Unified State Exam grading scale. Converting Unified State Exam points into grades. When to expect results

The “Get an A” video course includes all the topics you need to successful completion Unified State Examination in mathematics for 60-65 points. Completely all tasks 1-13 of the Profile Unified State Exam in mathematics. Also suitable for passing the Basic Unified State Examination in mathematics. If you want to pass the Unified State Exam with 90-100 points, you need to solve part 1 in 30 minutes and without mistakes!

Preparation course for the Unified State Exam for grades 10-11, as well as for teachers. Everything you need to solve Part 1 of the Unified State Exam in mathematics (the first 12 problems) and Problem 13 (trigonometry). And this is more than 70 points on the Unified State Exam, and neither a 100-point student nor a humanities student can do without them.

All the necessary theory. Quick ways solutions, pitfalls and secrets of the Unified State Exam. All current tasks of part 1 from the FIPI Task Bank have been analyzed. The course fully complies with the requirements of the Unified State Exam 2018.

The course contains 5 big topics, 2.5 hours each. Each topic is given from scratch, simply and clearly.

Hundreds of Unified State Exam tasks. Word problems and probability theory. Simple and easy to remember algorithms for solving problems. Geometry. Theory, reference material, analysis of all types of Unified State Examination tasks. Stereometry. Tricky solutions, useful cheat sheets, development of spatial imagination. Trigonometry from scratch to problem 13. Understanding instead of cramming. Visual explanation complex concepts. Algebra. Roots, powers and logarithms, function and derivative. A basis for solving complex problems of Part 2 of the Unified State Exam.

The assessment system for the Unified State Exam in mathematics at the profile level is much more complicated. Firstly, exam assignments have different "prices". The tasks from the first part (with a short answer) are the cheapest; the most “expensive” are the last two problems (an equation or inequality with a parameter and a problem in number theory).

In 2016 perfect solution all nineteen tasks can bring 32 primary scores. Maximum amount points decreased by two compared to 2015, since the first part now offers not 14, but 12 tasks.

Primary scores are converted to test scores. The conversion scale varies slightly from year to year. Below is the table that was used at the Unified State Examination in mathematics in 2015. Note that the corresponding function is very different from linear: fast growth in the area of ​​low estimates it gives way to a smoother one in the middle of the scale.

Unified State Examination in mathematics (profile level). Scale for converting primary scores into test scores

To enter a university you must earn a minimum 27 points(i.e., solve 6 simple tasks from the first part). Naturally, admission to serious educational establishments requires significantly higher results.

I would like to emphasize once again: the table above is just a guide! When exhibiting test score not only the quantity is taken into account primary points, but also the relative complexity of the problems solved, as well as the number of schoolchildren who completed a particular task. Thus, the final “formula” for transferring points will be known only after passing the Unified State Examination - 2016 in mathematics by all graduates.

IMHO, in mathematics it’s something like this. I would say from 75 (according to previous years, I haven’t looked at the ratio of “solved problems - Unified State Examination points"). 100 points means very good knowledge + a little luck + psychological stability.

Added after 6 minutes 27 seconds:

There is a free tutor - Internet, books, etc. But... you have to plow, plow yourself without reminders and control. And another question: in what years is a person from an ordinary high school who did not make any effort on his own, entered Moscow State University, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, etc.? Why did VZMS exist and exist? Why were FMS created?

Added after 7 minutes 34 seconds:

IMHO, and send the child to the appropriate place...

For some reason I remembered an older colleague. Its “homeland” is Pervomaika, with its “ceiling” being NIIZhT. So he arrived there safely. In mathematics I asked the teacher a lot of questions. To which he said: “Young man, you need to go to NSU with such questions!” Where he went and successfully graduated.
Well, we can make an assessment of graduates, and for recent years 10 there are statistics. AND? What fundamentally new will happen there? if the teachers pass?

The “subject” is taught in schools in different amounts, some have 10 hours of mathematics per week, some have three. What in this context is “to know the subject”?
Once upon a time, assignments were offered during the entrance exams to NSU. which "do not go beyond school curriculum. but they require creative application of the knowledge acquired at school." The Unified State Examination specification declares that 100 points require knowledge that goes beyond the scope of the general education class curriculum.
In general, there has long been an intention when certifying teachers to force them to take the Unified State Exam in the subject. Maybe we’re arguing here, but the teachers are already passing?

