The most sensible article about the events of recent days. Now the hysteria of the “six” is understandable. There’s certainly nothing more in the cards for Square. We wish GDP good bargaining.
An analysis of the past 8-9 summits of the SCO and G7 showed how competently two world leaders - Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump - “discouraged” the rest (with the exception of China) of the political crowd during these days.
What really happened:
Expressing surprise and misunderstanding at Russia's absence at the upcoming G7 summit in Canada, Donald Trump sent a very clear message not only to the American Democrats (Obama-Clinton) and the rest of the G7 members under whom this happened, but also to Vladimir Putin:
“Whether you like it or not, and it may be politically incorrect to say, but we need to rule the world. And there is the G7, which was before the G8, kicked out Russia, it must return Russia, because we need Russia at the negotiating table. Why are we holding a meeting when Russia is not at the meeting? I will recommend it, it depends on them, but Russia should be at the meeting, should be part of it.”
And if this idea regarding our own and other Democrats was clearly made with the intention of putting them and the media they own on the ears, so that again only Trump’s name would be on the global media agenda, that message to Vladimir Putin required a very subtle response from the Kremlin, so that the American side makes sure that it is heard, and Moscow’s response shows that the message is heard.
“As for Russia’s return to the G7 and G8, we did not leave it. Colleagues at one time refused to come to Russia for well-known reasons. Please, we will be glad to see everyone there, in Moscow." - Vladimir Putin responded to this idea, thereby showing the West not only the way to solve all existing problems, but also that there will be no other way for Russia to return to the G8. And if the West tried to obstruct us, now come to Moscow to atone for the mistakes and sins we have committed.
G6 thus found themselves between a rock and a hard place.
Moreover, Trump did not stop there and strengthened his signal to all world elites by withdrawing the US signature from the communiqué agreed upon at the summit. What does this signal mean? That the G7 as the parent structure of the world's ruling group is coming to an end. That the time for other coalitions is coming.
This signal from Trump has caused misunderstanding among many experts who see in this only the impulsiveness of the American president, thus supporting Clinton’s version and the mental illness of the American president. However, despite the opinions of respected experts, Trump's actions in no way fall into the category of "impulsive subjectivism."
Trump's foreign policy line has a very clear, understandable and rational character - he is getting rid of the unnecessary US imperial infrastructure, thereby trying not to repeat the unsuccessful Soviet experience of “perestroika”, as a result of which a similar disposal of the USSR’s imperial infrastructure followed one of the most catastrophic scenarios for the collapse of the USSR itself. Empire and its provinces.
According to this clear logic of Trump, all agreements on feeding limitrophes imposed by the world democratic lobby on America for the sake of maintaining its supposedly Imperial status, but in fact, sucking the juices out of the country just like supporting African regimes from the USSR, will be broken, no matter what the cost.
Which is what Trump does. What is the main outcome of the G7 in Canada? Not a trace remains of the former monolithic nature of the West and “Euro-Atlantic solidarity”. In essence, Trump, with his demarche, showed everyone that he does not keep anyone in the G7 by force, and, above all, he will not keep the United States there by force. The G6 cannot act as partners of the United States even purely economically - their entire combined GDP is less than the American one.
Another such summit and no one can guarantee that Trump will write a tweet on the plane leaving it about the US withdrawal from the G7. And the G6 leaders understood this perfectly - either they do not interfere with the US and Russia to build new world new order and line up in the wake of new geos political processes, or the United States will write them off the ship and set up a G2 with Russia or a G3 with Russia and China.
This political line of the world powers is clear and not subject to discussion - it is high time for Russia, China and the United States to get rid of the tutelage of the limitrophes, whose lobbies are constantly trying to pit us against each other, determine the regions of their geopolitical interests, calmly descend from the mountain and begin to rule the world based on clear principles of justice, morality, and economic mutual benefit.
Only in this case will humanity face a long and happy life. Otherwise, “we will live poorly, but not for long.”
Yuri Baranchik – cunning wolf V sheep's clothing
.
(Objections to the article)
I suggest you, friends, first read the article by Yu. Baranchik, before reading my objections, his arguments are filled with very base morality. The thoughts of the cunning and inventive sold their own homeland, and became the reason for this article of mine.
Ukraine divided by Yu. Baranchik 
Yuri Baranchik February 9, 2018 15:00
http://www.iarex.ru/articles/55591.html
Chief Editor of the Analytical Editorial Office of REGNUM Information Agency Candidate philosophical sciences, specialist in the philosophy of language, modern security policy in Eurasia, new technologies of political communications (Moscow).
Why Zakhar Prilepin is wrong
Yu. Baranchik: The joint division of Ukraine not only meets the interests of Russia, Poland and Hungary, but also serves the strategic rapprochement of our countries.
Zakhar Prilepin
Yu.B.
