Czech repeatedly Octavia pleased consumers. Sales of this car are growing all over the world, which is no exception for the CIS countries. Based on an analysis of all indicators, the manufacturer decided to return to the use of an atmospheric internal combustion engine MPi instead of TSi. This happened because the TSi did not justify itself and often broke down. Engineers Skoda Octavia decided to return to service the reliable 1.6 engine with modifications.
Appearance
Skoda Octavia- famous for its elegant and beautiful design. The shapes look gentle and smooth. Streamlined shapes and excellent aerodynamic properties make the car more luxurious.
The front part of the body is made in a classic style Skoda Octavia. The radiator grille inspires massiveness and has a chrome trim, which is typical for these cars. In the middle of the front bumper there is a full-strip air intake grille, into which fog lights are mounted. Classic 3rd generation front fenders Skoda Octavia.
The sides of the body and doors are harmoniously combined with the rest of the parts and have both stiffening ribs and smooth lines. Rear end the car remains massive, a large rear bumper and an impressive trunk lid, under which there is a spacious luggage compartment. Outdoor lighting devices are bright and give good review even at night. They fit harmoniously into the overall exterior Octavia.
Interior
Interior Skoda Octavia not much different from previous models. It adds some new elements, but everything remains the same. Comfortable and comfortable seats. The interior still has the nice colors and flowing shapes that enhance the car.
Differences appeared in dashboard. New forms of stove air ducts. The functional panel of the air conditioner has changed slightly, which did not affect the quality in any way. The gearshift knob has become more pleasant and fits better in the hand.
The large luggage compartment will not leave car enthusiasts indifferent, because Skoda Octavia has always been famous for its spacious trunk. For those who have little space, the rear seats can be folded down, which will allow you to fit more luggage, but at the same time take away the number of seats.
Specifications
Now Skoda Octavia will be equipped with two naturally aspirated versions: 1.4l and 1.6l. The first changes can be seen in the fact that at low speeds you don't feel the pulling power like on the TSi. MPi-the engine became 250 kg heavier due to its design features. The car's voice appears only at 4 thousand revolutions, but this is more due to the fact that the next gear should be engaged. The rest of the time the internal combustion engine is almost inaudible.
Manufacturers Skoda Octavia we returned to the old traditions, when the car should operate at medium speeds, which is very good for the urban cycle. To make the car start faster, you should press the gas pedal more and increase the speed to 2.5 - 2.7 thousand. Some owners do not like this, because they expected that Skoda would still achieve MPi so that the power appears at low speeds and the start is more playful. This fact scared me away, but after test drives, fans of this car still agreed that this drawback was not significant.
In the new MPi installed the new kind Timing belt, which was not inherent in these cars. The belt has become wider and stronger, which makes it possible to carry out the first replacement of the gas distribution kit after a mileage of 200,000 - 250,000 km. This point significantly reduces the cost of service. Also, it is worth noting that the new engine is not as picky about fuel as its predecessor.
The technical side of the design simplifies maintenance and makes engine maintenance cheaper. But, replacing the internal combustion engine with MPi, did not in any way affect the overall harmony outside and inside the engine compartment.
On Skoda Octavia 1.6 naturally aspirated engine is installed MPi, which has a power of 110 horses. This is an in-line four, which came to replace the TSi class internal combustion engines due to their frequent failure. The manufacturer promises that new engine will be more reliable and cheaper to maintain.
Planning release Skoda Octavia with the second version of the class engine MPi and volume 1.4l. It will be the same as the 1.6, only with reduced consumption by 20%, which will allow urban driving enthusiasts to save more on fuel. The reliability and quality of the 1.4 engine will remain the same as that of its older brother.
Advantages and disadvantages
Advantages of the motor MPi:
- dynamic starting from medium speed;
- reliable, new improved design will allow maintenance of many parts less frequently, which will enable owners to save their costs;
- simplicity in design, allows you to make repairs with ease;
- service life up to 1 million km, which betrays confidence and quality;
- fuel consumption is 9 liters in the city and 6.5 liters on the highway, which will significantly save cash owner.
