"A new world order with US hegemony is being created against Russia, at the expense of Russia and on the ruins of Russia" Zbigniew Brzezinski
An article published in the "Russian National Journal"
In August 1991, the chief American "specialist on Russia" Zbigniew Brzezinski said that after the collapse of communism, the "democracy" was left with one enemy - the Orthodox Church.
I was interested: why Brzezinski does not like Orthodoxy and the Russian people so much? Looking into his biography, I read that he is a Pole by nationality, was born in 1928 in Lvov (according to other sources - in Warsaw) in the family of diplomat Tadeusz Brzezinski, who very happily ended up in Canada before the war, where he remained forever. Tell me where and at what time the biggest hater of Orthodoxy and Russia should have been born? Of course, in the territory that became part of Poland during the time of Piłsudski, in the family of a statesman. Bitterness from the loss of "Polish lands" gives rise to Russophobia, hatred of Orthodoxy determines the place and time of birth.
He spent his early childhood under the bombing of Orthodox churches in eastern Poland: we recall that in 1937 alone, 114 churches were blown up in Poland. In a village called Radunin, residents remember well how joyfully they greeted the Russians in 1940. In this village I was shown an apparently unremarkable place. Here Polish fighters against the Soviet regime, Catholics, of course, shot the Orthodox villagers. Among them was Lyubov Sobolevskaya. She took her baby to the neighbors, returned to the rest of the condemned, and was martyred. Lyubov refused to remove the Orthodox cross and was killed for this. It seems to me that Mr. Brzezinski, if he had not left Poland, despite his early years, could have ended up in the ranks of the anti-communist resistance. Could have been in that village. If it is necessary “in the name of democracy” to eliminate a person, an organization or even a people, then none of the democrats will think: they are not afraid of blood.
Russian invaders and American freedom fighters
In 1998, in an interview with the French magazine Nouvelle Observatory, Brzezinski admitted that the arming of Bin Laden's anti-Soviet troops preceded the Russian invasion and was intended to provoke their reaction.
Zbigniew Brzezinski: According to the official version of history, the CIA's assistance to the Mujahideen began during 1980, that is, after Soviet army invaded Afghanistan on December 24, 1979. But a reality kept secret until today is different: in fact, President Carter signed the first directive on secret assistance to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul on July 3, 1979 ... This covert operation was a great idea. Its purpose was to lure the Russians into an Afghan trap, and you want me to regret it?
Nouvel Observatory: Do you regret that you contributed to Islamic fundamentalism, that you supplied weapons and advised future terrorists?
Z.Bzh: What is more important from the point of view of the history of the world? Talibans or the fall of the Soviet empire?
We, Russians, are tormented by doubts, we admit that we are guilty of something. Even in the repressions that were directed against the Russians, we are to blame. We consider it necessary to make excuses and blame the whole world. They do not consider conscience to be something necessary.
USSR as heir Russian Empire
The American political scientist admits that values and ideological foundations were laid in the foundation of the Soviet system, and the American system used pragmatic guidelines. It is in these Soviet ideological foundations that there is the terrible legacy of tsarism. Outwardly, the USSR was the complete opposite of the Russian Empire, but in reality it was only a distorting mirror. Zbigniew saw elements of anarchism in the Soviet system, restrained by a strong individual power, which was inherited from the autocracy. Soviet collectivism was born out of the conciliarity of the Orthodox Church, but died because of the dogmatic failure of socialism.
After the fall of the USSR, Brzezinski became a kind of prophet, but it is hardly worth overestimating his merits in this matter. He hated the USSR as the successor of the empire, carrying potential danger return to a single power at a different level. His life's work is the fight against this hated state, system, cultural and historical type. So he looked for a vulnerability in the Soviet system and found it: "human rights." Never in both Russian systems could “human rights” be put in the first place, above ideas, above conscience — this is the lot of Europe. And he played this card in full, supporting the dissidents of Poland, the GDR, the USSR. Used everything: the Pope, and even the Mujahideen. Zbigniew Brzezinski has always been far from science as objective knowledge and in different time tried to create a different image of the USSR among gullible listeners. So, at first it was the "exclusive enemy" (1956), then - the image alternative model with many points of contact (1964, Khrushchev's "thaw"), and finally - a dying, unable to develop economic and political organism (1989). “The USSR simply lacks the ability to impose its will on the world to the extent that it even remotely resembles the dominance that the United States achieved during the Pax Americana era of the 50s. America's dominance rested not only on military superiority, but also on its economic, political, cultural and even ideological attractiveness ... ”- he wrote in 1983. In short, the American way of life found adherents in every country, creating a kind of international of mammon fans. Obviously, lovers of the American way of life had to manifest themselves sooner or later in power and ... perestroika took place. And no pro-Soviet elite was created in American society. The weakness of the Soviet ideological weapon was in the presence of certain values that the Americans did not have when they propagated their "way of life." It was unprincipled, or rather, based on the well-known position "any means are good to achieve the goal": bombs, drugs, debauchery, and dollars. Zbigniew Brzezinski became the embodiment of this American pragmatism in politics. He invented a new political science, where they do not think about truth and conscience, where everything is aimed at self-justification. “Ideological restrictions also undermined the creative potential of the Soviet Union ...” Or “The final result was also significantly influenced by cultural phenomena. The American-led coalition for the most part perceived as positive many of the attributes of American political and social culture. "
Two different systems
V early works comparing the two systems, Brzezinski tried to identify some of the points of contact. Why? Because if they are completely different, then there can be no convergence, no merging ... And that would be fatal for an American political scientist: how then to destroy the Soviets? What to cling to? The Slavophile Nikolai Yakovlevich Danilevsky convincingly showed in his writings that there are two cultural and historical types: German-Roman and Russian (Slavic). They are opposite and can either fight among themselves or coexist peacefully. In one word: "What health to a Russian is death to a German." This is clearly confirmed by three wars: the First and Second World Wars and the third - ideological. Danilevsky already then warned about the danger of "entering Europe", the pernicious notions about the truth of only one European civilization. The trouble is that, wandering in the labyrinths of its own ideology, the USSR could not completely abandon the idea of growing into Europe. Hence the clumsy attempts to integrate into Europe under Brezhnev (the Helsinki Agreements, in which we immediately found ourselves in captivity), and quite "awkward" under Gorbachev and Yeltsin, which in several years proved the validity of Danilevsky's predictions. And the revolution itself was a product of this ingrowth. Brzezinski understands all this perfectly and, of course, is familiar with Danilevsky's legacy, but he bluffs, as, however, always and everywhere. He pushes Russia into European civilization, the leader of which is the United States, but in fact he is implementing a plan for the complete destruction of Russia. It cannot grow, it can only be destroyed, but the Russian fools, who have read Brzezinski, but are unfamiliar with Danilevsky, do not know about this. And the American, according to his bluff, is very actively concerned about democracy in Russia.
