In this article you will learn how to write an essay on social studies. Examples are attached.
First of all, it is necessary to understand that in order to learn how to write an essay in social studies, it takes quite a long time. It's impossible without preliminary preparation write an essay that would be rated by experts high score. Sustainable skills good results appear after 2-3 months of work (about 15-20 essays written). It is systematic training and determination that bring high results. You need to hone your skills in practice with the direct help and careful supervision of a teacher.
Video - how to write an essay on social studies
If you haven't tried essay writing yet, watch the video.
Unlike an essay on literature or the Russian language, where the minimum amount of work is clearly specified and general reflection is allowed (“philosophizing” without specification), in an essay on social science the volume is not limited, but its structure and content are fundamentally different. A social studies essay is actually an answer to the question: “Do I agree with this statement and why?” That is why an essay on social science must contain strict argumentation, scientificity and specificity. At the same time, it should be noted that very paradoxical, unusual statements that require imaginative thinking, a non-standard approach to solving the problem. This inevitably leaves its mark on the essay writing style and requires maximum concentration of strength and attention.
I would also like to add that the exam essay is graded specific people. In order for an expert, who checks from 50 to 80 papers a day, to mark an essay as worthy of attention, this essay must not only meet all the requirements set out below, but also be distinguished by a certain originality, originality and originality - this is implied by the genre of the essay itself. Therefore, it is necessary not only to present scientific and factual material on the topic, but also to pleasantly surprise you with the originality and flexibility of your thinking.
Algorithm for writing essays during the Unified State Exam
- First of all, during the exam you need to properly manage your time. Practice shows that writing an essay requires spending at least 1-1.5 hours out of the 3.5 hours allotted for the Unified State Exam in Social Studies. It is most advisable to start writing an essay after all other KIM tasks have been completed, because This type of work requires maximum concentration of the graduate’s efforts.
- Carefully read all the topics offered to choose from.
- Select topics that are understandable, i.e. – the student must clearly understand what this statement is about, what the author wanted to say with this phrase. In order to remove doubts about whether he understands the topic correctly, the graduate must restate the phrase in his own words, defining main idea. The student can do this orally or in a draft.
- From the selected understandable statements, it is necessary to choose one topic - the one that the student knows best. It should be noted that examinees often choose topics that are easy in their opinion, but which turn out to be difficult when covering the topic due to the limitations of scientific and factual material on this issue (in other words, the phrase itself says it all, nothing can be added). In such cases, the essay comes down to a simple statement of the meaning of the statement in different options and is rated low by experts due to poor evidence base. Therefore, you need to choose the topic of the essay so that the student, when writing it, can fully demonstrate the completeness of his knowledge and the depth of his thoughts (i.e., the topic must be winning).
- When choosing an essay topic, you need to pay attention to what social science this statement is attributed. Practice shows that a number of phrases can refer to several sciences at once. For example, the statement of I. Goethe “Man is determined not only natural qualities, but also acquired” can belong to both philosophy and social psychology, and sociology. Accordingly, the content of the essay should vary depending on this, i.e. must be consistent with said basic science.
- There is no need to write the entire essay as a draft. Firstly, due to limited time, and secondly, due to the fact that at the time of writing an essay some thoughts come, and at the time of rewriting - others, and redoing a finished text is much more difficult than creating a new one. In the draft, the graduate makes only an outline of his essay, approximate short sketches of the meaning of the phrase, his argumentation, the points of view of scientists, concepts and theoretical positions that he is going to present in his work, as well as the approximate order of their arrangement one after another, taking into account the semantic logic of the essay.
- IN mandatory the student must express his personal attitude to the chosen topic in a clearly defined formulation (“I agree”, “I disagree”, “I don’t completely agree”, “I agree, but partially” or phrases that are similar in meaning and meaning). Availability personal attitude is one of the criteria on the basis of which experts evaluate essays.
