Administrative violation part 2 of article 12.27. Leaving the scene of an accident. Can deprivation be avoided? Duration of administrative punishment

1. Failure by the driver to fulfill the obligations stipulated by the Traffic Regulations in connection with a road traffic accident, of which he is a participant, except for the cases provided for by part 2 of this article, shall -

shall entail the imposition of an administrative fine in the amount of one thousand rubles.

2. Leaving by the driver, in violation of the Traffic Rules, the place of a road traffic accident, in which he was a participant, in the absence of signs of a criminal offense -

shall entail deprivation of the right to drive vehicles for a period of one to one and a half years or administrative arrest for a period of up to fifteen days.

3. Failure to comply with the requirement of the Road Traffic Regulations prohibiting the driver to consume alcoholic beverages, narcotic or psychotropic substances after a road traffic accident in which he is involved, or after the vehicle has been stopped at the request of a police officer, before an authorized official carries out a survey in in order to establish a state of intoxication or before an authorized official makes a decision to exempt from such an examination -

shall entail the imposition of an administrative fine in the amount of thirty thousand rubles with deprivation of the right to drive vehicles for a period of one and a half to two years.

Commentary on Art. 12.27 Administrative Code

1. The object of the offense is traffic safety, traffic rules.

An offense under Part 1 of Art. 12.27 is characterized by an unlawful act and is expressed in the driver's failure to fulfill the duties provided for by the Traffic Rules in connection with an accident in which he is a participant (for example, failure to report the incident to the police, non-use of emergency alarms, failure to take measures to provide medical assistance, etc.). According to clauses 2.5, 2.6 of the Traffic Regulations (as amended by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of January 24, 2001 N 67), in the event of a road traffic accident, the driver involved in it is obliged to:

Immediately stop (do not move) the vehicle, turn on hazard warning lights and put up an emergency stop sign in accordance with the requirements of clause 7.2 of the Rules, do not move objects related to the incident;

Take possible measures to provide first aid to the injured, call an ambulance, and in case of emergency, send the injured along the way, and if this is not possible, deliver them by your vehicle to the nearest medical institution, provide your name, vehicle registration plate ( with the presentation of an identity document or driver's license and registration document for the vehicle) and return to the scene of the accident;

Clear the carriageway if the movement of other vehicles is impossible; if it is necessary to free the carriageway or deliver the injured in your vehicle to a medical institution, pre-fix in the presence of witnesses the position of the vehicle, traces and objects related to the incident, and take all possible measures to preserve them and organize a detour of the scene of the incident;

Report the incident to the police, write down the names and addresses of eyewitnesses and wait for the arrival of the police officers.

The subjective side of Part 1 is characterized by guilt in the form of negligence.

2. The objective side of Part 2 of Art. 12.27 is expressed in the fact that the driver leaves the scene of an accident, of which he was a participant. The subjective side of Part 2 is characterized by guilt in the form of intent.

3. The subject of the offense is the driver, who had responsibilities in connection with the road accident, provided for by the Traffic Regulations.

From January 1, 2008, a new part 3 of Article 12.27 will be in effect, providing for liability in the form of deprivation of the right to drive vehicles for failure to comply with the requirement of the Traffic Regulations to prohibit the driver to consume alcoholic beverages, narcotic or psychotropic substances after a road accident in which he is involved , or after the vehicle has been stopped at the request of a police officer, before an authorized official carries out an examination in order to establish a state of intoxication, or until an authorized official decides to exempt from such an examination.

Judicial practice under article 12.27 of the Administrative Code

Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 01.16.2018 N 88-AD17-3

Judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation S.B. Nikiforov, having considered the complaint of Oleg Borisovich Kinev against the decree of acting Justice of the Peace of Judicial District No. 3 of the Sovetskiy Judicial District of Tomsk dated August 26, 2016, the decision of the judge of the Sovetskiy District Court of Tomsk dated October 4, 2016 and the decision of the Acting Deputy Chairman of the Tomsk Regional Court dated August 29, 2017, issued against Kinev Oleg Borisovich (hereinafter - Kinev O.B.) in the case of an administrative offense provided for in Part 2 of Article 12.27

Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 13.03.2018 N 81-AD18-4

12.8 and part 3 of article 12.27

Determination of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of February 27, 2018 N 533-О

As follows from the materials presented, by a decision of a court of general jurisdiction, upheld by a higher court, the applicant, who left the scene of the road traffic accident, was found guilty of committing an administrative offense under Part 2 of Article 12.27 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation, and he was sentenced to an administrative penalty in in the form of deprivation of the right to drive a vehicle for a period of one year one month. As the courts established, the applicant, while driving a vehicle, became a participant in a road traffic accident, as a result of which mechanical damage was caused to another vehicle.

Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 12.03.2018 N 49-AD18-4

According to the note to this norm, the use of substances that cause alcohol or narcotic intoxication or psychotropic or other intoxicating substances is prohibited. Administrative liability provided for in Article 12.8 and Part 3 of Article 12.27 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation occurs in the case of an established fact of the use of substances causing alcohol intoxication, which is determined by the presence of absolute ethyl alcohol in a concentration exceeding the possible total measurement error, namely 0.16 milligram per one liter of exhaled air, or in the case of the presence of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances in the human body.

Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 12.03.2018 N 3-AD18-2

According to the note to this norm, the use of substances that cause alcohol or narcotic intoxication or psychotropic or other intoxicating substances is prohibited. Administrative liability provided for in Article 12.8 and Part 3 of Article 12.27 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation occurs in the case of an established fact of the use of substances causing alcohol intoxication, which is determined by the presence of absolute ethyl alcohol in a concentration exceeding the possible total measurement error, namely 0.16 milligram per one liter of exhaled air, or in the case of the presence of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances in the human body.

Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 03/15/2018 N 5-AD17-107

Judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation V.P. Merkulov, having considered the complaint of E.A. Agaeva. against the ruling of the judge of the Lyublinsky District Court of Moscow dated November 15, 2016, the decision of the judge of the Moscow City Court dated December 22, 2016 and the decision of the Deputy Chairman of the Moscow City Court dated July 18, 2017, issued against Elena Aleksandrovna Agaeva in the case on an administrative offense provided for in Part 2 of Article 12.27 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation,

Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 10.04.2018 N 4-AD18-2

Judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation S.B. Nikiforov, having considered the complaint of Lyudmila Nikolaevna Morozova against the effective decision of the Deputy Chairman of the Moscow Regional Court of August 15, 2017, issued against Lyudmila N.N. Morozova (hereinafter - L.N. Morozova) in the case on an administrative offense provided for in Part 2 of Article 12.27 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation,

Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 19.04.2018 N 7-AD18-1

Judge of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation V.P. Merkulov, having considered the complaint of I.A. on the entered into legal force the decision of the magistrate of the judicial section of the Komsomolsk judicial district of the Ivanovo region of July 6, 2017 and the decision of the acting the Chairman of the Ivanovo Regional Court of November 7, 2017, issued against Ivan Anatolyevich Groshev in the case of an administrative offense provided for in Part 2 of Article 12.27 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation,

Determination of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 05/29/2018 N 1129-О

As follows from the materials submitted, by the decision of the magistrate, left unchanged by the courts of higher instances, the applicant was brought to administrative responsibility for committing an administrative offense, expressed in leaving the driver in violation of the Traffic Rules of the Russian Federation (approved by the Resolution of the Council of Ministers - the Government of the Russian Federation of 23 October 1993 N 1090) of the scene of a road traffic accident, of which he was a participant (part 2 of Article 12.27 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation), and he was sentenced to an administrative penalty in the form of deprivation of the right to drive vehicles for a period of one year one month. As the courts established, an administrative investigation in the case of an administrative offense (Article 28.7 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation) was not lawfully conducted against the applicant, and the violation of the time limit for drawing up a protocol on an administrative offense does not in itself entail the termination of the relevant proceedings.

Determination of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 05/29/2018 N 1162-О

As follows from the materials submitted, by a decision of the magistrate that entered into legal force, the applicant was found guilty of committing an administrative offense under Part 2 of Article 12.27 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation, and he was sentenced to an administrative penalty in the form of deprivation of the right to drive vehicles for a period of one year.

Resolution of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of 05.15.2018 N 86-AD18-1

According to the note to this norm, the use of substances that cause alcohol or narcotic intoxication or psychotropic or other intoxicating substances is prohibited. Administrative liability provided for in Article 12.8 and Part 3 of Article 12.27 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation occurs in the case of an established fact of the use of substances causing alcohol intoxication, which is determined by the presence of absolute ethyl alcohol in a concentration exceeding the possible total measurement error, namely 0.16 milligram per one liter of exhaled air, or in the case of the presence of narcotic drugs or psychotropic substances in the human body.