During the 90s, he was the special envoy of the US President to promote the largest oil project in the world - the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline. This is the implementation of his plans to strangle Russia. At the same time, since 1999, he has headed the American Committee for Peace in Chechnya. He claimed that in this position he contributed to the peace negotiations between the Russian government and Maskhadov's fighters for independence. But his activities cannot hide the reality from our eyes: secret assistance to the separatists to maintain the war.
Russian Mussolini program
Who are you, Zbigniew Brzezinski?
But who gave this old, retired professor the power to travel around the world and tell the local elite what to do? One can only say that the real position of Zbigniew Brzezinski in some structures is much higher than the official one.
Now the neoconservatives are in power, and Brzezinski is a democrat. Outwardly completely different politicians... This is what the politicians in power are guided by today: “The first is oil. But not only. Hand in hand with the need to solve energy issues goes a kind of messianic message, religious fundamentalism, which all these people share. These are evangelists who literally believe what the Bible says. And not so much in the New Testament as in the Old.
The second reason is ideological, not economic, why the Middle East was chosen for the attack. They believe that this is a message from God, that he sends them to where they can receive additional strength, and at the same time they fulfill God's will, ”says a former dissident, former illegal intelligence officer, former student of Zbigniew Brzezinski, and during the Cold War Karel Keher, an employee of the analytical division of the Soviet department of the CIA.
You see, completely different people, who, unlike Brzezinski, prioritize the religious factor, still act according to the scheme outlined in Brzezinski's latest book, The Grand Chessboard. And all representatives of the political elite consider themselves to be Brzezinski's students: here are both Albright and Rice. It is hard not to call Brzezinski the father of modern American democracy.
Hateful Orthodoxy is the basis of totalitarianism
Zbigniew never showed himself as a Catholic, either because it is unprofitable for politics in America to be a Catholic, or for some other secret reasons. The admiration for Pope John Paul II is most likely a tribute to a politician to a politician. Brzezinski says little about religion, meanwhile, the religious factor is becoming almost the main one in world politics: Israel, Muslim countries ...
We can say that Brzezinski clearly expressed one religious bias. He hates Orthodoxy as the basis of the Russian Empire, as the basis of the Russian cultural and historical type, as the basis, in his opinion, of totalitarianism. He hates, as only a Pole who was born in Lviv before the war can hate. But he understands that this enemy is too tough for him now, this goal must be hidden, although the missiles are aimed and put on alert. Only once, to the joy of the fall of the communist regime, Brzezinski exclaimed: "Now we have only one enemy left - the Orthodox Church." This was a gross mistake, unforgivable for such an experienced schemer.
Hating Orthodoxy, Zbigniew Brzezinski is right as a political scientist. It was Orthodoxy that gave birth to Russia, it was under the influence of Russian culture that Bolshevism turned into communism, with its idealistic dream of a paradise on earth, which will include all the peoples of the world. As long as there is Orthodoxy, Russia will exist, even the disintegration into many small states (and their Brzezinski and Co. planned for it at first 14, now it seems - 7) because of Orthodoxy can be reversible. Even the isolation of Ukraine from Russia - the work of Zbig's entire life - cannot be considered final as long as there is a single Orthodox Church. All our traditional values, according to American ideologists, constitute the basis of totalitarianism.
Of course, Brzezinski is not devoid of mystical experience and looks, despite his advanced age, far, far ahead. This is how he describes “a completely new historical era”: “At the same time, the possibilities for social and political control over the individual will increase. Soon it will be possible to carry out almost continuous control over every citizen and keep constantly updated computer files-dossiers containing, in addition to the usual information, the most confidential details about the state of health and behavior of each person ”(“ Technotronic era ”). For the Orthodox, and just for the thinking cultured person, it is clear what Brzezinski is talking about, and it is clear that he is already participating in this process ...
Directions and Meditation of an American Political Scientist
While giving lectures in various countries, Brzezinski actually gives instructions to the pro-American democratic elite. In Ukraine, he, no longer disguising himself, instructs the public on how to act, scolds or praises politicians: resignation of the government ... I know some countries that are Ukraine's closest neighbors. I will not say in which of them, but you probably guessed in which of them, if the Russian ambassador allowed himself something like that, he would be packing his suitcases the next day, or already sitting in Moscow, waiting for his luggage. "
Brzezinski actively and often resorts to a kind of meditation. He is trying to convince the masses that everything will be as planned, that there is no alternative. At the same time, he actively bluffs and even distorts: he distorts the obvious facts. He doesn't tell the audience that Kievan Rus adopted Orthodoxy, but fantasizes that at one time she rushed to Europe. "Ukraine has fulfilled an important European mission, followed the European path and did it successfully." What is Ukraine in the 10th century? What mission? Or was Byzantium, to which Russia in some sense rushed, was not a Eurasian country?
One of the authors who wrote an article about Zbigniew Brzezinski recalls an ancient legend dating back to the times of the Greco-Persian wars. A powerful army of Persians marched against the Greeks, and the outcome of the struggle was in question. Then one of the wise offered to drive out a group of naked Persians in front of the formation of the Greek army. Then the Greeks, who paid a lot of attention, saying modern language, bodybuilding, almost got rid of laughter at the sight of the undeveloped Persians. It became clear to them that the Persians could not resist the Greeks, and they immediately defeated them. This is Brzezinski's tactics: he exposes his shortcomings and tries to sow discouragement in the camp of his enemies, and make his democratic elite giggle at the weakness of Russia.
Reading Brzezinski, one wonders how well we have absorbed his ideology. Don't you hear enough fears today from a patriot that mighty China will soon swallow us, that Russia will die out by some year, that there are practically no Armed Forces ... In a word, there is an omnipotent America that has no boundaries for its omnipotence Russia, small and weak, unlike Iran, already exists without any perspective. Why should we “go to Europe” to the sound of the American flute, as if spellbound?