Disadvantages of the MPi motor:
- at low speeds MPi, does not develop sufficient dynamics;
- acceleration picks up less quickly than the TSi.
As you can see, the new engine surpasses the advantages offered by the manufacturer Skoda Octavia.
Equipment and prices
Equipment for Skoda Octavia only one so far. This is a 1.6l/110hp engine. average cost a car with these characteristics is about 800,000 rubles. It is also planned that the Octavia will receive another 1.4 liter engine. But while sales from 1.6 are growing and the manufacturer is in no hurry to release a second engine to the market.
Conclusion
The new motor performed well during presentation and testing. There are nuances that the owners would like to change - dynamics and acceleration speed, but the manufacturer believes that now the engine is normal and nothing needs to be changed. I am very pleased with the consumption and the promised reliability. Some owners Skoda Octavia We have already felt that maintenance has become a little cheaper, as promised. But, its price not only depends on the cost of the work, but also on the course foreign currency, through which spare parts are imported. So, it’s too early to rejoice.
What a turbo engine is to a German, a tangle of doubts is to a Russian. Russians perceived the lack of conventional naturally-aspirated engines in the new Octavia with caution, especially since the base cars received a small 1.2 TSI. Some people didn’t like the image of a car with an engine capacity “like a Corsa”, some were afraid of freezing in winter, and the majority simply did not want an engine with direct injection and supercharging. And this is understandable: okay, when there are 180 hp under the hood. and 1.8 TSI, and if we are talking about 105 hp, is it worth making a fence?
And now Skoda has returned to the lineup with the 1.6 MPI engine. Just don't make a mistake - this is not the same 1.6 CFNA engine. what is familiar to us from models Polo Sedan and Skoda Rapid . This is a completely new motor with an index C.W.V.A. and completely new architecture, the production of which will soon be launched in Kaluga.
Skoda Octavia III built on a platform MQB, which was “attached” to a completely new line of engines of the family EA211. Several sizes of these motors(1.2 TSI, 1.4 TSI, 1.8 TSI) had little in common with the engines of the family EA111, which were installed on the previous Octavia, although the same indexes confused clients. So here's the motor 1.6MPI on the modern Octavia it also belongs to the new family EA211 , however, it lacks supercharging and direct injection. But the rest of the generic features are in place: an aluminum block, an exhaust manifold integrated into the head of the block, variable valve timing, and a timing belt drive. Why didn't they install it? engine from Polo Sedan? Firstly, he is rather weak for Octavia, secondly, the platform MQB in principle compatible only with motors of the family EA211. Read more about the differences between the two generations of engines in our material.
In general, I liked the 1.2 TSI engine: it exceeded expectations. Responsive character and good traction throughout the entire range, except the very bottom, allowed the Skoda Octavia to accelerate more vigorously than most competitors with naturally aspirated 1.6s. However, they don’t cry over spilled milk...
But the 1.6 MPI is unpretentious in comparison with turbo engines, and if I put my hand on my heart, buying an Octavia, I would definitely prefer it. In addition, this engine is equipped with a regular, hydromechanical automatic transmission, and not the notorious DSG. There is actually only one question - is a 1.6-liter naturally aspirated engine enough for such a large car?
The test was an Octavia with manual transmission. First impressions are rather positive: the engine accelerates the car honestly and even naturally, as if the Octavia is not an overgrown golf class, but some kind of B-class. There is no significant difference with a turbo engine, and it seemed so strange to me that I started studying the characteristics. When accelerating to 100 km/h, the naturally aspirated Octave loses only a third of a second to the 1.2 TSI version - 10.6 versus 10.3 seconds - so the numbers confirm subjective feelings.
