Sanskrit is one of the most ancient and mysterious languages. Its study helped linguists get closer to the secrets of ancient linguistics, and Dmitri Mendeleev created a table of chemical elements.
1. The word "Sanskrit" means "processed, perfected."
2. Sanskrit is a living language. He is one of 22 official languages India. For about 50,000 people it is their native language, for 195,000 it is a second language.
3. For many centuries, Sanskrit was simply called वाच (vāc) or शब्द (śabda), which translates as "word, language". The applied meaning of Sanskrit as a cult language was reflected in another of its names - गीर्वांअभाषा (gīrvāṇabhāṣā) - "the language of the gods".
4. The earliest known monuments in Sanskrit were created in the middle of the 2nd millennium BC.
5. Linguists believe that classical Sanskrit originated from Vedic Sanskrit (the Vedas are written in it, the earliest of which is the Rig Veda). Although these languages are similar, today they are considered dialects. The ancient Indian linguist Panini in the fifth century BC considered them to be different languages.
6. All mantras in Buddhism, Hinduism and Jainism are written in Sanskrit.
7. It is important to understand that Sanskrit is not National language. It is the language of the cultural environment.
8. Initially, Sanskrit was used as a common language of the priestly class, while ruling classes preferred to speak in Prakrit. Sanskrit finally became the language of the ruling classes already in late antiquity in the era of the Guptas (4th-6th centuries AD).
9. The extinction of Sanskrit occurred for the same reason as the extinction of Latin. It remained the codified literary language, while colloquial changed.
10. The most common writing system for Sanskrit is the Devanagari script. "Deva" - god, "nagar" - city, "i" - suffix relative adjective. Devanagari is also used to write Hindi and other languages.
11. Classical Sanskrit has about 36 phonemes. If allophones are taken into account (and the writing system takes them into account), then the total number of sounds in Sanskrit increases to 48.
12. For a long time Sanskrit developed separately from European languages. The first contact of linguistic cultures occurred during Indian campaign Alexander the Great in 327 BC. Then the lexical set of Sanskrit was replenished with words from European languages.
13. A full-fledged linguistic discovery of India occurred only in the second half of the 18th century. It was the discovery of Sanskrit that marked the beginning of comparative historical linguistics and historical linguistics. The study of Sanskrit revealed similarities between it, Latin and ancient Greek, which prompted linguists to think about their ancient relationship.
14. Until the middle of the 19th century, it was widely believed that Sanskrit was the proto-language, but this hypothesis was recognized as erroneous. The real proto-language of the Indo-Europeans was not preserved in the monuments and was several thousand years older than Sanskrit. However, it was Sanskrit that least of all moved away from the Indo-European proto-language.
15. Recently, there have been many pseudo-scientific and "patriotic" hypotheses that Sanskrit originated from Old Russian language, from Ukrainian language, and so on. Even superficial scientific analysis shows them to be false.
16. The similarity of the Russian language and Sanskrit is explained by the fact that Russian is a language with slow development (unlike, for example, English). However, Lithuanian, for example, is even slower. Of all European languages, it is he who is most similar to Sanskrit.
17. Hindus call their country Bharata. This word came to Hindi from Sanskrit, in which one of the ancient epics of India "Mahabharata" ("Maha" is translated as "great") was written. The word India comes from the Iranian pronunciation of the name of the region of India Sindhu.
18. A friend of Dmitri Mendeleev was the Sanskrit scholar Bötlingk. This friendship influenced the Russian scientist during the opening of his famous periodic table, Mendeleev also predicted the discovery of new elements, which he called in the Sanskrit style "ekabor", "ekaaluminum" and "ekasilicium" (from the Sanskrit "eka" - one) and left "empty" places for them in the table.
The American linguist Kriparsky also noted the great similarity between the periodic table and Panini's Shiva Sutras. In his opinion, Mendeleev made his discovery as a result of the search for the "grammar" of chemical elements.
19. Despite the fact that Sanskrit is said to be Difficult language, its phonetic system is understandable for a Russian person, but it has, for example, the sound “r syllabic”. So we don't say "Krishna" but "Krishna", not "Sanskrit" but "Sanskrit". Also, the presence of short and long vowels in Sanskrit can cause difficulties in learning Sanskrit.
20. Contrasting soft and hard sounds not in Sanskrit.
21. The Vedas are written with stress marks, it was musical and depended on tone, but in classical Sanskrit, stress was not indicated. In prose texts, it is transmitted on the basis of the stress rules of the Latin language.
22. Sanskrit has eight cases, three numbers and three genders.
23. developed system There are no punctuation marks in Sanskrit, but punctuation marks occur and are divided into weak and strong.
24. Classical Sanskrit texts often contain very long Difficult words, including dozens of simple and replacing entire sentences and paragraphs. Their translation is similar to solving puzzles.
25. From most verbs in Sanskrit, a causative is freely formed, that is, a verb with the meaning "to force to do what the main verb expresses." As in pairs: drink - water, eat - feed, drown - drown. In the Russian language, the remnants of the causative system have also been preserved from the Old Russian language.
26. Where in Latin or Greek some words contain the root "e", others the root "a", still others - the root "o", in Sanskrit in all three cases it will be "a".
27. A big problem with Sanskrit in that one word in it can have up to several dozen meanings. And no one will call a cow in classical Sanskrit a cow, it will be “variegated”, or “hair-eyed”. The 11th-century Arab scholar Al Biruni wrote that Sanskrit is “a language rich in words and endings, which denotes different names the same object and different objects by the same name.
28. In ancient Indian drama, the characters speak two languages. All respected characters speak Sanskrit, while the women and servants speak Middle Indian languages.
29. Sociolinguistic studies of the use of Sanskrit in oral speech indicate that its oral use is very limited and that Sanskrit is no longer developed. Thus, Sanskrit becomes a so-called "dead" language.
30. Vera Aleksandrovna Kochergina made a huge contribution to the study of Sanskrit in Russia. She compiled the Sanskrit-Russian Dictionary and wrote the Sanskrit Textbook. If you want to learn Sanskrit, then you cannot do without the works of Kochergina.
Sanskrit ( self-hidden, i.e. language itself [deepened] hidden [hidden])- literary language ancient india. Derived from Russian knot writing, so its letters look like they are tied to the main thread of the story. Knots, 30 percent of Sanskrit roots are Russian. In Sanskrit, a word can have up to 50 meanings, and the Russian language has the same polysemy.The researcher of the ancient Indian epic Tilak in 1903 published his book "The Arctic Homeland in the Vedas" in Bombay. According to Tilak, the Vedas, created more than three thousand years ago, tell about the life of his distant ancestors near Arctic Ocean. They describe endless summer days and winter nights, polar star and northern lights.
Ancient Indian texts tell that in the ancestral home, where there are many forests and lakes, there are sacred mountains that divide the earth into north and south, and rivers - into those flowing to the north and flowing to the south. The river flowing into the southern sea is called Ra (this is the Volga). And the one that flows into the Milky or White Sea is the Dvina (which means "double" in Sanskrit). The Northern Dvina does not really have its own source - it arises from the confluence of two rivers: the South and the Sukhona. And the sacred mountains from the ancient Indian epic are very similar in description to the main watershed of Eastern Europe- Northern Ridges, this gigantic arc of hills, which ran from Valdai to the northeast to the polar Urals.Judging by the research of paleoclimatologists, in those times about which the Vedas narrate, the average winter temperature on the coast of the Arctic Ocean was 12 degrees higher than now. And life there, in terms of climate, was no worse than today in the Atlantic zones of Western Europe.
A professor from India, who came to Vologda and did not know Russian, refused an interpreter a week later. "I myself understand Vologda enough," he declared, "because they speak corrupted Sanskrit."