- Without fail, the graduate must state his understanding of the meaning of the statement. Those. The high school student explains in his own words what the author wanted to say with this phrase. It is more advisable to do this at the very beginning of the essay. And if you combine the requirements of this paragraph with the provisions of the previous one, then this is what, for example, the beginning of an essay on philosophy “Before talking about the benefit of satisfying needs, you need to decide what needs constitute the benefit” will look like: “I completely agree with the statement of the great Russian writer of the second halfXIX– beginningXXcenturies L.N. Tolstoy, in which he talks about real and imaginary needs."
- You need to be very careful in selecting arguments to support your point of view. Arguments must be convincing and justified. Data from relevant sciences, historical facts, facts from public life. Arguments of a personal nature (examples from personal life) are rated the lowest, so their use as evidence is undesirable. It should be remembered that any personal example It’s easy to “turn” into an example from public life, from social practice, if you write about it in a third person (for example, not “The saleswoman in the store was rude to me, thereby violating my consumer rights”, A “Let’s say that the saleswoman was rude to citizen S. Thus, she violated his rights as a consumer.” The number of arguments in an essay is not limited, but 3-5 arguments are most optimal for revealing the topic. It should also be remembered that examples from history are most relevant in political science, partly in legal and sociological topics, as well as in philosophical topics related to the theory of social progress. Examples from social practice (public life) - in sociological, economic, legal topics. Data from the relevant sciences must be used when choosing any of the topics.
- The use of terms, concepts, and definitions in an essay must be competent and appropriate in relation to the chosen topic and science. The essay should not be overloaded with terminology, especially if these concepts are not related to the chosen problem. Unfortunately, some graduates try to insert as many terms as possible into their work, violating the principle of expediency and reasonable sufficiency. Thus, they show that they have not learned to use it correctly scientific terminology. The term should be mentioned appropriately; such a mention should indicate its correct understanding.
- It is very welcome if a graduate in his essay indicates the points of view of other researchers on the issues under consideration, provides a link to different interpretations problem and various ways to solve it (if possible). Indication of other points of view can be direct (for example: “Lenin thought this way:..., and Trotsky thought differently:..., and Stalin did not agree with both of them:...”), but can be indirect, non-specific, non-personalized: “A number of researchers think this way:..., others think differently:..., and some suggest something completely different:....”
- It is very welcome if the essay indicates who the author of this statement was. The indication should be brief but precise (see example in paragraph 8). If, when arguing your position on this issue, it is appropriate to mention the views of the author of the phrase, this must be done.
- Arguments must be presented in strict sequence, the internal logic of presentation in the essay must be clearly visible. The student should not jump from one to another and return to the first again without explanation and internal connection, connecting the individual provisions of his work.
- The essay must end with a conclusion that briefly summarizes the thoughts and reasoning: “Thus, based on all of the above, it can be argued that the author was right in his statement.”
Essay Examples on the topic of:
Philosophy “Revolution is a barbaric way of progress” (J. Jaures)
For the highest score
I completely agree with the statement of the famous French socialist, historian and political figure of the first half of the twentieth century, Jean Jaurès, in which he talks about the features of the revolutionary path of social progress, about distinctive features revolution. Indeed, revolution is one of the ways of progress, movement forward, to better and complex forms organization of social order. But since a revolution is a radical disruption of the entire existing system, a transformation of all or most aspects of social life, occurring in a short period of time, this form of progress is always accompanied by big amount victims and violence.
If we remember the revolutionary year of 1917 in Russia, we will see that both revolutions entailed the most severe confrontation in society and the country, which resulted in a terrible Civil War, accompanied by unprecedented bitterness, millions of dead and injured, unprecedented devastation in the national economy.
If we remember the Great French Revolution, then we will also see the rampant Jacobin terror, the guillotine, “working” seven days a week, and a series of incessant revolutionary wars.
If we remember the English bourgeois revolution, we will also see civil war, repression against dissidents.
And when we look at the history of the United States, we will see that both bourgeois revolutions that took place in this country took the form of war: first, the War of Independence, and then the Civil War.
The list of examples from history can go on and on, but wherever a revolution occurs - in China, Iran, the Netherlands, etc. – everywhere it was accompanied by violence, i.e. barbarism from the perspective of a civilized person.