Recently, the deeply respected Russian writer Zakhar Prilepin spoke out in the spirit that Russia will not allow Poland to divide Ukraine:
“Russian writer and adviser to the head of the DPR Zakhar Prilepin considers Poland’s claims to be unfounded. He claims that the Poles, out of envy of Russia, want to regain the territories that they consider theirs, but these dreams are in vain. Prilepin is confident that Russia will not allow Ukraine to be divided, preserving it “for our great common future.”
Firstly, it is a pity that Zakhar Prilepin did not provide any argumentation in support of this point of view.
Secondly, western Ukraine (very specific three regions) was annexed to the Ukrainian SSR only after the Second World War, and when they talk about some of Joseph Stalin’s mistakes, it was the annexation of these regions that were mentally alien to the Russian world, because of which the infection of the rest of Ukraine began Galician spirit, he is charged with a mistake.
But people who are really alien to us live there. Therefore, there is no need to spare a pawn if you can win a queen: we have enough land and people, and removing historical problems with Poland and thus achieving strategic peace on the western borders of the Russian world will be a very big joint victory.
The Poles will not want a new war between the West and Russia, since they understand perfectly well from history how this will end – a new division of Poland. And they will need to preserve new territories. Therefore, a joint and legal, I emphasize, Russian-Polish-Hungarian partition of Ukraine, when this under-country completely collapses and its population will need humanitarian assistance under the auspices of the UN, will only help consolidate the strategic partnership between our countries.
Thirdly, such a union is extremely important in the context of the processes taking place in Europe, namely the formation of a two-level Europe. But that's the best case scenario. At worst we're talking about about its collapse and fragmentation, the growth of processes of political and economic bifurcation in Eastern Europe. In these conditions, it is extremely important for us to consolidate a geopolitical union with leading countries of Eastern Europe, A joint participation in the division of a failed state, ensured by international legal solutions - what could be better than such political practice?
Eastern Ukraine (Kyiv is questionable - whether we need it in this form or not, in any case, without the territories, Kyiv is a deeply subsidized entity) and so it will be ours. But if at the same time we resolve the issues of strategic interaction with Poland and Hungary, then such a decision will be very long-term and will cement Russia’s western border for a long time and make it safe, since ensuring the security of this region will be not only the task of Russia alone, but also of Hungary and Poland.
The Poles have a very hard time accepting some of our pages. shared history. Although they could be very interesting options its development, when it was the Polish imperial component that could make the union of our countries truly great. But the mutual mistakes of the Russian and Polish elites of the seventeenth and nineteenth centuries prevented this great union from happening. This situation needs to be corrected and if there is such an opportunity, and now it appears, then it must be used as efficiently as possible and thus close the previous one quite complex history and start looking to the future together.
A.K.
Yuri Baranchik is a cunning wolf in sheep's clothing.
Proving Zakhar Prilepin wrong, he writes:
- But people who are really alien to us live there.
The argument is stunning. I propose to think like this: on Mars there also live Martian people who are really alien to us, we give them to Poland, which is offended by us. In addition - absolutely not our Swedes, Norwegians, Germans, definitely the British with their Belgian vassals, you can still dig deeper and find “NOT OURS”, WHICH is something to be ashamed of, because nothing can be spared for friendship with Poland!
I should ask Baranchik: “Are you a sheep?”
Proof:
1. Question: Baltic states. Why is it still not Polish? After all, it’s free, take it and rejoice.
No, give them “Tersk volost”. Poles, take the Balts, what are you waiting for? There you won’t even have to demolish the monuments; everything has already been demolished before you.
Answer: The Poles do not need our territory as such. What to take from the Baltic states? It is necessary to build there, but this is not included in the plans of the occupiers, this is not the USSR. They, the Poles, need some other territory that is inhabited by Russians. It’s not serious to fight with the stone blocks of monuments, have you decided to continue making “zombies” out of our people of Western Ukraine? And so that no one would guess, they called them “people who are really alien to us.” The principle of the Poles and Anglo-Saxon teachers is to attach a new word to the object of their desire and put into this word a meaning that is beneficial only to them. According to Yu. Baranchik’s clever idea, we are not obliged to care about the fate of some “people who are really strangers to us.” Whether they are killed or simply maimed, it shouldn’t matter to us...
2. Question: What is friendship with Poland on state level? When Russia restored the Polish state three times after its destruction by foreign troops, “grateful” Poland was not a friend for long. Why?
Answer: When Russia weakened as a state, the Poles came to the Kremlin and staged a state apocalypse there. This was not a “friendly visit!” When Russia fought with the Turks for... (a lot of things), they did not see any friendly gestures from Poland. In 1941, Poland was preparing to fight together with Nazi Germany against the USSR (the same Russia). Is this what friendly nations do? This is what hidden hostile elements do, shooting in the back. This list is far from exhaustive...