Comparison of Skoda Octavia characteristics with different engines
Acceleration is helped by moderate weight: due to the chassis made of high-strength steel, the base Octavia 1.6 MPI weighs 1225 kg, which is quite good for a car more than 4.6 m long. For comparison, the similar-sized Peugeot 408 is 150 kg heavier. In addition, Skoda has an excellent gearbox with a clear shift mechanism and good selection of numbers.
And yet there are differences. The engines' limits are close, but to get 100% out of the 1.6 MPI engine, you need to work harder. First of all, the gear lever. Where the 1.2 TSI picked up the car with fire from 2000 rpm, the naturally aspirated engine falls into a reverie. If you want to accelerate intensively, don’t be lazy to engage lower gears, keeping the speed in the range of 3000 rpm and above. Sometimes, forgetting to drop one or two gears, you get a weak response because the engine sleeps at 2000 rpm. Fifth gear here is for a leisurely cruise along the highway, and for any active maneuvers you need to work: third, second, third, fourth...
There is also a difference in efficiency: judging by the passport data, on average, a turbo Octave would save 1 l/100 km. On the other hand, it is more sensitive to fuel quality, while the 1.6 MPI engine has no problems with Russian gasoline.
We haven’t tried the version with hydromechanics, but there are suspicions that it will turn out to be sleepier: according to at least The Polo Sedan with a similar unit drives modestly, and the subjective impression is enhanced by the heavily damped pedal.
But overall the engine is not bad. If we abstract from the comparison with the 1.2 TSI, the Octavia 1.6 MPI drives better than many competitors with engines of the same size. In the end, for lovers of dynamics, Skoda offers the 1.4 TSI (140 hp), which performs much better than naturally aspirated 2-liter units, and for up to a million rubles you can buy an Octavia 1.8 TSI (180 hp) with dynamics almost like hot hatch. But I’m sure many customers will like the Octavia 1.6 MPI: after all, pragmatists buy it, and the engine is the same, for family needs
Octavia is one of Andrei Vinnikov’s favorite cars. I suspect because of the trunk, which modestly fits his equipment in one corner Otherwise, the 1.6 MPI version is a typical Octavia with spacious rear seats, best-in-class trunk, cool ergonomics and properly tuned controls. They say they have retuned the rear suspension, and although I can’t compare, I liked the vibration comfort of the Octavia 1.6 MPI: it’s sensitive to small things, but it goes over the rails with a bang. Definitely one of the best cars in class.
What's there to complain about? To the price. Let me remind you... It would seem that installing a simpler engine should lower the price, but that’s not the case: the Octavia 1.6 MPI costs from 644 thousand, and this is without air conditioning and a radio. With them the price will jump to 689 thousand. I can’t say that it’s incredibly expensive, since competitors have grown over the year, but still another price illusion has crumbled. There will be no freebies. Test car with climate control and a multimedia screen, according to my calculations, costs almost 800 thousand.
Surely the output, which is close to the Octavia in concept, but simpler, contributed to the price increase. In a comparable version, it costs about 567 thousand: for Skoda it is important to separate the models into niches so that the Octavia does not distract attention from the new product.
From this perspective, the Rapid is almost indistinguishable from the Octavia. And a comparison immediately arises: is it worth paying an additional 100 thousand rubles for an Octavia?
If we put practicality first, they are close. Both are roomy, with good luggage compartments, adequate dynamics and pleasant handling. The Octavia is a little larger, which is especially noticeable in the width of the cabin, but there is no gap between them.
For me the main difference is comfort. "Octavia" is better in all directions: this concerns the ease of seating of the driver and rear passengers, isolation from external environment, subjective feeling quality and many other little things. It’s not that “Rapid” was deliberately uncomfortable, no, by the standards of the class it’s actually good. But the hundred thousandth increase in cost makes the Octavia a refined car, while the younger brother is still cut down with thoughts of saving. Simply put, the choice between “Rapid” and “Octavia”, in addition to the wallet, is determined by the degree of spoiling of the future owner.
