavich and the Volyn prince Davyd Igorevich to seize their possessions. In 1124 Volodar and Vasilko died, and their inheritances were divided among themselves by their sons: Przemysl went to Rostislav Volodarevich, Zvenigorod to Vladimirko Volodarevich; Rostislav Vasilkovich received the Terebovl region, allocating a special Galician volost from it for his brother Ivan. After the death of Rostislav, Ivan annexed Terebovl to his possessions, leaving a small Berladsky inheritance to his son Ivan Rostislavich

(Berladnik).

In 1141, Ivan Vasilkovich died, and the Terebovl-Galician volost was captured by his cousin Vladimirko Volodarevich Zvenigorodsky, who made Galich the capital of his possessions (now the Galician principality). In 1144, Ivan Berladnik tried to take Galich from him, but failed and lost his Berladsky inheritance. In 1143, after the death of Rostislav Volodarevich, Vladimirko included Przemysl in his principality; thus, he united under his rule all the Carpathian lands. In 1149-1154 Vladimirko supported Yuri Dolgoruky in his struggle with Izyaslav Mstislavich for the Kyiv table; he repulsed the attack of Izyaslav's ally the Hungarian king Geyza and in 1152 captured Izyaslav's Upper Pogorynye (the cities of Buzhsk, Shumsk, Tihoml, Vyshegoshev and Gnojnitsa). As a result, he became the ruler of a vast territory from the upper reaches of the San and Goryn to the middle reaches of the Dniester and the lower reaches of the Danube. Under him, the Galician principality became the leading political force in Southwestern Russia and entered a period of economic prosperity; his ties with Poland and Hungary were strengthened; it began to experience a strong cultural influence of Catholic Europe.

In 1153 Vladimirko was succeeded by his son Yaroslav Osmomysl (1153–1187), under whom the Principality of Galicia reached the peak of its political and economic power. He patronized trade, invited foreign artisans, built new cities; under him, the population of the principality increased significantly. Yaroslav's foreign policy was also successful. In 1157, he repelled an attack on Galich by Ivan Berladnik, who settled in the Danube and robbed Galician merchants. When in 1159 the Kyiv prince Izyaslav Davydovich tried to put Berladnik on the Galician table by force of arms, Yaroslav, in alliance with Mstislav Izyaslavich Volynsky, defeated him, expelled him from Kyiv and transferred the Kievan reign to Rostislav Mstislavich Smolensky (1159–1167); in 1174 he made his vassal Yaroslav Izyaslavich Lutsky prince of Kyiv. Galich's international prestige increased enormously. Author Words about Igor's regiment described Yaroslav as one of the most powerful Russian princes: “Galician Osmomysl Yaroslav! / You sit high on your gold-forged throne, / propped up the Hungarian mountains with your iron regiments, / blocking the way for the king, closing the gates of the Danube, / the sword of gravity through the clouds, / rowing courts to the Danube. / Your thunderstorms flow across the lands, / you open the gates of Kyiv, / you shoot from the father’s golden throne of the saltans behind the lands.

During the reign of Yaroslav, however, the local boyars intensified. Like his father, he, in an effort to avoid fragmentation, handed over cities and volosts to the holding not of his relatives, but of the boyars. The most influential of them ("great boyars") became the owners of huge estates, fortified castles and numerous vassals. The boyar landownership surpassed the princely in size. The strength of the Galician boyars increased so much that in 1170 they even intervened in the internal conflict in the princely family: they burned Yaroslav's concubine Nastasya at the stake and forced him to take an oath to return his legitimate wife Olga, the daughter of Yuri Dolgoruky, who had been rejected by him.

Yaroslav bequeathed the principality to Oleg, his son by Nastasya; he allocated the Przemysl volost to his legitimate son Vladimir. But after his death in 1187, the boyars overthrew Oleg and elevated Vladimir to the Galician table. Vladimir's attempt to get rid of the boyar guardianship and rule autocratically already in the next 1188 ended with his flight to Hungary. Oleg returned to the Galician table, but soon he was poisoned by the boyars, and Volyn Prince Roman Mstislavich occupied Galich. In the same year, Vladimir expelled Roman with the help of the Hungarian king Bela, but he gave the reign not to him, but to his son Andrei. In 1189 Vladimir fled from Hungary to the German Emperor Frederick I Barbarossa, promising him to become his vassal and tributary. By order of Frederick, the Polish king Casimir II the Just sent his army to the Galician land, at the approach of which the boyars of Galich overthrew Andrei and opened the gates to Vladimir. With the support of the ruler of North-Eastern Russia, Vsevolod the Big Nest, Vladimir was able to subjugate the boyars and hold out in power until

his death in 1199.