“In general, the old man stubbornly pressed on the psyche, suggesting that Russia was defeated completely and irrevocably, that it was pointless to flap. It was reminiscent of either shamanic rituals, or a bluff of a card sharper, and angered even those loyal to the speaker, "- Orthodox publicists Medvedev and Shishov, who personally watched his political meditations, very aptly noticed the zest of Brzezinski. Moreover, it should be noted that he bluffed and shamanized very effectively, because at this meeting, indignant at some of his provisions, the main thing was agreed with the old man. “Nobody encroached on the idea of integrating Russia into Europe - Brzezinski called it“ the only choice ”. Moreover, representatives of our government even made such encouraging statements that in our country almost everyone is asleep and sees how to become a part of Europe. "
All political science of Zbigniew, both ideologically and methodically, is based on bluff. He bluffs when he talks about growing into Europe, he bluffs when he fought for "human rights." He bluffs when he says that Russia is no longer capable of anything and its nuclear forces can be ignored. Bluff is aimed at convincing your opponent that you have solid cards in your hands and he cannot play against you. And all American politics is based on bluffing. And this bluff is most of all believed in Russia by elderly people who have never seen America, listened to political information for many years, and since then are convinced of its omnipotence. Those who had to fight against this omnipotence are also convinced of its omnipotence.
While Brzezinski is pronouncing his incantations on Russia's entry into Europe, the whole world is quietly discussing the question of what to do when dollar bills worth a few cents will really cost that much and therefore will be useless to anyone. Every day there are growing contradictions with a united Europe, which does not want to be an American litter and implement for it too dangerous program"Ingrowth" of Russia.
Spells about the protection of democracy and human rights are already very few people in this world, and especially those on whose heads democratic-legal bombs fall. The United States is creating a worldwide Islamic coalition against itself. Brzezinski himself can no longer stand it and so comments on the actions of the American military in Iraq: “Over the past four years, the Bush team is quite real and very in a dangerous way undermined the seemingly guaranteed American primacy in the international arena, turning a controlled, albeit serious, threat of mainly regional origin into a source of catastrophic international conflict ... will undermine its constructive international influence. " “America is at the zenith of its power, and its geopolitical position is in nadir. Trust in us is falling, the wall of alienation is growing around us. We have lost the support of even our closest allies. What happened to us? " But at the same time he wants to show the American-loving post-Soviet elite that America has "poker" in its hands, and we need to rush into the arms of Europe and dissolve in the German-Roman civilization, according to Danilevsky.
Brzezinski's Ukrainian sentiments as open Russophobia
Above, we talked about what role is assigned to Ukraine in the fight against Russia. In 1989, Brzezinski resigned from Columbia University, where he taught since 1960, to devote himself to developing Ukraine's independent status. All this was done in order to prevent the revival of Russia as a superpower. Here are some quotes. After all of the above, they don't need comment.
“The Ukrainian elite was exterminated, and those who survived these horrors and were talented were lured into careers and service in favor of the empire. They became not physical, but spiritual victims of Russification. "
“I was shocked that orders in the Ukrainian army are still given in Russian. I talked about this with senior officers. My hair stood on end when I heard the command in Russian! "
"Ukraine's independence challenged Russia's claims to a divine destiny to be the standard-bearer of the entire Pan-Slavic community."
"Renouncing more than 300 years of Russian imperial history meant the loss of a potentially rich industrial and agricultural economy and 52 million people, ethnically and religiously most closely associated with the Russians, who were capable of transforming Russia into a truly large and confident imperial power."
“Without Ukraine, the restoration of the empire, whether on the basis of the CIS or on the basis of Eurasianism, would become an unviable business. An empire without Ukraine will ultimately mean that Russia will become a more Asian and more distant state from Europe. "
The secession of Ukraine, in his opinion, makes it forever impossible to restore Russia as a great power, even geopolitically. Plus to everything and the ability to rewrite history, if after Tatar-Mongol yoke Russia gathered around Moscow, then in the distant future Kiev can be made the center of pseudo-Russia (and already without the Orthodox Church). “A democratic Ukraine would not become anti-Russian, but it would inevitably exert strong pressure to revive democracy in Russia. With a real democracy in Ukraine, more and more Russians would view the Putin regime as an anachronism. "
Portrait of Brzezinski
An ordinary Russian person does not have his own personal intelligence, and the activities of the Russian cause him legitimate skepticism. Therefore, he cannot know all the details. real biography Brzezinski, all the ins and outs of his influence, weight in certain elite organizations of the world. But there is something that cannot be taken away from an Orthodox Russian person: he can look at him, and this assessment may turn out to be more weighty than the data of foreign intelligence.
The aforementioned Medvedev and Shishova attended a meeting with Brzezinski and made his verbal portrait: “In the hall, as you probably guess, there were a lot of dull people ... But next to Brzezinski, even such characters looked like cunts, their guys on the blackboard. And he ... he didn't look like a person at all - neither good nor bad. It was the face of a longtime inhabitant of the other world. In Russian, they are called evil spirits or undead. And it should be borne in mind that, getting into the environment of people, "anchutki" (also a common euphemism) are forced to put on a mask. To make a good impression. Therefore, our American friend did his best. He wanted to appear not only as a friend, but also as a sorrowful person about our future fate ... Although at some moments he stopped watching himself and downright infernal sparks began to dance in his eyes. For example, when the speaker said that Russia will never again be an empire. "
The origins of Russophobia
Let's go back to the old days, to the Polish childhood of Brzezinski. Little Zbig, the future democrat, was an ardent admirer of a regime that discriminated against representatives of all nationalities: Belarusians, Ukrainians, Jews, Germans and Lithuanians. According to his own recollections, he early years was full of purely Polish patriotism. As a child, he happily noted all the signs of the future Polish power (new buildings in Warsaw or the modern port in Gdansk), he was very encouraged and was confident in the strength Polish army... Little Zbig remained a Polish nationalist in Canada too: he visited the barracks where the army of General Bronislaw Dukh was being formed, and quietly dreamed of becoming a Polish president. The victory over the Third Reich and the liberation of Poland did not bring much joy to Zbig: he knew that his homeland remained under the invaders. Now, with a laugh, one can recall the pseudo-socialism of the Poles ... Now, thanks to the efforts of the American-Polish patriot, they are free ... from the former socialist prosperity. But then Zbigniew probably set a goal to take revenge on the Communists, or rather, the Russians associated with them, for the age-old desecration of Poland, expressed in her special status in the Russian Empire and the presence of the Constitution. This cannot be forgiven. Therefore, to this day, the offspring of Zbigniew Brzezinski work in Poland and even a little to the east.
