Today, the Skoda Octavia C-class car is very popular among car enthusiasts throughout Europe. The sedan has good handling, reliability and high quality assemblies. A total of three generations of cars were produced, with the release of an updated version of the sedan, as a rule, there was also the release of new power plants.
All this has contributed to the fact that the current line of Skoda Octavia engines is replete with abundance and in some way complicates the choice for the buyer. Experienced drivers recommend paying attention to the service life of the Skoda Octavia engine, in this way you can significantly narrow the range of the highest quality power units.
Engine life 1.2 TSI
This engine is equipped with one of the most popular trim levels – the Skoda Octavia A7. For lovers of dynamic, high-speed driving, a turbodiesel with a power of 105 horsepower is more than enough. Often, A7 owners also carry out chip tuning, thanks to which they can improve the car’s speed performance, increase power levels and equip the sedan with additional software.
This engine boasts truly high power levels combined with optimal fuel consumption. But it also has problems with the timing chain, which makes itself felt closer to the 300 thousand km mark. In general, before this mileage, no significant problems with the engine had yet been noticed. This is a fairly reliable power unit that can cover 300-400 thousand km without significant repairs.
Resource of the Skoda Octavia 1.4 power unit
The base 1.4-liter engine with 80 horsepower is one of the most affordable and popular engines in the lineup. However, many car owners note that the power of the Skoda Octavia with such a modification under the hood is clearly not enough. This equipment is perfect for those who need a car for every day. The features of this build are as follows:
- Direct fuel injection;
- Double boost;
- Smaller dimensions.
Similar changes in constructively contributes to greater vehicle efficiency. But the Skoda Octavia 1.4 is not without some drawbacks - problems often arise with the lubrication system. At the milestone of 300 thousand kilometers, the first problems with the timing chain tensioner appear, and problems with injectors often arise. In general, the engine, due to its simplified design, has a longer service life than the 1.6 MPI modification. Among car owners you can easily find those whose Skoda Octavia 1.4 has successfully surpassed the 350-400 thousand km mark.
Engine life 1.6 MPI
All three generations of Skoda Octavia cars were equipped with this engine. Made using technology Volkswagen engine has high dynamic characteristics. It is for this reason that most sedans produced before 1998 had a 1.6 MPI under the hood. The most successful build is considered to be the Skoda Octavia A5. In 1998, the company's engineers decided to modernize the engine. As a result of the modernization, vehicles equipped with this installation demonstrated a significant reduction in fuel consumption. The marks are set at the following level:
- In the urban cycle, 7.5-8 liters per 100 km;
- In the extra-urban cycle, fuel consumption dropped to 6 liters per 100 km;
- Mixed cycle 7 liters;
Everything would be fine, but the 1.6 MPI engine, after the modernization, began to increasingly exhibit malfunctions and interruptions that were previously unusual for it. A major renovation engine has become practically unfeasible. A mileage of up to 200 thousand kilometers guarantees reliability, but after that unexpected expenses may begin. This should be taken into account when choosing a car for secondary market. Many car owners note that this type of engine is capable of traveling 400 thousand kilometers or more, but on one condition that scheduled maintenance is carried out on time.
➖ Visibility
➖ Weak paintwork
➖ Noise insulation (wheel arches)
pros
➕ Spacious trunk
➕ Reliability
➕ Controllability
Advantages and disadvantages of the Skoda Octavia A5 identified based on reviews real owners. More detailed pros and cons of the Skoda Octavia 1.4, 1.6 MPI and 1.8 TSI with manual, automatic and DSG robot can be found in the stories below:
Owner reviews
The car is reliable; I have never had any problems with the engine or suspension. After 7 years and 85 thousand mileage, I changed the rear silent blocks of the front levers + the rear spring burst. The stabilizer struts and pads are still original. There are no signs of corrosion, few chips - I mostly drive in the city (I live 15 km from the city).
Combined cycle consumption is 7 liters per 100 km. It steers great. There is enough engine in the city - torquey. The air conditioner is working properly, there have been no refuelings yet. In winter it warms up in 10 minutes. I'm still completely satisfied with the car.
