How the particles are spelled are neither. Russian spelling and punctuation rules (1956). If the repeating particle NI is used in a stable expression, then the comma between the parts of this turnover is not put

1. Particle not used for negation, for example: I didn’t talk about it. I didn't talk about it. This is not what I was talking about.
2. It is necessary to pay attention to individual cases of the use of this particle:
1. In the presence of a negative particle not in both the first and second parts of the compound verb predicate, the sentence acquires an affirmative meaning, for example: I can't help but mention ...(i.e. should mention) one must confess ...(i.e. one must confess).
2. In interrogative and exclamation sentences, the particle not adjoins pronouns, adverbs and particles, forming combinations with them: how not, who is not, who is not, where not, wherever not, what not, what not, what not etc.; here are interrogative sentences with a combination not - whether, for example:

   Well, how not to please a dear little man!(Griboyedov).

   Who did not curse the station keepers, who did not curse them?(Pushkin).

   Why are you not great?(Pushkin).

   Where has he never been! What did he not see! What is not work! Sprayed the light; do you want to get married?(Griboyedov).

   Would you please senz?(Krylov).

3. In conjunction with the union while particle not used in the subordinate clauses of time, denoting the limit to which the action lasts, expressed by the predicate of the main sentence, for example: Sit here until I come;
4. Particle not is part of stable combinations: almost, almost, hardly not indicating the assumption far from, not at all, not at all, not at all, not at all, denoting strong negation, for example: almost the best shooter, almost at five o'clock in the morning, not a fair decision, not a bad product at all, far from reliable means;
5. Particle not is a member of creative unions: not that; not that - not that; not only - but; not that not - but; not that not - but, for example:

   Give back the ring and go; otherwise I will do with you what you do not expect(Pushkin).

   Above, behind the ceiling, someone is moaning or laughing(Chekhov).

   The guerrillas had more than rifles, but also machine guns(Stavsky).

3. Particle nor used to reinforce denial, for example:

   I couldn’t profit anywhere with a bone(Krylov).

   There was not a single gap in the sky behind(Fadeev).

   Blizzard never even looked at the questioners(Fadeev).

   There is not a soul in the village now: everyone is in no.(Fadeev).

Repeating particle nor acquires the meaning of a union, for example:

There was no water or trees anywhere to be seen(Chekhov).

No muses, no work, no joy of leisure - nothing can replace your only friend(Pushkin).

But the crowds flee without noticing him or his longing(Chekhov).

I don't know who you are, no who is he(Turgenev).

It is necessary to pay attention to individual cases of the use of the particle nor:

1. a) Particle nor used before the predicate in subordinate clauses to strengthen the affirmative sense, for example:

   Obey him in everything that you order(Pushkin).

   He could not distinguish iamba from chorea, no matter how we fought(Pushkin).

   Everywhere I look, everywhere rye is thick(Maikov).

   Whoever passes, everyone will praise(Pushkin).

Particle nor in subordinate clauses of the indicated type, it is adjacent to a relative word or conjunction, and therefore the subordinate clauses begin with the combinations: whoever, whoever, whatever, whatever, no matter how, howsoever, no matter how, no matter how much, wherever, wherever, wherever, wherever, whatever, Whichever, who's, whoever, when not, whenever etc.

These combinations have entered some steady turnover: wherever it goes, out of nowhere, no matter what etc.

2. b) Particle nor occurs in stable combinations that have the meaning of a categorical command, for example: Don `t move, not a step further, not a word etc.
3. c) Particle nor is part of negative pronouns: no one, nobody (nobody) etc.; nothing, nothing (to nothing) etc.; no, no (no) etc.; nobody's, nobody's (no one) etc. and adverbs: never, nowhere, nowhere, out of nowhere, no way, not at all, do not care, not at all, as well as the composition of the particle something.

Is written nor in stable combinations that include pronouns, for example: stayed at nothing, was left with nothing, disappeared for nothing.

4. d) Double nor enters into stable turns, which are a combination of two opposed concepts, for example: neither alive nor dead; neither this nor that; neither fish nor fowl; neither give nor take; neither pava nor crow etc.

XIII Non-Impacted Particles NOT and NO

Section 48. It is necessary to distinguish the spelling of unaccharged particles not and nor ... These particles differ in meaning and use.

1. Particle not used for negation, for example: I didn’t talk about it. I didn't talk about it. This is not what I was talking about.