The eldest son Yang spent two years building democracy in Ukraine, the youngest, Mark, explores this very democracy in Poland. So the children are faithful to the precepts of their father. The head of such a family, you must agree, must not love Russia and cannot leave the Russians hope for some kind of national identity. But we will still keep this hope for ourselves.
"What do we all say: youth, youth? ... But if we want, there will be no youth at all!" - these words of the satirist Mikhail Zhvanetsky some 20-25 years ago caused Homeric laughter. Today they are perceived, alas, as a kind of gloomy prophecy. The rampant forces of evil, which permeated the pores of public life, are aimed at ensuring that in Holy Russia, which is still the guardian of Orthodoxy, there would be no morally pure youth capable of love and heroism, faith and creativity. Father Alexander, how to answer the age-old Russian question “what is happening to us”? Why do we tolerate when they try to impose on us a way of life that is alien to Christianity?
- Everything that happens has clear goals. The political and economic goals are now quite clear. Until now, our country is still a state with a colossal military might, colossal intellectual and moral potential.
Unfortunately, we somehow very easily believed in the propaganda husk, which proves to us that we are drunkards, lazy, stupid and therefore have no right to count on a better fate. But “our smart, cheerful people”, as A.S. Griboyedov, despite poverty and ruin, despite the fact that many talented people they leave, attracted by material well-being in the West, despite all these losses, they remain a very strong people.
Certain forces want to subdue our people, but for this they need to be neutralized and, if possible, destroyed. The goals of the Club of Rome and the Cairo Population Conference are no longer hidden: to reduce the population of Russia by 2020 to 50 million people. That is enough for working in mines and for servicing oil rigs. So the officials who allow child molestation in schools and the media (so that their maternal and paternal feelings atrophy and, consequently, the birth rate decrease!) Are only puppets in the wrong hands. The fact is that global community not interested in the existence of the Russian people.
And this must be explained now to all our compatriots. The memorandum national security America it is written: high fertility in other countries is a threat to America's security. The same idea was expressed back in his time by Napoleon, who said that 500 thousand babies born annually in Russia threaten his business in Europe. America, with a population of only 4 percent of the world's population, is known to consume about 40 percent of the world's resources and emit about 70 percent of the world's waste. Negative influence human activities on the environment the globe... All of humanity will not be able to live at the American level of comfort, because a global ecological catastrophe will simply happen. There is only one way out: to reduce the consumption level to reasonable limits. But America will not want to sacrifice its level of consumption and comfort and will never allow other peoples to live the same way as the American people. That is why the United States is forced to reduce the population of foreign countries. By agreeing to a family planning program that results from this big politics, we are strangling our future with our own hands, freeing up a colossal economic space.
For whom is Orthodoxy totalitarianism?
Well, at the heart of the spiritual reasons for what is happening is the struggle waged by the prince of this world - Satan - against those who confess Christ.
The Savior told his disciples: “If they persecuted me, they will also persecute you” (John 15.20). Was Orthodoxy always persecuted by chance?
They always felt in him a force that really opposed the triumph of evil. Is it by chance that the main anti-Soviet of the past, and now one of the leading Russophobes, Zbigniew Brzezinski, said that after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the main enemy of the United States is the Orthodox Church? We know that Lenin also considered the Russian Orthodox Church to be his enemy, or, as it was said then, the enemy of the proletariat. He branded the well-known sociologist Pitirim Sorokin as “a feudal lord, a feudal lord and a certified lackey of clericalism”, who “dared” in the 1920s to draw attention to family problems. Traditional and a strong family, which is a “small church”, like a bone in the throat of the ideologists of the “new morality” - they strive to destroy it at all costs, presenting it as something “obsolete and retrograde”. In the West, instead of the word “family”, a new concept is implanted - “gender”, which means “bundle”, “sparka”. Getting in touch with new and new partners, moreover, regardless of their gender, is supposedly a manifestation of some kind of modern freedom, and creating a family and raising children is considered a return to totalitarianism. It is no coincidence that our Russian academician I. Kon, who worked a lot in the field of propaganda of "free morals", honestly fulfilling the grant of the McCarthur Foundation "For international research in the field of homosexuality in Russia", turned out to be in a sense a "faithful Leninist": in his opinion, the religious "totalitarian" ideology really dangerous. Truly, from this perverted point of view, family is totalitarianism, shame is totalitarianism, chastity is totalitarianism, morality is also totalitarianism! It becomes clear why Brzezinski considers the Orthodox Church to be the MAIN enemy (although, it would seem, what relation does the Russian religious organization have to distant America!). As a restraining force, Orthodoxy greatly impedes the introduction of a “new morality”, which is extremely necessary for exercising control over us, the “masses”. In his book Technotronic Era, Brzezinski, describing a “completely new historical era,” says: “At the same time, the possibilities for social and political control over the individual will increase. Soon it will be possible to carry out almost continuous control over every citizen and keep constantly updated computer files-dossiers containing, in addition to the usual information, the most confidential details about the state of health and behavior of each person ”.
Brzezinski wrote all this not as a private person, but as President Carter's national security adviser, a leading member of the Club of Rome, a member of the Council for international relations”. And now, as a member of the Trilateral Commission, during his visit to Russia in March 2002, he again emphasized that “Russia will never again be a great power”, that it “will be more successful if it is decentralized” - that is, divided into a Central , East and West. The reasons for such appetites, it seems, are not only economic, but also spiritual.