The advantages of the model also include a classic, timeless body and a feeling of security in a large car. Good ground clearance, adequate cross-country ability. A pleasant interior with a soft panel, good ergonomics - everything is in its place.
The sound insulation of the front arches is not very good, they say this is a feature of the Golf suspension. Wide thresholds stain pants in bad weather (but there is a pipe with a diameter of 40 mm). Wide A-pillars interfere with visibility when turning, you have to turn your head.
Alexander Telegin, review of Skoda Octavia A5 1.4 (80 hp) manual transmission 2011
Video review
I bought a Skoda and I don’t regret it, I drive safely. The car itself is beyond praise, dynamic, responsive, informative steering wheel - several times I got out of such a situation that I thought everything, but I got out!
The speed is stable, the interior is comfortable, the climate is such that you can die from the cold, in automatic mode works flawlessly. I drove it for a year, the engine is like a clock, and the movement is like an electric motor. If you need to rush, please, I barely paid off the cops, they weren’t even going to catch up with me, they slowed down at the checkpoint. And I just ran it in according to the regime! Overall, the Skoda is a great car.
Alexey, review of Skoda Octavia 1.8 DSG 2011
Very fast for 1.4. It goes smoothly on the highway at 180 km/h. The acceleration dynamics are also pleasing. Comfortable. Large trunk (although it doesn’t like heaviness). He eats little.
There are more shortcomings... Weak paintwork, chips and scratches are quite common. Very poor sound insulation of wheel arches, in the cabin at speed strong hum. In service if used original spare parts, a little expensive for a budget car.
But the biggest disadvantage, which outweighs all the advantages, is that it warms up catastrophically in winter. IN severe frost For about 15 minutes you drive like you’re in a freezer. Then only the arrow begins to rise. Sometimes I manage to get home from work, and it’s just starting to get warm in the cabin...
Evgeniy, review of Skoda Octavia A5 1.4 manual transmission 2011
I am very pleased with the car: spacious interior, huge trunk, reliable engine and chassis. Included are rain and light sensors, PTF, dual-zone climate control, cruise control, excellent music with eight speakers.
Today I understand that by selling this car and even adding 300-400 “rubles”, I will not get anything better. Reading about breakdowns of turbines, engines and gearboxes up to one hundred thousand, I am simply amazed, while everywhere they try to present this as the norm. I haven’t mentioned the body yet, it’s actually galvanized and doesn’t rust. But the paintwork is definitely weak, with numerous chips all over the body.
Review of Skoda Octavia 1.6 MPI (102 hp) manual 2012
First impressions after Astra are, of course, very positive. The noise is better, the interior is more modern, the displays are not monochrome. Mechanics 6-speed, on the highway - just a song. At 200 km/h – 4,500 rpm. It eats, however, at the level of a 5-speed Astra, but I never paid attention special attention for expenses.
We went to Altai on it. No problem at all. Average consumption for the entire trip is 9.2 liters. I covered 1,800 km in 4 days. On the road, your back does not get tired, you can sit comfortably. Cruise control is a nice feature on uncrowded or multi-lane roads.
Acceleration is quite acceptable. At first I was generally delighted with the 1.8 turbo, but now I’ve gotten used to it, it seems that it doesn’t work. According to the passport, 8.7 seconds to 100 km/h, Astra had 10.5 seconds. The difference is noticeable.
All wheel drive works. On ice you can feel the moment of transfer of power - your ass is pulled a little (before the systems are turned on). Once he sat down on his belly along a muddy country road and hung his muzzle up. I kept thinking that I would have to go out into the muck in clean shoes and work trousers. But no, I left. I turned off all sorts of anti-skids, turned the wheels and got out. I was very happy. I never drove around the traffic jam on this winter road again.
My wife, after riding in the back, began to complain that she was getting motion sickness. I searched the Internet - yes, many people complain about the excessive softness of the original shock absorbers.