And even though other thinkers exalted revolution (such as Karl Marx, who argued that revolutions are the locomotives of history), even though reactionaries and conservatives denied the role of revolutions in social progress, the point of view of J. Jaurès is closer to me: yes, revolution is a way of progress, a movement for the better, but carried out by barbaric methods, that is, with the use of cruelty, blood and violence. Happiness cannot be created through violence!
For a small point
In his quote, the author talks about revolution and progress. Revolution is a way of transforming reality into a short time, and progress is moving forward. Revolution is not progress. After all, progress is reform. It cannot be said that the revolution does not produce positive results - for example, the Russian revolution allowed workers and peasants to get rid of a difficult situation. But by definition, revolution is not progress, because progress is all that is good, and revolution is all that is bad. I disagree with the author who classifies revolution as progress.
Essay outline
Introduction
1) A clear indication of the problem of the statement:
“The statement I have chosen concerns the problem...”
“The problem with this statement is...”
2) Explanation of the choice of topic (what is the significance or relevance of this topic)
“Everyone is concerned about the question...”
“The RELEVANCE of this topic lies in...”
3) Reveal the meaning of the statement from the point of view of social science, 1-2 sentences
4) Introduction of the author and his point of view
“The author argued (said, thought) from such a point of view...”
5) Your own interpretation of this phrase, YOUR OWN POINT OF VIEW (DO YOU AGREE OR NOT)
“I think...” “I agree with the author of the statement...”
6) Expressing your position, moving on to the main part of the essay
P.S. It would be a plus if in the introduction you provide information about the author of the statement and insert a definition of the chosen field of the essay (philosophy, politics, economics, law, etc.)
Argumentation:
1) Theoretical argumentation of the problem. At least 3 aspects of the theoretical discussion of the topic must be presented.
For example: reveal the concept itself, give examples, analyze features, functions, classifications, properties.
2) Practical argument or example from public life
Hello! In this article you will see a number of essays written on maximum score on all Unified State Exam criteria this year. If you want to learn how to write an essay on society, I have written an article for you that reveals all aspects of doing this work
Political Science Essay
“Silent citizens are ideal subjects for an authoritarian ruler and a disaster for democracy” (Roald Dahl)
In his statement, Roald Dahl touches on the problem of the dependence of the level of political participation of citizens on the current regime in the state. Undoubtedly, this statement does not lose its relevance to this day, because the activity with which people take part in the life of the country is directly related to its basic foundations and laws. Moreover, consider this question can be based on both the realities of a democratic society and an authoritarian one.
Theoretical argument
The meaning of Dahl's words is that the lack of developed civic consciousness plays into the hands of rulers within an authoritarian regime, but has a negative impact on the state, where the main power is concentrated in the hands of society. I completely share the point of view of the author of the statement, because we can always find examples of this both in the past and at the present time. And in order to prove the significance of Dahl’s statement, it is worth first considering it from a theoretical point of view.
Political participation itself is nothing more than a set of actions taken by ordinary members political system in relation to its “top” in order to influence the latter. These actions can be expressed both in the usual reactions of citizens to any changes, in people’s speeches at various channels, websites, radio stations and other media, creating various social movements, and in participation in ongoing elections and referendums. In addition, political participation can be classified according to the number of people involved (individual and collective), compliance with laws (legitimate and illegitimate), activity of participants (active and passive), etc.
Civil society receives the greatest freedom within the framework of a democratic regime, the main characteristic of which is the concentration of all power in the hands of the people. The freedoms of citizens are significantly limited in the realities of an authoritarian society due to the constant government surveillance of citizens. A completely civil society is controlled by the state within the framework of totalitarianism.
As a first example confirming Dahl's point of view, we can cite the famous historical fact. During the so-called "Thaw" Soviet Union under the leadership of N.S. Khrushchev moved from Stalin's totalitarian regime to an authoritarian one. Undoubtedly, the dominance of one party continued to exist, but at the same time freedom of speech was significantly expanded, many repressed people were returned to their homeland. The state relied on the support of the population, partially increasing the range of its rights and opportunities. This directly illustrates the interaction civil society and the state apparatus under an authoritarian regime.