3. Question: Are the fraternal peoples of Russia and Poland united by a single Christian Faith?
Answer: No, it does not unite. Judge "according to their works." As soon as a certain territory breaks away from Orthodox Russia, impudent forces arrive and begin pogroms, up to and including the physical extermination of Orthodox Christians and their churches. There are plenty of examples: Ukraine, Serbia, Montenegro, Kosovo. Someone will say that these territories did not suffer from Poland, there are no Poles there. This can be forgiven for Baranchik, he is still a little ram, but when he becomes an adult ram, he will also understand. In the Orthodox world, the only schismatic and provocateur is the Catholicism of Poland, incited by the “Papal Throne”. Most of the Ukrainian militants, today's pogromists of Orthodox churches, trained under Polish instructors. These dirty events have been discussed more than once at the Highest Church level and are generally known.
Enough evidence? Now to the main thing - no matter how much you feed the wolf, he always looks into the forest. What can a wolf see in the forest? In the forest he sees his lair. This means that if you give Poland a part of Orthodox Ukraine, the “wolf” will drag it into the dark forest and into his lair. Where is Poland’s lair – in the Vatican and in London. The Vatican will destroy Orthodoxy in a separate territory, that is, break people from the inside, and London will take out the furniture. This will be called “A friendly gesture from Poland to Russia’s peace initiatives.” Twenty years will be enough, maybe less. Further, the claims of “Polish friends” will continue, but to these claims will be added the claims of other “friends”. And so on ad infinitum. That we will be friends with the whole world?
But that's not all! When the angry and robbed people of Western Ukraine realize that they, as a PEOPLE, are of no interest to anyone, it will be too late, as there will be no more “single people”: The government is lordly, education is primary, religion is UniAD (Catholicism is an unaffordable luxury for slaves) , the language is synthetic, the history is contrived, the territory is confiscated, the nation is serfs (the lowest Polish caste without the possibility of advancement, this is already manifested and clearly visible among visiting workers in Poland). The people of this part of Ukraine will be doomed to extinction.
This small part arguments against Baranchik’s only argument, that there are completely strangers there, who were annexed by Stalin’s mistake. There are people there who are dear to us, these are our Slavic brothers, these are Russian people! The Poles are people who are dear to us, who find themselves under political influence London and poisoned by this influence. But as soon as this corrupting influence of the Anglo-Saxons ends (Alexander I, I.V. Stalin), the Poles easily turn into peace-loving, friendly Slavs. While Poland was under the protection of Russia, it did not attack any state and no one attacked Poland itself, industry and population grew. However, as soon as Pan Pilsudski became friends with Hitler, Poland immediately disappeared from the map of Europe. Yuri, don’t mind that the USSR occupied part of Poland together with Hitler. The USSR returned its own territory, seized from Russia by Poland after the First World War. Then in 1918 the Bolsheviks acted with Russian territory and the people as you propose to do today. And it would be a shame to call Vilnius, Grodno, and Brest Polish territories.
Quote: “The Poles have a very hard time accepting some pages of our common history. Although there could be very interesting options for its development, when it was the Polish imperial component that could make the union of our countries truly great.”
Yuri, you shouldn’t judge the centuries-long neighborhood of two peoples close in spirit based on certain points cohabitation. If you solve big issues related to the people of your country, then you can show heroism, you can even die, but not give up your brothers for the amusement of the enemy. And you are going to please the pride of the ruling elite, which is hostile to the memory of our fathers and grandfathers, with a piece of your own territory and the well-being of the population of these territories. To give gifts to them, the stalkers of the British, who are disgusted by the monuments that saved them from complete destruction by the Nazis??? That's not how you make friends, so servile.
Yuri, change your role and don’t grow from a little ram into a mature, stupid animal that hates its own new gates, as well as its compatriots. And all this for the sake of the ratings of your articles in the eyes of our sworn partners. You, Yuri, failed to hide the predatory wolf’s body; under a small sheep’s skin it is on you in the form of Trishka’s caftan. The animal's toothy mouth was covered, but its backside with its tattered wolf tail gave away the predator.
PS: The last warning to Yuri Baranchik - do not settle on the territory that you are going to transfer under the authority of the Polish Patriarchate, I do not advise it, it’s a pity even for such a sheep like you.
Yuri Baranchik
In Russia, it is customary to look for a fifth column among NGOs, especially with foreign participation, opposition bloggers like Navalny, on the streets and squares of Russia. Although there is often no need to look for enemies and ill-wishers of the country - you can just turn on the TV.
Apparently, among polished gentlemen like TV channel directors and imposing venerable journalists, it is much more difficult to discern a truly insidious and dangerous enemy. And it would be good for the country and the people, but first of all - for the authorities themselves. Isn’t it too late to ask later about what kind of snake was warmed on your chest?
REGNUM news agency columnist Yuri Baranchik, analyzing the conflict that erupted around one of Nikita Mikhalkov’s programs, wonders how it could happen that in a state inhabited by 80% of Russians, ardent Russophobes often succeed on central TV channels, and people who try to ask uncomfortable questions about there is no room for this. Isn’t it time to radically change something in our lives?
Yuri Baranchik: “New Russia needs a new elite”
The scandal with the ban on the 38th episode of Nikita Mikhalkov’s author’s program “Besogon”, dedicated to the problem of Russophobia on central Russian television channels (!), suggests that the program lived up to its name - the demons began to fuss and showed themselves.