With the death of Vladimir, the family of the Galician Rostislavichs ceased, and the Galician land became part of the vast possessions of Roman Mstislavich Volynsky, a representative of the older branch of the Monomashichs. The new prince pursued a policy of terror in relation to the local boyars and achieved its significant weakening. However, shortly after the death of Roman in 1205, his power collapsed. Already in 1206, his heir Daniel was forced to leave the Galician land and go to Volhynia. A long period of unrest began (1206-1238).

The Galician table passed either to Daniel (1211, 1230–1232, 1233), then to the Chernigov Olgoviches (1206–1207, 1209–1211, 1235–1238), then to the Smolensk Rostislavichs (1206, 1219–1227), then to the Hungarian princes (1207-1209, 1214-1219, 1227-1230); in 1212-1213 the power in Galich was even usurped by the boyar - Volodislav Kormilichich (a unique case in ancient Russian history). Only in 1238 did Daniel manage to establish himself in Galicia and restore the united Galicia-Volyn state. In the same year, he, remaining its supreme owner, allocated Volhynia to his brother Vasilko.

In the 1240s, the foreign policy situation of the principality became more complicated. In 1242 it was devastated by the hordes of Batu. In 1245, Daniil and Vasilko had to recognize themselves as tributaries of the Tatar Khan. In the same year, the Chernigov Olgoviches (Rostislav Mikhailovich), having entered into an alliance with the Hungarians, invaded the Galician land; only with great effort, the brothers managed to repel the invasion, having won a victory on the river. San.

In the 1250s, Daniel launched an active diplomatic activity to create an anti-Tatar coalition. He concluded a military-political alliance with the Hungarian king Bela IV and began negotiations with Pope Innocent IV on a church union, a crusade of European powers against the Tatars and recognition of his royal title. At 125

4 the papal legate crowned Daniel with a royal crown. However, the inability of the Vatican to organize a crusade removed the issue of union from the agenda. In 1257, Daniel agreed on joint actions against the Tatars with the Lithuanian prince Mindovg, but the Tatarsmanaged to provoke a conflict between the allies.

After the death of Daniil in 1264, the Galician land was divided between his sons Leo, who received Galich, Przemysl and Drogichin, and Shvarn, to whom Kholm, Cherven and Belz passed. In 1269, Shvarn died, and the entire Galician principality passed into the hands of Leo, who in 1272 transferred his residence to the newly built Lvov. Leo intervened in internal political strife in Lithuania and fought (albeit unsuccessfully) with the Polish prince Leshko Cherny for the Lublin volost.

After the death of Leo in 1301, his son Yuri again united the Galician and Volhynian lands and took the title "King of Russia, Prince of Lodimeria (i.e. Volhynia)". He entered into an alliance with the Teutonic Order against the Lithuanians and tried to achieve the establishment of an independent church metropolis in Galicia.

After the death of Yuri in 1316, Galician land and most of Volyn were received by his eldest son Andrei, who was succeeded in 1324 by his son Yuri. With the death of Yuri in 1337, the senior branch of the descendants of Daniil Romanovich died out, and a fierce struggle began between the Lithuanian, Hungarian and Polish pretenders to the Galician-Volyn table. In 1349-1352, the Polish king Casimir III captured the Galician land. In 1387, under Vladislav II (Jagiello), it finally became part of the Commonwealth.Rostov-Suzdal (Vladimir-Suzdal) Principality. It was located on the northeastern outskirts of Russia in the basin of the Upper Volga and its tributaries Klyazma, Unzha, Sheksna (modern Yaroslavl, Ivanovo, most of Moscow, Vladimir and Vologda, southeast of Tver, west of Nizhny Novgorod and Kostroma regions); in the 12th–14th centuries the principality was constantly expanding in the eastern and northeastern directions. In the west, it bordered on Smolensk, in the south - on Chernigov and Muromo-Ryazan principalities, in the northwest - on Novgorod, and in the east - on Vyatka land and Finno-Ugric tribes (Merya, Mari, etc.). The population of the principality was mixed: it consisted of both Finno-Ugric autochthons (mostly Merya) and Slavic colonists (mainly Krivichi).