Vologda ethnographer Svetlana Zharnikova was not at all surprised by this: “The present-day Indians and Slavs had one ancestral home and one proto-language - Sanskrit,” says Svetlana Vasilievna. “Our distant ancestors lived in Eastern Europe on the territory approximately from modern Vologda to the coast of the Arctic Ocean.” Candidate historical sciences Svetlana Zharnikova wrote a monograph about the historical roots of the North Russian folk culture. The book is thick.
"The vast majority of the names of our rivers can be simply translated from Sanskrit without distorting the language," says Svetlana Zharnikova. lotus, water lily", Kusha - "sedge", Syamzhena - "uniting people". In the Vologda and Arkhangelsk regions, many rivers, lakes and streams are called Ganges, Shiva, Indiga, Indosat, Sindoshka, Indomanka. In my book, thirty pages are occupied by these names in Sanskrit. And such names can be preserved only if - and this is already a law - if the people who gave these names are preserved. And if it disappears, then the names change. "
Somehow, Svetlana Zharnikova accompanied an Indian folklore ensemble on a trip to Sukhona. The head of this ensemble, Mrs. Mihra, was shocked by the ornaments on the Vologda national costumes. "These," she exclaimed enthusiastically, "we meet in Rajasthan, and these - in Aris, and these ornaments - just like in Bengal." It turned out that even the technology of ornamental embroidery is called the same in the Vologda region and in India. Our craftswomen talk about the flat surface "chasing", and Indian - "chikan".
The cooling forced a significant part of the Indo-European tribes to look for new, more favorable territories for life in the west and south. The "Deichev" tribes left for Central Europe from the Pechora River, "Suekhane" from the Sukhona River, and "Vagane" from the Vaga. All these are the ancestors of the Germans. Other tribes settled on the Mediterranean coast of Europe, reached Atlantic Ocean. They went to the Caucasus and even further south. Among those who came to the Hindustan peninsula were the Krivi and Drava tribes - remember the Slavic Krivichi and Drevlyans.
According to Svetlana Zharnikova, at the turn of 4-3 millennia BC, the original Indo-European Aryan tribal community began to break up into ten language groups, which became the ancestors of all modern Slavs, all Romance and Germanic peoples of Western Europe, Albanians, Greeks, Ossetians, Armenians, Tajiks , Iranians, Indians, Latvians and Lithuanians.
“We are going through a ridiculous time,” says Svetlana Vasilievna, “when ignorant politicians are trying to make peoples strangers to each other. A wild idea. No one is better or older than the other, because everything is from the same root.”
An excerpt from the article by S. Zharnikova “Who are we in this old Europe?” journal "Science and Life", 1997
It is interesting that the names of many rivers - "sacred springs", found in the ancient Indian epic "Mahabharata", are also in our Russian North. We list those that coincide verbatim: Alaka, Anga, Kaya, Kuizha, Kushevand, Kailash, Saraga. But there are also the rivers Ganges, Gangreka, lakes Gango, Gangozero and many, many others.
Our contemporary, the outstanding Bulgarian linguist V. Georgiev noted the following very important circumstance: “Geographical names are the most important source for determining the ethnogenesis of a given area. In terms of stability, these names are not the same, the names of rivers, especially the main ones, are the most stable.
But in order to preserve the names, it is necessary to preserve the continuity of the population that passes these names from generation to generation. Otherwise, new peoples come and call everything in their own way.
So, in 1927, a team of geologists "discovered" the highest mountain in the Subpolar Urals. It was called by the local Komi population Narada-Iz, From - in Komi - a mountain, a rock, but no one could explain what Narada means. And geologists decided in honor of the decade October revolution and for clarity, rename the mountain and call it Narodnaya. So it is now called in all gazetteers and on all maps. But the ancient Indian epic tells about the great sage and associate Narada, who lived in the North and conveyed the orders of the Gods to people, and the requests of people to the Gods.
The same idea was expressed back in the 20s of our century by the great Russian scientist Academician A. I. Sobolevsky in his article “Names of the rivers and lakes of the Russian North”: “The starting point of my work is the assumption that the two groups of names are related belong to the same language Indo-European family, which I still, until I find a more suitable term, call "Scythian". In the 60s of the last century, the Swedish researcher G. Ehanson, analyzing the geographical names of the North of Europe (including the Russian North), came to the conclusion that in they are based on some kind of Indo-Iranian language.
Names of some northern Russian rivers: Vel; Valga; Indiga, Indoman; Lala; Sukhona; Padmo.
Meanings of words in Sanskrit: Vel - border, limit, river bank; Valgu - pleasant beautiful; Indu - drop; Lal - play, overflow; Suhana - easily overcome; Padma - water lily flower, lily, lotus.
“So what is the matter and how did Sanskrit words and names get to the Russian North?” - you ask. The thing is that they did not come from India to the Vologda, Arkhangelsk, Olonets, Novgorod, Kostroma, Tver and other Russian lands, but quite the opposite.
Note that the most recent event described in the Mahabharata epic is the epic battle between the Pandavas and the Kauravas, which is believed to have taken place in 3102 BC. e. on Kurukshetra (Kursk field). It is from this event that the traditional Indian chronology begins the countdown of the worst time cycle - Kaliyug (or the time of the kingdom of the death goddess Kali). But at the turn of the 3rd-4th millennium BC. e. there were no tribes speaking Indo-European languages (and, naturally, Sanskrit) on the Hindustan peninsula. They came there much later. Then a natural question arises: where did they fight in 3102 BC? e., that is, five thousand years ago?
Even at the beginning of our century, the outstanding Indian scientist Bal Gangadhar Tilak tried to answer this question, analyzing ancient texts in his book The Arctic Home in the Vedas, which was published in 1903. In his opinion, the homeland of the ancestors of the Indo-Iranians (or, as they called themselves, the Aryans) was in the North of Europe, somewhere near the Arctic Circle. This was evidenced by the surviving legends about the year, which is divided into light and dark half, about the freezing Sea of Milk, over which the Northern Lights (“Blistavitsy”) sparkle, about the constellations not only of the polar, but also of the polar latitudes, circling on a long winter night around the Polar Star . Ancient texts told of spring snowmelt, summer sun never setting, mountains stretching from west to east dividing rivers into those flowing north (into the Milk Sea) and flowing south (into the South Sea).
Universal word
Let's take for example the most famous Russian word of our century "satellite". It consists of three parts: a) “s” is a prefix, b) “put” is a root and c) “nik” is a suffix. The Russian word “put” is the same for many other languages of the Indo-European family: path in English and “path” in Sanskrit. That's all. The similarity between Russian and Sanskrit goes further and can be seen at all levels. The Sanskrit word "pathik" means "one who walks the path, the traveler". The Russian language can form words such as “putik” and “putnik”. The most interesting thing in the history of the word “sputnik” in Russian. The semantic meaning of these words in both languages is the same: "one who follows the path along with someone."
Russian word "seen" and "soonu" in Sanskrit. Also “madiy” is “son” in Sanskrit and can be compared with “mow” in Russian and “mu” in English. But only in Russian and Sanskrit “mou” and “madiy” should change into “moua” and “madiya”, since we are talking about the word “snokha” referring to feminine. The Russian word “snokha” is the Sanskrit “snukha”, which can be pronounced in the same way as in Russian. The relationship between the son and the son's wife is also described by similar words in the two languages. Is there a greater similarity somewhere? There are hardly two more different language who have preserved the ancient heritage - such a close pronunciation - to this day.
Here is another Russian expression: "That is your dom, etot our dom." In Sanskrit: "Tat vas dham, etat nas dham". "Tot" or "tat" is demonstrative pronoun singular in both languages and indicates an object from the side. The Sanskrit “dham” is the Russian “dom”, possibly due to the absence of the aspirated “h” in Russian.