It is necessary to pay attention to individual cases of the use of this particle:

a) In the presence of a negative particle not in both the first and second parts of the compound verb predicate, the sentence acquires an affirmative meaning, for example: I can't help but mention ...(i.e. "Must mention"), one must confess ...(i.e. "I must confess").

b) In interrogative and exclamation sentences, the particle not adjoins pronouns, adverbs and particles, forming combinations with them: how not,who is not,who is not,where not, where not,than not,what not, what not etc.; here are interrogative sentences with a combination not – whether , for example: Well, how not to please a dear little man!(Griboyedov). Who did not curse the station keepers, who did not curse them?(Pushkin). Why are you not great?(Pushkin). Where has he never been! What did he not see! What is not work! Sprayed the light; do you want to get married?(Griboyedov). Would you please senz?(Krylov).

c) In conjunction with the union while particle not used in the subordinate clauses of time, denoting the limit to which the action lasts, expressed by the predicate of the main sentence, for example: Sit here until I come.

d) Particle not is part of stable combinations: almost, almost, hardly not indicating the assumption far from, not at all, not at all, not at all, not at all, denoting strong negation, for example: almost the best shooter, almost at five o'clock in the morning, by no means a fair decision, not a bad product at all, far from a reliable means.

e) Particle not is a member of creative unions: not that; not that - not that; not only - but; not that not - but; not that not - but, for example: Give back the ring and go; otherwise I will do with you what you do not expect(Pushkin). Above, behind the ceiling, someone is moaning or laughing(Chekhov). The partisans had not only rifles, but also machine guns.(Stavsky).

2. Particle nor used to reinforce denial, for example: I couldn’t profit anywhere with a bone(Krylov). There was not a single gap in the sky behind(Fadeev). Blizzard never even looked at the questioners(Fadeev). There is not a soul in the village now: everyone is in no.(Fadeev).

Repeating particle nor acquires the meaning of a union, for example: There was no water or trees anywhere to be seen(Chekhov). No muses, no work, no joy of leisure - nothing can replace your only friend(Pushkin). But the crowds flee without noticing him or his longing(Chekhov). I don't know who you are or who he is(Turgenev).

It is necessary to pay attention to individual cases of the use of the particle nor :

a) Particle nor used before the predicate in subordinate clauses to strengthen the affirmative sense, for example: Obey him in everything that you order(Pushkin). He could not distinguish iamba from chorea, no matter how we fought(Pushkin). Everywhere I look, everywhere rye is thick(Maikov). Whoever passes, everyone will praise(Pushkin).

Particle nor in subordinate clauses of the indicated type, it is adjacent to a relative word or conjunction, and therefore the subordinate clauses begin with the combinations: whoever,whoever,whatever,whatever,no matter how, no matter how,no matter how much, no matter how muchwherever, wherever,wherever, wherever,whatever, whatever,whoever, whoever,when not, whenever etc.

These combinations have entered some steady turnover: wherever it went, out of nowhere, by all means etc.

b) Particle nor occurs in stable combinations that have the meaning of a categorical command, for example: not from the spot, not a step further, not a word etc.

c) Particle nor is part of negative pronouns: no one, nobody (nobody) etc.; nothing, nothing (up to nothing) etc.; no, no (no) etc.; nobody's, nobody's (nobody's) etc. and adverbs: never, nowhere, nowhere, nowhere, in any way, not at all, at all, at all, as well as the composition of the particle something .

Is written nor in stable combinations that include pronouns, for example: was left with nothing, was left with nothing, disappeared for nothing.

d) Double nor enters into stable turns, which are a combination of two opposed concepts, for example: neither alive nor dead; neither this nor that; neither fish nor fowl; neither give nor take; neither pava nor crow etc.

In a famous hit, it is sung: "I will go after you, no matter what the way prophesies to me ..." Or is it "not prophesied"? What is before us - affirmation or denial? Compared with the negative particle, the particle is not used much less often, but it is precisely with the distinction of these particles that many difficulties are connected in Russian writing.

"Transparent" use cases do not include:

nor in stable terms
- Neither give nor take; neither light nor dawn; neither day nor night; neither stand nor sit; neither alive nor dead; neither fish nor fowl; neither this nor that ( are not comma separated!).
- None - i.e. nobody (not one - many); never - not at all (more than once - many times, several times).
- Don `t move! No step back!

pair use neither: no, no (The people did not receive any bread or circuses).
In such sentences, the negative particle can neither be replaced or completely omitted - the meaning of the statement will remain. ( The people did not receive either bread or circuses. The people did not receive bread, circuses.)