Most of the territory was occupied by forests and swamps; fur trade played an important role in the economy. Numerous rivers abounded with valuable species of fish. Despite the rather harsh climate, the presence of podzolic and soddy-podzolic soils created favorable conditions for agriculture (rye, barley, oats, garden crops). Natural barriers (forests, swamps, rivers) reliably protected the principality from external enemies.

In 1 thousand AD. the upper Volga basin was inhabited by the Finno-Ugric tribe Merya. In the 8th–9th centuries an influx of Slavic colonists began here, who moved both from the west (from the Novgorod land) and from the south (from the Dnieper region); in the 9th century Rostov was founded by them, and in the 10th century. - Suzdal. At the beginning of the 10th c. Rostov land became dependent on the Kyiv prince Oleg, and under his closest successors it became part of the grand ducal domain. In 988/989 St. Vladimir singled it out as an inheritance for his son Yaroslav the Wise, and in 1010 he transferred it to his other son Boris. After the assassination of Boris in 1015 by Svyatopolk the Accursed, direct control of the Kyiv princes was restored here.

According to the will of Yaroslav the Wise in 1054, Rostov land passed to Vsevolod Yaroslavich, who in 1068 sent his son Vladimir Monomakh to reign there; under him, Vladimir was founded on the Klyazma River. Thanks to the activities of the Rostov Bishop St. Leontiy, this area has become

actively penetrate Christianity; St. Abraham organized the first monastery here (Bogoyavlensky). In 1093 and 1095 Vladimir's son Mstislav the Great sat in Rostov. In 1095, Vladimir singled out the Rostov land as an independent principality for his other son Yuri Dolgoruky (1095–1157). The Lyubech congress of 1097 assigned it to the Monomashichs. Yuri moved the princely residence from Rostov to Suzdal. He contributed to the final approval of Christianity, widely attracted settlers from other Russian principalities, founded new cities (Moscow, Dmitrov, Yuryev-Polsky, Uglich, Pereyaslavl-Zalessky, Kostroma). During his reign, the Rostov-Suzdal land experienced an economic and political flourishing; the boyars and the trade and craft layer intensified. Significant resources allowed Yuri to intervene in the princely civil strife and spread his influence to neighboring territories. In 1132 and 1135, he tried (albeit unsuccessfully) to bring Pereyaslavl Russian under control, in 1147 he made a trip to Novgorod the Great and took Torzhok, in 1149 he began the fight for Kyiv with Izyaslav Mstislavovich. In 1155, he managed to establish himself on the Kievan grand-ducal table and secure the Pereyaslav region for his sons.

After the death of Yuri Dolgoruky in 1157, the Rostov-Suzdal land broke up into several destinies. However, already in 1161 Yuri's son Andrei Bogolyubsky (1157-1174) restored its unity, depriving his three brothers (Mstislav, Vasilko and Vsevolod) and two nephews (Mstislav and Yaropolk Rostislavichs) of their possessions. In an effort to get rid of the guardianship of the influential Rostov and Suzdal boyars, he moved the capital to Vladimir-on-Klyazma, where there was a numerous trade and craft settlement, and, relying on the support of the townspeople and the squad, began to pursue an absolutist policy. Andrei renounced his claims to the Kyiv table and accepted the title of Grand Prince of Vladimir. In 1169-1170, he subjugated Kyiv and Novgorod the Great, transferring them respectively to his brother Gleb and his ally Rurik Rostislavich. By the beginning of the 1170s, the Polotsk, Turov, Chernigov, Pereyaslav, Murom and Smolensk principalities recognized dependence on the Vladimir table. However, his campaign in 1173 against Kyiv, which fell into the hands of the Smolensk Rostislavichs, failed. In 1174 he was killed by boyars-conspirators in the village. Bogolyubovo near Vladimir.