The next example confirming Dahl’s position could be the event that was widely covered two years ago in the media – the annexation of Crimea to Russia. As you know, a referendum was held on the peninsula (the highest opportunity for the expression of the will of the people within the framework of democracy), which showed the desire of the Crimeans to join the Russian Federation. Residents of the peninsula expressed their opinions as representatives of civil society, thus influencing the future policies of the democratic state.
To summarize, I want to say that Roald Dahl incredibly accurately reflected in his statement the relationship between civil society and the state.
In addition, before reading this article, I further recommend that you familiarize yourself with the video tutorial, which reveals all aspects of the mistakes and difficulties of applicants in the second part of the Unified State Exam.
Essay on Sociology
“A citizen who has a share of power should act not for personal gain, but for the common good.” (B.N. Chicherin)
In his statement B.N. Chicherin touches on the problem of the essence of power and the ways of its influence on society. Without a doubt, this issue does not lose relevance to this day, because since time immemorial there have been relationships between those in power and ordinary people. This problem can be considered from two sides: influencing the authorities for the sake of one’s personal benefit, or for the benefit of many people.
Theoretical argument
The meaning of Chicherin’s words is that people with power should use it to solve the problems of society, and not to achieve some personal needs. Without a doubt, I fully share the author's point of view, since we can find many examples of it, both in the past and at the present time. However, before this we should understand the theoretical component of Chicherin’s words.
What is power? This is the ability of one person or group of people to impose their opinion on others, to force them to obey. Within the state, political power is one of its main elements, capable of imposing certain opinions and laws on citizens through legal and political norms. One of key features power is the so-called “legality” - the legality of its existence and the actions it carries out.
What can be the source of power? Firstly, this is authority - recognition by the people of the ruler, and secondly, charisma. Power can also be based on certain knowledge, which its representatives have, and on their wealth. There are cases when people come to power using brute force. This often happens through the violent overthrow of the current government.
Examples for revealing criterion K3
As a first example illustrating Chicherin’s point of view, we can cite the work of A.S. Pushkin " Captain's daughter" In this book we can clearly observe how Emelyan Pugachev, despite his position, does not refuse help to all members of his army. The false Peter III frees all his supporters from serfdom, grants them freedom, thus using his power to support many people.
In order to give the following example, it is enough to turn to history Russia XVIII century. Alexander Menshikov, an associate of Emperor Peter I, used his high position for personal enrichment. He used government money to achieve his personal needs, which had nothing to do with solving the pressing problems of an ordinary resident of Russia at that time.
Thus, this example clearly illustrates the use of power by a person not to help society, but to implement own desires.
To summarize, I want to say that B.N. Chicherin incredibly accurately reflected in his statement two contradictory ways in which a person uses his power, the essence of the latter and its methods of influencing society.
Second work in political science
“Politics is essentially power: the ability to achieve a desired result by any means” (E. Heywood)
In his statement, E. Heywood touches on the problem of the true essence of power within politics. Undoubtedly, the relevance of the author’s words is not lost to this day, because one of the main features of power is its ability to use any means to achieve a goal. This statement can be considered both from the point of view of the cruel methods of carrying out the government’s plans, and from the side of more democratic methods.
Theoretical argument
Heywood's point is that political power has an unlimited range of ways in which it can impose its opinions on other people. I completely share the author’s point of view, since you can find many different examples that serve as proof of his words. However, first it is worth understanding the theoretical component of Heywood’s statement.
What is power? This is the ability to influence people, to impose your opinion on them. Political power, characteristic exclusively of the institution of the state, is capable of exercising this influence with the help of legal and government methods. The so-called “legality”, i.e. the legitimacy of power is one of its main criteria. There are three types of legitimacy: charismatic (people trust to a certain person or a group of people), traditional (people follow power based on traditions and customs) and democratic (based on the compliance of the elected government system principles and foundations of democracy).