In May, some nasty cricket appeared on the right. I’ll tell you, it’s very wonderful to live in the time of the Internet, because I was already prepared to disassemble the torpedo and look for the asshole, but on the forums everything has long been clarified that we need to go from the other side - under the fender liner on the right there is a block of the original signaling, and it starts to rattle at speed. I cured it by tightening it and placing a piece of some old gasket on it.
Review of the Skoda Octavia Combi 1.8 TSI station wagon with all-wheel drive, 2012.
I drove my beloved Corolla and had no troubles, I loved the car very much. But I wanted an automatic, climate control, cruise, and I decided to take a risk and get a new car.
Now the mileage is 1300 km. The seat is certainly more comfortable than in the Corolla. But in Toyota I liked the mirror settings more, in Skoda I don’t like it. The overview is almost the same for both. The cars have large, comfortable mirrors, but the wide front pillar gets in the way.
In the Octavia, passengers do not like the center console, which rests on their feet. Nobody complained about this in Corolla. Passengers also don’t like the rear seat in the Octavia; again, the Corolla had no complaints. But there is, of course, more legroom in the back in the Skoda.
There is nothing to say about the trunk - in the Octavia it is simply super. In the Corolla the loops were eaten most volume. In the Octavia, the noise of the wheels is very annoying. In the Corolla, the wheel arches were not as noisy. I don’t know about others, but it seems to me that the Shumka is better in the Corolla. The Octavia has a very noisy suspension. In the Corolla, again, the suspension is quieter.
Overall, I liked the Corolla E120 much more. There were no complaints about the Turkish assembly at all. In short, the next car will definitely not be a Skoda. Thanks to all.
Maxim, review of the 2013 Skoda Octavia 1.8 TSI with automatic transmission.
As you know, it is not customary to change horses at a crossing. HoweverSkoda I decided - after many months of salesYetiAndOctavialost the technologically advanced 1.2 turbo engineTSI. Instead, the Czechs again returned to us the “aspirated” 1.6. Why this castling was necessary, we’ll figure it out together with the baseSkoda Octavia 1.6 MPI.
The answer to a seemingly simple question eventually turned into almost an entire investigation! It turned out that just testing an Octavia with a new engine and consulting with a sales manager is completely insufficient. I had to involve the owners of a Skoda with a 1.2TSI engine and the service and warranty department of the dealership. Why was the last one needed? It's simple. Most of the suspicions about replacing engines were due to unreliability power unit 1.2TSI. They say it was too fragile, so they changed it to 1.6. As it turned out, everything is far from so obvious.
The fact is that Skoda has two completely different engines 1.2TSI. The first, chain - the one that was installed on Skoda Yeti, really turned out to be a rather capricious unit, often asking questions to its owners. To a greater extent, this is why it was replaced on the crossover. However, the new Skoda Octavia was equipped with a completely different 1.2TSI engine, which differs not only in its timing belt drive, but also has a lot of structural differences with the Yeti engine. Moreover, through our own channels we managed to find out that technical and warranty complaints have not yet been identified either with the turbine or with other parts of the Skoda Octavia 1.2TSI belt motor. Single requests were recorded.
Suspicions related to the fact that the small-volume turbo engine did not warm up well, causing the owners and passengers in the cabin to freeze in winter, were also not confirmed. It turned out that the engine exhaust system redesigned on the Octavia, and in particular the exhaust manifold, long ago resolved this problem.
.jpg)
Considering that, in terms of its characteristics, the basic Octavia turbo engine fully satisfied the needs of the owners, the question “why they changed it” only intensified. It turned out that it was all their fault marketing research Skoda company. And to be more precise - extremely conservative preferences of regional consumers.
If in largest cities In our country, new technologies are treated more or less leniently, while in the regions, buyers give preference to proven and familiar solutions. This is where the Czechs got caught. After the Skoda dealership salesman said that the car would have a TSAI turbo engine with a DESGE preselective robotic transmission and the latest generation EESP system, the buyer got up and went to the brand, where they said clearly and habitually “1.6 automatic.” And now the same can be said in Skoda showrooms.