“Contrary to the very widespread belief, Zbigniew Brzezinski, as far as one can judge, never uttered the words often attributed to him that“ after the collapse of the USSR, the Russian Church became America’s main enemy ”, - with these words begins the article by Deacon Andrei Glushchenko“ Did Zbigniew Brzezinski Is the Russian Church the main enemy of the United States? " - Personally, it seems to me, to say the least, the participation of a clergyman in the discussion of this issue, especially on the side of Brzezinski. But it's not that. In the end, everyone has the right to have their own opinion and express it. Priests are no exception. The discussion about whether or not Zbigniew Brzezinski said these words has been going on for several days, or even for the first year. It is being conducted fiercely, uncompromisingly and ... forms the basis of all kinds of accusations against the Orthodox Church. If this discussion did not serve as a technological basis for discrediting the Orthodox Church, it would be possible to ignore it. Let the experts, political scientists and historians, even the priests, wage their own scientific war over the authenticity and historical reliability of certain phrases. Their business. But no, it doesn't stop there. For example, A. Yaroslavsky, in one of his articles, first, for a seed, creates the illusion of striving for justice, accusing the adherents of Orthodoxy, who used the quote attributed to Brzezinski, of lying. Then, based on this specific accusation, he almost imperceptibly transfers the accusation of lying in general, without being tied to Brzezinski, to the church itself and smoothly moves on to discussing "Orthodox hysteria", "manipulation of consciousness" and not without humor, which, in my opinion, is worthy better application, accuses the Orthodox Church of neither more nor less money-grubbing. Note, not individual specific clergymen, but the entire Orthodox Church as a whole. At the same time, he illustrates the depravity of the Orthodox Church with a photograph of a priest getting into a BMW-X5 car, which is really not the cheapest car. And how long has the mass media sucked into the cost of the watch of the Patriarch of All Russia Kirill, the transport that he uses, and the like. In such publications, psychologically very subtly and professionally calculated and having as their goal, first of all, discrediting the Orthodox Church, the most primitive envy awakened in readers (not in all, of course) by the end of the publication no longer allows them to remember and think, and moreover, in fact, the financial situation of the priests to the fact whether Zbigniew Brzezinski said the above phrase or not? And why, in fact, the Patriarch of All Russia should walk like a ragamuffin and drive an old Zhiguli of the first model? Why, in fact, is the Pope given the transport, clothes and so on corresponding to his rank, and this does not surprise anyone, while the Patriarch of one-sixth of the land should be denied this? Perhaps priests of other faiths are dragging their lives in poverty? So I assure you, no! Or, perhaps, the head of a sect disguised as Orthodoxy, Filaret wears rags and rides a donkey? Of course not! But I, for some reason, did not notice so close attention to the garage of Filaret's representative "Mercedes", property and other things from the "free democratic" press. Why is this so selective ?!
With regard to Filaret, the fourth power is silent, but it does not take its eyes off the Russian Orthodox Church either by photo or by video. It does not reduce to see something disgusting and how some kind of abomination about the Orthodox Church to submit to readers. As, for example, one of the stories about a girl who was allegedly forcibly held for 8 years in orphanage Holy Bogolyubsky monastery. As you might expect, the story turned out to be fake. Or a sensational message on the website "There is NO Crime" about the suicide (!) Of a priest. Many became interested in the sensation, but that the suicide was not a priest, in fact, few people learned from subsequent publications (there was no sensation). Examples of such are countless. But the problem is not that all sorts of libels about the Russian Orthodox Church periodically appear in the press. Much worse is the fact that the work of denigrating the Russian Orthodox Church has been carried out systematically and continuously for a very long time, and the true driving force of these "works" is not at all the desire for justice and truth, but that vile and vile war that has been waging for many centuries with Eastern Slavs West.
I will not cite the great many statements of Brzezinski himself and other politicians confirming that it is Zbigniew Brzezinski who is the author or certainly one of the leading authors of the "peaceful" destruction of the USSR from within. Anyone interested can easily find them and not only on the Internet. The point is different. The destruction of the "evil empire" - the USSR has already taken place, the declared goal has been achieved and, it would seem, Brzezinski, with a sense of accomplishment, has every right to retire to "well-deserved rest." His age not only allows him, but, I would say, even obliges him to do it. However, as it turned out, Brzezinski cannot retire until the last nail is driven into the coffin of now Russia. In 2002, during a visit to Russia, imagining himself to be either a god or a prophet, he declares: "Russia will never again be a great power" (I still think that it is not up to him to decide - author) and that she “It will be more successful if it is decentralized” - that is, divided into Central, Eastern and Western.
What does it mean in in this case"Successful"? And in general, what is success and whose success is it? And who needs this dismemberment of the Slavic peoples so much? Why the Slavic peoples, and not only the Slavic, having a centuries-old common history and who got along well in a single country (both in Tsarist Russia and in the USSR, and these countries were just extremely successful), must now be dismembered by some completely stupid borders and customs barriers? Who needs all this? Zbigniew Brzezinski himself gave the answer to this question in his book "The Grand Chessboard". Speaking at length about the inevitability, expediency and even necessity of the US global hegemony, he unequivocally substantiates the need to dismember Russia by the fact that United Russia will interfere (!) with the plan for the establishment of world domination of the United States. Ukraine is given a special place in this book. We can be proud. The issue of the final and irrevocable separation of Ukraine and Russia is key in weakening Russia's influence (the fact that there may be other views in Ukraine is not taken into account, in principle). And without its successful resolution, ensuring the complete world domination of the United States, according to Brzezinski, is impossible. How much chatter about some kind of "democracy", "freedom" and "success." And the goal is banal and old. World domination. Persia, England, Germany aspired to it. Alexander the Great, Napoleon and Hitler were all striving for it. And then how does Brzezinski differ from Hitler? Didn't they hang and shoot? The issue is controversial. During the period of independence, Ukraine has lost more than six million of its population, and in the nineties there was a time when the country lost more from suicide in a year than the entire huge USSR in ten years of war in Afghanistan. And how many died and continue to die due to the fact that medical care is simply not affordable? And normal food products are no longer available to everyone? And what about "family planning" with its propaganda of abortion? And so on ... So the latest technologies for the destruction of the Ukrainian population are not so bloodless. Although from a legal point of view ... And from a moral? And from the point of view of so widely promoted "universal human values"? .. I must admit that Hitler and Goebbels were more honest and sincere than Brzezinski and the American "democrats".