After the death of Andrei, the local boyars invited his nephew Mstislav Rostislavich to the Rostov table; Suzdal, Vladimir and Yuryev-Polsky received Mstislav's brother Yaropolk. But in 1175 they were expelled by the brothers of Andrei Mikhalko and Vsevolod the Big Nest; Mikhalko became the ruler of Vladimir-Suzdal, and Vsevolod became the ruler of Rostov. In 1176 Mikhalko died, and Vsevolod remained the sole ruler of all these lands, behind which the name of the great Vladimir principality was firmly established. In 1177 he finally eliminated the threat from Mstislav and Yaropolk

, inflicting a decisive defeat on the Koloksha River; they themselves were taken prisoner and blinded.

Vsevolod (1175-1212) continued the foreign policy of his father and brother, becoming the chief arbiter among the Russian princes and dictating his will to Kyiv, Novgorod the Great, Smolensk and Ryazan. However, already during his lifetime, the process of crushing the Vladimir-Suzdal land began: in 1208 he gave Rostov and Pereyaslavl-Zalessky as inheritance to his sons Konstantin and Yaroslav. After the death of Vsevolod in 1212, a war broke out between Konstantin and his brothers Yuri and Yaroslav in 1214, ending in April 1216 with Constantine's victory in the Battle of the Lipitsa River. But, although Constantine became the great Prince of Vladimir, the unity of the principality was not restored: in 1216-1217 he gave Yuri Gorodets-Rodilov and Suzdal, Yaroslav - Pereyaslavl-Zalessky, and his younger brothers Svyatoslav and Vladimir - Yuryev-Polsky and Starodub . After the death of Constantine in 1218, Yuri (1218–1238), who took the throne of the Grand Duke, endowed his sons Vasilko (Rostov,

Kostroma, Galich) and Vsevolod (Yaroslavl, Uglich). As a result, the Vladimir-Suzdal land broke up into ten specific principalities - Rostov, Suzdal, Pereyaslav, Yuriev, Starodub, Gorodet, Yaroslavl, Uglich, Kostroma, Galicia; the Grand Prince of Vladimir retained only formal supremacy over them.

In February-March 1238, North-Eastern Russia fell victim to the Tatar-Mongol invasion. Vladimir-Suzdal regiments were defeated on the river. City, Prince Yuri fell on the battlefield, Vladimir, Rostov, Suzdal and other cities were subjected to a terrible defeat. After the departure of the Tatars, Yaroslav Vsevolodovich occupied the grand-ducal table, who transferred to his brothers Svyatoslav and Ivan Suzdal and Starodub, to his eldest son Alexander (Nevsky) Pereyaslav, and to his nephew Boris Vasilkovich the Rostov principality, from which the Belozersky inheritance (Gleb Vasilkovich) separated. In 1243, Yaroslav received from Batu a label for the great reign of Vladimir (d. 1246). Under his successors, brother Svyatoslav (1246–1247), sons Andrei (1247–1252), Alexander (1252–1263), Yaroslav (1263–1271/1272), Vasily (1272–1276/1277) and grandsons Dmitry (1277–1293) ) and Andrei Alexandrovich (1293–1304), the crushing process was on the rise. In 1247, the Tver (Yaroslav Yaroslavich) principalities were finally formed, and in 1283, the Moscow (Daniil Alexandrovich) principalities. Although in 1299 the metropolitan, the head of the Russian Orthodox Church, moved to Vladimir from Kyiv, its importance as the capital gradually declined; from the end of the 13th century the grand dukes stop using Vladimir as a permanent residence.

In the first third of the 14th century Moscow and Tver begin to play a leading role in North-Eastern Russia, which enter into rivalry for the Vladimir Grand Duke's table: in 1304/1305–1317 it was occupied by Mikhail Yaroslavich of Tverskoy, in 1317–1322 by Yuri Danilovich of Moscow, in 1322–1326 by Dmitry Mikhailovich Tverskoy, in 1326-1327 - Alexander Mikhailovich Tverskoy, in 1327-1340 - Ivan Danilovich (Kalita) of Moscow (in 1327-1331 together with Alexander Vasilyevich Suzdalsky). After Ivan Kalita, it becomes the monopoly of the Moscow princes (with the exception of 1359-1362). At the same time, their main rivals - the Tver and Suzdal-Nizhny Novgorod princes - in the middle of the 14th century. also take the title of great. The struggle for control over North-Eastern Russia during the 14th–15th centuries. ends with the victory of the Moscow princes, who include the disintegrated parts of the Vladimir-Suzdal land into the Moscow state: Pereyaslavl-Zalesskoe (1302), Mozhaiskoe (1303), Uglichskoe (1329), Vladimirskoe, Starodubskoe, Galicia, Kostroma and Dmitrovskoe (1362–1364), Belozersky (1389), Nizhny Novgorod (1393), Suzdal (1451), Yaroslavl (1463), Rostov (1474) and Tver (1485) principalities.