It would seem, what’s wrong with analyzing the public statements of a public figure? However, for some reason, in a mono-ethnic country, which is Russia - more than 80% of which are Russians, disrespectful statements towards Russians are allowed, but a position in their defense is prohibited. The answer here is obvious - those who talk in words about supposedly protecting Russia’s interests often do it only in words, but in reality they do everything to do harm. They just do it competently, so that the highest eye does not notice.
About the author: Yuri Vladimirovich Baranchik. Expert on Belarus, Russia, CIS, EU, USA, Belarusian-Russian relations, world geopolitics. Candidate of Philosophy, head of the Internet project “Empire”. Last place of work - director of the information and analytical center of the Scientific Research Institute of Tomsk State University of the Academy of Management under the President of the Republic of Belarus.
Makei's group has launched a campaign to intimidate Lukashenko
In the last two or three weeks in Belarus, the most relevant political topics are, firstly, the unexpectedly loud marches of “parasites”, as a result of which the authorities were forced to suspend the odious Decree No. 3, and secondly, the ongoing conflict with Russia. We examined the second plot in detail in last review blogosphere “Lukashenko launched the Maidan scenario, and he knows it.”
As for the first plot, despite the disproportionate a large number of analysts in Belarus on this topic, in our opinion, it is too early to say anything definite based on the results of the first part of the Marlezon Ballet. So far we only have a “run for the ruble” (there are no questions, few people expected such protest activity from Belarusian citizens, especially in the provinces), but whether there will be a similar protest “strike for the ruble, not for a penny” - we can only assess this based on the results of protests on March 15 and 25.
At the same time, in addition to the Belarusian plots that are quite understandable and open to most observers, a more complex plot continues to unfold in the republic, associated with a sharp escalation of the confrontation between the pro-Western and pro-Lukashenko groups in power. And I consider him the main one. So somehow, how exactly will the further promotion of the marches of “parasites” go, how exactly will the conflict with Moscow be resolved in Minsk - will Belarus remain in the Union State with Russia and the EAEU or will it join, for example, GUAM, the next summit of which will be at the level of heads government will be held on March 27 in Kyiv, depends solely on which of the two groups - pro-Lukashenko or pro-Western - will win in Lukashenko’s entourage.
In this regard, I think it is fundamental important level development of this plot is that the very presence of such groups in the republic itself is finally openly recognized by our ideological opponents, which they very vigorously and stubbornly resisted six months ago, since the very recognition of the presence of various groups in power would immediately confirm the truth of my assumptions about that Lukashenko’s successor in the form of the head of the pro-Western group in power - the head of the Belarusian Foreign Ministry Vladimir Makei - is actually ready to begin fulfilling his duties in the new post.
It was precisely this fact - the reluctance to admit the existence of groups around Alexander Lukashenko - that determined the severity of our discussion with Alexei Dzermant in August 2016 on the pages of the REGNUM news agency, which was then supported by almost all the pro-Western media of the republic:
“As for the Belarusian pro-Western opposition media that zealously stood up for Makei, what is happening is very similar to an entire information network, which very clearly and easily revealed itself under very simple circumstances. In this regard, when seven (!) of the eight most read pro-Western, opposition and anti-Lukashenko Internet resources and two main state information media - one television, and the second print - in the person of their leaders come to the defense of one official, they are perceived exclusively with a smile the arguments of some experts writing on the resource headed by Alexei Dzermant that the “Makei group” that Baranchik is screaming about is a fiction. There is no evidence that it even exists."
Analysis shows that exactly the opposite is the case. And if the control of the “Makei group” over the opposition media has not caused much surprise for a long time - they are the only owners, so what is there to hide, then the degree of control over the state media shows that the Alexander Lukashenko clan no longer has much control over the situation in the information sphere. And for the fact that the author of the material introduced the phrase “Makei’s group” into circulation in Belarusian political science (which, by the way, I didn’t have - there was an “expert group”), to the author, who, apparently, due to his youth and inexperience, simply let slip about the conversations of his elders comrades, I must say a special thank you - now it is there, something you can safely write about with reference to Andrei Lazutkin, and there is no need to “strain yourself.”
That is, just six months ago it was dangerous for the pro-Western group in power to designate themselves as some kind of decision-making center under Lukashenko, so they diligently pretended to be ordinary campaigners. But the other day, with their open public “attack” on the Belarusian security forces, they still found themselves in the public space, so now the argument that the “Makei group” does not exist does not work: it exists, and it leads in the Belarusian opposition pro-Western and anti-Lukashenko media launched a very powerful information campaign to intimidate Lukashenko. Only not by the Maidan, but by the security forces (!), who are the only ones who can protect him from it.