True, the six-speed automatic transmission now interests us to a lesser extent, since Octavia inherited it from previous models. But the 1.6 MPI engine, contrary to many opinions and rumors, is completely new on the car. This 110 horsepower belt motor has nothing in common with the 1.6 (105 hp) CFNA series engine installed on the Polo Sedan or Skoda Rapid. According to its design features new engine The 1.6 MPI is essentially an engine from the TSI family, only without a turbine and direct injection. It is this that will now become the most affordable power unit for the Octavia.
.jpg)
The previous MPI engine left behind a memory in the form of an extremely unpretentious, but very noisy and not the most efficient power unit. Sort of unsightly " workhorse", which was supposed not to drive, but to pull, and always and in any weather. This image suited the first Octavia Tour, the current Polo Sedan and even the new Rapid. But for the new Octavia, which during its existence has noticeably blossomed, ennobled itself and even managed to climb into the D-class with one foot, the engine would spoil its reputation.
So, let's go. The first suspicions about noise are dispelled literally from the start. Skoda begins its journey quietly and naturally. There is no obsessive metallic hum characteristic of its predecessor up to 4000 rpm. Afterwards, the engine, of course, shows a “voice”, but this is rather a signal that it’s time to change gear.
By the way, the characteristics of the engine remain true to tradition - the engine is most efficient in the mid-speed range, which is very convenient for everyday city driving. For a more active start, you have to push the accelerator a little harder, starting the movement of thousands from two to two and a half thousand revolutions, and there is no point in cranking it up to the cutoff anymore - peak thrust is achieved at 3800 rpm. As a result, maintaining the tachometer needle in the specified range, when active work With the manual gearbox lever you can quite confidently maintain any city pace.
It’s a pleasure to operate the Skoda’s “mechanics” - the lever literally slides into the gear slots on its own. With such a clear and light box, you begin to doubt the need for an “automatic”.
It's a little more difficult on the track. The Skoda Octavia 1.6, of course, reaches its cruising speed of 100 km/h easily. And 140 km/h is, in general, not a problem for her. You just need to immediately tune in that the speed gain will not be very intense. And overtaking within these speed limits is given to Skoda exclusively by moving.
I was pleased with the engine and moderate appetite. During the test day in a mixed driving cycle, we managed to achieve 9 liters per 100 km.
Is there a big difference with the 1.2 TSI engine? By and large, the new naturally aspirated engine clearly loses only in elasticity - the turbo engine pulled confidently and easily from the very bottom, allowing the Skoda to be faster at low speeds. But the new engine is practically devoid of pronounced pickup. In all other respects, the engines are very similar - both in accelerating to 100 km/h and in achieving maximum speed. From the point of view of choosing the basic version of the model, the motor will not surprise you with its capabilities, but it will not disappoint either.
In addition, the atmospheric unit has operational advantages. The 1.6 MPI engine is technically simpler, and therefore cheaper to maintain. It is not so demanding on fuel quality. In addition, only for this engine you can choose a classic hydromechanical “automatic”, and not the preselective DSG robot, which many are afraid of. For our buyer, all of these are very important parameters, the appearance of which promises the Skoda Octavia 1.6 MPI a primarily strategic gain.
.jpg)
Otherwise, this car is still the embodiment of a caring family man's dream. The salon may not amaze with the flight of designer imagination, but it is incredibly comfortable and very spacious for all inhabitants. The quality of finishing and the feeling of good quality in every, even the smallest detail. Even a modest standard radio outperforms many more expensive rivals in terms of sound quality.
Already become a “trick”Skoda standard glass scraper hidden in the gas tank flap. You can also order a standard trash can for the side door or a double-sided rubber-pile mat for the trunk. By the number of incredibly pragmatic solutions Skodaahead of the rest.
The door pockets are lined with lint, even on the small display, the parking sensors display parking zones in detail, all the necessary additional benefits are clear and always at hand, the rear armrest has adjustable cup holders in size, and, of course, a large opening in the trunk. And this is almost a basic version, with only a few additional options added.