18.04.2018

Leaving the scene of an accident. Cancellation of the order under Part 2 of Art. 12.27 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation and termination of proceedings in the case due to insignificance

Does leaving the scene of an accident always entail punishment under Part 2 of Art. 12.27 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation or a different outcome of the case is possible? In this article, using an example of a specific case from my law practice, we will discuss the possibility of terminating proceedings in an administrative offense case upon leaving the scene of an accident due to its insignificance. The peculiarity of this case is that the category of insignificance was applied in the court of appeal, when the ruling of the court of first instance on deprivation of the right to drive a vehicle had already been issued.

Case story:

The client turned to me for legal assistance, who explained that a protocol was drawn up against him on an administrative offense on the fact of leaving the scene of an accident (part 2 of article 12.27 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation), and a ruling of the first instance court had already been issued, according to which he was deprived of his right driving a vehicle for a period of one year.

The principal admitted the actual guilt in leaving the accident site. I considered it futile to challenge the subjective side of the offense, as they say, in such situations “did not notice the collision”, taking into account the position of the courts on this issue, as well as the factual circumstances of the case.

After reading the ruling of the court of first instance, the case materials and having clarified a number of essential points from the client, I had an idea - why not try to cancel the ruling of the court of first instance and terminate the proceedings due to the insignificance of the administrative offense (Article 2.9. Of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation ), especially since there have already been similar cases in my practice.

It was decided to build the position of the defense precisely along the way of proving the insignificance of the offense.

It is better to prove insignificance in the court of first instance, as long as the decision has not been made, and the person brought to administrative responsibility has not been sentenced. In the situation under consideration, such an opportunity had already been missed, therefore, it was necessary to provide as much evidence as possible indicating the possibility of applying the provisions on the insignificance of the offense committed (Article 2.9 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation).

Legal and regulatory framework:

In accordance with Article 2.9 of the Administrative Offenses Code of the Russian Federation, if the committed administrative offense is insignificant, the judge, body, official authorized to resolve the case of an administrative offense may release the person who committed an administrative offense from administrative responsibility and limit themselves to an oral comment.

According to clause 21 of the Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of March 24, 2005 N 5 "On some issues arising from the courts when applying the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation" 2.9 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation has the right to release the guilty person from administrative responsibility and limit himself to an oral remark, which should be indicated in the decision to terminate the proceedings.

An insignificant administrative offense is an action or inaction, although formally containing signs of an administrative offense, but taking into account the nature of the offense and the role of the offender, the amount of harm and the severity of the consequences that have occurred, it does not represent a significant violation of protected public relations.

Based on the legal position set forth in the Decision of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation dated December 7, 2010 N 1702-O-O “On refusal to accept for consideration the complaint of citizen Oleg Aleksandrovich Krivodanov on violation of his constitutional rights by part 2 of Article 12.27 of the Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative offenses and the provision of clause 2.5 of the Traffic Rules of the Russian Federation ", an administrative offense provided for in part 2 of article 12.27 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, in the absence of harmful consequences of leaving the scene of a road traffic accident that did not cause harm to health and major damage and did not constitute significant violation of protected public relations, - in accordance with article 2.9 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, the law enforcement authority may recognize it as insignificant and not entail administrative punishment.

Defense tactics:

In the case under consideration, taking into account the established circumstances, the nature of the offense committed, the role of the offender, the absence of grave consequences, in my opinion, there were all grounds for recognizing the offense as insignificant.

Thus, the nature of the collision of vehicles indicated that the collision was insignificant, and therefore it is difficult to notice such a collision.

As a result of the road accident, only property was damaged, no other harm was caused (harm to health, interests protected by law). The damage was not significant in nature.

I advised the principal to meet with the victim and offer to voluntarily compensate for the damage caused, since in any case, even if the damage had been compensated under the OSAGO, the insurance company, under the stated circumstances, after paying compensation to the victim, would have filed recourse claims against the person who left the scene of the accident. The principal took this advice and compensated for the damage caused in full, after which the victim wrote a receipt for compensation for damage to him, and also wrote a petition in which he asked to consider the issue of recognizing the offense as insignificant. The said petition and the receipt were attached to the complaint. Previously, the principal was not brought to administrative responsibility, he had no unpaid fines. The experience of driving a car was 49 years, during which there was only 1 accident that occurred 12 years ago.