To summarize, I’ll say this: the appearance of an atmospheric engine is the right step. He didn’t spoil the concept of the car, but he made it “clearer” for the Russian clientele. The hegemony of turbo engines has been broken, and for Russia this is good news.
What a turbo engine is to a German, a tangle of doubts is to a Russian. Russians perceived the lack of conventional naturally-aspirated engines in the new Octavia with caution, especially since the basic versions received a small 1.2 TSI. Some did not like the image of a car with an engine capacity “like a Corsa”, some were afraid of freezing in the winter, and the majority simply did not want an engine with direct injection and supercharging. And this is understandable: okay, when there are 180 hp under the hood. and 1.8 TSI. But if we are talking about 105 “horses”, is it worth making a fence?
And now Skoda has returned the 1.6 MPI engine to the lineup. Just make no mistake - this is not the 1.6 CFNA engine that we are familiar with from the Polo Sedan and Skoda Rapid models. This is a completely new motor with the CWVA index and a completely different architecture, the production of which will soon be launched in Kaluga.
The Skoda Octavia III is built on the MQB platform, which was also accompanied by a new line of engines of the EA211 family. Several standard sizes of these engines (1.2 TSI, 1.4 TSI, 1.8 TSI) had little in common with the engines of the EA111 family that were installed on the previous Octavia, although the same indices confused customers. So, the 1.6 MPI engine on the modern Octavia also belongs to the new EA211 family, but is devoid of supercharging and direct injection. But the rest of the generic features are in place: an aluminum block, an exhaust manifold integrated into the head of the block, variable valve timing, and a timing belt drive. Why didn't they install the engine from the Polo Sedan? Firstly, it is rather weak for Octavia, and secondly, the MQB platform is, in principle, compatible only with engines of the EA211 family. Read more about the differences between the two generations of engines in our material.
In general, I liked the outgoing 1.2 TSI engine: it exceeded expectations. Responsive character and good traction throughout the entire range except the very bottom allowed the Skoda Octavia to accelerate more vigorously than most competitors with naturally aspirated 1.6. However, they don’t cry over spilled milk...
But the 1.6 MPI, although structurally similar to turbo engines, does not have supercharging and direct injection, which means it should be more unpretentious. In addition, this engine is equipped with a regular, hydromechanical automatic transmission, and not the notorious DSG. There is, in fact, only one question: is a 1.6-liter naturally aspirated engine enough for such a large car?
The test was an Octavia with manual transmission. First impressions are rather positive: the engine accelerates the car honestly and even effortlessly, as if the Octavia is not an overgrown golf class, but some kind of B-class. There is no striking contrast with the turbo engine, and it seemed so strange to me that I started studying the characteristics. In acceleration to 100 km/h, the naturally aspirated Octavia loses only a third of a second to the 1.2 TSI version - 10.6 versus 10.3 seconds - so the numbers confirm subjective feelings.
Comparison of Skoda Octavia characteristics with different engines
Acceleration is helped by moderate weight: due to the chassis made of high-strength steel, the base Octavia 1.6 MPI weighs 1225 kg, which is quite good for a car more than 4.6 m long. For comparison, the similar-sized Peugeot 408 is 150 kg heavier. In addition, Skoda has an excellent gearbox with a clear shift mechanism and good selection of numbers.
And yet there are differences. The engines' limits are close, but to squeeze 100% out of the 1.6 MPI engine, you need to work harder. First of all, the gear lever. Where the 1.2 TSI picked up the car with fire from 2000 rpm, the naturally aspirated engine falls into a reverie. If you want to accelerate intensively, don’t be lazy to engage lower gears, keeping the speed in the range of 3000 rpm. Sometimes, forgetting to drop 1-2 gears, you get a weak response because the engine sleeps at 2000 rpm.