The trunk itself is what we are used to seeing in Skoda - that is, huge. Of course, with a 12-volt outlet, a spacious additional compartment and a full-size spare wheel.
What is the result?
With the replacement of the engine, the Skoda Octavia 1.6 MPI did not lose the main thing - harmony. The transition to the classic scheme of the aggregate pair was not a step back for Octavia. This is still a very comfortable family car in every sense, and only a temperamental father of the family would be at odds with it. It’s better for this one to look towards turbo versions. For the rest, enjoy the incredible functionality of the Czech car, relegating the dynamic characteristics to the background.
The editors of the "Engine" magazine express their gratitude to the "AutoPremium" company, the official Skoda dealer in St. Petersburg, for the car provided.
Skoda Octavia
Volkswagen's popular 1.6-liter gasoline engine has a very long history. He is already over 40 years old. Yes, this is not a mistake. During its existence, many design changes, modernizations appeared, and as a result - big number modifications. Initially it was offered with a carburetor, later single-point injection appeared, and in last years– multipoint (MPI) and direct (FSI).
The last two versions were released in parallel. They were installed on many VW cars - Seat, Skoda, Volkswagen and Audi. MPI is structurally outdated, sluggish, but very reliable. FSI is more modern, has more power and is the cause of constant alarm messages accompanied by the “Check Engine” indicator lighting up.
1.6 MPI appeared in 1994. During its production, versions with varying degrees boost, with 8 and 16-valve cylinder heads, OHC and DOHC gas distribution systems. The most famous and longest-lasting 102-horsepower modification. Her simple design(two valves per cylinder, one camshaft, a limited proportion of complex electronics) allows repairs to be carried out with the least amount of effort and money. There is a wide range of substitutes on the market at reasonable prices.
You can count on very good durability. Periodically occurring malfunctions are the failure of the ignition coil ($70-80 for a branded replacement) and the throttle valve. The latter requires cleaning every 40,000 km and reprogramming ($50-70). Operating with a dirty throttle valve results in the need to replace it - about $250. An original damper from an official service will cost about $200, and a good replacement will cost about $110.
The 1.6 MPI spark plugs are covered by a manifold - replacing them is difficult.
The disadvantage of the 102-horsepower 1.6 MPI is high fuel consumption. For example, in Passat and Octavia it reaches 9-9.5 l/100 km. The problem is known to both the owners and the manufacturer. The first ones solve it by installing gas equipment, since the engine runs great on gas.
In 2001, the FSI direct injection version entered the market, which consumes 15-20% less fuel than the MPI. The engine is different modern design, chain drive of camshafts (except for versions designated BAD) and better dynamics. The first copies had a power of 110 hp, later ones - 115 hp.
Unfortunately, it quickly became clear that the design of the new engine was imperfect. And although the engine block was still strong, the “head” and equipment caused a lot of trouble. In the first versions, the gas distribution system failed: the chain quickly stretched, the hydraulic chain tensioner and the valve timing regulator failed.
Soon the problem of carbon deposits on the intake valves arose, and malfunctions in the electronics that controlled the engine began to occur. Many owners drive with the “Check Engine” indicator constantly glowing. They reason like this: “The fight against it does not always give results, and even then it is often temporary. And the expenses incurred can be large or even too large.”
Many troubles begin due to refueling with low-quality 95 or 92 gasoline, while the engine is designed for 98. As a result, the “Check” lights up, the valves begin to make noise, the lambda probe and the nitrogen oxide sensor fail.
FSI is significantly more expensive to repair. While MPI repair costs are in the hundreds of dollars, FSI may cost around $1,000. Not without reason, the FSI version was constantly modernized, and in 2008, further production was completely abandoned. The improved MPI remains on sale to this day and is considered one of the best petrol units from the VW group.
Typical faults 1.6MPI
Throttle valve.