No aggravating circumstances in the case were established for administrative responsibility.

The client was officially employed, worked as a director of a commercial organization, used the car for work purposes, since he needed to monitor the construction of facilities, including socially significant ones, as part of the implementation of the state program, in support of which the relevant documents were attached to the case materials ...

At the place of work and at the place of residence, the principal was characterized exclusively from the positive side, was a military pensioner, was repeatedly awarded during the period of military service.

Separately, it was noted that his daughter and three granddaughters, who are dependent on the latter, live together with the principal. In particular, the principal pays for the education at the university for the eldest granddaughter. In addition, his daughter lives with the principal, who has the status of a large family and also needs financial support from him.

In connection with the above, the deprivation of the principal of the right to drive a vehicle may negatively affect his financial condition and, as a result, the well-being of his family.

The above circumstances in aggregate testified that the offense committed by the principal did not entail any significant harmful consequences, the damage caused was compensated in full. The client is a respectable citizen, officially employed, positively characterized, and is engaged in socially useful activities. The fact of the collision of vehicles, in fact, was not disputed by the principal, the latter only indicated that he might not have noticed this collision. In connection with the above, the offense may be recognized by the court as insignificant, and the person brought to administrative responsibility is released from administrative responsibility under Part 2 of Art. 12.27 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation, with the announcement of an oral comment.

Each of the above circumstances was confirmed by the relevant evidence in order to justify to the court the presence of signs of insignificance of an administrative offense and, accordingly, the possibility of terminating the proceedings with an oral comment.

Outcome of the case:

Taking into account the totality of the evidence presented, the appellate court came to the conclusion that it is possible to cancel the ruling of the first instance court and terminate the proceedings due to the insignificance of the administrative offense. The client was released from the previously imposed punishment in the form of deprivation of the right to drive a vehicle.

With a court order in the present case.

Failure to fulfill obligations in connection with a road traffic accident

Commentary on Article 12.27 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation:

1. The objects of the offense under consideration are the established management procedure, as well as public relations in the field of road safety.

2. The commented article consists of two parts.

3.On the objective side, the offenses provided for by this article are expressed in failure to fulfill the duties assigned to the drivers of vehicles of clause 2.5 of the Traffic Rules of the Russian Federation, approved by the Decree of the Council of Ministers - the Government of the Russian Federation of October 23, 1993 N 1090 (as amended and add.).

Obligations, the failure of which entails liability under Part 1 of the commented article, include: to stop, not to touch the vehicle; turn on hazard warning lights and set an emergency stop sign; do not move objects related to the incident; take measures to provide first aid to victims and refer them to a medical institution; if it is necessary to clear the carriageway, in the presence of witnesses, fix the position of vehicles, traces and objects related to the accident, take measures to preserve them; report the incident to the police, write down the names and addresses of eyewitnesses, etc.

According to part 2 of this article, the driver is liable in case of leaving the scene of an accident in violation of the Road Traffic Regulations, i.e. the driver deliberately ignores the duty assigned to him. As a rule, by committing such illegal actions, the driver is trying to evade responsibility for the accident.

According to the considered part of the article, it is impossible to qualify the actions of the driver when he leaves the scene of the accident to deliver the victim to a medical institution, and in the absence of victims - to register an accident at the nearest police department or traffic police post. In the latter case, the conditions set forth in clause 2.6 of the Traffic Regulations must be met (mutual consent of the driver in assessing what happened, drawing up an accident diagram, etc.).

4. Under Part 3 of Article, liability arises for the driver's violation of the prohibition to consume alcoholic beverages, narcotic, psychotropic or other intoxicating substances after a road traffic accident in which he is involved, or after the vehicle has been stopped at the request of a police officer, before conducting a survey in order to establish the state of intoxication or before an authorized official makes a decision to exempt from such a survey (clause 2.7 of the Road Traffic Rules). Failure to comply with this prohibition constitutes a completed administrative offense.