Young languages of the Indo-European group, such as English, French, German, and even Hindi, which is directly descended from Sanskrit, must use the verb "is", without which the above sentence cannot exist in any of these languages. Only Russian and Sanskrit do without the linking verb “is”, while remaining completely correct both grammatically and idiomatically. The very word “is” is similar to “est” in Russian and “asti” in Sanskrit. And even more than that, the Russian “estestvo” and the Sanskrit “astitva” mean “existence” in both languages. Thus, it becomes clear that not only the syntax and word order are similar, the very expressiveness and spirit are preserved in these languages in an unchanged initial form.
Here is a very simple and useful rule Panini's grammar. Panini shows how six pronouns are converted into adverbs of time by simply adding "-da". Only three of Panini's six Sanskrit examples remain in modern Russian, but they follow this 2,600-year-old rule. Here they are:
Sanskrit pronouns: kim; tat; sarva
The corresponding meaning in Russian is: which, which; that; all
Sanskrit adverbs: kada; tada; sada
Corresponding meaning in Russian: when; then; always
The letter “g” in the Russian word usually denotes the combination into one whole of parts that existed separately before.
Reflection in Russian toponymy of common language roots.
In place names (i.e., in geographical names), the picture is reflected no less fully than in the Mahabharata and Srimad Bhagavatam. Of course, if you do not point to individual titles rivers, cities, mountains, but to unfold in front of a person a map completely dotted with these Names. In addition, the inexhaustible depth of the common philosophical Knowledge of our ancestors is reflected in the geographical names of the multi-tribal Empire.
Arya - this is literally how two cities are called until today: in Nizhny Novgorod and in the Yekaterinburg region.
Omsk - Siberian city on the Om River - this is the transcendental mantra "Om". The city of Oma and the Oma River are in the Arkhangelsk region.
Chita is a city in Transbaikalia. The exact translation from Sanskrit is "comprehend, understand, observe, know." Hence the Russian word "read".
Achit is a city in the Sverdlovsk region. Translated from Sanskrit - "ignorance, stupidity."
Moksha is the name of two rivers, in Mordovia and in the Ryazan region. The Vedic term "moksha", translated from Sanskrit - "liberation, departure to the Spiritual World".
Kryshneva and Hareva are two small tributaries of the Kama River, bearing the Names of the Supreme Personality of Godhead - Kryshen and Hari. Note that the name of the "Christian sacrament" of the consecration of food and communion is "the Eucharist". And these are three Sanskrit words: "ev-Hari-isti" - "the custom of Hari to donate food." For Jesus brought from Hindustan, where He studied from the age of 12.5, not some newly invented religion own name, but pure Vedic Knowledge and rituals and informed the students of their ancient Aryan names. And only then they were deliberately perverted by our geopolitical adversary and used against Risshi-ki as an ideological weapon.
Kharino - this name Kryshnya is the name of a town in the Perm region and two ancient villages: in the Nekrasovsky district of the Yaroslavl region and in the Vyaznikovsky district of the Vladimir region.
Hari-Kurk is the name of the strait in Estonia at the entrance to the Gulf of Riga. The exact translation is "chanting Hari".
Sukharevo is a village in the Mytishchi district near Moscow, the most sacred place of Bharata Varsha. Today, the Vedic temple Kryshnya has been revived here. Translated from Sanskrit, "Su-Hare" means "possessing the power of loving service to Kryshnya." The territory of this temple is washed by the mouth of a small sacred river Kirtida, named after the Goddess of the Seas (translated from Sanskrit - "giving praise"). Five thousand one hundred years ago, Kirtida adopted the little Goddess Rada-rani (Rada descended down).
The cult of the Goddess Rada was much more widespread in Russia than even the cult of Kryshny Himself, just as it is today in the sacred places of Hindustan.
Kharampur - a city and a river in the Yamalo-Nenets autonomous region. The exact translation is "led by the Goddess Hara".
Sanskrit and Russian.
When analyzing them, there is some surprise from the similarity of many words. Undoubtedly, Sanskrit and Russian are very congenial languages. What is the main language?
A people that does not know its past has no future. In our country, for a number of specific reasons, the knowledge of our roots, the knowledge of where we come from, has been lost. The binding thread that held all people together into a single whole was destroyed. The ethnic collective consciousness was dissolved in cultural ignorance.
Analyzing historical facts, analyzing scriptures Vedas, one can conclude that an ancient Vedic civilization existed earlier. Therefore, it can be expected that traces of this civilization remain in the cultures of the whole world until today. And now there are many researchers who find this kind of features in the cultures of the world. Slavs belong to the family of Indo-European, Indo-Iranian, or as the Aryan peoples are now called. And their past has nothing to do with pagan or barbarian culture. Between the Russian and Indian souls there is such a significant similarity as an irresistible desire for spiritual horizons. This can be easily observed from the history of these countries.
Sanskrit and Russian. Vibration value.
We all know that speech is an expression of the culture of its speakers. Any speech is a certain sound vibration. And our material universe also consists of sound vibrations. According to the Vedas, the source of these vibrations is Brahma, who, through the pronunciation of certain sounds, creates our universe with all its types of living beings. It is believed that the sounds emanating from Brahman are the sounds of Sanskrit. Thus, the sound vibrations of Sanskrit have a transcendental spiritual basis. Therefore, if we come into contact with spiritual vibrations, then a program is included in us spiritual development our heart is cleansed. And this scientific facts. Language is a very important factor influencing culture, the formation of culture, the formation and development of the people.
In order to elevate the people or, on the contrary, to lower them, it is enough to language system this people introduce the appropriate sounds or appropriate words, names, terms.
Researches of scientists about Sanskrit and Russian language.
The topic of the similarity of Sanskrit with world languages was addressed by the first italian traveler Philip Sosetti, who visited India 400 years ago. After his travels, Sosetti left a work on the similarity of many Indian words with Latin. The next was the Englishman William Jones. William Jones knew Sanskrit and studied a significant part of the Vedas. Jones concluded that Indian and European languages are related. Friedrich Bosch - a German scientist - philologist in the middle of the 19th century wrote a work - a comparative grammar of Sanskrit, Zen, Greek, Latin, Old Church Slavonic, German.
Ukrainian historian, ethnographer and researcher Slavic mythology Georgy Bulashov, in the preface of one of his works, where the analysis of Sanskrit and the Russian languages \u200b\u200bis written - “all the main foundations of the language of tribal and tribal life, mythological and poetry, are the property of the entire group of Indo-European and Aryan peoples. And they come from that distant time, the living memory of which has been preserved to our time in the most ancient hymns and rituals, the sacred books of the ancient Indian people, known as the "Vedas". Thus, by the end of the last century, studies by linguists showed that is Sanskrit, the oldest of all modern dialects.
Russian scientist folklorist A. Gelferding (1853, St. Petersburg) in a book about kinship Slavic language with Sanskrit, writes: “The Slavic language in all its dialects has retained the roots and words that exist in Sanskrit. In this respect, the closeness of the compared languages is unusual. The Sanskrit and Russian languages do not differ from each other in any permanent, organic changes in sounds. Slavic does not have a single feature alien to Sanskrit."
A professor from India, a linguist, a great connoisseur of Sanskrit dialects, dialects, dialects, etc. Durgo Shastri came to Moscow at the age of 60. He did not know Russian. But a week later he refused an interpreter, arguing that he himself understands Russians quite well, since Russians speak corrupted Sanskrit. When he heard Russian speech, he said that - "you speak one of the ancient dialects of Sanskrit, which used to be common in one of the regions of India, but is now considered extinct."
At a conference in 1964, Durgo presented a paper in which he gave many reasons that Sanskrit and Russian are related languages, and that Russian is a derivative of Sanskrit. Russian ethnographer Svetlan Zharnikova, candidate of historical sciences. The author of the book - On the historical roots of the North Russian folk culture, 1996.