I will give just two examples. The start of the campaign to attack the Belarusian security forces was, as usual, given by the leading propaganda mouthpiece of Makei’s group - the Center for Strategic and Foreign Policy Studies, which is trusted to voice the most complex multi-step tactics:
“After A. Lukashenko’s return from Sochi to Belarus, sound measures in his policy, such as the suspension of the decree, the announcement of an open dialogue with society, announced during the meeting on March 9, 2017, were also accompanied by directly opposite signals and measures related to the intensification of repression by the state and intimidation of the population. Such a lack of a clear strategic vision and a consistent public line of behavior probably indicates that A. Lukashenko is trying to combine natural and only correct steps in the current situation to de-escalate tensions with strengthening the role of the power resource.
Judging by a number of signs, this behavior of the first person is associated with his outright misinformation about the essence of what is happening in the country. In particular, as evidenced by the broadcast of the republican media (“Special report” on March 6, 2017, “Main broadcast” on March 12, 2017), as well as statements by A. Lukashenko himself (meeting on March 9, 2017), a group of security officials imposed on him the idea of an allegedly active management influence on social protests on the part of persons living in Ukraine.”
What's interesting about this passage. Firstly, that healthy steps on Lukashenko’s part mean “an open dialogue with society.” What an open dialogue with society is in the conditions of the active participation of the West in this dialogue - everyone saw perfectly well in 2014 using the example of Ukraine and the fate of Yanukovych, who, instead of crushing the Maidan in its very bud, bought into slogans about “dialogue”. When the West talks about “dialogue” (or this or that grouping surrounding the leader of any country speaks on its behalf), in fact it is talking about ways to surrender power - this was the case with the USSR, and this was the case with Yanukovych.
That is, Makei’s propagandists suggest that Lukashenko follow the path of Yanukovych. Accordingly, their role in this “corps de ballet” is very clear - Makei’s group occupies today exactly the same place in Lukashenko’s entourage that the group of the head of the administration Lyovochkin occupied in the winter of 2014 in Yanukovych’s entourage, which, in fact, initially played a double game under the leadership of the US intelligence services and ultimately handed over her boss in strict accordance with her obligations.
Secondly, the Center’s experts state that Lukashenko has a “lack of a clear strategic vision and a consistent public line of behavior” in the current situation, which precisely indicates the presence of different groups in his circle - which we talked about six months ago, and which propagandists zealously resisted then Makeya at all levels.
And thirdly, the experts of the Makeevka Center very crudely and without evidence (from an analytical point of view) frame those who, in their opinion, are behind these controversial actions of Lukashenko. In their opinion, these are security forces who not only supply him with misinformation, but also “impose on him the idea of an allegedly active management influence on social protests on the part of people living in Ukraine.”
As a matter of fact, only two questions arise regarding this fragment of text. Firstly, when someone says that a certain group, in in this case group of Belarusian security forces exercises active managerial influence on the head of state, then on behalf of which group is this being said? Secondly, what happened that Makei’s group decided to identify itself as a group, albeit not yet explicitly, speaking about its opponents, but nevertheless, thus coming out of the shadows?
The answer to the first question is again given to us by the Ukrainian situation and the analysis of the processes that took place in Yanukovych’s entourage between the security forces supporting him and the pro-Western group in his entourage, which only pretended to support Yanukovych, but in fact handed him over. The chronicle of the Ukrainian Maidan perfectly shows that if Yanukovych had not surrendered his security forces and gave them the command to disperse the Maidan at the stage when it began (similar to the leaders of the PRC, who in the same way suppressed their Maidan on Tananmen), then today he would sit quietly in Kyiv. However, due to their insufficient education for political activity at this level and the desire to outwit everyone, he betrayed his security forces and came under the active managerial influence of a pro-Western group in his circle, which initially set as its goal his surrender.
What do we see in the republic? That Makei actively advocates deepening the dialogue with the West, saying that only he can save the republic from “Russian takeover”, and, for example, his partner in the fight against “Russian aggression” Pavel Yakubovich has not only practically ideologically merged with the pro-Western opposition in a number of ways questions - from Kurapaty and marches of parasites, having formed a united information front with the “Belarusian Partisan” and “Our Niva” - the worst critics of Alexander Lukashenko, but also asks for a very symbolic forgiveness from pro-Western activists, which looks very ambiguous... Is Pavel Izotovich preparing again, as in 1994, to defect to the camp of the winners or has the senator already defected?
Thus, on the first question, we see that the situation in the republic is almost a mirror image of the Ukrainian one, only with a slight Belarusian specificity associated with the fact that the struggle of clans and groups surrounded by the leader takes place in a much more shadowy format than in Ukraine.
The answer to the second question is that Makei’s group began to see the first signs of defeat of its line in the internal struggle with the security forces group and decided to resort to media support (which it has by orders of magnitude stronger than that of the security forces, who today do not even have state media at their disposal ) from their information resources in order to have the necessary impact on Lukashenko.
