schedule Operating mode:
Mon., Tue., Wed., Thu., Fri. from 10:00 to 18:00
Latest reviews from MSUPU
Anonymous review 13:59 07/08/2017Graduated this year. Faculty of Educational Psychology.
I’m very pleased with the faculty, I especially liked the people I studied with and the teachers (the coolest were in the third year).
When I entered I couldn’t stand working with children, now I work in primary school and I am happy that I once chose this faculty.
I didn’t like that there were long lines in the cafeteria during the long break.
Ekaterina Molokanova 15:17 03/15/2016
I am a graduate of the Faculty of Educational Psychology of Moscow State University of Psychology and Education in 2014 (Master’s degree, Department preschool pedagogy and psychology). I remember with gratitude the teaching staff and all the employees of the University.
The university is equipped at a decent level, there is a good library, and there is a canteen. I would especially like to note the relevance curriculum, level of research work, support for student initiatives, lack of corruption.
The teachers give everything they...
Gallery MGPPU
general information
Federal state budget educational institution higher education city of Moscow "Moscow State Psychological and Pedagogical University"
License
No. 02141 valid indefinitely from 05/17/2016
Accreditation
No. 02221 is valid from 02.09.2016 to 06.05.2021
Monitoring results of the Ministry of Education and Science for MSUPE
| Index | 18 year | 17 year | 16 year | 15 year | 14 year |
| Performance indicator (out of 7 points) | 5 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Average Unified State Examination score for all specialties and forms of study | 68.61 | 68.34 | 66.96 | 66.80 | 69.59 |
| Average Unified State Examination score of those enrolled on the budget | 69.34 | 68.64 | 67.05 | 66.34 | 72.02 |
| Average Unified State Examination score of those enrolled on a commercial basis | 62.09 | 62.4 | 64.72 | 56.79 | 61.37 |
| Average in all specialties minimum score Unified State Exam for full-time students | 53.57 | 56.01 | 52.94 | 52.38 | 51.77 |
| Number of students | 4470 | 4396 | 4408 | 4797 | 4975 |
| Full-time department | 3877 | 3646 | 3496 | 3420 | 2916 |
| Part-time department | 345 | 411 | 492 | 660 | 876 |
| Extramural | 248 | 339 | 420 | 717 | 1183 |
| All data |
The university was created with the support of the Moscow Committee of Education with the aim of training practice-oriented specialists for qualified solutions to the social needs of the city in the fields of education, healthcare and social protection childhood. The university trains psychologists, teachers, social workers, defectologists and other specialists.
Moscow State Psychological and Pedagogical University is a state budgetary educational institution created in 1996 on the initiative of the Moscow Department of Education.
MSUPE provides the opportunity to specialize in clinical, advisory, social, legal, pedagogical, extreme and other areas of psychology. The scientific training of students is combined with the initial focus of training on the needs of the urban social sphere and solving practical problems.
MSUPU is unique in that it unites traditions scientific research and practice orientation. Together with the Psychological Institute Russian Academy education, it constitutes a single scientific and educational complex "Psychology". That's why research students and graduate students of MSUPE are directly connected with advanced academic research.
During the training process, each student undergoes practical training in various institutions collaborating with the university: kindergartens and centers, comprehensive and inclusive schools, rehabilitation centers and hospitals.
The staff of the institute consists of erudite, proactive and creative teachers, most of whom are doctors and candidates of science.
MSUPU conducts active international activities. Cooperation is being implemented with:
- First University of Rome (Italy),
- University of Luneburg (Germany),
- Medical rehabilitation center them. Lowenstein (Switzerland),
- Tel Aviv University (Israel),
- University of Wisconsin (Madison, USA),
- Capital pedagogical university Beijing (PRC),
- Institute of Psychology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,
- Mongolian state university science and technology,
- Sofia University and many others.