The most common and most characteristic problem The 8-valve engine version is associated with malfunction throttle valve. This is the result of its pollution. Mechanics recommend cleaning the damper regularly (every 40,000 km, cost $50-70) and reprogramming it. Replacement is much more expensive. For the original one you will have to pay 170-200 dollars, and for an analogue of decent quality - 110 dollars.
Ignition coil.
The disease is manifested by uneven engine operation and partial loss of power. Fortunately, there is only one coil and replacing it is simple and inexpensive.
Lambda probe.
Repairs are inexpensive.
Typical faults 1.6FSI
Carbon deposits on valves and intake ports.
The problem is manifested by a drop in engine power and unstable idling. Removing oil deposits is problematic. In order to do this well, you need to remove the block head and get rid of carbon deposits mechanically.
This is what one of the valves of the 1.6 FSI / 115 hp engine looks like. after 100,000 km.
Nitrogen oxide sensor.
Very expensive replacement - up to $500.
Timing belt
The timing chain stretches and the chain tensioner fails (mainly in early production versions). If left untreated, the chain may jump with subsequent damage to the valves and head. Replacing the chain, shoes and rollers will cost about $300 outside the dealership.
Sometimes the 1.6 FSI engine control unit fails.
Application
1.6 MPI.
Audi A3 I (101 and 102 hp, 1996-2003)
Audi A3 II (102 hp, 2003-2010)
Audi A4 I (101 and 102 hp, 1994-2001)
Audi A4 II (102 hp, 2000-2008)
Seat Ibiza II/Cordoba I (75 and 101 hp, 1996-2002)
Seat Leon I (101 and 102 hp, 1999-2006)
Seat Leon II (102 hp, 2005-2012)
Seat Altea (102 hp, 2004-2010)
Seat Toledo I (101 hp, 1996-99)
Seat Toledo II (101 hp, 1998-2000)
Seat Toledo III (102 hp, 2004-2009)
Seat Exeo (102 hp, 2009-2010)
Skoda Felicia (75 hp, 1995-2001)
Skoda Octavia I (75, 101 and 102 hp, 1996-2010)
Skoda Octavia II (102 hp, 2004-2013)
Skoda Octavia III (110 hp, from 2014)
Volkswagen: Polo, Golf, Bora, Jetta, Touran, New Beetle, Passat.
Engine 1.6 MPI with 75, 101 and 102 hp. found application in almost all VW models (class B, C and D).
1.6 FSI.
Audi A2 – 110 hp (BAD), 2002-2005
Audi A3 II – 115 hp (BAG, BLF and BLP), 2003-2007
Seat – 1.6 FSI did not go to any model.
Skoda Octavia II – 115 hp (BLF), 2004-2008
Volkswagen Golf - IV 110 hp (BAD), 2001-2003
Volkswagen Bora - 110 hp (BAD), 2001-2005
Volkswagen Golf V – 115 hp, 2003-2007
Volkswagen Jetta V – 115 hp, 2005-2007
Volkswagen Touran I – 115 hp, 2003-2006
Volkswagen Passat B6 – 115 hp, 2005-2007
Czech repeatedly Octavia pleased consumers. Sales of this car are growing all over the world, which is no exception for the CIS countries. Based on an analysis of all indicators, the manufacturer decided to return to the use of an atmospheric internal combustion engine MPi instead of TSi. This happened because the TSi did not justify itself and often broke down. Engineers Skoda Octavia decided to return to service the reliable 1.6 engine with modifications.
Appearance
Skoda Octavia- famous for its elegant and beautiful design. The shapes look gentle and smooth. Streamlined shapes and excellent aerodynamic properties make the car more luxurious.
The front part of the body is made in a classic style Skoda Octavia. The radiator grille inspires massiveness and has a chrome trim, which is typical for these cars. In the middle of the front bumper there is a full-strip air intake grille, into which fog lights are mounted. Classic 3rd generation front fenders Skoda Octavia.
The sides of the body and doors are harmoniously combined with the rest of the parts and have both stiffening ribs and smooth lines. Rear end The car remains massive, with a large rear bumper and an impressive trunk lid, under which there is a spacious luggage compartment. Outdoor lighting devices are bright and give good review even at night. They fit harmoniously into the overall exterior Octavia.