Don't say what it creates big problems. In the end, with such a box, unnecessary shifting is not a burden, and at the peak of its capabilities the engine is quite peppy for an aspirated engine of this volume. It’s a pity that the test didn’t come with an automatic transmission: wouldn’t it choke the engine? In the Polo Sedan, this version seems sluggish largely due to the very damped gas pedal.
There is also a difference in efficiency: judging by the passport data, on average, a “turbo octave” would save 1 l/100 km. On the other hand, it is sensitive to fuel quality, while the 1.6 MPI engine should be more omnivorous: it can be fed with 92-grade gasoline.
If we abstract from the comparison with the 1.2 TSI, the Octavia 1.6 MPI rides at the level of most competitors with engines of the same size. In the end, for speed lovers, Skoda offers the 1.4 TSI (140 hp), which is more vigorous than 2-liter naturally aspirated ones, and for up to a million rubles you can buy an Octavia 1.8 TSI (180 hp) with dynamics almost like at the hot hatch. But I am sure that many clients of the Octavia 1.6 MPI will like it: after all, pragmatists buy it, and the engine is the same - for family needs.
Otherwise, the 1.6 MPI version is typical Octavia with spacious rear seats, class-leading boot, cool ergonomics and properly tuned controls. They say they have retuned the rear suspension, and although I can’t compare, I liked the Octavia 1.6 MPI in terms of vibration comfort: it’s sensitive to small things, but it goes over the rails with a bang. Definitely one of the best cars in the class.
To summarize, let's say this: the appearance of an atmospheric engine is the right step. He didn’t spoil the concept of the car, but he made it “clearer” for the Russian clientele. The hegemony of turbo engines has been broken, and for Russia this is good news.
Price analysis
Unfortunately, installing a naturally aspirated engine did not reduce the cost of the base Octavia. So, if a year ago the 1.2 TSI version with air conditioning cost 632 thousand, now a car with a similar equipment with a 1.6 MPI engine will cost almost 688 thousand.
And yet the price is adequate, because for Last year competitors also rewrote prices. In the table below, we compared the Octavia with oversized golf class over 4.6 meters long with naturally aspirated engines, and it turned out that it is one of the most affordable. However, there are nuances: for example, most competitors offer heated seats, while in the basic Active version it cannot be ordered even for an additional fee, and the next trim level, Ambition, costs from 749 thousand rubles.
An Octavia with a six-speed automatic transmission will cost 704 thousand, if equipped with air conditioning and a radio - about 748 thousand. Detailed price list is available at
Many motorists in the world prefer products from the Czech Skoda. These are comfortable and reliable cars can be found on the roads of various continents. All new products from manufacturers are expected by both experts and car enthusiasts. The A5 modification of the Skoda Octavia, equipped with a 1.6-liter engine, is quite popular among European and Russian owners. Design and specifications a5 fully meet the requirements of modern standards. Modification a7 is also of interest. It must be said that the a7 body began to be produced in 2013. Let's look at a small description of the models, as well as reviews from users of a7 and a5.
The unit and its features
The A5 Octavia has several powertrain options. The inscriptions on the trunk indicate that the car is equipped with an MPI engine. Being a modification of the well-known BSE product, the engine has been produced by VAG for about 10 years. The main feature that distinguishes this power unit is its low toxicity exhaust gases, which is due to the design features. This is evidenced by numerous reviews of the Skoda Octavia with a 1.6 liter engine.
Thanks to the use of aluminum when creating the block, the weight of the unit is significantly lower, and the power is 102 “horses”. Skoda Octavia, equipped with a 1.6 engine, consumes both 95 and 92 gasoline, consuming about 11 liters in the city, and about 8 liters outside the city. Equipped, at the user's choice, with an automatic transmission or a manual transmission, the Skoda with a 1.6 engine operates smoothly.
This is evidenced by reviews of car owners of the automatic model and those who prefer mechanics.