Novgorod land. It occupied a vast territory (almost 200 thousand square kilometers) between the Baltic Sea and the lower reaches of the Ob. Its western border was the Gulf of Finland and Lake Peipsi, in the north it included Lakes Ladoga and Onega and reached the White Sea, in the east it captured the Pechora basin, and in the south it was adjacent to the Polotsk, Smolensk and Rostov-Suzdal principalities (modern Novgorod, Pskov, Leningrad, Arkhangelsk, most of the Tver and Vologda regions, Karelian and Komi autonomous republics). It was inhabited by Slavic (Ilmen Slavs, Krivichi) and Finno-Ugric tribes(Vod, Izhora, Korela, Chud, All, Perm, Pechora, Lapps).

The unfavorable natural conditions of the North hindered the development of agriculture; grain was one of the main imports. At the same time, huge forests and numerous rivers favored fishing, hunting, and fur trade; The extraction of salt and iron ore was of great importance. Since ancient times, the Novgorod land has been famous for its various crafts and the high quality of handicrafts. Its advantageous location at the crossroads of

The Baltic Sea to the Black and Caspian ensured her the role of an intermediary in the trade of the Baltic and Scandinavia with the Black Sea and the Volga region. Craftsmen and merchants, united in territorial and professional corporations, represented one of the most economically and politically influential strata of Novgorod society. Its highest stratum, large landowners (boyars), also actively participated in international trade.

Novgorod land was divided into administrative districts - pyatins, directly adjacent to Novgorod (Votskaya, Shelonskaya, Obonezhskaya, Derevskaya, Bezhetskaya), and remote volosts: one extended from Torzhok and Volok to the Suzdal border and the upper reaches of the Onega, the other included Zavolochye (onega interfluve). and Mezen), and the third - the land to the east of the Mezen (Pechora, Perm and Yugra regions).

Novgorod land was the cradle of the Old Russian state. It was here that in the 860s-870s a strong political formation arose, uniting the Slavs of the Ilmen, Polotsk Krivichi, Meryu, all and partly Chud. In 882 Prince Oleg of Novgorod subjugated the Polans and the Smolensk Krivichi and moved the capital to Kyiv. Since that time, Novgorod land has become the second most important region of the Rurik dynasty. From 882 to 988/989 it was ruled by governors sent from Kyiv (with the exception of 972–977, when it was the inheritance of St. Vladimir).

At the end of the 10th-11th centuries. Novgorod land, as the most important part of the grand princely domain, was usually transferred by the Kyiv princes to the eldest sons. In 988/989 St. Vladimir installed his eldest son Vysheslav in Novgorod, and after his death in 1010, his other son Yaroslav the Wise, who, having taken the throne in 1019, in turn passed it on to his eldest son Ilya. After Elijah's death c. 1020 Novgorod land was captured by the Polotsk ruler Bryachislav Izyaslavich, but was expelled by the troops of Yaroslav. In 1034 Yaroslav handed over Novgorod to his second son Vladimir, who held it until his death in 1052.

In 1054, after the death of Yaroslav the Wise, Novgorod fell into the hands of his third son, the new Grand Duke Izyaslav, who ruled it through his governors, and then planted his youngest son Mstislav in it. In 1067 Novgorod was captured by Vseslav Bryachislavich of Polotsk, but in the same year he was expelled by Izyaslav. After the overthrow of Izyaslav from the Kyiv table in 1068, the Novgorodians did not submit to Vseslav of Polotsk, who reigned in Kyiv, and turned for help to Izyaslav's brother, Prince Svyatoslav of Chernigov, who sent his eldest son Gleb to them. Gleb defeated the troops of Vseslav in October 1069, but soon, obviously, he was forced to transfer Novgorod to Izyaslav, who returned to the grand prince's table. When in 1073 Izyaslav was again overthrown, Novgorod passed to Svyatoslav of Chernigov, who received the great reign, who planted his other son Davyd in it. After the death of Svyatoslav in December 1076, Gleb again took the throne of Novgorod. However, in July 1077, when Izyaslav regained the Kievan reign, he had to cede it to Svyatopolk, the son of Izyaslav, who returned the Kievan reign. Izyaslav's brother Vsevolod, who became Grand Duke in 1078, retained Novgorod for Svyatopolk and only in 1088 replaced him with his grandson Mstislav the Great, son of Vladimir Monomakh. After the death of Vsevolod in 1093, Davyd Svyatoslavich again sat in Novgorod, but in 1095 he came into conflict with the townspeople and left the reign. At the request of the Novgorodians, Vladimir Monomakh, who then owned Chernigov, returned Mstislav (1095–1117) to them.