Difficult use cases include the following:

nor to reinforce denial
In sentences, where it is used to reinforce negation, there is usually already a negation (no, not): There is not a penny of money. Didn't give me a single ruble... Sometimes denial is only implied: Not a penny in your pocket. Not a penny was in my pocket.

still exists double negation with not(I could not help but notice. It is impossible not to confess). This double negation gives the sentence the meaning of a statement, not a negation ( I could not help but notice - I noticed. One must confess - one must confess). In order not to make mistakes, choose synonymous substitutions for expressions and words, then a lot will become clear; try not to memorize the rules, but to understand them and focus on examples that illustrate the rules.

use neither with pronouns and adverbs
Whoever passes will leave a trace ( whoever will pass - everyone will pass).
Wherever he stops, everywhere they recognize ( wherever you stop - wherever you stop).
Whichever way you go, everywhere there is a dead end ( no matter which way you go, any way you go).
In such sentences, pronouns and adverbs with nor can be easily replaced with synonymous constructions. Neither is used with pronouns and adverbs when no exclamation and no question.

v independent exclamation and interrogative sentences(in the presence or possibility of substitution of amplifying particles only, really) it is not written: Where has he not been? Who didn't love him! What thoughts I have not changed my mind!

v concessional clauses to strengthen the affirmative sense it is used only: "I will go after you, no matter what the way prophesies to me ..." ("I will go", despite the fact that "prophesies the way"). That is, no matter what is sung, you still need to write.

§ 88. Not written together:

1. In all cases when no word is not used without a negative particle, for example: ignorant, inevitable, unhappy, indignant, unwell, uncomfortable, lacking(meaning "not enough"), unbearable, impossible, really, intolerable, unshakable, unharmed.

2.With nouns, if negation gives the word a new, opposite meaning, for example: enemy, misfortune, if negation gives a word that does not have this particle, the meaning of opposition, negation, for example: non-specialist, non-Marxist, non-Russian, for example: disagreements between Marxists and non-Marxists; all non-specialists liked the report; a non-Russian will look without love at this pale, blood-stained, whipped muse(Nekrasov).

3.With full and short adjectives and with adverbs in -o (-e), if their combination with does not serve not to deny a concept, but to express a new, opposite concept, for example: an unhealthy look (i.e., painful ), impossible character(i.e. heavy), the sea is restless (i.e. worried), the matter is unclean (i.e. suspicious), come immediately(i.e. immediately, without delay), did wrong(i.e. bad).

4.With full participles, in which there are no explanatory words, for example: unfinished (work), unblown(flower), stainless (steel), unloved (child), unconcealed (anger), uncompressed (stripe) (in such cases, the participle is close to the adjective); but: work not completed in time, a flower not blossoming due to the cold, a child not beloved by the mother, students who have not yet been examined(in such cases, the participle is close in meaning to the verb).

Note. With explanatory words denoting the degree of quality, not with a participle is written together (in these cases, the participles with are not close to the adjective), for example: an extremely ill-considered decision, a completely inappropriate example, but: completely inappropriate example(not written separately due to the presence of an explanatory word for the rule).

5. In pronouns, when not separated from the next pronoun by a preposition, for example: someone, something, no one, nothing(but: no one, no reason, no one, no reason, no reason).

In pronominal adverbs, for example: once, nowhere, nowhere, nowhere.

6. In adverbs there is no need (in the meaning of "aimless", for example: there is no need to go there), reluctantly; in prepositional combinations in spite of, in spite of; in an interrogative particle really.

Spelling of adverbs and adverbial combinations that include a negation, a preposition, and a noun or adjective (for example, unbeknownst, out of place, by accident, beyond the power) is determined by the rules laid down in § 83, paragraphs 5 and 6.

7. In the verb prefix, under-, denoting non-compliance with the required norm, for example: under-fulfill (perform below the required norm), under-look (not enough, look bad, miss something), over-sleep (sleep less than normal).

Note. It is necessary to distinguish verbs with the prefix do- from verbs with the prefix do-, which have a negation in front of themselves not and denote an action that has not been completed, for example: not to read a book, not to drink tea, not to watch a play.

§ 89. Not written separately:

1. With verbs, including adverbial forms, for example: she does not drink, does not eat, does not speak; cannot but see; without looking, without looking, without haste.

About fused writing despite, despite and verbs with an under-prefix - see § 88, paragraphs 6 and 7.

Note. Commonly used verb forms no, no, no, no are written together.