Comments from car enthusiasts
Mikhail, driving experience – 10 years
But I always liked the A5 Octavia; it has a lot of advantages. An almost immense trunk, a Volks platform, excellent ergonomics, exceptional build quality. The list of advantages of the Skoda Octavia can be continued endlessly. In general, having got rid of Cruise, it was decided to take the A5 Octavia with a naturally aspirated 1.6 mpi - an extremely durable engine, in tandem with which there is a 6-speed automatic transmission.
Since I bought the A5 car used, after purchasing it I immediately changed all the filters and oil. What can I say about the purchase? The handling, noise and smoothness of the A5 are excellent, you get complete pleasure from driving, quality can be seen in everything. Parking sensors, climate control, high-quality sensors that control light and rain work exceptionally well. In short, dreams come true, and I have more in the car than I would like. Besides, great amount secret boxes and plenty of space for a fun company.
Separately, it should be said about the box and engine of the a5 Octavia. Despite the fact that my 8-valve 1.6 MPI is old, it feels absolutely confident and pulls out great from the very bottom. The automatic transmission is simply lovely, it’s also pleasing, it works exceptionally, shifts quickly, and in “sport” mode it drives clearly, cheerfully and predictably. Now I’m not surprised by the reviews of enthusiastic automatic transmission car owners.
Fuel consumption is quite acceptable; in city traffic jams it consumes no more than 14 liters. If traffic jams can be avoided, then you can get by with 10 liters. Outside the city it’s absolutely lovely; the A5 model doesn’t consume more than 7.5. Thanks to the precise operation of the brakes, we managed to avoid “kissing” the minibus. The maneuverability of the a5 Octavia can be compared to a small car; the car is capable of turning around in a small space. In general, I’m happy with the car, I recommend it to anyone who needs a quiet and high-quality transport with an incredibly large trunk.
Igor, car ownership experience – 9 years
Over the entire period of operation, serious breakdowns include the air conditioning compressor and a bearing that flew in the gearbox during winter driving. By that time, the mileage had exceeded 100 thousand. Despite the fact that I don’t abuse the Skoda very much, I don’t drive like a pensioner, on the highway I definitely squeeze out 140–170 km.
What can I say about the 1.6 MPI engine. At the 325th thousand mileage valve cover The gasket started to leak. Having listened to many stories from automatic transmission car owners, I can say that I am very pleased with the manual transmission. She is very attentive to my requirements, sensitively reacting to the slightest movement. I have no words. I am very glad that I purchased the a5 Skoda Octavia with the 1.6 MPI engine.
Sergey, car ownership experience – 4 years
Like my previous and current A7 Skoda, they are equipped with a 1.6 MPI engine. I consider the years of owning a car with an A7 body to be the best. Initially, I was suspicious of the MPI power for the 1.6-liter A7 unit. I was especially concerned about the tandem with an automatic transmission; I thought that for such an engine, a manual transmission was the most acceptable option. However, it turned out to be the opposite. The power of the MPI a7 is quite enough to overcome climbs and make sharp accelerations. After listening to A7 automatic car owners, as well as from my own experience, I was convinced that the automatic transmission in combination with the 1.6 liter MPI engine behaves absolutely adequately, and there is enough power for my A7 “dinosaur”.
Vladislav, car ownership experience – 1.5 years
I decided to tell my impressions about the Skoda Tour brand with a 1.6 liter gasoline engine, since this car is my first possession. Considering that the quality/price ratio suited me, I chose this model. After reading reviews of past and present owners on the Internet and visiting showrooms, I decided to buy a Tour, which attracted me with its advantages: the large dimensions of the time-tested car itself and the luggage compartment.
Today I am very pleased with my car: a spacious interior, air conditioning, good finishing, a large trunk and an on-board computer - a big plus for the Skoda Tour model as a family vehicle. Now the mileage of my Octavia (Tour) is a little more than 2 thousand kilometers, and I must say that the running-in of the MPI engine was successful.