Quotes - the vast majority of the names of our rivers can be translated from Sanskrit without distorting the language. Sukhona - from Sanskrit means easily overcome. Kubena is twisty. Ships - a stream. Darida - giving water. Padma is a lotus. Kama - love, attraction. There are many rivers and lakes in the Vologda and Arkhangelsk regions - Ganges, Shiva, Indigo, etc. The book has 30 pages of these names in Sanskrit. And the word Rus comes from the word Russia - which in Sanskrit means holy or bright.
Modern scientists attribute most European languages to the Indo-European group, defining Sanskrit as the closest to the universal proto-language. But Sanskrit is a language that no people in India has ever spoken. This language has always been the language of scholars and priests, much like Latin for Europeans. This is a language artificially introduced into the life of the Hindus. But how then did this artificial language appear in India?
The Hindus have a legend that says that once upon a time they came from the North, because of the Himalayas, to them seven white teachers. They gave the Hindus a language (Sanskrit), gave them the Vedas (those very famous Indian Vedas) and thus laid the foundations of Brahmanism, which is still the most popular religion in India, and from which Buddhism in turn emerged. Moreover, this is a fairly well-known legend - it is studied even in Indian theosophical universities. Many Brahmins consider the Russian North (the northern part of European Russia) to be the ancestral home of all mankind. And they go to our north on a pilgrimage, just like Muslims go to Mecca.
Sixty percent of Sanskrit words coincide both in meaning and in pronunciation with Russian words completely. Natalya Guseva, an ethnographer, doctor of historical sciences, a well-known expert on the culture of India, the author of more than 160 scientific papers on the culture and ancient forms of Hindu religion. Once one of the respected scientists of India, whom Guseva accompanied on a tourist trip along the rivers of the Russian North, in communication with local residents refused an interpreter and, tearing up, remarked to Natalya Romanovna that he was happy to hear living Sanskrit! From that moment, her study of the phenomenon of the similarity of the Russian language and Sanskrit began.
And, indeed, it is surprising: somewhere there, far to the south, beyond the Himalayas, peoples of the Negroid race live, the most educated representatives of which speak a language close to our Russian language. Moreover, Sanskrit is close to the Russian language in the same way that, for example, the Ukrainian language is close to Russian. There can be no question of any other such close coincidence of words between Sanskrit and any other language except Russian. Sanskrit and the Russian language are relatives, and if we assume that the Russian language, as a representative of the family of Indo-European languages, originated from Sanskrit, then the assumption that Sanskrit originated from the Russian language is also correct. Yes, by at least says an ancient Indian legend.
There is another factor in favor of this statement: as the well-known philologist Alexander Dragunkin says, a language derived from some other language always turns out to be simpler: fewer verbal forms, shorter words, etc. A person here follows the path of least resistance. Indeed, Sanskrit is much simpler than the Russian language. So we can say that Sanskrit is a simplified Russian language, frozen in time for 4-5 thousand years. And the hieroglyphic writing of Sanskrit, according to academician Nikolai Levashov, is nothing more than the Slavic-Aryan runes, slightly modified by the Hindus ...
According to the story of the late Natalya Romanovna Guseva, in 1964, the well-known, according to her, Indian Sanskrit scholar Durga Prasad Shastri (दुर्गा प्रसाद शास्त्री) arrived in the USSR. After staying in Moscow for a month, the scientist decided that the Russians speak some form of Sanskrit. He was led to such a conclusion by the multitude of phonetic correspondences between Russian and Sanskrit words, while their meaning coincides at the same time.
- Why, for example, some words, such as "you", "you", "us", "those", "that", - Shastri was surprised, - are simply the same in both languages, while other pronouns are extremely close, and Russian " own", "that", "this" in Sanskrit correspond to "sva" ("pile"), "tad" ("tat"), "etad" ("etat")? The eternal concepts of life and death also turned out to be similar words: “alive”, “alive” - “jivan”, “jiva”, and “dead” - “mrytyu”. It also turned out that the Russian prefixes “pro-”, “re-”, “ot-”, “c(co)-”, “nis (bottom)-” correspond in Sanskrit“great-”, “para-” (pr), “ut-” “sa (self)-”, “nis(nish)-”. And from this follows the undoubted similarities of many forms. For example, the words "floats" corresponds in Sanskritप्रप्लवते “praplavate”, and “swims” - परिप्लवते “pariplavate”.
Natalya Romanovna Guseva - Soviet and Russian writer, playwright, Indologist, historian and ethnographer; doctor of historical sciences, a well-known specialist in the culture of India and Indian religions. Laureate international award them. Jawaharlal Nehru,
The Sanskritologist also observed similar correspondences in pass - parade, fart-pardate, drink away - prapiti, fall away - utpad (t), open - utkrta, set sail - utchal, coincidence - sampadana, brothers - sabhratri, give away - ut (d) yes, fall down - nishpad. He even established that the word "family" is comparable to the Sanskrit verb "samya", which in Sanskrit means "to stick together". After asking other Indians, Natalya Guseva learned that they were also surprised at the similarity of Russian verbs “to be”, “wake up”, “stand”, “dry”, “cook”, “bake”, “fall”, “roar” and without difficulty recognize in them the Sanskrit roots "bhu", "budh", "stha", "shush", "var", "pach", "pad", "rav". They are very happy when they hear the word “drying” in Soviet bakeries, because they know its equivalent “shushka”, and cracker is translated as sukhan (सूखन).
The words “mane”, “spring”, “maiden”, “meat”, “darkness”, “mouse”, “day” have correspondences in the form ग्रीवा [mane] - 'back of the neck', vsTt [vasanta] - 'spring ', देवी [devi] - 'maiden, princess', मांस [mamsa] - 'meat', तम [tama], मूषक [musaka], दिन [dina]…
Since then, an orientalist, doctor of historical sciences, Natalya Guseva, who accompanied Shastri on his trip around the country and helped him as a translator (although then not from Sanskrit, but from English), and her Indian friend Amina Ahuja, a professor of Russian literature Jawaharlap Nehru University of Delhi - started searching for the "secret sources of visible rivers", that is, promoting the Arctic hypothesis of the ancestral home of the Indo-Europeans.
This hypothesis was first formulated in 1903 by the famous politician India Bal Gangadhar Tilak in the book "Arctic homeland in the Vedas". Guseva and her associates decided to find confirmation of this hypothesis in search of Sanskrit place names in the Russian north. For these searches, supporters of the hypothesis, such as, for example, Dr. philosophical sciences Valery Nikitich Demin, Candidate of Historical Sciences Svetlana Vasilievna Zharnikova were declared racists and criticized by the scientific community. Even an outstanding Russian linguist, Slavist, philologist, academician of the Russian Academy of Sciences Oleg Nikolaevich Trubachev, who had nothing to do with the "Hyperboreans", but simply spoke of close kinship and close contacts between the Slavs and Indo-Aryans in the Northern Black Sea region, fell under the distribution. This was enough for the academician to be ranked among the nationalists. The argument of the critics was that nowhere, except in Russia and India, such theories even come to mind.
Now, few people remember that since the end of the 18th century, British scientists, who had not yet become notorious, decided that Sanskrit was the ancestor of all developed languages. This idea first came to an English official in India, William Jones, who in 1788 published The Sanskrit language. In it, he launched into the world the idea of an Indo-European language family. After Jones died of cirrhosis of the liver, his work was continued by the German writer Friedrich von Schlegel, who, comparing Sanskrit, Persian, Greek and German, came to the conclusion that they had a common origin. The first to understand that the Indo-European first language would not have been Sanskrit at all was August Schleicher. It was he who began to reconstruct the original language. Starting with Schleicher, Sanskrit was placed in the Indo-Aryan group, but still considered one of the oldest languages. Russian, on the other hand, was derived from Old Slavonic, which, according to most foreign linguists, arose in the middle of the 1st millennium AD.