5. The subject of the offense under consideration is the driver of the vehicle.

6. On the subjective side, an offense presupposes that the guilty person has direct intent.

7. Cases of administrative offenses under part 1 of this article are considered by the head of the traffic police, his deputy, the commander of a regiment (company, battalion) of the road patrol service, his deputy (Article 23.3), and under parts 2 and 3 of this article are considered by judges (part 1 of article 23.1).

Protocols on administrative offenses are drawn up by officials of the internal affairs bodies (police) (Part 1, Clause 1, Part 2, Article 28.3).

Hiding from the scene of an accident is considered a crime, regardless of whether the driver is at fault or not. Responsibility for leaving the scene of the accident in 2018 provides for deprivation of rights, arrest or a fine.

To avoid punishment, the driver must remain where the incident occurred and wait for the arrival of law enforcement officers.

Hiding from the scene of an accident - punishment under article 12.27 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation

The penalty for leaving the accident site without victims is not charged. The punishment is up to 15 days of administrative arrest or withdrawal of rights for a period of one and a half years.

To avoid such liability, you must act in accordance with the law. In the traffic rules in paragraph 2.5 of the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of October 23, 1993 No. 1090 (as amended on December 19, 2014), it is said that after a road accident, each of those involved must stop the vehicle, muffle it, turn on the emergency signaling and put up an emergency sign at a distance of at least 15 meters in settlements and 30 - outside the city or village. The driver has the right to increase the minimum distance by what he considers necessary in order to protect other road users.

If these obligations are not met, the driver will be fined 1,000 rubles.

Accident notification

A notice is an act that contains information about the accident, the responsibility of those involved. He confirms the innocence or guilt of the driver. Filling it out will save a lot of time when trying to achieve prosecution through the insurance company.

If the second participant in the accident refuses to fill out the form, you can do it for him, indicating in it the contacts of witnesses, car make, number, full name. To claim compensation to insurance, send both forms. If you do not have a sample with a certificate, you have the right to use the form of other drivers.

Deprivation of rights for hiding from the scene of an accident in what cases is provided?

If the driver fled after a road accident, the ability to drive the vehicle will be taken away for 1-1.5 years, if a protocol is drawn up, you will be asked to visit the traffic police by sending a summons or sending a district police officer to the address of registration.

An administrative case is formed if one of the accomplices or witnesses testifies against you. To do this, someone must record your number or a description of the car, which will make its way through the traffic police database. Then the case will be referred to the court.

If the driver-culprit was found quickly (less than 24 hours later) and he refused to undergo an examination to detect in the blood exceeding the permissible doses of alcohol or drugs, he faces liability in the form of a fine of 30 thousand rubles or deprivation of rights from 1.5 to 2 years.

Any accident should be considered on an individual basis, in order to get competent legal advice, consult a specialist. Detailed list of lawyers

Search for cars that escaped from the scene of an accident on the basis of the traffic police

The search will be carried out only if, after the traffic accident, one of its participants summoned an inspector, in his presence a map of the accident was drawn up and signed and witnesses were interviewed. After that, the traffic police will try to find the culprit, hand him a summons and ask him to come to the department.

They have no right to oblige to do this, so the injured party has two options:

• Wait and hope for the trustworthiness of the guilty hiding party;
• Go to court immediately;
• Hire lawyers to work with indemnity insurance.

If the initiator of the accident is found, he will be presented with a violation of 12.27 of the Administrative Code of the Russian Federation and will be temporarily deprived of his rights. Reimbursement issues are resolved in court or amicably.

If both participants in the accident left the scene of the accident, who is to blame?

No one. If the drivers left the location of the traffic accident, it will be almost impossible to defend their position in court. All that you or other persons involved may be presented with is a punishment for hiding and leaving the location of the accident.

In the insurance company for OSAGO with this scenario, you can count on no more than 25 thousand rubles of compensation. To issue and receive full compensation for damage, you need to wait for the traffic police and draw up a road accident diagram.

How to avoid responsibility for leaving the scene of an accident?

It is impossible to evade responsibility after a traffic accident, but if this has already happened, you have three options for the development of events:

1. Wait until the duration of the consideration of the case is over;
2. Will voluntarily report to law enforcement agencies;
3. Contact another participant in the accident and agree on a peaceful solution to the problem.

The first option is the most risky in terms of responsibility. It is necessary to wait a year until the duration of the consideration in the case of administrative responsibility ends. Three years must pass so that you cannot be obliged to comply with a claim for compensation for damage due to a traffic accident.

