ALGORITHM FOR WRITING AN ESSAY (ARTICLE)
What is more important: mental or physical beauty?
What is more important: mental or physical beauty - this is the problem he discusses famous writer Yu. Bondarev.
This moral question, raised by the author, has worried people for a long time. The famous German philosopher I. Kant once spoke about this: “Beauty is a symbol of moral goodness, not physical beauty, but spiritual beauty is more important in life!” Nowadays, this problem is topical: young people react only to external signs beauty, forgetting about inner spiritual wealth.
Yu. Bondarev, talking about an incident at a disco, undoubtedly takes the side of an ugly girl on the outside, but beautiful on the inside. She was able to repel the handsome scoundrel. While drawing his heroine, the author admires her.
I share the point of view of Yu. Bondarev: the spiritual beauty that the heroine of the text possesses is much more important than physical beauty.
I can cite the example of the hero of L.N. Tolstoy’s novel “War and Peace”, the handsome Anatoly Kuragin. As if V.G. was talking about him. Belinsky: “Beauty elevates moral virtues, but without them, beauty in our time exists only for the eyes, and not for the heart.”
Approving the act of the proud and smart girl, I remember another heroine of L. Tolstoy’s novel - Princess Marya Bolkonskaya. Ugly, in moments of emotional excitement, opening her beautiful eyes, she became a beauty, giving many of her interlocutors moral lessons!
Thus, we can conclude that a person’s spiritual beauty is more important than physical beauty.
The connection between talent and hard work
The connection between talent and hard work is the problem that the author reflects on.
This creative question raised by S. Petrov is not new for society. How many critics, philosophers, public figures, assessing the works of outstanding writers, artists, poets, discussed the inseparable existence of these two concepts. After all, Alexander Sergeevich Pushkin said that without difficulty he would not have been able to “draw the content of his poems from the depths of his soul with fearless sincerity.”
I agree with the melancholy view of S. Petrov that talent is a gift of nature, but it is also work, exhausting, often painful labor of the soul. Those who say that talent is 99% labor and 1% inspiration are right.
Inspiration is born in the process of hard work, caused by a sincere desire to comprehend, embody, and achieve what is sought.
In the work of N.V. Gogol's "Portrait" the author talks about tragic fate talented artist Chartkov, who showed great promise. But the wealth that fell upon him prevented this from happening. Chartkov became famous, but his paintings were mediocre, he simply carried out the will of the customer, there was not a drop of true creativity in his works. Without difficulty, his talent, so noticeable at the beginning, simply disappeared.
A striking fusion of talent and hard work is the work of the famous writer L. N. Tolstoy, who devoted his entire life to literature. For example, the author rewrote his novel “War and Peace,” a huge work, seven times! And this contributed to the fact that this work has become so popular in Russian and world literature.
Who has a better chance of becoming great and rich?
Why do some achieve exceptional success while others are content with very average results? What determines success: talent, intelligence, education, ambition, or a combination of all of the above plus a bit of luck? , a senior editor and regular contributor to Fortune magazine, draws on extensive research to argue that world-class results are within the reach of nearly everyone, and the key to achieving them is deliberate practice.
It's not about talent
The most common explanation for extraordinary success is natural gift. Plus, as Jeff Colvin writes, the best part about this explanation is that we can legitimately put the idea of doing a great job out of our heads. After all, if we had some kind of natural gift, we would already know about it, but since we don’t have it, then we shouldn’t bother. The author proposes to reconsider the role of innate talents, emphasizing the fact that “talents themselves are much less significant than we used to think,” and if innate abilities exist, and some scientists doubt this, then success is not created by them. General abilities, such as intelligence and memory, also turned out to be not so important. “Research shows that in many fields there is little or no relationship between intelligence and job performance,” writes Jeff Colvin. “People with low IQs perform brilliantly, but those with high IQs sometimes fail to rise above mediocrity.”
According to the author, innate, unchangeable limits are of cardinal importance for achieving success. A person 150 cm tall is unlikely to become a famous basketball player, or his voice, for example, can be developed as desired, but the range is limited - a tenor will not be able to sing in bass. Everything that lies outside the physical framework turns out to be controversial, writes Colvin. Clear evidence that nonphysical limits exist has not yet been found.
Deliberate Practice
“In general, deliberate practice is about pushing ourselves beyond what we can usually do,” says Jeff Colvin. It's not easy and not very pleasant. But if everything were easy and pleasant, then everyone would achieve success.