According to Schleicher, the language tree looked like this: the trunk of this tree represented a certain Indo-European language, which first split into Ario-Greek-Celtic and Slavic-Balto-Germanic macro-branches. The first was divided first into the Aryan and Greco-Itclo-Celtic directions, and then into the Greek branch and the Italo-Celtic, from which the Celtic and Italic ones emerged. Among the latter was Latin.
The second macro-branch was divided first into the Germanic and Balto-Slavic direction, and only in the last place, according to Schleicher, did the Slavic languages stand out from it.
Member of the Russian Geographic Society Svetlana Vasilievna Zharnikova (December 27, 1945, Vladivostok - November 26, 2015, St. Petersburg) until her death continued to lead irrefutable evidence relationship between the northern dialects of the Russian language and Sanskrit.
Why were the guardians of the purity of science so afraid? The fact is that the “Hyperboreans” came close to unraveling the Russian-Sanskrit mystery. The only threshold they could not cross was to publish the conclusion that Sanskrit came from Russian. For such a conclusion Soviet time they would be expelled from the party, and in recent years the triumph of democracy could even put them behind bars. Only unofficially, in a narrow circle, scientists dared to say that Sanskrit is the development of one of the akaya Proto-Slavic dialects.
How is it really? In fact, Sanskrit has become one of the last dialects to break away from our language. Why not vice versa? Why didn't Russian come from Sanskrit? The thing is that Sanskrit words come from later versions of our words, while Germanic, Armenian, Celtic and even Baltic words come from their earlier forms.
On the affinity of the Slavic language with Sanskrit A. Hilferding 1853.djvu
Take, for example, the word "snow". On the Sanskrit it is called Gima (हिम), that is, almost like Russian winter. After all, it is known that in Russian Z was formed from G. Therefore, in such words as prince / princess, these two sounds still alternate. The word हिम is related to Armenian ձմեռն, Lithuanian žiema, Latvian ziema, Latin hiems and Ancient Greek χεῖμα. However, in the Germanic languages, which broke away from our ancient linguistic community much earlier, English snow, Dutch sneeuw, Danish sne, Norwegian snø and Swedish snö are derived from an earlier synonym Snoigos. The basis of this word was snoig-, and -os was the ending male for the nominative, that is, in Russian, the nominative case. In Old German, Snoigos was called snaiwaz, and -os there became -az. The presence of the double sound -ai– tells us that the Germanic language separated from ours not only before the loss of -os, but even before the monophthogization of diphthonoges, that is, before the monophonic sounding of double sounds, which occurred around the 20th century BC. In the Germanic languages, this very ending -az fell out rather late. So, in Gothic, which existed in the middle of the 1st millennium AD, -az turned into -s, and snow was designated as snaiws. In Russian, snoigos eventually turned into snow, and gima became winter.
The mere presence of snow in Sanskrit, common in India, where this snow is not observed even in the most severe winter, when the temperature drops to + 18 ° at night, indicates that the people who spoke it once saw this snow, and the similarity of the sound of this word with our allows us to say that they did not see him on the peaks of the Himalayas, when they went to India, but observed him with us. If this word arose already in India, then snow in Sanskrit would be called semolina or Mrs. what is it called now, respectively, in Telugu and Tamil, or if this word did not exist at all, just as it does not exist in such Dravidian languages as Tulu or Kannada (not to be confused with Tula and Canada). The Aryans, by the way, used the word gima for the lotus flower they saw in India.
Adelung F. "On the similarity of the Sanskrit language with Russian" (1811).pdf
An important indicator of the time of isolation separate language from the general is also the presence or absence of palatal consonants in it. In the course of a process called palatization in scholarly language, back-lingual consonants turned into soft sibilants. So, "k" turned into "h", "j" turned into "g", and "x" into "sh". Before this transition, for example, the verb "chati", from which today's words "started", "started", "hour" and "part" come from, and which in those days meant "cut off", sounded like [katya]. A descendant of this "katya" in English language is irregular verb to cut, which John Hawkins erroneously considered an element of the pre-Germanic substratum. AT Sanskrit but this verb sounds like छदि [chati], that is, exactly the same as in ours. This also indicates that Sanskrit separated from our language later than the Germanic ones. In addition, the ending "-tei" in this Sanskrit word has already changed to "-ti", which once again testifies to the late isolation of Sanskrit.
Adelung F. "On the similarity of the Sanskrit language with Russian" (1811).pdf
Another evidence of the late separation of Sanskrit from our once common language is the numeral "four", sounding on Sanskrit as चतुर् (chatur). A long time ago, when neither Germanic, nor Romance, nor Armenian, nor Greek had yet separated from our language, this numeral sounded like a kvetvor. In the Germanic languages, the initial "kv" turned into f, in Greek into τ, in Celtic into p, and only in Sanskrit, Slavic and Latvian, the initial sound sounds like [h].
SANSCRIT - the literary language of Ancient India, originated from Russian (or probably more precisely Slavic) knot writing, so its letters look like they are tied to the main thread of the story. Knots, 30 percent of Sanskrit roots are Russian. In Sanskrit, a word can have up to 50 meanings, and the Russian language has the same polysemy.
Based on the materials of the book by A.V. Trekhlebov "The blasphemers of FINIST"
Sanskrit - Samskrta- an artificial language, brought to perfection. More precisely, in Russian this word sounds like samskryt, i.e. the language itself [deepened] is hidden [hidden].
According to the book "Inglistic Dictionary"
Why does the Vologda dialect not need to be translated into Sanskrit? A professor from India, who came to Vologda and did not know Russian, refused an interpreter a week later. “I myself understand the Vologda people quite well,” he declared, “because they speak corrupted Sanskrit.” Vologda ethnographer Svetlana Zharnikova was not at all surprised by this: “Today's Indians and Slavs had one ancestral home and one parent language - Sanskrit,” says Svetlana Vasilievna. “Our distant ancestors lived in Eastern Europe on the territory approximately from modern Vologda to the coast of the Arctic Ocean.” Candidate of Historical Sciences Svetlana Zharnikova wrote a monograph about the historical roots of the North Russian folk culture. The book is thick.
The researcher of the ancient Indian epic Tilak in 1903 published his book "The Arctic Homeland in the Vedas" in Bombay. According to Tilak, the Vedas, created more than three thousand years ago, tell about the life of his distant ancestors near the Arctic Ocean. They describe endless summer days and winter nights, the North Star and the Northern Lights.
Ancient Indian texts tell that in the ancestral homeland, where there are many forests and lakes, there are sacred mountains that divide the earth into north and south, and rivers - into flowing north and flowing south. The river flowing into the southern sea is called Ra (this is the Volga). And the one that flows into the Milky or White Sea is the Dvina (which means “double” in Sanskrit). The Northern Dvina does not really have its own source - it arises from the confluence of two rivers: the South and the Sukhona. And the sacred mountains from the ancient Indian epic are very similar in description to the main watershed of Eastern Europe - the Northern Uvaly, this giant arc of hills that ran from Valdai to the northeast to the polar Urals.
Judging by the research of paleoclimatologists, in those days about which the Vedas tell, the average winter temperature on the coast of the Arctic Ocean was 12 degrees higher than now. And life there, in terms of climate, was no worse than today in the Atlantic zones of Western Europe. “The vast majority of the names of our rivers can be simply translated from Sanskrit without distorting the language,” says Svetlana Zharnikova. - Sukhona means "easily overcome", Kubena - "winding", Suda - "stream", Darida - "giving water", Padma - "lotus, water lily", Kusha - "sedge", Syamzhena - "uniting people". In the Vologda and Arkhangelsk regions, many rivers, lakes and streams are called the Ganges, Shiva, Indiga, Indosat, Sindoshka, Indomanka. In my book thirty pages are occupied by these names in Sanskrit. And such names can be preserved only if - and this is already a law - if the people who gave these names are preserved. And if it disappears, then the names change.”