Finally
As evidenced by reviews from motorists, when compared with turbo engines, the 1.6 MPI is unpretentious, so when choosing an Octavia, many would give it preference. In addition, this engine is not equipped with the famous DSG, but with a conventional hydromechanical automatic transmission. To answer the question whether such a unit is sufficient for such a fairly large car, a Tour was tested, equipped not with an automatic transmission, but with a manual transmission.
The engine confidently and effortlessly accelerates a heavy car, like a run-down B-class. Moderate weight also helps with acceleration: thanks to the high-strength steel used for the chassis, the base 1.6 MPI Octavia Tour weighs 1,225 kg. This is quite good for a car whose length exceeds 4.5 meters.
In addition, the Tour is endowed with an excellent gearbox, which has a successful selection of numbers and an intelligible shift mechanism. It is worth noting that an atmospheric engine is the right step. It makes the car more understandable to the Russian clientele, without spoiling the Tour concept.
The engine is the main part of any “iron horse”; it is the heart of the car, without which it is a pile of iron. The Skoda company produces high-quality and reliable power units, but Volkswagen engines are also installed on the Octavia. This article will tell you which engines were and are installed on the Skoda Octavia, consider the characteristics and compare them with each other.
The production of engines for Skoda cars began with engineers thinking about how to make an engine good quality, reliable and at the same time affordable. The decision came naturally. After developing the first prototype, the company realized that it needed to implement other solutions to find a solution. Together, Skoda and Volkswagen developed the first gasoline engine, which was used in the first generation.
Subsequently, all other engine models were designed together, and it did not matter that the Skoda emblem was on the top cover. VW engineers added power indicators and compliance calculations to the engine for each generation of the Czech car.
Today, all engines that are installed on Skoda are designed and assembled by the Volkswagen concern. This gave rise to the opinion among motorists that the engines were reliable and of high quality because they were made by Germans.
Engine MPi
MPi is the latest generation of internal combustion engines that are installed on the Octavia. They came to replace the unreliable TSi. This is an aspirated engine with a volume of 1.6 liters and a power of 110 horses. Quite simple and easy to maintain, but compared to others, it has increased fuel consumption.
In the future, Skoda plans to release another 2.0-volume autosphere, which should produce up to 160 hp. Car enthusiasts don’t really believe in this revision and development, but time will tell.
Engine TSi
The TSi is a turbocharged petrol engine. The manufacturer has several volumes in which it was produced: 1.2, 1.4, 1.8. Of course, it is worth noting that the price of the car also fluctuates depending on the volume. Let's look at each motor separately:
1,2 TSi- a small-displacement engine, which, according to CIS buyers, does not justify itself because it lacks power characteristics. 105 horses, which this in-line four is equipped with, is certainly not enough for those who like to “drive”. The cylinder of 71.0 mm and the piston stroke of 75.6 do not give a feeling of drive. There is another side, the average consumption is about 7 liters, which allows you to save on fuel. To date, the model with this engine is not produced in the CIS and is intended only for European consumers.
1,4 TSi– gasoline engine with a mid-class turbine. Customers really like it because 140 hp. quite enough for a good trip on the highway. They were equipped with pretty good gearboxes: 6-speed manual transmission and 7-automatic transmission, which provided more power and dynamics when traveling. Also, the owners were pleased with the fuel consumption of 7 liters, although according to technical data it should be 5.5-6 liters. A car with this internal combustion engine picked up dynamics quite well and showed sharp transitions from a smooth to jerky ride rhythm. The disadvantage of the engine was a weak timing system, which repeatedly led to belt breaks and bent valves.
1,8 TSi– the most powerful gasoline engine in the entire line. The turbine only added power, but even without it the car behaved confidently. It was equipped with a 7-speed automatic transmission, which responded quite well and quickly to all driver commands. The advantage of this internal combustion engine was that the operating range was wide and the power of 180 horses was felt already at 1500 rpm. Average fuel consumption is 7-7.5 liters, instead of the stated 6.2-6.5.