The main sources of power can be: charisma, authority, strength, wealth or knowledge, which is possessed by the ruler or a group of people in power. That is why only the state, due to the concentration of political power, has a monopoly on the use of force. This contributes not only to the fight against lawbreakers, but also as a way of imposing a certain opinion on citizens.
Examples for revealing criterion K3
As a first example illustrating the process of achieving political power of their goals within the history of Russia, we can cite the period of the reign of I.V. Stalin. It was at this time that the USSR was characterized by mass repression, the purpose of which was to strengthen the authority of the authorities and suppress anti-Soviet sentiments in society. IN in this case the authorities used the most brutal methods to achieve what they needed. Thus, we see that the authorities did not skimp on methods for achieving their goals.
The next example is a situation that is now widely covered in the world media. During presidential race in the United States, candidates try to win over voters to their side without using force. They attend numerous television programs, speak in public, and conduct special campaigns. Thus, presidential candidates also use the full power available to them, trying to win the US population to their side.
To summarize, I want to say that E. Heywood’s statement is incredibly accurate and clearly reflects the essence of power as such, revealing all its main aspects.
Essay on political science for maximum score
“Government is like fire—a dangerous servant and a monstrous master.” (D. Washington)
In his statement, George Washington touched upon the issue of the relationship between civil society and the state. Undoubtedly, his words are relevant to this day, because in any state there is a constant dialogue between its “top” and citizens. This issue can be considered both from the point of view of a positive dialogue between the government and the people, and from a negative point of view.
Theoretical argument
The meaning of Washington's words is that the state reacts completely differently to certain social unrest, in some cases trying to resolve them peacefully, and in other cases using force to do this. I completely share the point of view of the first president of the United States, since confirmation of his words can be found both by turning to history and by looking at the current situation in the world. In order to prove the significance of Washington's words, it is first worth considering them from a theoretical point of view.
What is civil society? This is the sphere of the state, not directly under its control and consisting of the inhabitants of the country. Elements of civil society can be found in many areas of society. For example, within social sphere such elements will be the family and non-state media. In the political sphere, the main element of civil society is political parties and movements expressing the opinion of the people.
If the residents of the state want to influence the government, they try to influence it in one way or another. This process is called political participation. Within its framework, people can express their thoughts directly by contacting special government bodies, or indirectly - by participating in rallies or public performances. And it is precisely such manifestations of civil sentiment that force the state to respond.
Examples for revealing criterion K3
The first example that can clearly illustrate the reluctance of the state to listen to the population of the country is the era of the reign of I.V. Stalin in the Soviet Union. It was at this time that the authorities began to carry out mass repressions designed to almost completely suppress any activity of civil society. Everyone who expressed disagreement with the current course of development of the country, or spoke unflatteringly about its “top”, were repressed. Thus, the state represented by I.V. Stalin ignored the manifestations of the will of the people, establishing his total control over the latter.
The next example is a situation typical of modern political science. We will, of course, talk about the annexation of the Crimea peninsula to the Russian Federation. As is known, during the general referendum - the highest way expression of the will of the people in democratic countries - a decision was made to return the peninsula to the Russian Federation. Thus, civil society influenced the further policy of the state, which in turn did not turn away from the people, but began to act based on their decision.
Thus, I want to say that the words of D. Washington incredibly accurately and clearly reflect the whole essence of the relationship between the state and the actions of civil society.
Essay on social studies for 5 points: sociology
"To make people good citizens, they should be given the opportunity to exercise their rights as citizens and fulfill their duties as citizens.” (S. Smaile)
In his statement, S. Smaile touches on the problem of people realizing their rights and responsibilities. Undoubtedly, his words do not lose relevance to this day, because it was in modern society within a democratic regime, people can fully realize their rights and responsibilities. This statement can be considered both from the point of view of the level of freedoms of citizens within the framework of a rule of law state, and within a totalitarian state.