The year before last, Svetlana Zharnikova accompanied an Indian folklore ensemble on a trip to Sukhona. The head of this ensemble, Mrs. Mihra, was shocked by the ornaments on the Vologda national costumes. “These ones,” she exclaimed enthusiastically, “are found with us in Rajasthan, and these are found in Aris, and these ornaments are exactly like in Bengal.” It turned out that even the technology of ornamental embroidery is called the same in the Vologda region and in India. Our craftswomen talk about the flat surface "chasing", and Indian - "chikan".
The cooling forced a significant part of the Indo-European tribes to look for new, more favorable territories for life in the west and south. The “Deichev” tribes left for Central Europe from the Pechora River, “Suekhane” from the Sukhona River, and “Vagane” from the Vaga. All these are the ancestors of the Germans. Other tribes settled in the Mediterranean coast of Europe, reached the Atlantic Ocean. They went to the Caucasus and even further south. Among those who came to the Hindustan peninsula were the Krivi and Drava tribes - remember the Slavic Krivichi and Drevlyans.
According to Svetlana Zharnikova, at the turn of 4-3 millennia BC, the original Indo-European tribal community began to break up into ten language groups, which became the ancestors of all modern Slavs, all Romance and Germanic peoples of Western Europe, Albanians, Greeks, Ossetians, Armenians, Tajiks, Iranians, Indians, Latvians and Lithuanians. “We are going through an absurd time,” says Svetlana Vasilievna, “when ignorant politicians are trying to make peoples strangers to each other. Wild idea. No one is better or older than the other, because everything is from the same root.
An excerpt from the article by S. Zharnikova “Who are we in this old Europe?” journal "Science and Life", 1997
It is interesting that the names of many rivers - "sacred wells", found in the ancient Indian epic "Mahabharata", are also in our Russian North. We list those that coincide verbatim: Alaka, Anga, Kaya, Kuizha, Kushevand, Kailash, Saraga. But there are also the rivers Ganges, Gangreka, lakes Gango, Gangozero and many, many others.
Our contemporary, the outstanding Bulgarian linguist V. Georgiev noted the following very important circumstance: “Geographical names are the most important source for determining the ethnogenesis of a given area. In terms of stability, these names are not the same, the names of rivers, especially the main ones, are the most stable. But in order to preserve the names, it is necessary to preserve the continuity of the population that passes these names from generation to generation. Otherwise, new peoples come and call everything in their own way. So, in 1927, a team of geologists "discovered" the highest mountain in the Subpolar Urals. It was called by the local Komi population Narada-Iz, Iz - in Komi - a mountain, a rock, but no one could explain what Narada means. And geologists decided in honor of the decade of the October Revolution and, for clarity, to rename the mountain and call it Narodnaya. So it is now called in all gazetteers and on all maps. But the ancient Indian epic tells about the great sage and associate Narada, who lived in the North and conveyed the orders of the Gods to people, and the requests of people to the Gods.
The same idea was expressed back in the 20s of our century by the great Russian scientist Academician A. I. Sobolevsky in his article “Names of rivers and lakes of the Russian North”: “The starting point of my work is the assumption that the two groups of names are belong to the same language of the Indo-European family, which for the time being, pending the search for a more suitable term, I call "Scythian". In the 60s of the last century, the Swedish researcher G. Ehanson, analyzing the geographical names of the North of Europe (including the Russian North), came to the conclusion that they are based on some kind of Indo-Iranian language.
Names of some northern Russian rivers: Vel; Valga; Indiga, Indoman; Lala; Sukhona; Padmo.
Meanings of words in Sanskrit: Vel - border, limit, river bank; Valgu - pleasant beautiful; Indu - a drop; Lal - play, overflow; Suhana - easily overcome; Padma - water lily flower, lily, lotus.
“So what is the matter and how did Sanskrit words and names get to the Russian North?” - you ask. The thing is that they did not come from India to the Vologda, Arkhangelsk, Olonets, Novgorod, Kostroma, Tver and other Russian lands, but quite the opposite.
Note that the most recent event described in the epic Mahabharata is a huge battle between the Pandava and Kaurava peoples, which is believed to have taken place in 3102 BC. e. on Kurukshetra (Kursk field). It is from this event that the traditional Indian chronology begins the countdown of the worst time cycle - Kaliyug (or the time of the kingdom of the death goddess Kali). But at the turn of the 3rd-4th millennium BC. e. there were no tribes speaking Indo-European languages (and, naturally, Sanskrit) on the Hindustan peninsula. They came there much later. Then a natural question arises: where did they fight in 3102 BC? e., that is, five thousand years ago?
Even at the beginning of our century, the outstanding Indian scientist Bal Gangadhar Tilak tried to answer this question, analyzing ancient texts in his book The Arctic Home in the Vedas, which was published in 1903. In his opinion, the homeland of the ancestors of the Indo-Iranians (or, as they called themselves, the Aryans) was in the North of Europe, somewhere near the Arctic Circle. This was evidenced by the surviving legends about the year, which is divided into light and dark half, about the freezing Sea of Milk, over which the Northern Lights (“Blistavitsy”) sparkle, about the constellations not only of the polar, but also of the polar latitudes, circling on a long winter night around the Polar Star . Ancient texts told of spring snowmelt, summer sun never setting, mountains stretching from west to east dividing rivers into those flowing north (into the Milk Sea) and flowing south (into the South Sea).
Universal word
Let's take for example the most famous Russian word of our century "satellite". It consists of three parts: a) “s” is a prefix, b) “put” is a root, and c) “nik” is a suffix. The Russian word “put” is the same for many other languages of the Indo-European family: path in English and “path” in Sanskrit. That's all. The similarity between Russian and Sanskrit goes further and can be seen at all levels. The Sanskrit word "pathik" means "one who walks the path, the traveler". The Russian language can form words such as “putik” and “putnik”. The most interesting thing in the history of the word “sputnik” in Russian. The semantic meaning of these words in both languages is the same: "one who follows the path along with someone."
Russian word "seen" and "soonu" in Sanskrit. Also, “madiy” is “son” in Sanskrit and can be compared with “mow” in Russian and “mu” in English. But only in Russian and Sanskrit “mou” and “madiy” should change into “moua” and “madiya”, since we are talking about the word “snokha”, which belongs to the feminine gender. The Russian word “snokha” is the Sanskrit “snukha”, which can be pronounced the same way as in Russian. The relationship between the son and the son's wife is also described by similar words in the two languages. Is there a greater similarity somewhere? It is unlikely that there will be two more different languages that have preserved the ancient heritage - such a close pronunciation - to the present day.
Here is another Russian expression: “That is your dom, etot nash dom”. In Sanskrit: "Tat vas dham, etat nas dham". “Tot” or “tat” is a singular demonstrative pronoun in both languages and indicates an object from the side. The Sanskrit "dham" is the Russian "dom", perhaps because Russian lacks the aspirated "h".
Young languages of the Indo-European group, such as English, French, German, and even Hindi, which is directly descended from Sanskrit, must use the verb "is", without which the above sentence cannot exist in any of these languages. Only Russian and Sanskrit do without the linking verb “is”, while remaining completely correct both grammatically and idiomatically. The very word “is” is similar to “est” in Russian and “asti” in Sanskrit. And even more than that, the Russian “estestvo” and the Sanskrit “astitva” mean “existence” in both languages. Thus, it becomes clear that not only the syntax and word order are similar, the very expressiveness and spirit are preserved in these languages in an unchanged initial form.