In this regard, the following passage from Tsarik and Sivitsky attracts attention: “The information provided by A. Lukashenko from the special services, on the basis of which critical situation key decisions are made regarding national security, is in the nature of direct misinformation and naturally pushes the first person to commit further gross political mistakes" The fact is that the coordination of all Belarusian intelligence services is carried out by the Assistant to the President of Belarus for National Security, Viktor Lukashenko. Accordingly, accusing the security forces of being engaged in gross misinformation of the head of state, in fact, they are blaming this not so much on the heads of the republic’s security departments, but on the eldest son of Alexander Lukashenko, thus driving a wedge into their relationship and trying to form a mistrust on the part of the head of state.
This thesis again takes us six months back to the situation in the summer of 2016, when on the pages of the REGNUM news agency in the articles “Belarus: the elite has already chosen Lukashenko’s successor” and “Why did they forget about Lukashenko in Minsk? Error or…” this confrontation between Vladimir Makei and Viktor Lukashenko was very substantively presented as two potentially different scenarios for the development of the republic. But if then the propaganda chicks of Makey’s nest fiercely argued with this thesis, today they, in essence, but only in their perverted form, like everything they do, repeat it.
Thus, just six months ago we were right in our fundamental assessments of the main balance of power in the republic’s elites. Today they have been virtually confirmed word for word by our opponents. Moreover. What Makei’s propagandists are trying to squeeze out of their fingers more or less scientifically is voiced much more brutally on the “Belarusian Partisan” website, in fact, the current head of this site, journalist Dmitry Galko, known for his connections with the neo-Bandera junta in Ukraine:
“Lukashenko is now being pushed to repeat the scenario of December 2010 - that is, to brutally disperse protests and destroy structures civil society. Which, naturally, will lead to a curtailment of liberalization, will make further rapprochement with the West impossible and will again turn Belarus into an international pariah, tightly tied to Russia.
The President himself is ready to take reasonable steps and make concessions in the current situation in order to reduce social tension. But there is a certain force that takes him in the opposite direction, introducing a fake danger in the form of a “Ukrainian scenario.” And this force was entrenched in the power bloc.
Power is not monolithic, this is quite obvious. It has its “sharp ends” and “blunt ends”, that is, supporters of unscrewing the screws and supporters of tightening them, those who support moderate pro-Western views and those who immoderately support Russia, those who love the NKVD uniform and those who condemn Stalin's repressions. They whisper different things into the president's ears from both sides, which is why he rushes about chaotically. In my opinion, there cannot and should not be any throwing around here. Only concessions, only dialogue, only an end to repression, the release of all those arrested and the continuation of “perestroika”. An attempt to repeat the scenario of December 2010 this time may develop into a Romanian scenario. With subsequent hybrid aggression according to the Donbass scenario.”
Thus, with his text, Galko confirms both the theses of Tsarik and Sivitsky, and the fact that a pro-Western group operates around Lukashenko. But if it exists, then there is absolutely no doubt about who its leader is, and there is absolutely no doubt that its goals - the removal of Lukashenko from power - are exactly what “perestroika” meets. It’s not worth mentioning how “perestroika” ended for Gorbachev and Yanukovych.
It is also important to note that, in fact, the strictly anti-Lukashenko Galko and the pro-Makeev Tsarik and Sivitsky are saying the same thing. A logical question arises: does Lukashenko really not see this connection?
regnum author Yuri Baranchik
19:43 — REGNUM Lately, both in our country and abroad, politicians and experts have been asking the same question - what is Trump doing? Why is he creating not only in all directions of the American foreign policy, but also more globally - world geopolitics and economics for all key players a lot of small and large problems? Why is NATO and transatlantic solidarity falling apart? Why is he leaving the Middle East? Why is he declaring a trade war not only against China and Russia, but also against his main ally, the European Union?
Ivan Shilov © IA REGNUM
There are many versions put forward, but the most that experts offer as an explanatory hypothesis is that Trump’s actions are of an economic nature, such as that he seeks to rid the United States of enslaving economic treaties.
“The era of trade wars and robberies” that currently hosts the White House is not an “episode” and not an incident. tea fluk-tu-a-tion “ry-night eco-no-mi-ki.” These are completely systemic and, moreover, conscious and necessary long-term steps on-ci-o-nal-but ori-en-ti-ro-van-noy " Trump's teams." Somehow, unlike previous administrations, it’s so egoistic to work in in- te-res precisely na-tsi-o-nal-noy economic-mi-ki. And not the “global-list” financial circles, which solved their problems of a total re-arrangement of the world, including at the expense of their own -but the American people, and not just everyone else.
And it must be very clearly understood that these pro-tek-ci-o-nist measures will survive President Trump, they will last for a long time, if not -Always. The wave of “trade restrictions” and other sanctions will only continue to grow. Moreover, no matter how our pro-advanced eco-no-mi-sties laugh at the stra-te-gi-her im-port-be-replaced, in the USA it is also official-tsi-al-but for-pu-sche-na and is in full swing. This program is called Buy American and Hire American (“Buy-pay Amer-ri-kan-skoe - na-ni-may amer-ri-kan-tsev”) and approved in the spring of 2017. Its meaning and purpose is to return to the United States those industries and jobs that have left the country in the era of globalization since the 1970s and 1980s.