The second and third options are the most optimal. Repentance and voluntary admission of guilt mitigates punishment. To find out which scenario is best for you, consult with a professional lawyer.

Remember that leaving the scene of an accident, if you haven't noticed, is no different from deliberately avoiding responsibility.

If the culprit of the accident fled the scene, how to get insurance?

If the culprit of the accident fled from the scene of the accident, the chances of getting insurance are few, but they are.

For this you need:

• Put the car on the handbrake, do not move it, do not collect debris;
• Wait for the employees and sign the accident map they have drawn up;
• Provide all the data that will help to find the culprit of the road traffic accident (number, description of the car, testimony of witnesses, recording from the registrar);
• If the hiding person is found and his OSAGO policy is active, the insurers will be obliged to pay compensation. If not, go to court and demand that the culprit be brought to justice.

I scratched someone else's car, but did not notice it myself and left the scene of the accident, what will happen?

More often than not, responsibility does not come. But if the injured driver is a principled person, he will try to find the culprit's car with the help of the traffic police or on his own.

If the initiator by that time does not get rid of the traces of the crime (traces of the accident), the injured party will call the outfit, the employees will come and forbid the car to be repaired before the examination. After it, there will be a court and a decision on forcing the culprit to pay compensation or a refusal to do so.

If they slander you, you have not been involved in any traffic accident, the chances of losing in court and being held liable are extremely small. To increase your chances of defending your position in court, consult with lawyers.

Paying traffic fines in the first 3 days implies a 50% discount, so even if there is no money, it is better to take a loan before payday and pay off the receipt, especially since MFOs provide interest-free loans. Offers

The goal of road users is to ensure safety and maintain an environment that will minimize the risks of accidents and other emergency situations on the road. However, unfortunately, this is not always possible, and accidents happen quite often.

In such cases, all drivers who have become initiators or victims of an incident must fulfill certain requirements set forth in the traffic rules, for non-compliance with which financial liability is provided. 1000 rubles:

1. Turn on the emergency gang and place an emergency stop sign at the required distance
2. Do not move objects that are in one way or another associated with an accident (first of all, cars and their parts damaged in an accident)
3. If the incident led to the fact that people were injured, it is necessary to call an ambulance, and if necessary - to immediately deliver the victims by passing transport to the place where they will be provided with prompt medical assistance
4. If this cannot be done, then the driver himself should take them to the nearest medical institution in a personal car. In this case, he will need to provide his personal data and car number, as well as present the relevant documents (passport and vehicle registration certificate)
5. Clear the road if the position of his car impedes the movement of other vehicles
6. If the driver needs to fulfill paragraph 4 and / or 5, then he must first document with third parties (witnesses) the current position of his vehicle, as well as the traces of an accident and other facts related to the case, as well as take measures to preserve them in their current state and organize a way to bypass the accident site for other vehicles
7. If no one is injured (that is, the damage of the accident is limited to material damage), the driver should remove his vehicle from the road, provided that it interferes with passing vehicles.

   Before doing this, using photo and video communication devices, you need to record:
   

• position of the car on the road after the accident,
• traces of an accident and deformation on the car body,
• other items, one way or another related to the accident.

The same should be done if an incident occurred with the participation of several drivers who do not agree with the nature or list of visible damage to the vehicle. They must also record the personal details and addresses of witnesses to the accident and bring information and accidents to the attention of the transport police.

They will provide further instructions on where to document the incident: at a traffic police post or police unit closest to the accident area. After receiving instructions, drivers have the opportunity to leave the scene of the accident, but before that they should film all the circumstances of the incident and the current damage to their vehicles with a camera or other device.

If the participants in the incident have no disagreements about what happened, they are not obliged to report it to the police and can leave the accident scene by completing the necessary documents in one of the following ways:

1. With the assistance of the police at the nearest traffic police post, having previously recorded the damage and details of what happened with the help of recording devices
2. Without authorized employees, independently filling out an accident notification form in accordance with the rules of OSAGO, if:

• 2 cars were injured in the accident (including vehicles with trailers),
• the civil liability of both drivers is insured in accordance with the Legislation,
• damage is caused only to machines belonging to these persons,
• the circumstances that caused material damage to the vehicles are uniformly assessed by the aggrieved parties.

1. Do not draw up documents at all - if both participants in the accident do not have such a need and if other property is not damaged, except for those belonging to these persons.