In the second half of the 11th c. in Novgorod, the economic power and, accordingly, the political influence of the boyars and the trade and craft layer increased significantly. Large boyar land ownership became dominant. The Novgorod boyars were hereditary landowners and were not a service class; possession of land did not depend on the service of the prince. At the same time, constant

the change of representatives of different princely families on the Novgorod table prevented the formation of any significant princely domain. In the face of the growing local elite, the prince's position gradually weakened.

In 1102, the Novgorod elites (boyars and merchants) refused to accept the reign of the son of the new Grand Duke Svyatopolk Izyaslavich, wishing to keep Mstislav, and the Novgorod land ceased to be part of the Grand Duke's possessions. In 1117 Mstislav handed over the Novgorod table to his son Vsevolod (1117–1136).

In 1136 the Novgorodians revolted against Vsevolod. Accusing him of bad management and neglect of the interests of Novgorod, they imprisoned him with his family, and after a month and a half they expelled him from the city. From that time on, a de facto republican system was established in Novgorod, although the princely power was not abolished. The supreme governing body was the people's assembly (veche), which included all the free citizens. The veche had broad powers - it invited and removed the prince

, elected and controlled the entire administration, resolved issues of war and peace, was the highest court, introduced taxes and duties. The prince from a sovereign ruler turned into the highest official. He was the supreme commander in chief, could convene a council and issue laws if they did not contradict customs; embassies were sent and received on his behalf. However, when elected, the prince entered into contractual relations with Novgorod and gave an obligation to govern “in the old way”, appoint only Novgorodians as governors in the volosts and not impose tribute on them, wage war and make peace only with the consent of the veche. He did not have the right to remove other officials without trial. His actions were controlled by an elected posadnik, without whose approval he could not make judicial decisions and make appointments.

The local bishop (lord) played a special role in the political life of Novgorod. From the middle of the 12th century the right to elect him passed from the Metropolitan of Kyiv to the veche; the metropolitan only sanctioned the election. The Novgorod lord was considered not only the main clergyman, but also the first dignitary of the state after the prince. He was the largest landowner, had his own boyars and military regiments with a banner and governors, certainly participated in peace negotiations and inviting princes,

He acted as a mediator in internal political conflicts.

Despite the significant narrowing of princely prerogatives, the rich Novgorod land remained attractive to the most powerful princely dynasties. First of all, the senior (Mstislavichi) and junior (Suzdal Yuryevich) branches of the Monomashichs competed for the Novgorod table; Chernigov Olgovichi tried to intervene in this struggle, but they achieved only episodic successes (1138–1139, 1139–1141, 1180–1181, 1197, 1225–1226, 1229–1230). In the 12th century the preponderance was on the side of the Mstislavich clan and its three main branches (Izyaslavichi, Rostislavichi and Vladimirovichi); they occupied the Novgorod table in 1117-1136, 1142-1155, 1158-1160, 1161-1171, 1179-1180, 1182-1197, 1197-1199; some of them (especially the Rostislavichs) managed to create independent, but short-lived principalities (Novotorzhskoe and Velikoluki) in the Novgorod land. However, already in the second half of the 12th century. the positions of the Yurievichs began to strengthen, who enjoyed the support of the influential party of the Novgorod boyars and, in addition, periodically put pressure on Novgorod, blocking the supply of grain from North-Eastern Russia. In 1147, Yuri Dolgoruky made a trip to the Novgorod land and captured Torzhok, in 1155 the Novgorodians had to invite his son Mstislav to reign (until 1157). In 1160, Andrei Bogolyubsky imposed on the Novgorodians his nephew Mstislav Rostislavich (until 1161); In 1171 he forced them to return Rurik Rostislavich, who had been expelled by them, to the Novgorod table, and in 1172 to transfer him to his son Yuri (until 117

5 ). In 1176 Vsevolod the Big Nest managed to plant his nephew Yaroslav Mstislavich in Novgorod (until 1178).