The fact that Brzezinski's fiery anti-communism turned out to be genetic Russophobia or, I would even say, Slavophobia, is not surprising. And even naturally. The same animals recurrences of Ukrainian "svidomikh", according to at least, can be explained both historically and by the green paper with the image of Benjamin Franklin, which the US Federal Reserve System prints tirelessly for sabotage purposes. And in general, it is impossible to oblige to love Russia. And it is not necessary. But I would like to hear at least once a clear answer from the "svidomikh", in words and in the slogans of the alleged patriots of Ukraine, did they act patriotically, killing more than six million Ukrainians together with the "chess player" Brzezinski for the sake of US world domination? And do these supposedly patriots understand that, according to the idea of the “chess player” Zbyshek, they are not even figures, but just dust and dirt on his “great chessboard”, which, together with such a name as Ukraine, will simply erase with a rag after the game ends? Well, just to keep it clean ... And the fact that the "board" has not yet been tidied up and the "state" of Ukraine is still allowed to exist - this is the merit of Russia, and not of the Galicians. As long as Russia stands and the "chess players" have plans to use Ukraine against Russia - Ukraine is allowed to be. Beggar, wretched, half-strangled, but still allowed to be. But if the plans of Brzezinski are destined to come true and Russia falls ... Then in the blink of an eye the territory of Ukraine will be dismembered. What will get Turkey, Romania, Poland, I will not predict. When necessary, they will be told who what ... However, the division of Ukraine has already begun, and the so-called "international community" has already chopped off the oil-bearing part of the shelf (sovereign Ukrainian territory!) And "completely legally" handed it over to Romania. There was not enough patience to wait for Russia to be finished off. The process dragged on ...
But why exactly Zbigniew Brzezinski became the ideologist and technologist of the dismemberment and destruction of the Slavic peoples? I say "destruction" because the goals of the Club of Rome and the Cairo Population Conference are no longer hidden: to reduce the population of the territory of the former USSR to 50 million by 2020. The Nazis set themselves similar tasks ...
In order to answer the question why Brzezinski, it is worth remembering the 20s of the now last century. From the very first days of the existence of the Polish Republic, relations with the RSFSR, already hostile, worsened even more. Poland carried out an armed operation to seize the territories of the RSFSR. Western Ukraine was captured and most of Belarus, including Minsk. Poland at that time was one of the serious opponents, and the Polish intelligence was one of the most active on the territory of the RSFSR. In addition, Warsaw has become one of the capitals of emigration, and the emigration is the poorest. In Warsaw, there were those who did not have the means to get to Paris or London and were ready to perform the dirtiest services for a pittance. Fertile human resources! It was there, in Warsaw, that the "club" "Prometheus" appeared, which included representatives of various national emigrant communities settled in Warsaw, including the North Caucasian peoples and the Transcaucasus. "Prometheus" falls under the roof of the Polish "dvuyka", the intelligence and counterintelligence departments united at that time in Poland, and begins to actively develop technologies for undermining the Soviet state with the help of nationalist movements. Poland at this time participates together with the Nazis in the partition of the Czech Republic and tries to obsequiously please at that moment the still great Germany. However, licking Hitler's boots and participating in the partition of the Czech Republic did not help the Poles. In 1939, the Germans, without further ado, without any motivation and explanation, simply appropriated Poland for themselves along with the Poles. And in order not to create a premature conflict (the war was not far off), they returned the territories chopped off by the Poles from the RSFSR. Poland was gone and the Nazis began to use "Prometheus". It is thanks to "Prometheus" and its "developments" that the forest brothers arose in the Baltic states, the Bandera people in Ukraine. Later, in the course of the war, it turned out that both in the Caucasus and in the Crimea, the Nazis, relying on the invaluable developments of "Prometheus", also did a lot. In 1945, traces of "Prometheus" are lost. However, given the touching frugality with which the Americans have always treated fascist lackeys, there is no doubt that the "Prometheus" was picked up by the US special services. If we take into account the fact that diplomatic departments and intelligence are, in fact, inseparable (and Zbigniew Brzezinski's father was a diplomat), and the fact that the American "nation", obtained as a result of crossing a wallet and a stomach, is used to using mainly other people's purchased brains , including Polish ones, the appearance of Brzezinski becomes quite understandable. As, incidentally, his genetic hatred for the Eastern Slavs is understandable. "... My father ... also fought against the Ukrainians in the city that is usually called Lviv, and the Ukrainians call Lviv," - Zbigniew Brzezinski blurted out, not without pride, in an interview. Brzezinski's eldest son Jan, a US national security specialist, inherited the same hatred. Now he is the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense of the United States. For about two years this "specialist" looked after the correctness of the implementation of the recommendations of the United States by the first "independent" president of the "independent" Ukraine L. Kravchuk. Well, he advised, of course. Since he was just an adviser to Kravchuk. It was during this period that it is observed, where, with the connivance government agencies, and where and under the direct leadership of statesmen, an outburst of persecution of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church. It was during this period that not only doors were wide open - gates for various kinds, including destructive sects banned in Western countries (was it not on the advice of the son of the “great chess player” Brzezinski?). Moreover, it was they who were provided with all-round support at the highest state level... And if about whether or not to allow Orthodox priests to appear at school and conduct (even on a voluntary basis) any classes, discussions have been going on for almost twenty years, then with regard to the Scientology sect banned in France, Germany and Russia, the Ministry of Education Ukraine without delay issued a special order, ordering to distribute in educational institutions video materials provided by the units of this sect. It was during the same period that mass seizures of Orthodox churches were organized with their desecration, robbery and beating of Orthodox priests, mainly in the western regions. It was then that the disarmed Denisenko (Filaret), pulling on a home-made cockle, began to call himself the patriarch of the “church of the Great” and with the help of state structures, including law enforcement agencies, acting together with the UNA-UNSO militants under the auspices of Kravchuk, and then Kuchma, by force took away Orthodox churches and shrines. Not forgetting to cash in on deliveries to hot spots (mainly in Russia) of Ukrainian mercenaries (the notorious "brotherhood" "Order of St. Hilarion"), illegal emigration and banking activities very characteristic of the "pompous priesthood" (Bank "Agio"). This is how the fire of hatred for the Eastern Slavs and interethnic hatred, kindled in Warsaw by "Prometheus", was passed from father to son - Zbigniew Brzezinski, and then to his son Jan Brzezinski. The dynasty, however.