Here is a simple and very useful rule of Panini's grammar. Panini shows how six pronouns are converted into adverbs of time by simply adding "-da". Only three of Panini's six Sanskrit examples remain in modern Russian, but they follow this 2,600-year-old rule. Here they are:
Sanskrit pronouns: kim; tat; sarva
The corresponding meaning in Russian is: which, which; that; all
Sanskrit adverbs: kada; tada; sada
Corresponding meaning in Russian: when; then; always
The letter “g” in the Russian word usually denotes the combination into one whole of parts that existed separately before.
Reflection in Russian toponymy of common language roots.
In toponymy (i.e., in geographical names), the picture is reflected no less fully than in the Mahabharata and in the Srimad Bhagavatam. Of course, if you do not point to individual names of rivers, cities, mountains, but unfold a map in front of a person, completely dotted with these Names. In addition, the inexhaustible depth of the common philosophical Knowledge of our ancestors is reflected in the geographical names of the multi-tribal Empire.
Arya - this is literally how two cities are called until today: in Nizhny Novgorod and in the Yekaterinburg region.
Omsk - Siberian city on the Om River - this is the transcendental mantra "Om". The city of Oma and the Oma River are in the Arkhangelsk region.
Chita is a city in Transbaikalia. The exact translation from Sanskrit is "comprehend, understand, observe, know." Hence the Russian word "read".
Achit is a city in the Sverdlovsk region. Translated from Sanskrit - "ignorance, stupidity."
Moksha - two rivers bear this name, in Mordovia and in the Ryazan region. The Vedic term "moksha", translated from Sanskrit - "liberation, departure to the Spiritual World".
Kryshneva and Hareva are two small tributaries of the Kama River, bearing the Names of the Supreme Personality of Godhead - Kryshen and Hari. Please note that the name of the "Christian sacrament" of the consecration of food and communion is "the Eucharist". And these are three Sanskrit words: "ev-Hari-isti" - "the custom of Hari to donate food." For Jesus brought from Hindustan, where He studied from the age of 12.5, not some newly invented religion of His own Name, but pure Vedic Knowledge and rituals, and told his disciples their ancient Aryan names. And only then they were deliberately perverted by our geopolitical adversary and used against Risshi-ki as an ideological weapon.
Kharino - this name Kryshnya is the name of a town in the Perm region and two ancient villages: in the Nekrasovsky district of the Yaroslavl region and in the Vyaznikovsky district of the Vladimir region.
Hari-Kurk is the name of the strait in Estonia at the entrance to the Gulf of Riga. The exact translation is "chanting Hari".
Sukharevo is a village in the Mytishchi region near Moscow, the most sacred place of Bharata Varsha. Today, the Vedic temple Kryshnya has been revived here. Translated from Sanskrit, "Su-Hare" - "possessing the power of loving service to Kryshnya." The territory of this temple is washed by the mouth of a small sacred river Kirtida, named after the Goddess of the Seas (translated from Sanskrit - "giving praise"). Five thousand one hundred years ago, Kirtida adopted the little Goddess Rada-rani (Rada descended down).
The cult of the Goddess Rada was much more widespread in Russia than even the cult of Kryshny Himself, just as it is today in the sacred places of Hindustan.
Kharampur is a city and a river in the Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug. The exact translation is "led by the Goddess Hara".
Sanskrit and Russian
When analyzing them, there is some surprise from the similarity of many words. Undoubtedly, Sanskrit and Russian are very congenial languages. What is the main language?
A people that does not know its past has no future. In our country, for a number of specific reasons, the knowledge of our roots, the knowledge of where we come from, has been lost. The binding thread that held all people together into a single whole was destroyed. The ethnic collective consciousness was dissolved in cultural ignorance.
Analyzing historical facts, analyzing the scriptures of the Vedas, one can come to the conclusion that an ancient Vedic civilization previously existed. Therefore, it can be expected that traces of this civilization remain in the cultures of the whole world until today. And now there are many researchers who find this kind of features in the cultures of the world. Slavs belong to the family of Indo-European, Indo-Iranian, or as the Aryan peoples are now called. And their past has nothing to do with pagan or barbarian culture. Between the Russian and Indian souls there is such a significant similarity as an irresistible desire for spiritual horizons. This can be easily observed from the history of these countries.
Sanskrit and Russian. Vibration value.
We all know that speech is an expression of the culture of its speakers. Any speech is a certain sound vibration. And our material universe also consists of sound vibrations. According to the Vedas, the source of these vibrations is Brahma, who, through the pronunciation of certain sounds, creates our universe with all its types of living beings. It is believed that the sounds emanating from Brahman are the sounds of Sanskrit. Thus, the sound vibrations of Sanskrit have a transcendental spiritual basis. Therefore, if we come into contact with spiritual vibrations, then a program of spiritual development is turned on in us, our heart is cleansed. And these are scientific facts. Language is a very important factor influencing culture, the formation of culture, the formation and development of the people.
In order to elevate a people or, on the contrary, to lower them, it is enough to introduce the corresponding sounds or the corresponding words, names, terms into the language system of this people.
Researches of scientists about Sanskrit and Russian language.
The first Italian traveler Philip Sosetti, who visited India 400 years ago, addressed the topic of the similarity of Sanskrit with world languages. After his travels, Sosetti left a work on the similarity of many Indian words with Latin. The next was the Englishman William Jones. William Jones knew Sanskrit and studied a significant part of the Vedas. Jones concluded that Indian and European languages are related. Friedrich Bosch - a German scientist - philologist in the middle of the 19th century wrote a work - a comparative grammar of Sanskrit, Zen, Greek, Latin, Old Church Slavonic, German.
Ukrainian historian, ethnographer and researcher of Slavic mythology Georgiy Bulashov, in the preface of one of his works, where the analysis of Sanskrit and Russian languages is written - “all the main foundations of the language of tribal and tribal life, mythological and poetic works, are the property of the entire group of Indo-European and Aryan peoples . And they come from that distant time, the living memory of which has been preserved to our time in the most ancient hymns and rituals, the sacred books of the ancient Indian people, known as the Vedas. Thus, by the end of the last century, research by linguists showed that the fundamental basis of the Indo-European languages is Sanskrit, the oldest of all dialects today.
Russian scientist folklorist A. Gelferding (1853, St. Petersburg), in a book about the relationship of the Slavic language with Sanskrit, writes: “The Slavic language in all its dialects has retained the roots and words that exist in Sanskrit. In this respect, the closeness of the compared languages is unusual. The Sanskrit and Russian languages do not differ from each other in any permanent, organic changes in sounds. Slavic does not have a single feature alien to Sanskrit.
A professor from India, a linguist, a great connoisseur of Sanskrit dialects, dialects, dialects, etc. Durgo Shastri came to Moscow at the age of 60. He did not know Russian. But a week later he refused an interpreter, arguing that he himself understands Russians quite well, since Russians speak corrupted Sanskrit. When he heard the Russian speech, he said that - "you speak one of the ancient dialects of Sanskrit, which used to be common in one of the regions of India, but is now considered extinct."
At a conference in 1964, Durgo presented a paper in which he gave many reasons that Sanskrit and Russian are related languages, and that Russian is a derivative of Sanskrit. Russian ethnographer Svetlan Zharnikova, candidate of historical sciences. The author of the book - On the historical roots of the North Russian folk culture, 1996.
Quotes - the vast majority of the names of our rivers can be translated from Sanskrit without distorting the language. Sukhona - from Sanskrit means easily overcome. Kubena is sinuous. Ships - a stream. Darida - giving water. Padma is a lotus. Kama - love, attraction. There are many rivers and lakes in the Vologda and Arkhangelsk regions - Ganges, Shiva, Indigo, etc. The book has 30 pages of these names in Sanskrit. And the word Rus comes from the word Russia - which in Sanskrit means holy or bright.
Modern scientists attribute most European languages to the Indo-European group, defining Sanskrit as the closest to the universal proto-language. But Sanskrit is a language that no people in India has ever spoken. This language has always been the language of scholars and priests, much like Latin for Europeans. This is a language artificially introduced into the life of the Hindus. But how then did this artificial language appear in India?