That is, I am not against teachers at will We went to take the Unified State Exam. But I don’t know what fundamentally new things will happen from such a surrender. Teachers have the opportunity to take an option and decide at any time. And see what is difficult for them personally. And are there children who need to be taught what the teacher himself does not and cannot do? And if there is, then what should we do? In general, this is how teachers work.
Yusha
You shouldn't rate our teachers so low. What then did children “forget” in such schools, in your opinion?
I am much more optimistic than you and believe that most teachers will pass the Unified State Exam very well, many with 90-100 points. Not all, probably. So there is no need to set requirements for everyone to pass at 100. You just need to go and pass. How long will it take?
Nobody will judge you and me now. We DO NOT know how the teachers would write it. But if they knew, they could evaluate the Unified State Examination itself and the school education system.
In particular, find an understanding of such things:
“This is an exam that you can definitely pass with a 100 if you know the subject.”
Or

“This is an exam that you can definitely pass with a 70 if you know the subject. And 100 is for geniuses.”
And there will also be an understanding of this question:
“This is an exam that you can definitely pass with a 100 if you know the subject.”
"This is an exam that you can pass with 90-100 without a tutor"

“This is an exam that cannot be passed with 90-100 without a tutor.”
Now society has a strange attitude towards the Unified State Exam, there are many myths, many reproaches. Perhaps they are fair, perhaps not.
It seems to me that if all teachers passed this exam, there would be fewer myths, and also, there would be changes in the exam itself, and teachers would reveal all the problems that exist in it.

And now teachers are really scaring EGE children. Because for them it is the unknown. And if you went through it yourself, there would be less fear! Problem 19 is Olympiad task

. The 17th task is also very often not a weak one. IMHO, a level of 90-100 points is the level of training and an indicator of the ability to study in best universities

countries. Explain to me: where will such a number of such teachers come from in the country's schools? What did they forget there at such a level?

Added after 48 seconds: Some children require personal interaction. Sometimes one tiny clarification is missing.
21OKSI Well, that’s why there used to be a system of Olympiads and a physics and mathematics school. And now oops. They train smart children for the Olympics in the same way. good schools
. So that the 19th task is solved.

But either this issue must be resolved at the state level, with the possibility of choice. or at the individual level. parents are looking for an opportunity for their own child.
In general, the Internet makes things a lot easier. It is quite possible to find an analysis of solutions to problems 18 and 19.
sono io IMHO - because "no". Because it doesn’t matter whether it’s a humanities class or not, but the student should have the opportunity to get advice from his teacher in

in full . There is no need to divide children into classes, as if the choice of class really means something important. In some gymnasiums and lyceums, the competition in the physics and mathematics class is off the charts, and children with an above-average level of preparation end up in the humanities (chemical-biological, philological, historical, economics, etc.) classes. And no one says that the teacher is obliged to pull out every student. The teacher must achieve a decent score in the Unified State Examination. Otherwise, no matter how talented a teacher he may be, he won’t have enough students.

high score
not to prepare - because he himself does not know the answer.
21OKSI At my eldest son's school, the teacher went over task 18 with them - in detail and at length. And many guys solved it successfully. About 19 - I don’t know what it is. And I remember about 18, because they discussed it a lot. This is still a big question about the right to choose. Our city is somewhat smaller than Novosibirsk - 6 schools and a gymnasium. Not in any of the schools, not in any of the teachers, even in specialized
math groups , did not go through tasks 18 and 19 with children. For some, their parents worked with them (I know one like that, I was lucky), but for others, they had no choice at all. Even though we don’t need specialized mathematics, if something happens, the only choice is to move. It’s scary to think about villages in relation to this situation. I would say. that every student has the right to choose a teacher who can prepare him for high level. But whether to use this right is up to the student. Eat great amount children. who do not need this high level at all. Then it is only to the detriment of the student that his super-duper teacher forcibly drags him to high Unified State Exam scores. Passed the basics - demonstrated knowledge of mathematics at a cultural level. We need mathematics as a basis

further development
We do not ask whether the child wants to go to Baumanka or to a local university. He goes and decides everything Unified State Exam assignments and gets your point. So the teacher must go and decide. And get your score. What's so difficult about it?

Regarding the fact that not all teachers prepare for a high level of the Unified State Exam.... This is a difficult question. We seem to have equal rights to education. This means that EVERY student has the right to a teacher who CAN prepare him for a high level of the Unified State Exam. I don't think this should be exactly 100 points. But still, a teacher should be able to get a fairly high score. If the teacher is not ready for this, IMHO, he should not work in the 11th grade. Any other time, but not 11.
Why? There are different teachers, not all work in depth. There are excellent school teachers who teach the basic level. That is, for a specialized exam, but within the framework of the general education program. Why demand from them full version Unified State Exam, designed for admission to the best specialized universities in the country?

What do you mean by “solve the Unified State Exam”? Decide on the minimum to get a certificate? decide on the level of enrollment at a local university? Is it necessary to decide on a level, for example, Moscow State University or Baumanka?