Interior
Interior Skoda Octavia not much different from previous models. It adds some new elements, but everything remains the same. Comfortable and comfortable seats. The interior still has the nice colors and flowing shapes that enhance the car.
Differences appeared in dashboard. New forms of stove air ducts. The functional panel of the air conditioner has changed slightly, which did not affect the quality in any way. The gearshift knob has become more pleasant and fits better in the hand.
The large luggage compartment will not leave car enthusiasts indifferent, because Skoda Octavia has always been famous for its spacious trunk. For those who have little space, the rear seats can be folded down, which will allow you to fit more luggage, but at the same time take away the number of seats.
Specifications
Now Skoda Octavia will be equipped with two naturally aspirated versions: 1.4l and 1.6l. The first changes can be seen in the fact that at low speeds you don't feel the pulling power like on the TSi. MPi-the engine became 250 kg heavier due to its design features. The car's voice appears only at 4 thousand revolutions, but this is more due to the fact that the next gear should be engaged. The rest of the time the internal combustion engine is almost inaudible.
Manufacturers Skoda Octavia we returned to the old traditions, when the car should operate at medium speeds, which is very good for the urban cycle. To make the car start faster, you should press the gas pedal more and increase the speed to 2.5 - 2.7 thousand. Some owners do not like this, because they expected that Skoda would still achieve MPi so that the power appears at low speeds and the start is more playful. This fact scared me away, but after test drives, fans of this car still agreed that this drawback was not significant.
In the new MPi installed the new kind Timing belt, which was not inherent in these cars. The belt has become wider and stronger, which makes it possible to carry out the first replacement of the gas distribution kit after a mileage of 200,000 - 250,000 km. This point significantly reduces the cost of service. Also, it is worth noting that the new engine is not as picky about fuel as its predecessor.
The technical side of the design simplifies maintenance and makes engine maintenance cheaper. But, replacing the internal combustion engine with MPi, did not in any way affect the overall harmony outside and inside the engine compartment.
On Skoda Octavia 1.6 naturally aspirated engine is installed MPi, which has a power of 110 horses. This is an in-line four, which came to replace the TSi class internal combustion engines due to their frequent failure. The manufacturer promises that the new engine will be more reliable and cheaper to maintain.
Planning release Skoda Octavia with the second version of the class engine MPi and volume 1.4l. It will be the same as the 1.6, only with reduced consumption by 20%, which will allow urban driving enthusiasts to save more on fuel. The reliability and quality of the 1.4 engine will remain the same as that of its older brother.
Advantages and disadvantages
Advantages of the motor MPi:
- dynamic starting from medium speed;
- reliable, new improved design will allow maintenance of many parts less frequently, which will enable owners to save their costs;
- simplicity in design, allows you to make repairs with ease;
- service life up to 1 million km, which betrays confidence and quality;
- fuel consumption is 9 liters in the city and 6.5 liters on the highway, which will significantly save cash owner.
Disadvantages of the MPi motor:
- at low speeds MPi, does not develop sufficient dynamics;
- acceleration picks up less quickly than the TSi.
As you can see, the new engine surpasses the advantages offered by the manufacturer Skoda Octavia.
Equipment and prices
Equipment for Skoda Octavia only one so far. This is a 1.6l/110hp engine. average cost a car with these characteristics is about 800,000 rubles. It is also planned that the Octavia will receive another 1.4 liter engine. But while sales from 1.6 are growing and the manufacturer is in no hurry to release a second engine to the market.
Conclusion
The new motor performed well during presentation and testing. There are nuances that the owners would like to change - dynamics and acceleration speed, but the manufacturer believes that now the engine is normal and nothing needs to be changed. I am very pleased with the consumption and the promised reliability. Some owners Skoda Octavia We have already felt that maintenance has become a little cheaper, as promised. But, its price not only depends on the cost of the work, but also on the course foreign currency, through which spare parts are imported. So, it’s too early to rejoice.