The Hindus have a legend that says that once upon a time they came from the North, because of the Himalayas, to them seven white teachers. They gave the Hindus a language (Sanskrit), gave them the Vedas (those very famous Indian Vedas) and thus laid the foundations of Brahmanism, which is still the most popular religion in India, and from which Buddhism in turn emerged. Moreover, this is a fairly well-known legend - it is studied even in Indian theosophical universities. Many Brahmins consider the Russian North (the northern part of European Russia) to be the ancestral home of all mankind. And they go to our north on a pilgrimage, just like Muslims go to Mecca.
Sixty percent of Sanskrit words coincide both in meaning and in pronunciation with Russian words completely. Natalya Guseva, an ethnographer, doctor of historical sciences, a well-known expert on the culture of India, the author of more than 160 scientific works on the culture and ancient forms of the Hindu religion, spoke about this for the first time. Once, one of the respected scientists of India, whom Guseva accompanied on a tourist trip along the rivers of the Russian North, refused an interpreter in communication with local residents and, tearing up, remarked to Natalya Romanovna that he was happy to hear living Sanskrit! From that moment, her study of the phenomenon of the similarity of the Russian language and Sanskrit began.
And, indeed, it is surprising: somewhere there, far to the south, beyond the Himalayas, peoples of the Negroid race live, the most educated representatives of which speak a language close to our Russian language. Moreover, Sanskrit is close to the Russian language in the same way that, for example, the Ukrainian language is close to Russian. There can be no question of any other such close coincidence of words between Sanskrit and any other language except Russian. Sanskrit and Russian are relatives, and if we assume that the Russian language, as a representative of the family of Indo-European languages, originated from Sanskrit, then it is also true that Sanskrit originated from the Russian language. So, at least, says the ancient Indian legend.
There is another factor in favor of this statement: as the well-known philologist Alexander Dragunkin says, a language derived from some other language always turns out to be simpler: fewer verbal forms, shorter words, etc. A person here follows the path of least resistance. Indeed, Sanskrit is much simpler than the Russian language. So we can say that Sanskrit is a simplified Russian language, frozen in time for 4-5 thousand years. And the hieroglyphic writing of Sanskrit, according to Academician Nikolai Levashov, is nothing more than the Slavic-Aryan runes, slightly modified by the Hindus.
The Russian language is the most ancient language on Earth and the closest to the language that served as the basis for most of the world's languages.
From the site http://www.vedamost.info
The similarity of the Russian language and Sanskrit. speech degradation.Vedic literature describes amazing fact. It turns out that the center of all the Vedic mysteries of the Vedic civilization was the former territory Soviet Union. That is, it was the center of all the Vedic mysteries. And if you, perhaps, remember, there is such a walk for the Golden Fleece? Where did they swim? To Colchis! Where is Colchis? Caucasus. Noah's Ark. Where is he there? Caucasus. And so on. That is, there are a lot of historical epics - the so-called literary monuments, which all, if we trace, lead to our territory of the former Soviet Union, perhaps it is more correct to say so.
How is the destruction of the Vedic roots?
And how does this destruction of the Vedic roots take place. Conscious. And the Vedic literature also describes this - how in the Kali Yuga, consciously, certain spheres, that is, certain living beings, people, will consciously destroy and undermine the Vedic roots of society. And even how they will change the language on purpose, filling it with wrong sound vibrations.
First, you will not find almost a single person with a Sanskrit name now. Or, let's say, an old Slavic name. Now we are all Vasya, Petit, Kolya, Leni, Ivan, Sergey. All people have Hebrew, Latin and Greek names. At least in Russia. Who had to do everything... That is, there were some original names, and they are again described in the Vedic literature. Changed the personal vibrational field.
If you know that at initiation, when one goes to some tradition, they also change his name. That is, they give him a Vedic name. For what? It is very important. 
And how language roots were cut down. The Russian language was very strongly connected with Sanskrit, there are a lot of Sanskrit root words. Living beings simply communicating in everyday life in these dialects could attract light forces, divine energy. That is, various living beings that could provide them with security, protection, and so on. And in order to enslave a certain system, it was necessary to remove these traditional sound vibrations. 
Similarities between the Russian language and Sanskrit. speech degradation.
I will now read to you some, such, comparative words Sanskrit and Russian.
So:
purva is called in Sanskrit, purva is the first,
adi—one;
dvaya - two, two;
three - three; traya - three; treba - the third; track - three;
catur - four; chatvara - four;
tesatero - ten;
matri - mother, mother; pramatri - foremother;
devara—brother-in-law;
bharat—brother;
sabhatri—brothers;
svakr - father-in-law;
dada - uncle;
svaka - brother-in-law;
matchmaking is a property;
sunu – son;
to you - to you;
you - you;
us - us;
te – those;
that - that;
then - tada;
sada - always;
kada—when;
how how;
kuta—where;
kator - which;
tat – that;
this - this;
pile - your own.
Vidha - to see;
supa - soup;
harmya - mansions, or temple;
patha—the path;
mane - that's interesting, mane in Sanskrit means neck, and people think that this is some hair, mane means neck in Sanskrit;
nara - people;
nava - new;
dvar – door;
anghira or arhangira - archangels; t
adjika (here, interesting word), tajika - means in Sanskrit Persian, Tajika;
suska - drying;
agni - fire;
musica is a mouse. 
Here, surprisingly, many men are so, an interesting parallel; beer - beer. But Ayurveda describes it literally as "a tonic drink made from malt." A tonic drink, that is, well, not intoxicating. But now he has already become so drunk.
Phena - foam;
lakhu—easy;
rathin - warrior;
sarathin - companion;
drava - look, here, firewood, here we all say "firewood". It turns out that in Sanskrit the literal translation is a sawn tree. And that's why no one, probably, thought in Russian why a "tree", but when they saw it - firewood? It turns out that in Sanskrit "firewood" is called "sawn wood."
Girik - mountains,
devi - deva;
ladies - house;
vasanta - spring;
marvel - marvel;
dina – day; and so on.
I'll probably bore you if I start listing. This is me, in brief, so that you have an idea about all these roots that connect Russian speech with the progenitor of all these languages - Sanskrit. 
Bhavishya Purana describes (I, this is all in Sanskrit, I returned, originally, in Sanskrit) describes - Prakrit. To understand what prakrta is – it is a gross language. And it is said that the whole society, civilized society at all times speaks Sanskrit. Prakriti in the Vedic society, that is, this, such an unpurified language, is spoken by laborers and vagabonds. That is, what we now call homeless people, scourges there, vagrants. They speak this prakriti.
And it is said that when the epochs of degradation come, this Sanskrit, since the speech apparatus also degrades, the articulation changes. You must have noticed that if any of you have ever come across, for example, here, people cannot say “Srimad-Bhagavatam”. They cannot say "Bhakti Vedanta". They say: "Bhahn ...", so, something like that; "Shebhathn..." like this. That is, the articulation is missing. That is, people ... This indicates a certain sensory status. So speech changes. Speech changes. 
And the Bhavishya Purana also predicts, explains how people will move away from Sanskrit. It is said that in the run-up to the Age of Kali, there will be a separation from Prakrit - not from Sanskrit - of a language called "Latin" in Sanskrit. What we know as what? Latin. Latin. And almost everything came from Latin Indo-European languages. Almost all. And straight from prakrti come some language groups related to Turkic languages or Finno-Ugric, you know, right? Too. And there are some more descriptions. That is, this is the degradation of society, it leads to the fact that along with this degradation, our speech, our alphabet, and so on also change. But, in general, some roots, sometimes, even now, I read - and you noticed that something was still preserved. Still, enough, quite a lot in everyday life, we say these words.