The success of using deliberate practice depends on the answers to two questions, the author believes. What do you really want? And what do you believe in? To answer the first one, you need to understand your own true desires - only those who are driven will achieve success. strong desire, ready for dedication and self-sacrifice. As for faith, there is a chance for those who believe that if they do properly planned work for several hours a day for many years, they will be able to begin to perform significantly better and even achieve outstanding success. “If you feel that the quality of your work is forever limited by your lack of a special natural gift or lack of general ability at the level you have determined for yourself, then you have no chance of success,” writes Jeff Colvin.
Detailing how to develop and implement a mindful practice , Jeff Colvin also pays attention to organizations - they, too, want to be successful. “The best organizations assign people jobs in general the same way sports coaches or music teachers choose exercises for their students,” he writes. - Trying to push them beyond their capabilities and encouraging the development of the most important skills" Apply principles successful work It's not easy, but companies that want to survive have no choice.
So, the price of great success is extremely high, but “the most amazing and inspiring news that the facts present to us is this: success is not only for the elite. It is available to everyone."
Jeff Colvin Outstanding results. Talent has nothing to do with it! - M. .
People barely familiar with poker believe that the main thing for winning is bluffing, the ability to read your opponent and blind luck. But what is really more important in poker: luck, talent or hard work?
Luck vs Math
Players at the poker table are divided into two groups: those who believe in luck and try in every possible way to appease and attract it, and those who believe in mathematics, distance and their skill. In fact, both players believe in the same thing, they just call it differently. Luck can be defined as success by chance. That is, in poker, luck is winning a hand by making a mistake on each street. Then failure is when your opponent wins the hand by making a runner-runner straight to the river, although from a mathematical point of view his actions were wrong.
Answer a few questions: When you are dealt a pocket pair of Aces and you win the hand with them, is that luck or not? What if Aces come several times in a row? And if you lose a hand with pocket Aces against 72, is that a failure? A pocket pair of Aces comes into your hand once every 221 hands - and that's part of the game. In 12% of cases, a pair of Aces will lose 72 - this is also part of the game. Every day, 3,500 people die on the roads in traffic accidents - this is part of life, statistics, and someone has to fall into this number.
The Existence of Luck Depends on Point of View
Luck is either there or not - it all depends on the point of view. For example, many players are deeply convinced that tournament poker is a lottery where everything depends on luck. Undoubtedly, it is impossible to win a large tournament for several hundred or thousand people without luck. Professionals will confirm that in MTT you need to be able to win “coins” and you need to run over your opponent from below several times.
But luck in tournament poker is an example of the importance of the concept of distance. One tournament is a very short distance. And it can be argued that luck is extremely important in tournament poker. The most striking proof of this is Chris Moneymaker's victory in the 2003 WSOP Main Event, after which the poker boom began.
Even more bright case happened 9 years later, albeit online. In 2012, the WCOOP Main Event was won by a player from Russia under the nickname “maratik”. As it turned out, this guy qualified for the Main Event through a satellite, coming from the very bottom - a tournament for 40 FPP points. Qualifying for the $5,200 buy-in tournament — great luck, but beating a field of 1,825 opponents and earning $1,000,907 is even more crazy. This victory is remembered as the most profitable in the history of poker, considering that the winner invested less than $1 to participate in this tournament. Is it lucky to win such a tournament? Definitely.
Players associate luck with the random number generator and the ability to catch the coveted outs. “If I knew the buy-in, I would live in Sochi” is a classic preference saying that is also relevant in poker. Unsuccessful players develop paranoia about offline poker and rigged RNG in online poker. But in the near future, the RNG of poker rooms will switch to blockchain. And then assumptions about RNG tweaking will forever remain myths.
But luck is far from the only one important factor success in poker. Famous player Nikita Bodyakovsky played in the EPT Main Event 10 times early in his career and never made the money. 10 tournaments without ITM will seriously make you doubt the choice of poker as a professional career if you believe in luck and don’t know about the distance. But Nikita Bodyakovsky continued to play offline, and now his total prize money in offline tournaments is more than $6.7 million.
Talent + luck = success
Talent is another factor of success, shrouded in an aura of mystery. Talent in poker can be defined as the ability to see spots, choose non-standard lines and make the right decisions without special theoretical training.
In the 2000s, when there were no poker tutorials, training sites or videos, talented players outnumbered amateurs. And many famous poker names have become popular due to talent. Gus Hanses is definitely one of those people. He earned $10 million in live poker. Gus Hansen is a player whose crazy, aggressive lines have been admired by thousands of viewers of Poker After Midnight. Despite this, Hansen lost almost $22 million in online poker. This is how a talented player may not be successful in the financial part of the issue.
Hard work, or lucky is the one who is lucky
Luck and talent in the right proportions could transform an average player into an extraordinary one. And many of the players who play at high stakes today share a similar story: they loved the game, they were talented, and one day they got lucky in some big tournament. But all famous players have one thing in common important quality- hard work. Having felt the taste of victory and got a bankroll, good players do not immediately go to higher limits. They start working on their technique and play according to their bankroll. Those who do otherwise return to the starting point.