And one more thing: the ability to do something yourself and the ability to explain to another... somewhat different things... It’s strange if it’s difficult for an amplifier to solve the exam. Then what will he teach the children? It is a pity that only one teacher in Russia made such a decision. I am sure that all teachers working with 11th graders must take the Unified State Exam in their discipline every year together with their students. And this is not a test of the teacher's knowledge, this is a test Unified State Exam procedures
- this is how you should treat it!
Well, the Unified State Exam should not be difficult for a teacher!
Why is this act of a teacher “certainly worthy of respect,” but for students this is an ordinary event?

If all teachers in Russia passed the Unified State Exam, I am sure this would be the reason for some adjustments both in the Unified State Exam and in the curriculum. Krasnoyarsk gymnasium teacher Oksana Fan-Di, together with her students, passed the literature exam. The teacher notes that the purpose of such an unusual experiment was not only to test one’s own knowledge. Since 2015, the Unified State Examination in mathematics has been divided into two levels: basic and specialized.

Unified State Examination level is intended for graduates planning to enter technical and economic universities and subsequently study higher mathematics., If a graduate fails at the basic level is a must! Without a positive grade for this exam, it is impossible to obtain a school certificate.

Naturally, exam options Basic and specialized levels differ greatly both in the level of complexity of the proposed tasks and in their topics. The basic level assumes familiarity with the basic concepts of algebra, geometry, and arithmetic at the school “four” level. Among the profile-level tasks, there are serious tasks (for example, parametric ones) that require knowledge that goes beyond the scope of the school curriculum.

The basic level version of the Unified State Exam in mathematics includes 20 questions that require only a short numerical answer. The student is not required to provide a complete solution and is not required to justify the answer. For each correctly solved task you can get 1 primary point. Thus, the maximum primary the score is 20.

The scores obtained are converted to "traditional" grades according to the table below. So, for example, a graduate who scores 14 primary points receives a “good” grade.

Unified State Examination in mathematics (basic level). Scale for converting primary scores into grades

Please note: a student who scores less than 7 points receives an “unsatisfactory” grade for the exam. In this case, the Unified State Examination in mathematics will have to be taken again, otherwise the graduate risks being left without a certificate.

The table below was used in the 2015 Unified State Exam in Mathematics. The likelihood of any changes in 2016 is low, but the situation will finally become clear after the exam. It is too early to make any forecasts for 2017.

According to many experts, the Unified State Exam 2016 will be the last in the history of modern Russian education. In the next graduation year, students will take Soviet-style final exams.

In 2016, the minimum passing scores will increase, and an additional number of retakes will be introduced.

Changes in the Unified State Exam 2016

According to forecasts, creative activities will be expanded written assignments on exams in subjects such as history, Russian language, and literature. The number of test tasks will be significantly reduced, which will avoid elementary cheating on the part of graduates, and will allow assessing the real level of their knowledge, since test tasks they could simply guess the correct answer without knowing it.

As before, mathematics and Russian will remain compulsory subjects. To get admission to the Russian language exam, you will need to write, which will now be assessed on a pass/fail basis. At the same time, the Ministry of Education and Science does not rule out that in the foreseeable future the list of required exams will be supplemented with foreign languages, physics and history.

Discussions on the topic of certificates

Despite the fact that many find the innovations for the Unified State Examination in 2016 radical, experts from the Ministry of Education and Science hold a different point of view on this matter, without excluding the possibility that in the future the exams will become mandatory only for applicants and will turn into a tool for admission to a university. Regarding school and lyceum graduates, now everyone will have certificates. Even unsatisfactory grades will be noted in the certificates. Thus, experts believe that a graduate will be able to study at a university in those specialties where the subjects in which he received an unsatisfactory grade are not specialized.

A similar initiative has already been discussed in the State Duma for “ round table" The reason for such a discussion was an appeal from Professor Rukshin from pedagogical university named after Herzen, in which he asked to consider his proposal to issue certificates to everyone without exception, without regard to his performance in exams. The condition will be only to have completed 11 years of secondary school. There is a high probability that this initiative will be approved. Its supporters believe that such a reform in the education system will give people with a special mindset a greater chance of implementation and will become an impetus for true personal development.

In addition, as reported by the Ministry of Education and Science, in 2016, when submitting documents to the admissions committee, graduates will have to take additional entrance exams in mathematics and foreign language, if the selected specialty contains such exams in the list of exams required for enrollment. Moreover, after the ninth grade, a student can find out what his chances are of passing the entrance exams and whether he will be admitted to them.

The USE 2016 and its possible abolition next year puts an end to the debate about the imperfection of the system. Rumors about new uniform final exams do not subside, but until the result of the reforms is visible in practice, it is too early to talk about their correctness or error.

Table of assessments of the minimum passing score of the Unified State Exam 2016 in all subjects