2. In participles: a) in short form, for example: debt not paid, house not completed, coat not sewn b) in full form, when there are explanatory words in the participle (see § 88, item 4), as well as when there is or implies opposition in the participle, for example: he did not bring the finished work, but only individual sketches.

3. With nouns, adjectives and adverbs, if there is or is implied opposition, for example: it was not luck that led us to success, but endurance and composure; death is not terrible - your disfavor is terrible(Pushkin); the morning came not clear, but foggy; the train is not going fast and not slow(meaning: "with some average speed"); not tomorrow (there can be no opposition here).

Note. Attention should be paid to some cases of separate writing of the particle not. The particle is not written separately: a) if an adjective, participle or adverb has a pronoun beginning with neither, for example: a thing that is not necessary for anyone (for anyone, etc.), nor when a common error no one it is profitable to undertake this; b) if not included in the reinforcing negation far from, not at all, not at all, not at all, not at all, etc., preceding a noun, adjective or adverb, for example: he is not at all our friend, far from the only desire, not at all fair decision, not at all the best solution, far from enough.

4. With pronouns and pronouns, for example: not me, not this, not different, not like that, not differently, not like that. For cases of continuous writing not with pronouns and pronominal adverbs, see § 88, item 5.

Note. The philosophical term not-self is hyphenated.

5. With amplifying adverbs, as well as with prepositions and conjunctions, for example: not really, not quite, not quite, not from ..., not under ..., not that ... not that.

The expression is written separately more than once, for example: More than once he accused himself of being too careful.(Fadeev).

6. With unchangeable words not formed from adjectives and acting as a predicate in a sentence, for example: do not, do not mind, do not pity.

7. For all hyphenated words, for example: all non-business enterprises; not spoken in Russian; sing not in the old way.

§ 90. Neither is written in one piece:

1. In pronouns, if the particle is not separated from the subsequent pronoun by a preposition, for example: nobody, nothing, nobody, nothing, nobody, nobody, nobody, nobody, but: no one, no one etc.

76. Spelling of particles NOT with different parts of speech, NOT and NOR.

1. Written separately:

• the particles would be (b), the same (g), whether (e) (read it, go, the same),
• particles, after all, they say, like, etc. (He's supposedly not; local. You know that!);

2. Written with a hyphen:

• particles something, something, something, or something, something, something, something, enough),

Spelling particles NOT with different parts of speech

Part of speech		apart
	1.if it is not used without (ignorant, adversity), 2.if you can choose a synonym without not (untruth is a lie, an enemy is a friend),	1.if there is or implies opposition; not a friend, but an enemy), 2. in the interrogative presupposition with the logical emphasis of negation (your father arranged for you here, wasn't that so?
	1.if the bases are not used (careless, nondescript). 2.if you can pick up a synonym without not (rather big - big, gvmslody - old), 3.if there is an opposition with the union no (the river is not-jaw-dropping, but cold), 4.with short adjectives -ii, if the full adjectives from which they are derived are not written in one piece, low - low)	1.if there is or implies opposition to the union a (not large, small), 2.with relative adjectives (the sky is southern), 3.with short adjectives, if the full adjectives from which they are derived are not written separately (the book is not interesting, but boring)
	with indefinite and negative pronouns without prepositions (several, no one, something)	always spelled separately (not three, not seventh)
pronoun.		with other categories of pronouns (not in my class, not on our floor)
	if not used without (hate, bewilderment) note: verbs like overlook are written together, since they include a single prefix under-,	with all other verbs (don't know, don't cry
	if not used without (hating, perplexed) note: gerunds formed from verbs with a prefix are underwritten together, as well as verbs (oversight)	with all other adverbs (not knowing, crying)
communion

communing	if full participles do not have dependent words with them (non-arriving student)	1 . if full participles have dependent words (a student who did not come on time), 2.with short participles (tests not verified), if there is or is supposed to be opposed (not finished, but only started work)
	1 . if not used without (ridiculous, careless), 2.adverbs in -o, -e, if you can choose a synonym for bel not (not stupid - smart)	1.adverbs in -o, -e, if there is or implies opposition (not funny, but sad), 2, adverbs in -o, -e, if they have explanatory words at all, not at all, not at all, far from at all (not at all funny). 3.if the adverb is hyphenated (not in Russian)

Problems and tests on the topic "Spelling particles NOT with different parts of speech, NOT and NOR."

• Particle as a service part of speech - Particle Grade 7
• Particles - Morphology. Service parts of speech grade 10

  Lessons: 1 Assignments: 9 Tests: 1