In the 13th century Yuryevichi (Vsevolod's Big Nest line) achieved complete predominance. In the 1200s, the Novgorod throne was occupied by the sons of Vsevolod Svyatoslav (1200–1205, 1208–1210) and Konstantin (1205–1208). True, in 1210 Novgorodians were able to get rid of the control of the Vladimir-Suzdal princes with the help of the Toropetsk ruler Mstislav Udatny from the Smolensk Rostislavich family; The Rostislavichs held Novgorod until 1221 (with a break in 1215–1216). However, then they were finally ousted from the Novgorod land by the Yurievichs.

The success of the Yurievichs was facilitated by the deterioration of the foreign policy situation of Novgorod. In the face of the increased threat to its western possessions from Sweden, Denmark and the Livonian Order, the Novgorodians needed an alliance with the most powerful Russian principality at that time - Vladimir. Thanks to this alliance, Novgorod managed to defend its borders. Summoned to the Novgorod table in 1236, Alexander Yaroslavich, the nephew of Prince Yuri Vsevolodich of Vladimir, defeated the Swedes at the mouth of the Neva in 1240, and then stopped the aggression of the German knights.

The temporary strengthening of princely power under Alexander Yaroslavich (Nevsky) was replaced in the late 13th - early 14th century. its complete degradation, which was facilitated by the weakening of external danger and the progressive disintegration of the Vladimir-Suzdal principality. At the same time, the role of the veche also declined. In Novgorod, an oligarchic system was actually established. The boyars turned into a closed ruling caste that shared power with the archbishop. The rise of the Moscow principality under Ivan Kalita (1325–1340) and its formation as the center of the unification of Russian lands aroused fear among the Novgorod leaders and led to their attempts to use the powerful Lithuanian principality that had arisen on the southwestern borders as a counterweight: in 1333, for the first time, he was invited to the Novgorod table the Lithuanian prince Narimunt Gedeminovich (although he only lasted a year on it); in the 1440s, the Grand Duke of Lithuania was given the right to collect irregular tribute from some Novgorod volosts.

Although 14-15 centuries. became a period of rapid economic prosperity of Novgorod, largely due to its close ties with the Hanseatic Trade Union, the Novgorod leaders did not use it to strengthen their military-political potential and preferred to pay off the aggressive Moscow and Lithuanian princes. At the end of the 14th century Moscow launched an offensive against Novgorod. Vasily I captured the Novgorod cities of Bezhetsky Verkh, Volok Lamsky and Vologda with adjacent regions

; in 1401 and 1417 he tried, though unsuccessfully, to seize Zavolochye. In the second quarter of the 15th c. Moscow's offensive was suspended due to the internecine war of 1425–1453 between Grand Duke Vasily II and his uncle Yuri and his sons; in this war, the Novgorod boyars supported the opponents of Vasily II. Having established himself on the throne, Vasily II imposed tribute on Novgorod, and in 1456 went to war with him. Having suffered a defeat at Russa, the Novgorodians were forced to conclude a humiliating Yazhelbitsky peace with Moscow: they paida significant indemnity and pledged not to enter into an alliance with the enemies of the Moscow prince; the legislative prerogatives of the veche were abolished and the possibilities of conducting an independent foreign policy were seriously limited. As a result, Novgorod became dependent on Moscow. In 1460, Pskov was under the control of the Moscow prince.

In the late 1460s, the pro-Lithuanian party led by the Boretskys triumphed in Novgorod. She achieved the conclusion of an alliance treaty with the great Lithuanian prince Casimir IV and an invitation to the Novgorod table of his protege Mikhail Olelkovich (1470). In response, Moscow Prince Ivan III sent a large army against the Novgorodians, which defeated them on the river. Shelon; Novgorod had to annul the treaty with Lithuania, pay a huge indemnity and cede part of Zavolochye. In 1472 Ivan III annexed the Perm Territory; in 1475 he arrived in Novgorod and massacred the anti-Moscow boyars, and in 1478 liquidated the independence of the Novgorod land and included it in the Muscovite state. In 1570 Ivan IV the Terrible finally destroyed Novgorod's liberties.