And yet, why exactly the Orthodox Church was subjected to the most active persecution with the participation of statesmen and under the tacit patronage of the authorities, and western Ukraine and with the participation of representatives of law enforcement agencies (the Internet was bypassed by far from isolated footage of the storming of an Orthodox church by the militants and the beating of a priest under the "supervision" of a district police officer)? Why was Islam in Ukraine not subjected to such persecution, despite all the hype around Bin Laden? Why, despite the calls of the Galician idols Bandera and Shukhevych, "Vishati Jews", the synagogues did not suffer? Only Orthodox churches UNA-UNSO militants smashed with impunity, and today Tyagnibokovskaya "Svoboda" is ready to take up this very "democratic" mission. So nothing is over yet. And yet why?
The USSR was good or bad, but this country had its own ideology and concept of development. The USSR had an ideological core and a morality based on it. It was this morality and ideological core, and only then, in the second place, tanks and aircraft made it possible to win the Great Patriotic War. And this was very well understood by both Zbigniew Brzezinski and other pseudo-democrats. That is why the main blow, informational, was inflicted on ideology and morality. That is why such an attractive, at first glance, slogan about the rule of law and law was slipped into. Praising the slogan, they "forgot" only to warn that law and law are exclusively for the rich. The poor can only count on morality and culture. That is, those laws that are higher and stronger than paper laws. It is for their destruction that freedom of sex is promoted, parades of gays and lesbians, gay marriage, various brochures tell you how to avoid drug overdose ... and much more. The destruction of ideology and morality is an indispensable condition for the reduction (read destruction) of the population, further fragmentation and dismemberment of countries and peoples, and, ultimately, the achievement of complete world domination of the United States. It would seem that the problem has been practically solved. Ukraine does not have its own ideology. Of morality, too, little is left. But ... The Orthodox Church, hammered in Soviet times, which the "chess players" did not take into account, not only was it "more alive than all living things" after all the persecutions, it was also able to give the Slavic peoples, instead of the Soviet ideological core, an ideological core and morality that were more reliable. proven for millennia.
That, in fact, is all. Could the Orthodox Church not be the main enemy of the United States and Brzezinski? Regardless of whether Zbigniew Brzezinski said it or not. Of course, the Orthodox Church is their enemy. And they are enemies of Orthodoxy and the East Slavic world. Enemies at the genetic level. And you can say anything you want. A word in politics has never been dear.
Nikolay Mashkin, Chief Editor newspapers "Ridne Pribuzhja"
Zbigniew Brzezinski died. Recently, it was he who served as the personification of Western Russia-phobia. Brzezinski not only hated Russia, but also brought theoretical foundations to his hatred. While many other American political scientists admitted that Russia could potentially be reformed along liberal lines and turned into a tracing paper of the countries of the Western world, Brzezinski declared that it was unreformable. It all the same, by virtue of its natural essence, will be restored as an empire. Therefore, according to Brzezinski, only geopolitical destruction can rid the West of its historical adversary.
Brzezinski hated the USSR and became one of the main strategists of its destruction. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, his hatred is projected onto Russia. Brzezinski also admits his hostile attitude towards Orthodoxy. Brzezinski's hatred was thus an attitude of enmity towards a civilizational enemy.
The personal origins of Brzezinski's position are obvious - belonging to the Polish gentry. His father Tadeusz Brzezinski was a diplomat who defended the interests of Poland in the pre-war period, including primarily in the direction of confrontation with the USSR. According to one version, Zbigniew was born in Kharkov, where his father worked at the consulate. With the transfer in 1938 of his father to work at the consulate in Canada, he finds himself in North America. Only in 1950, when it became clear that the Sovietization of Poland was a fait accompli, did Zbigniew Brzezinski accept American citizenship. His dissertation, defended at Harvard University, was devoted to the genesis of the totalitarian system in the USSR. In it, he comes to the conclusion that this genesis has deep historical foundations.
Thus, the Soviet theme was for Brzezinski an area of scientific specialization. Brzezinski was a clever opponent. The United States was able to put forward a whole galaxy of outstanding Sovietologists in the struggle against the USSR. At the same time, the Soviet Union paralyzed the development of the humanities with a dogmatic scheme, and intellectuals of the Brzezinski level were unable to oppose the United States in the Cold War. Brzezinski was not just a political scientist, but a man who entered the circle of the world elite, who possessed real levers of influence. Back in 1973, he was introduced by D. Rockefeller as an executive director to one of the elite clubs he founded - the Trilateral Commission. Having a large number of graduate students, Brzezinski placed them in spheres of influence, strengthening his position and expanding the circle of Russian phobes.
Brzezinski was an adherent of the American-centered model of the world order system. The theoretician of the victory over the USSR in the "cold war" justifies the special role of the United States in the modern world by the need to "manage chaos." In relation to America's planetary role, he uses definitions such as "world arbiter", "world controller" and even "world policeman". “The United States,” Z. Brzezinski proclaimed back in 1990, when the Soviet Union existed, “has already become the world's policeman, but I think with increasing confidence that we will be the world's controller. You obey the policeman because he can send you to jail, you obey the traffic inspector because you don't want to get into an accident. The international system still needs an arbiter, and the US will play that role. ”
In 1990, the proclaimed landmarks sounded like a futurological forecast. After seven years, Z. Brzezinski's assessment already had a stating character, as a statement about achieved results: "America currently acts as an arbiter for Eurasia, and there is not a single major Eurasian problem that can be solved without America's participation or contrary to America's interests."
It is fairly well known what influence, as an adviser to J. Carter, Zbigniew Brzezinski had on the development of a strategy for fighting the USSR. One of the realized, in particular, at his prompting stratagem was the involvement of the USSR in 1979 in the war in Afghanistan. Brzezinski himself not once admitted his role in setting the Afghan trap and training the mujahideen. The collapse of the Soviet system, however, was not perceived by him as the final achievement of the goal.
That " cold war"Was conducted not so much against communism as against Russian statehood, evidenced by a number of direct statements of Brzezinski:
“We destroyed the Soviet Union, we will destroy Russia too. You have no chance. "
"Russia is generally an extra country."
"Orthodoxy is America's main enemy."