The meaning of S. Smaile’s words is that the level of legal consciousness of citizens, just like the level of peace in the country itself, directly depends on what rights and freedoms are granted to the people. I fully share the author’s point of view, since for the successful development of a state it really needs to rely on the support of the population. However, in order to confirm the relevance of Smaile’s statement, it is first worth considering it from a theoretical point of view.
Theoretical argument
So, what is the rule of law? This is a country in which the rights and freedoms of its inhabitants are of the highest value. It is within the framework of such a state that civic consciousness is most developed, and the attitude of citizens towards the authorities is mostly positive. But who are the citizens? These are individuals who are connected to the state through certain mutual rights and obligations that they are both obliged to fulfill to each other. The basic duties and rights of citizens that they must observe are written in the Constitution - the highest legal act, which sets the foundations for the life of the entire country.
Within a democratic regime, the rights and freedoms of citizens are most highly respected, since they are nothing other than the main source of power in countries with such a regime. This is a unique feature of democratic countries, the analogues of which cannot be found anywhere else. totalitarian regimes(where all power strictly controls other spheres of society), not in authoritarian ones (where power is concentrated in the hands of one person or party, despite even a certain presence of civil liberties and rights among people).
Examples for revealing criterion K3
As a first example that can clearly demonstrate the authorities’ lack of desire to listen to the citizens of the country, it may be known fact from world political science. Augusto Pinochet, Chilean political figure, came to power as a result of a military coup and established his totalitarian power in the state. Thus, he did not listen to the opinions of citizens, limiting their rights and freedoms through force. Soon this policy bore fruit, leading the country to a state of crisis. This clearly demonstrates the impact of the absence political rights and freedoms for people to influence the effectiveness of their activities.
The next example that will clearly demonstrate the desire of the authorities to make contact with citizens and take into account their rights and responsibilities will be our country. As is known, Russian Federation is rule of law, which is enshrined in the Constitution of the country. Moreover, it is the Constitution of the Russian Federation that specifies all fundamental human rights and freedoms, which under no circumstances are subject to limitation. Ideological pluralism, coupled with the positioning of human rights and freedoms as highest values perfectly illustrates a state that is ready to listen to the opinions of its citizens and treats them with respect.
To summarize, I want to say that S. Smail incredibly clearly reflected in his statement the essence of the relationship between the state and its citizens
That's all. Go to the “All Blog Articles” page to continue preparing with our portal!
Want to understand all the topics in your history course? Sign up to study at Ivan Nekrasov’s school with a legal guarantee of passing the exam with 80+ points!
What could be more wonderful than school time? But despite this, we have to face many difficulties. The biggest obstacle that anyone who decides to graduate from 11th grade will have to go through is the Unified State Exam.
In almost all universities and in all areas you need to take a subject called social studies. The hardest part of the exam is the essay. Therefore, before writing, you need to draw up a plan for an essay on social studies and follow it strictly point by point. This is the only way to write a beautiful essay. An essay plan in social studies, as well as in other subjects, should contain three main parts: introduction, main part and conclusion. We will dwell on each point in detail.
Why do you need to know how to write essays?
Everyone forces us to express our thoughts consistently, correctly and with reason. This will definitely come in handy in life. Even if you just have a friendly conversation, then it would be appropriate here, not saturated with jargon and other “garbage” of the Russian language.
Also, writing essays teaches us to identify the main idea that they want to convey to us, analyze, and express our personal opinion about the problem.
If we talk about exams, then before writing you should develop detailed plan writing social studies essays. This will help you not get lost in your own thoughts and not move away from the main problem. Some people really like writing essays; all they need to do is write social studies in their heads. For the rest, it’s better to use a draft so that the plan is always in front of you.
The introduction and conclusion are short sections that are about three to four sentences each. All parts are separated by a paragraph. You should not write in a continuous canvas, it is very difficult for readers to perceive. You won't earn many points for such a "sheet".
Unified State Exam in Social Studies
The test part of the social studies exam is quite simple. Need to answer test questions, they all have 4 possible answers. The second part is a little more difficult. Here you are asked to fill in the missing words, complete the table, or connect the corresponding points.