Ivan Krivushin

GREAT Kyiv PRINCES (from the death of Yaroslav the Wise to the Tatar-Mongol invasion)1054 Izyaslav Yaroslavich (1)

Vseslav Bryachislavich

Izyaslav Yaroslavich (2)

Svyatoslav Yaroslavich

Vsevolod Yaroslavich (1)

Izyaslav Yaroslavich (3)

Vsevolod Yaroslavich (2)

Svyatopolk Izyaslavich

Vladimir Vsevolodich (Monomakh)

Mstislav Vladimirovich (Great)

Yaropolk Vladimirovich

Vyacheslav Vladimirovich (1)

Vsevolod Olgovich

Igor Olgovich

Izyaslav Mstislavich (1)

Yuri Vladimirovich (Dolgoruky) (1)

Izyaslav Mstislavich (2)

Yuri Vladimirovich (Dolgoruky) (2)

Izyaslav Mstislavich (3) and Vyacheslav Vladimirovich (2)

Vyacheslav Vladimirovich (2) and Rostislav Mstislavich (1)

Rostislav Mstislavich (1)

Izyaslav Davydovich (1)

Yuri Vladimirovich (Dolgoruky) (3)

Izyaslav Davydovich (2)

Rostislav Mstislavich (2)

Mstislav Izyaslavich

Gleb Yurievich

Vladimir Mstislavich

Mikhalko Yurievich

Roman Rostislavich (1)

Vsevolod Yurievich (Big Nest) and Yaropolk Rostislavich

Rurik Rostislavich (1)

Roman Rostislavich (2)

Svyatoslav Vsevolodich (1)

Rurik Rostislavich (2)

Svyatoslav Vsevolodich (2)

Rurik Rostislavich (3)

Ingvar Yaroslavich (1)

Rurik Rostislavich (4)

Ingvar Yaroslavich (2)

Rostislav Rurikovich

Rurik Rostislavich (5)

Vsevolod Svyatoslavich (1)

Rurik Rostislavich (6)

Vsevolod Svyatoslavich (2)

Rurik Rostislavich (7

) 1210 Vsevolod Svyatoslavich (3)

Ingvar Yaroslavich (3)

Vsevolod Svyatoslavich (4)

/1214 Mstislav Romanovich (Old) (1)

Vladimir Rurikovich (1)

Mstislav Romanovich (Old) (2), possibly with his son Vsevolod

Vladimir Rurikovich (2)

1 235 Mikhail Vsevolodich (1)

Yaroslav Vsevolodich

Vladimir Rurikovich (3)

Mikhail Vsevolodich (1)

Rostislav Mstislavich

Daniel Romanovich

LITERATURE Old Russian principalities of the X-XIII centuries. M., 1975
Rapov O.M. Princely possessions in Russia in the X - the first half of the XIII century. M., 1977
Alekseev L.V. Smolensk land in the IX-XIII centuries. Essays on the history of Smolensk and Eastern Belarus. M., 1980
Kyiv and the western lands of Russia in the 9th–13th centuries. Minsk, 1982
Yury A. Limonov Vladimir-Suzdal Rus: Essays on socio-political history. L., 1987
Chernihiv and its districts in the 9th–13th centuries. Kyiv, 1988
Korinny N. N. Pereyaslav land X - the first half of the XIII century. Kyiv, 1992
Gorsky A. A. Russian lands in the XIII-XIV centuries: Ways of political development. M., 1996
Aleksandrov D. N. Russian principalities in the XIII-XIV centuries. M., 1997
Ilovaisky D.I. Ryazan principality. M., 1997
Ryabchikov S.V. Mysterious Tmutarakan. Krasnodar, 1998
Lysenko P.F. Turov land, IX–XIII centuries Minsk, 1999
Pogodin M.P. Ancient Russian history before the Mongol yoke. M., 1999. T. 1–2
Aleksandrov D. N. Feudal fragmentation of Russia. M., 2001
Mayorov A.V. Galicia-Volyn Rus: Essays on socio-political relations in the pre-Mongolian period. Prince, boyars and city community. SPb., 2001

New on site

>

Most popular