According to reviews from owners and mechanics, one disadvantage of this line is Skoda engines The Octavia remains weak in its valve timing. Of course, there are a number of other issues to consider - slightly expensive parts and maintenance.
Engine TDi
TDi is a diesel engine with a turbine. As you know, diesel internal combustion engines are designed for power, which is what the manufacturer proves. 143 horsepower with a volume of two liters is enough to feel confident in the suburban and urban cycles. Quite a good consumption figure - 5.5 liters.
Every diesel owner knows that it is reliable, economical and of high quality. The resource is designed for 650-700 km, which allows you to travel a lot with confidence.
The disadvantage is expensive maintenance, since the manufacturer recommends pouring only branded oil and using Skoda consumables. At the same time, low-quality domestic diesel fuel leads to repairs of the injection pump and fuel pump every 60-70 thousand km. In its turn, Consumables are quite expensive good funds, which affects the size of the owner’s wallet.
Limited edition
Limited version or deluxe engine L&K, which are assembled by hand and placed onOctaviawith a volume of 1.8 turbo. The engine has fairly high power characteristics.V-shaped engine with 20 valves produces 180 horsepower. The main difference from the others is that they are a limited edition and are installed on cars. Skoda Octavia premium class. On this moment, this line is considered one of the best and most reliable, but its price is too high.
Comparison of engine characteristics
It is quite difficult to compare one and another engine with each other, since you need to take into account many factors that play a role in this. This may include everything from engine size to maintenance costs.
It is best to consider the main characteristics for comparison in the table:
| Engine | 1.6MPi | 2.0 TDi | 1.2TSi | 1.4TSi | 1.8TSi |
| Fuel type | petrol | diesel with turbine | gasoline with turbine | gasoline with turbine | gasoline with turbine |
| Volume | 1598 | 1968 | 1197 | 1395 | 1798 |
| Cylinders, quantity | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Cylinder arrangement | rower | rower | rower | rower | rower |
| Compression | — | 16,2 | 10,5 | 10,5 | 9,6 |
| Valves, quantity | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| Power characteristics, hp | 110 | 143 | 105 | 140 | 179 |
| Torque, N*m | 155 | 320 | 175 | 250 | 250 |
Which engine is better
The engine that every car enthusiast likes is the best. If we consider it from the point of view of traction power, then of course diesel is beyond competition. It withstands loads better than gasoline ones. The option, on the speed side, is a gasoline engine with a turbine, which develops speed quickly and sharply.
From a practical point of view, the best option small-displacement turbine or naturally aspirated. The 1.2 TSi consumes the least amount of fuel, and the 1.6 MPi is inexpensive to maintain and repair.
When considering the question of which engine is better, we can definitely say the one that doesn’t break down. But there are none. Therefore, each owner approaches the choice of engine individually and looks at what is best for him. Some people can afford to pay for the repair of the fuel and injection pump, but for others a simple aspirated engine will become a burden.
Lack of engines in the Octavia line
The main drawback of the entire Octavia series is that the ECU is not flashed correctly, and in order to achieve maximum power and reduce consumption, some owners flash their cars with “Custom” software. Of course, this may lead to problems with the on-board computer, but this does not stop Octavia owners.
Often, there have been cases when, after such firmware, the internal combustion engine failed, and the owner had to shell out a considerable amount for repairs, and what’s worse, replacement of the engine itself. power unit. So, you should not flash control units with unknown software.
Conclusion
Having considered the whole the lineup Octavia engines, it should be noted that they were all quite good, reliable and easy to operate and repair. With each new generation, designers and manufacturers improve characteristics. The only thing that is missing compared to the rest of the manufacturer is a reduction in consumption. It remained at about 9-10 liters and remained there. In all other respects, the entire line of Skoda Octavia internal combustion engines performed quite well.