There is an exchange of teaching staff. Scientists from the UK, Bulgaria, Switzerland, China, Australia, France, USA, Germany, Mongolia give lectures at the Moscow State University of Psychology and Education.
The university is working on programs double diplomas in psychology with universities in other countries: France, Switzerland, Bulgaria, Italy.
More details Collapse http://www.mgppu.ru
Dear applicants, before enrolling in this institution for the Faculty of Extreme Psychology, think a million, no, a billion times whether you need it or not! And now more details. I really wanted to enter this university to study at the Faculty of Extreme Psychology! And I was very happy when I found out that I passed! That's where all the fun ended... And then such a “cheerful animal” as the Scribe appeared! There is no respect for students, especially for working ones (they are almost forced to choose, either work or study). Disdainful attitude, indifference, insults and shouting - this is what students receive at this faculty. Let's start with studying: in the first half of the year it was still somehow interesting, but unfortunately there were few specialized subjects, you can count them on the fingers of one hand. Undoubtedly, some of them were interesting; time flew by quickly. But this is the first half of the year, no further studies! Couples are rare (maybe this is good for some), there is no knowledge (don’t forget that some people still want to gain knowledge), couples are boring or they are going through a bachelor’s program. In the 2nd year, about 5 pairs. Profile items no, there was a rumor that the institute simply did not allocate money for them, so there was no studying, only a couple of questions about the master’s thesis and this was such a pleasure. Supervisor master's program to put it mildly - pii... Tough. This woman Ekimova V.I. had a blast with the students just like that, getting on their nerves with a bang. Thanks to them, she asserted herself. IN general person not permanent. Today she corrected her diploma, and tomorrow she said that she didn’t do it and that it was all complete nonsense and would have to redo it again. She especially takes it out on students who write diplomas from teachers with whom she has differences and personal enmity, because of this the student gets breakdown, does not know what to do, is in a tense state. He says that in state exams you need to answer briefly and to the point, but in fact, when a student answers briefly and to the point, the very essence, this teacher (she is also a member of the commission) during the exam says that you need to answer extensively, tell in more detail. And that students’ readiness for the state exam is low, not the state level. Well, excuse me, as they taught (and as I wrote above). And then the student is simply in oh, what a shock! In general, as a director of a master’s program, I’m terrible. But there is a tiny plus - he teaches well and interestingly, but this is nonsense and trifle compared to the rest of the trash. At the faculty, there is no consensus between the teachers, everyone pulls the blanket over themselves, says negative things about the other teacher behind their back, and the students suffer from this. When writing a dissertation, teachers say not to listen to anyone but them, and the director of the master’s program says not to listen to teachers, but to listen only to her, and it’s not clear who to believe. Regarding the work of the faculty. A. A. Pakhalkova works at the faculty, a lady who doesn’t give accurate information or she gives it too late, who herself makes mistakes, and at the same time blames everything on the students, that they are to blame for everything, and when it turns out that it is all her fault, she doesn’t even apologize, she still pretends that the students are wrong. She also doesn’t take responsibility for her words and pretends that she didn’t say them. And the most fun thing is, prepare money for reviewers. Yes, they collected money from us for reviewers, with the words “just don’t write about this anywhere, otherwise we already had problems with corruption,” in general, they are quietly doing this business. The reviewers wrote a review of the master's thesis, and some of the reviews were not positive, and these reviews did not give any advantages during the defense itself, well, they are there, just for show. All the same, the assessments were given by the commission and the reviews were not taken into account, that is, in fact, they are not needed, and the money was handed over. It is not clear on what basis the commission makes assessments. There were cases where a person didn’t answer anything at all and was given a 5, while people who answered at least something were given a 4. Well, in addition, I want to say that the university issues diplomas without a crust, only inserts and students themselves ordered and paid for the crusts for their diplomas. I hope the review is useful to you and I repeat, think carefully before going to this faculty. After all, the nerves are not restored, but still I want to be healthy person! Good luck to all!