The hardest part is C. Here you need to choose an expression (quote) of a famous person from several proposed options. Next, write an essay-argument on the topic of the statement. In order to cope with the work and get a good score, you need to make an outline for your social studies essay. The Unified State Exam is quite easy to pass if you prepare for it a little.
It is worth setting aside at least an hour a day for self-study either hire a tutor or attend specialized training courses. Pay special attention to creative part. It is possible to create an essay plan for social studies (USE) so that it can be used for absolutely all topics. This is what we suggest you do right now. We will highlight the main parts that should be contained in your essay and give the main cliches. All this will greatly simplify your work during the unified state exam.
Plan
The plan for an essay in social studies is practically no different from that for others. creative works. Now we will provide a detailed plan for the essay, we will describe in sufficient detail what should be included in each part. So, the plan for an essay in social studies is as follows:
- Introduction. It is worth saying right away that there are no strict requirements for this work. The main thing is that the topic is disclosed. You need to demonstrate your knowledge of the theory and confirm it with facts from history, literature or life. Entry is not mandatory, but recommended. Many schoolchildren cannot imagine an essay without an introduction. If you find it difficult to start your essay right away with thoughts, give a short introduction (2-3 sentences). Here we can clearly formulate the problem. If there is no introduction, points for this are not reduced.
- The meaning of the quote. This short section consists of no more than five sentences. It is not at all necessary to quote the entire statement. A link to the author will suffice, followed by an interpretation in your own words. Here, many use clichés, for example: “In the statement of the philosopher Feuerbach, a phenomenon (process or problem) is considered (or described) ...” or “The meaning of the statement ... is that ....” In the examples you will see how to use these forms correctly.
- Theory. In this part you must write whether you agree with the author’s opinion or not. In most cases, students confirm the opinion and simply rewrite the quote using special terminology. Also in this part you can give examples to defend your point of view.
- Data. It's better to avoid any common phrases, need to be given specific examples(“as we know from the chemistry course...”, “as he said famous philosopher..." and similar forms).
- IN conclusion we need to summarize everything we said earlier. Schoolchildren often use this form: “Thus, the examples given allow us to assert that...” Instead of the ellipsis, you need to insert a reformulated main idea of the statement.
Introduction
The social studies essay (outline, cliches we have already provided) should be short, but reflect the main idea. In this part we will give you examples of possible introductions.
- "Feuerbach is a famous German philosopher who argued that theory and practice are interrelated and complement each other."
- “The most interesting quote for me was the statement of the American writer L. Peter, who spoke about the high purpose of economic culture.”
The meaning of the statement
- “The meaning of the statement is very simple - you need to be able to save and correctly distribute resources, which will help stop hunger throughout the world.”
- "By raising this problem, the author says that the younger generation understands little about adult life. They seem to be foreigners who do not know the customs and way of life of the inhabitants of this country."
Theory
Let's look at the plan for writing a social studies essay. Next, we must demonstrate our theoretical knowledge acquired in social studies lessons at school. Here are some examples:
- "Everyone's behavior individual person It has great importance for the whole society. This is an isolated but connected group. Exactly social status determines the behavior pattern of each individual person. If someone stands out for his behavior, and this is unacceptable in society, then social control services are involved..."
- "My opinion is this: I completely agree with the position of the author. Indeed, laws play big role In human life. They help and protect from bad, immoral acts..."
Data
We have almost figured out how to write an essay on social studies; all that remains is to understand what examples can be given in the next paragraph. Facts could be something like this:
- Literary. For example: “I would like to give an example from the book “Rich and Poor Dad,” where the author R. Kiyosaki says that economic freedom is very important...”
- From education, science, media and so on.“As an argument, we can cite the history of the development of the science of chemistry. How did people gain knowledge about possible reactions? Of course, from experience..."
Conclusion
The last part consists of 1-2 sentences, for example:
- “I completely agree with the statement, because only... can lead to...”
- “Thus, the philosopher... expressed a rather clever thought... which requires analysis and reflection.”