This happened to a Russian under the nickname “I7AXA”, who was lucky to win almost $200,000 in the Sunday Million tournament. Winning a Sunday tournament for several thousand people is always lucky. But then other qualities come into play. “I7AXA’s” winnings were not enough, he went to high limits, where in just a couple of hands he managed to give away all his winnings to the regulars there.
Hard work is the main quality that will turn a good player into a better one in 2018. Today the field, online and offline, is stronger than ever before in history. Therefore, those who do not work on the game end up in the tail the food chain. Young Internet players spend several hours analyzing the game and spots in order to accept optimal solutions. And due to the fact that every year there are more and more such players, famous players, such as Daniel Negreanu or Patrik Antonius, leave online for offline, where it is easier to withstand competition. And other players, like Vanessa Selbst, give up their careers altogether and move into other areas. Hard work will bring victory. Lucky is the one who is lucky.
Success "HERE" - talent + luck + work
Ultimately, in poker, it's all about the decisions you make. Whether you believe in luck or not is up to you. If it helps, then yes, if not, then what's the point? Is there room for talent in poker? Definitely. But in any case, the main quality in 2018 remains hard work. And if you combine all 3 qualities, then success is guaranteed.
Abilities and talents - these words seem similar in meaning, but they also have deep differences. For many years we have heard that talent is only small part success, the rest depends on hard work and perseverance. But is this really so, and most importantly, how do you find out in which area you are really talented?
The question is far from idle, because only by doing “his” business can a person reach unprecedented heights in professional activity and get great pleasure from it, living in complete harmony with yourself. Together with the site, we will learn to identify hidden talents or develop abilities.
Talents and abilities: what's the difference?
Before we start searching for the most competent approach to personal development and the components of success, let’s try to decide on the main concepts with which we will operate. Remember how they sometimes say about a budding artist: “he is not just capable, he is truly talented!” Talent, in in this case, is referred to as a certain maximum measure of ability. What do scientists think about this?
An ability is considered to be a skill or skill that a person acquires during the learning process and makes it possible to successfully cope with a particular type of activity. So, a master who can determine in a matter of seconds what happened to your car (computer or vacuum cleaner) is most likely not a genius, although he has plenty of ability and opportunities for learning, that is, practice. What then is talent?
We are used to poeticizing this concept, calling it a gift from above, but scientists are sure: it’s all about genetics! They define talent as an innate, genetically determined ability to perform certain tasks.
Is it so important to be talented?
So, the originality of someone's data is determined by set of genes, inherited by a person from his parents. But what about the statement that only hard work will lead to victory, and talent, without proper effort, will achieve nothing?
To identify the influence of talent on achieving results, scientists conducted an experiment on a control group of athletes. Not only the level of initial training was the same, but also the conditions, as well as the intensity of the load.
As one might expect, the subjects showed absolutely different results: Some have significantly improved their initial performance, while others have barely achieved success. At the same time, participants in the experiment with similar biological data demonstrated approximately the same achievements.
It turns out that work, even very hard work, is not enough, and you need to have innate abilities inherited from your parents? But perhaps such abilities are needed only by athletes, and in the field intellectual activity Are there other laws?
Scientists have studied this issue in detail, examining the relationship between intensity practical classes among musicians and chess players, and the results they demonstrated. It turned out that the level of skill depends only 30% on practice, and the rest is determined by innate abilities!
The theory of 10,000 hours: still work
Perhaps you have heard about the theory of 10,000 hours of work? Its author, M. Gladwell, claims that it is ten thousand hours of hard practice that allow a person to master perfectly a certain skill, regardless of the ratio of a person’s talents and abilities.
In the group of subjects (these were students learning to play the violin), outstanding results were achieved only by those who spent exactly the same number of hours on training. Violinists who spent 8,000 hours practicing showed good results. Those who limited themselves to 4,000 hours of training received a very mediocre level of training.
Does this mean that having dedicated strictly certain time By honing a certain skill, will you become an unsurpassed professional in your chosen field of activity?
Indeed, the intensive efforts that you make when mastering this or that type of activity will contribute to a specific restructuring of your brain, and therefore will make you very effective in your chosen field.
What is more important: talent or hard work?
So, we have every reason to believe that talent is very important if you are not going to be satisfied with average performance and have a firm intention to conquer the peaks and top the ratings, to become a brilliant professional.
It is your talent and abilities that will allow you to easily and naturally cope with tasks that others can only achieve at the cost of considerable effort. But, of course, talent alone is not enough if, having achieved your first successes, you do not apply the due diligence. It is work that polishes the edges of talent and makes it reveal itself to the fullest.