“Russia is a defeated state. She lost a titanic fight. And to say “It was not Russia, but the Soviet Union” means to run away from reality. This was Russia, called the Soviet Union. She challenged the United States. She was defeated. Now there is no need to feed illusions about the great-power nature of Russia. It is necessary to discourage such a way of thinking…. Russia will be fragmented and under "tutelage".
“Russia can be either an empire or a democracy, but it cannot be both. If Russia remains a Eurasian state, pursues Eurasian goals, it will remain imperial, and Russia's imperial traditions must be isolated. We will not observe this situation in a passive manner. All European states and the United States must become a united front in their attitude towards Russia. "
“The Contrast Between America and Russia: Americans have used their belief in common sense and self-interest to civilize their vast continent, overcoming natural obstacles to building a strong democracy. And the Russians, with their "slavish obedience" as the main mechanism of action, used the "soldier's sword" to conquer civilizations "
"If the Russians are so stupid that they demand to rebuild their empire, they will run into such conflicts that Chechnya and Afghanistan will seem like a picnic to them."
The American political scientist publicly compared V.V. Putin with the fascist dictator B. Mussolini. He openly expressed the hope that over time, not a "KGB graduate" but a Harvard graduate could become the president of the Russian Federation, or London School business.
Meanwhile, Z. Brzezinski is by no means a private person. Until recently, he held important positions in the circles that determine the foreign policy of the United States: consultant to the Center for Strategic and International Studies, professor of American foreign policy at the Paul Nitze School of Contemporary International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, member of the board of directors of the National Democracy Support, the organization Freedom House ”,“ Trilateral Commission ”,“ American Academy of Humanities and Natural Sciences ”, co-chairman of the“ American Committee for Peace in Chechnya ”. And if this is said by an official figure of the highest institutions of American state power, then this is at least not far from the true strategic guidelines of the United States in relation to Russia.
In the 1990s. American political scientist begins to develop a new political configuration of the world. His vision for the future state structure The Eurasian space was first publicly published in 1997 in Foreign Affairs magazine, which is the print organ of the US Council on Foreign Relations. It is characteristic that in the Russian translations of the book "The Great Chessboard", the graphic maps of the dismemberment of Russia offered by the political scientist, were probably cut off for reasons of political correctness (Fig. 1).
Rice. 1. The future configuration of the world according to the project of Z. Brzezinski
Less than a year after the first publications, the Russian state was shaken by a financial default. The scenario of the disintegration of Russia described by Z. Brzezinski began, it seemed, to be realized in practice. What was it - a brilliant foresight of the future or a recipe for managing it? The political scientist himself answered this question. As a dedication to the book, he made an entry: “To my students - to help them shape the outlines of the world tomorrow". The configuration of the world is thus defined not as a forecast, but as an attitude of purposeful design.
The establishment of US hegemony over the territory of Eurasia was characterized by Z. Brzezinski as "the main geopolitical prize for America." Russia, on the other hand, seemed to him the main obstacle to the implementation of American project... It was not about the state system. Russia, in the understanding of the American political scientist, poses a threat to the global interests of the United States as a subject of world geopolitics, regardless of the format of the structure of Russian statehood. It was considered by Z. Brzezinski as a kind of "black hole" of the world.
For comparison, China does not pose such a danger in Brzezinski's understanding. You can negotiate with China and even divide spheres of influence. Z. Brzezinski admitted the scenario of a broad regional Chinese expansion. The project of "Great China" was designed, which includes, along with the PRC, the territories of Korea, Mongolia, Taiwan, parts of Indonesia, Malaysia, Singapore, Vietnam, Laos, Kampuchea, Myanmar, Bhutan, Pakistan, and Afghanistan.
Why did America need such a significant geopolitical strengthening of the Chinese People's Republic? The idea became clear when China's borders expanded into the zone of the former Soviet statehood. The state space Greater China includes, in the projection of Z. Brzezinski, the territory of Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, parts of Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan, as well as the Russian Amur region with Blagoveshchensk, Khabarovsk and Vladivostok. Outside of the conflict scenario, these territories in favor of the PRC naturally cannot be torn away. Consequently, Great China was "created" as a kind of counterbalance of force in relation to Russia. It was Z. Brzezinski who, during his stay in the White House of J. Carter, developed a plan to include the PRC in the implementation of the global American project.
Close personal contacts were established between the American political scientist and the ideologist of Chinese reforms Deng Xiaoping. The result of his efforts was the conclusion of a number of American - Chinese bilateral agreements on cooperation in the technological, scientific, and economic spheres. As a retaliatory step, China unequivocally supported the United States in building an Afghan geopolitical trap against the USSR ("Soviet Vietnam"). Other territories torn away from the Russian Federation are indicated on the map by Z. Brzezinski in the West of the Eurasian space. Petersburg, Pskov, all North Caucasus, Krasnodar and Stavropol Territories. The problem of claims to the South Russian regions is solved by Z. Brzezinski by including Turkey itself in the politically united European space. Federated device Russia is being replaced by a confederal one.
In it, along with Russia proper, the borders of which are established along the Ural ridge, the Siberian and Far Eastern republics are also distinguished. Tactically, confederalism is viewed in this case as a transitional phase to the complete political dismemberment of the designated territories. In Siberia and the Far East, instead of the "heavy hand of the Moscow bureaucracy," the "soft hegemony" of the United States of America should be established.
Zbigniew Brzezinski died. But the American political science school, created by him and sharpened for Russia-phobia, remains. This school is closely intertwined with the Western project and the ideology of Western global domination. The question is, what can Russian political science be able to oppose to this ideology and the related political science school? So far, she herself is mainly a paraphrase of American political scientists, sometimes stopping Russian-phobic positions, and sometimes not.
And it is obvious that without the presence of our own political science school, it is impossible to carry out an identical public policy... Paradoxically, Z. Brzezinski himself spoke about this: “To be a military enemy of the United States on a global scale, Russia will have to carry out some kind of mission, implement a global strategy and, possibly, acquire an ideological basis. This seems unlikely to me ... In short, the total mobilization that the Soviet system was able to impose on Russia will be very difficult to justify and legitimize in the absence of a strong and comprehensive ideological foundation. " Without an identical ideology, Russia, in his opinion, cannot be a real enemy of the United States. The acquisition of such an ideology by Russia is, therefore, even in the confessions of its enemies key issue its civilizational and geopolitical survival.