That's why it's just kon-sta-ti-ru-em - this is not a new eco-no-mi-che-war. This is such a new world in which we will have to live. And all the thoughts about the “laws of global markets”, all the attempts to “integrate the domestic eco-no-mi -ki in inter-family distribution” and other benefits are meaningless in this new world.
All this, of course, is correct from an economic point of view. But what do Trump’s sudden movements mean from the point of view of political metaphysics? What paradigm or concept are they starting from? What produces them?
It is impossible to understand the reasons for such a sharp activity of Trump as a political actor, as well as those people who stand behind him, only within the framework of the economic paradigm, but only on the basis of political metaphysics, an understanding of the political processes that have been taking place in the world for not the last two years. three years, and at least thirty to forty years. AND the most important event During this period of world history the collapse of the USSR began.
Ryzhkova Anna © IA Krasnaya Vesna
What can you name one of the most important reasons for the collapse? Soviet Union? In addition to the subjective factor (betrayal of the elite), there was also an objective factor - this, which pressed Soviet economy stronger and stronger, but from which, for ideological reasons, the party leadership of the country could not get rid of, since this would not only mean the collapse of the socialist idea, but would also create a whole series serious problems CPSU. As a result surplus imperial infrastructure crushed the USSR. How at one time she crushed the Roman Empire, Spain, British Empire and many others.
Part of the Soviet leadership, concentrated mainly in the special services, understood that it was necessary to get rid of the unnecessary imperial burden. In principle, preparations for this have been going on since the time of Yu. Andropov. However, in the final stages of the collapse of the empire, something went wrong. Perhaps there was not even enough theoretical knowledge on how to get rid of unnecessary imperial ballast.
As a result, the planned demolition of unnecessary imperial infrastructure and the transformation of the country and the world socialist system did not take place - the Union collapsed in an emergency mode. Nevertheless, the excess infrastructure was shed, after which Russia was able to breathe freely and, with Vladimir Putin coming to power, begin new stage imperial development.
It is no coincidence that George Bush Sr., in a stunningly frank interview in 1992, spoke about this as follows:
« The collapse of the Soviet Union is my most important defeat. I am afraid that this is a foreign policy Catastrophe, the extent of which we still do not understand. You don't understand well what happened. Russia has not been defeated, on the contrary, it has become very strong, and we need it to be our Friend. And those who defeated me only want to rob. The Russians will not forget this and someday they will send us a return bill.
Russia and the Union are like Matryoshka dolls. They were nested within each other. In reality, we competed with Russia, but it was in the form of a Union, that is, it had huge weights on its feet. Now these Weights have been removed during the collapse of the Union, Russia will overcome its current problems and become much more evil and powerful and will remember well everyone who has offended it today. And I would like to be the same Friend of Russia as I was an Enemy for the Soviets.
Do you want to know what kind of weights she had? This is in the numbers - in the Union there were two bottomless holes into which all budget surpluses flowed - Agriculture And Social help. Since today's Russia can have the same income and not spend money on these unprofitable expenditure items, in the coming years it will become stronger and more dangerous than the USSR».
It is also no coincidence that Madeleine Albright’s insight recently voiced that the Americans should not have declared their victory in cold war: “I think it was a mistake on our part to say that we won the Cold War. They are the ones who lost the Cold War. And the difference here is not only semantic. communist system failed."
What does this mean? This indicates that a certain part of the Western elites are aware of the processes taking place in the last thirty years. Russia did not die and did not perish with the collapse of the USSR. It was bombarded with debris, but in the time that has elapsed since the collapse of the Union, it has not only cleared away the rubble, but has strengthened so much that it can now host the Olympics and the World Cup without any problems, under conditions of sanctions and without socialist belt-tightening, not to mention such achievements such as the return of Crimea to its homeland and the operation in Syria.
What was it like in the Soviet Union? Let me remind you of just one quote from the correspondence between Brezhnev and Kosygin:
“Somehow it turned out that we decided to hold the Sports Olympics in the USSR. This event costs a huge amount of money. Perhaps we should reconsider this issue and abandon the Olympics. I know that this will cause a lot of misunderstandings, but when resolving this issue, we should probably proceed from the fact that questions about the cost of this event come to the fore.
Some comrades suggested to me that it was possible to refuse this event by paying some small fee in the form of a fine. I would also like to know your opinion on this issue. In addition to the colossal expenses, there is also the question in this matter that, from the experience of holding similar Olympics in the past, there may be various kinds scandals that could tarnish the Soviet Union. In this regard, we should remember the Federal Republic of Germany and other places. And with regard to the Soviet Union, I think that our enemies will especially try to do this. If you also have doubts on this score, perhaps today, as an exchange of views, raise this issue at the Politburo.”
Indeed, it was not the West that defeated us, but we lost. But further actions of the West, especially the United States, which began to enormously inflate its imperial infrastructure, affected them in the most deplorable way.