What if you’re unlucky with talent? In this case, the 10,000 hours of hard work spent will also not be in vain; they will allow a capable “average” person to become an excellent professional.
What to do if you are not very talented
So, what to do if you are sure that you were unlucky with your talents and, unlike those who always shone at the Olympics, famously scored goals or produced divine sounds, easily running their fingers over the keys, you modestly drew caricatures in the margins of your notebook and Did you take home a report card with C grades?
Probably, you were simply unlucky with teachers who did not take the trouble to discern your talents and abilities. Because talent can manifest itself in something completely ordinary, which even you yourself have not noticed special attention.
Remember and analyze what exactly comes easier to you than others, and at the same time brings great pleasure? It is in this area of activity that you have undoubted abilities that are worth developing and improving!
We begin to look for deeply hidden talents
Urging you not to go with the flow and urgently figure out your (still hidden) talents and abilities, we bring to your attention several questions that will give you the opportunity to discover what exactly you are strong in:
1. What is the opinion of your loved ones about your talents and abilities? Ask this question to everyone who has known you well for a long time, perhaps they will point out one or another of your strengths, to which you simply did not attach special significance. Be sure to analyze everything you hear from a certain position.
2. Think about which of the things listed by your acquaintances and friends is easy for you, but the result exceeds your wildest expectations? Remember not only school lessons, but any episodes in which you shone. Make a list to think about the information in more detail.
3. Now try to answer which of the above is not only easy and good for you, but also brings you pleasure. Found it? Most likely this is your talent, which you have diligently tried to “bury” for many years.
You may be asking why do you need all this? You are already a good professional, so why and who needs this search for talent? Alas, life, consisting exclusively of everyday routine, becomes monotonous and boring. That's why we often get irritated for no reason, grumble and even We plunge into depression. Very often, considering ourselves not very talented, we do not realize the need for self-expression and deprive ourselves of the most fascinating moments of inspired creativity that are so familiar to talented people.
Read even more about how to know yourself and better understand others at estet-portal.com.
In the literature devoted to esotericism, and simply in the mass consciousness, there are two, often mutually exclusive, positions devoted to the development of various esoteric, including predictive abilities.
The first position is a talent that is inherited or bestowed from above, and without it no serious success in mastering practices is possible. The second is that all people have the rudiments of abilities that lie in the sphere of communication with “ subtle plans“, and the final result depends only on desire and diligence in their development.
It seems to me that both approaches are guilty of being too categorical. The truth, as always, lies somewhere in the middle.
It cannot be denied that some people have innate abilities or inclinations towards one or another direction of esotericism (in in a broad sense term). Often these are truly hereditary talents, sometimes they are spontaneous manifestations of certain abilities in people who are in no way “related” to esotericism. And of course, it is easier for such people to develop these talents, turning inclinations into full-fledged skills and knowledge.
Usually this kind of talent lies in a certain area, often quite narrow. Be it clairvoyance, the ability to receive certain information without the help of “ordinary” senses, or the ability to influence the energy component of the surrounding world, which can be expressed in a penchant for healing practices or, conversely, for practices “ negative impact».
At the same time, we must not forget that any talent, no matter how strong it is, requires “polishing and cutting,” otherwise it may remain incompletely developed and ultimately use a small fraction of the potential inherent in it.
On the other hand, there are many examples when people who showed no obvious talent for it were interested in esotericism in its various manifestations. But hard work, constant practice and regular training allowed these people to achieve significant success in the chosen field. These include psychic practices of various directions, predictions, traditional practices of various directions: witchcraft, witchcraft, shamanic practices, ritual magic, etc.
I am sure that in esotericism everything is exactly the same as in other areas in which the result can be art or craft. Talent gives a head start at the start, but it depends only on the desire to develop, efforts for such development, perseverance and perseverance whether a person will become a real Master, remain at the level of a craftsman, of which there are many, or will not rise above the level of a “talented amateur”, an elite athlete.
By the way, even the presence of talent does not oblige a person to anything. It's like in music - you can have perfect pitch, but not want to study music, and successfully not study it all your life. :-)
Of course, in this case we do not take into account situations where a person is forced to develop esoteric talents, an example of which is the so-called. "shamanic disease" But these cases are still special, and we are now talking about free choice and personal desire to develop certain abilities and master certain practices.
To summarize, we can say that talent is not a hindrance to business, but without painstaking daily work it will remain undiscovered, and the lack of a clearly expressed inclination towards one or another direction of esotericism is not an insurmountable obstacle to mastering anything.
In principle - a banality. But sometimes it’s useful to remind.