What is the US economy like today? This is a colossus with feet of clay. The negative trade balance is about $850 billion. The US consumes more than it produces and is losing resources to resist. Today they are the same frog that China, the European Union, and even Mexico are slowly frying over the fire so that they don’t notice: of the defi-cited 566 billion dollars, the most is 375 .2 billion dollars go to China, 151.4 to the European Union, 71.1 to Mexico, 68.6 to Japan.
Ivan Shilov © IA REGNUM
What was the task of the neo-Trotskyist democrats who conceptually ruled the United States (with the help of Nazi money laundered and invested in the country’s economy) all the years after World War II? To make the USA, as the Trotskyists in the USSR tried to do in their time, the base of the world revolution, only using different methods. However, both there and there, no one was interested in the interests of the people. Both the Russians and the Americans were to serve as a purely expendable resource to keep the fire burning. This is why the tendencies of deindustrialization in the late USSR and the USA are so similar, this is why the general purposeful decline in the level of mass culture is connected, this is why the Soviet and American professors who forged space programs and nuclear shields stood in the same queues at American labor exchanges in the 90s. e.
In recent years, this American party seemed to have to push themselves a little more, and that’s it, the task would be completed - they would rule over the whole world. However, this was an illusion. While they were soaring in their clouds and building their castles, Russia, China, Iran, and the European Union grew stronger. And we are ready to issue our invoice.
Trump, or rather, the people who stand behind him, understand all this perfectly well - that if the United States does not have time to shed its excessive imperial infrastructure, then it will crush them, just as it once crushed their main enemy - the USSR. That is why Trump is rapidly destroying it and everything connected with it. And since it is, in fact, the current world geopolitical and geo-economic system - the WTO, NATO, Euro-Atlantic solidarity, multilateral agreements and so on, the United States is forced to destroy precisely these “world bonds” so beloved by the liberals of all countries.
(ss) Victor Freitas
Trump’s task is to reset all this as quickly as possible, before no one understands anything, and start negotiating again. But it's clear that main task any negotiator, and Trump is a very experienced negotiator, guards like the apple of his eye. That's why he behaves in such a way that no one understands anything, but sees only a beast (or an elephant in a china shop) running madly around the cage, which destroys everything it touches.
Very talented. Almost brilliant. Like many Hollywood products. Trump is an actor who does not understand this himself, but which is understood very well by those who nominated him to play this particular role. But if the West thinks that this will deceive us, then they are mistaken. We also have this kind of professionals. And they worked according to the same scenario, only much earlier, when they nominated Vladimir Zhirinovsky to prevent his return to the USSR. Exactly the same actor, but who plays as he lives. Trump in this regard is his complete analogy, only at a higher level (which does not mean higher level self-reflection, like Zhirinovsky). In this regard, Trump rather plays like Hitler, whom the directors of the play also selected for his “special” mission.
If we think that Trump’s goal is in the area of the economy, some kind of trade wars with China and the EU, tariffs, oil prices, gas exports, the dollar exchange rate, that he is a businessman, then we will undoubtedly lose, since let's buy into what the United States is initially willing to give up. But we will not see the true purpose of his, at first glance, chaotic actions at this level of analysis.
But as soon as we rise from the level of economics to the level of geopolitical metaphysics, Trump’s true goal will appear before us in all its glory - getting rid of unnecessary imperial infrastructure, which puts its weight on the United States more and more.
That is why the Directors are giving us the Middle East again, and China - Asia. We are even ready to give Moscow the entire territory again former USSR and even (at the second stage of agreements) Eastern Europe. They want to return to us those weights that Russia got rid of with the collapse of the USSR, and to get rid of them themselves.
In any case, the post-Yalta peace associated with the victory of the Soviet Union in World War II, to which the United States, Britain and France managed to cling, as well as, inter alia, the period associated with the defeat of the USSR in the Cold War and the short American twenty-year plan, is ending. And a new world treaty, perhaps after World War III, is just around the corner. What might he look like?
The USA goes to the North and South America, returning to the Monroe Doctrine. Russia is given back the entire post-Soviet territory, part of Eastern Europe and interspersed with the Middle East, North and Central Africa. China - Asia. Europe, that part of it that understands what is happening, will cluster around Germany. It will be in alliance with Russia, France and Austria (new Imperial Concert).
The new Middle East will indeed be new - Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia will seriously decrease in size so that with their excessive political mass they do not introduce excessive and unnecessary unrest into the processes in their region and the world. Those who are against this course of events will simply be torn apart, and their countries will plunge into the abyss of chaos and suffering.
The world will truly become multipolar. And the United States will seriously work on this together with us and China. Because if they do not do this, they will come to disintegration, the consequence of which will also be a multipolar world, only without the United States in its current form, but with two or three countries in the place of current America.
Does Trump understand all this? It may well be. At your own level. But he only plays as best he can, and the old saloon principle says: “don’t shoot the pianist, he plays as best he can.”
Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping, Donald Trump - all these leaders at the head of their countries are far from accidental. Planet Earth is truly entering a new planetary cycle of its development. Those dark forces that were at the helm human history in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, go down in history.
